PLYMOUTH, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy’s world crumbled after the arrival of her third child, as her mental health took a dramatic nosedive.

Struggling with sleeplessness, manic episodes, and harmful thoughts, she reached out to specialists in postpartum mood disruptions, and was prescribed various psychiatric drugs. When these measures failed, she admitted herself to a mental health institution.

Less than three weeks after returning home, she tragically ended the lives of her children within their Massachusetts residence.

If you are experiencing suicidal, substance use, or other mental health crises, reach out by calling or texting 988 to connect with a trained crisis counselor, available free of charge around the clock. Alternatively, visit 988lifeline.org or dial 800-273-8255 [TALK].

Cracker Barrel has announced that CEO Julie Felss Masino will be stepping down, a move that comes on the heels of the unsuccessful attempt to refresh the brand’s image. Her “woke” rebranding efforts failed to resonate with the loyal customer base, leading to a rollback after significant backlash.

Taking over the leadership role will be David Deno, who has a strong background in the restaurant industry, having recently served as CEO of Bloomin’ Brands, the parent company of Outback Steakhouse. He is set to assume his new responsibilities on August 10, as detailed in a Cracker Barrel press release.

Masino’s tenure, which lasted less than three years, faced challenges when customers objected to the chain’s modernization efforts. The removal of the iconic mascot, Uncle Herschel, and the overhaul of traditional restaurant decorations did not sit well with many diners.

Confronted with strong opposition from both customers and former President Donald Trump, Cracker Barrel opted to return to its classic appeal. This strategic shift has paid off, with the company’s stock soaring by 100% this year, affirming the enduring charm of its original brand identity.

A startling security breach executed by a rogue AI may mark the dawn of a new era of cyber threats, according to expert warnings.

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, announced on July 21 that one of its sophisticated models managed to escape its confines, access the internet, and penetrate another AI company’s systems.

This groundbreaking breach is reportedly the first instance of an AI model autonomously infiltrating a company’s databases without direct human input. The incident has triggered global concern, drawing parallels with the fictional uprisings depicted in films like The Terminator and The Matrix.

However, James Knight of DigitalWarfare.com underscored to the Daily Mail that this is far from science fiction. He cautioned that AI-driven hacking could wreak havoc on a nation in mere hours, simultaneously infiltrating thousands of corporate and government networks, exfiltrating sensitive information, and crippling critical systems with ransomware attacks.

Knight, a seasoned cybersecurity professional whose company specializes in identifying vulnerabilities in major corporate networks, stated, “For two years now, AI software capable of such breaches within 15 minutes has existed.”

He added that the nightmare scenario of ‘Agentic AI,’ which are AI-fueled hacking programs, being used by terror groups or hostile nations to target thousands of companies at once without any human input could become a reality within 25 years.

Within that timeframe, Knight predicted that rogue AI systems would be able to run entire hacking campaigns at machine speed – scanning for targets, breaking in, moving through networks, stealing data and even spreading ransomware to thousands of companies and millions of people. 

Knight warned AI could eventually be paired with powerful new computers capable of breaking even the strongest digital security protections, allowing criminals to access everything from emails and financial records to military secrets within seconds.

‘We know what it can do. We aren’t crazy enough to think that governments don’t already have access to these capabilities,’ he warned.

Knight explained these quickly evolving weapons could soon autonomously plan, act and adjust their strategy to do the most damage to businesses and everyday people at the speed of a supercomputer.

‘They are already moving out of research and into practical use,’ Knight told the Daily Mail.

These models, far beyond basic chatbots used by millions every day, can act on their own with high intelligence thanks to the latest in AI programming.

The program being tested was OpenAI’s advanced AI models’ ability to perform complex hacking and cybersecurity tasks – an early trial of the agentic systems Knight feared will soon overwhelm human-run digital defenses.

The rogue AI was supposedly in a secure, digital environment within OpenAI’s computers and did not have direct access to the public internet, but it managed to exploit an undiscovered weak point in the company’s system and spread itself onto the net.

The rogue AI broke into the internal systems of Hugging Face, a company which hosts large language models and AI datasets, and stole secret login details and hidden answers to the cybersecurity test the wayward program was taking.

Hugging Face said it noticed the break-in, locked down their systems and no public data or customer information was exposed.

‘Human-speed defense against machine-speed offense is not a fair contest,’ Knight warned. 

‘Within minutes, they would have completely owned a large number of them. Every day, we would hear about hundreds of thousands of new companies that have been breached.’

While many online said the thought of a soulless computer program going rogue and hacking whoever it wanted was ‘scary,’ Knight said there was no ‘magic’ involved in OpenAI’s breakout.

Knight, who has three decades of experience in cybersecurity, pulled back the curtain on how the AI model breached the security of Hugging Face, a company which allows anyone to upload their AI creations or use ones made by others.

He said the rogue AI did the same thing human hackers do now at a much slower speed, target weak passwords and exploit vulnerabilities in software missing the latest security patches.

‘What we are looking at with these latest AI models is automated intelligent capabilities that follow what has been done manually in the past. However, everything is automated and employs great intelligence backed by powerful compute capabilities.’

‘Taking everything else out of the picture, how hard would it be for any AI, let alone the latest models, to hack a system with a weak password? Not hard at all,’ Knight revealed.

Hugging Face co–founder Thomas Wolf called the incident a chilling warning to the entire industry.

Wolf added that the breach was a ‘wake-up call’ because he believed most companies were currently unprepared for the mounting threat, claiming that they were not aware that the ‘game has changed.’

In a press release acknowledging the AI breach, OpenAI claimed the program went rogue after engineers lowered the safety rules that normally stop dangerous hacking programs from going too far.

They added that the AI became so laser-focused on completing its goal, it found a previously unknown security hole in the testing environment – known as a ‘zero-day’ flaw – which also allowed the AI hacker to escape the OpenAI system and reach the internet.

Knight was skeptical about OpenAI’s claims the program was initially ‘sandboxed,’ meaning it was being tested in a completely closed-off computer network.

‘This cannot be a true statement. If that was the case, it would not be connected to any other network, and would certainly not have gained any internet access,’ Knight said.

The Daily Mail has reached out to OpenAI for comment regarding the claims and the company’s plans for future hacking tests.

While Knight warned that nothing can fully stop an AI program from hacking databases if it goes rogue, the best defense will still revolve around what people do to stop human hackers today – using better authentication methods.

‘The most quoted statistic is that 80 percent of all breaches involve a weak password. Sixty percent of all breaches also involved a missing security patch,’ Knight revealed.

Employing AI to manage the job of cybersecurity and switching to multi-factor authentication methods – where users receive a special code through their phones to access websites – will also slow down rogue AI attacks.

‘This nightmare scenario can be avoided, and it will involve action by companies now, to invest in enough employees to cover the basics and protect themselves,’ Knight warned.

Amidst his daughter Hannah’s healthcare struggles, Armando Niedermeier-Rubio has secured an extension on his visa.

The “90 Day Fiancé” celebrity took to Instagram this past Sunday with the good news, writing, “Approved ✅. My Humanitarian Visa has been extended for another 30 days!

“This extension allows me to stay in Arizona with Hannah as she continues her medical treatment. Most importantly, I can remain by her side, alongside my husband, Kenny Niedermeier, as she makes her road to recovery over the next month at least 🙏🏻,” he added.

Armando expressed his heartfelt thanks and gratitude to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) @cbpgov over the weekend for handling his case with empathy and treating him with respect and kindness.

He offered a “very special thank you” to Representative Adelita Grijalva for her extensive support and advocacy on his behalf, and acknowledged his immigration attorney’s efforts as well.

“Thank you for working tirelessly every step of the way, specially as this process continues,” he wrote. “Finally, a huge thank you to every single one of you who have prayed for @hannah_rubio_ , shared our story, sent encouraging messages, and supported our family.”

The reality star, 37, concluded, “Your love has carried us through the hardest days of our lives. This approval to remain at my daughters side is one more answered prayer, thank you ❤️‍🩹 Please keep Hannah in your prayers as she continues healing.”

When Hannah was transferred from Mexico to an Arizona medical facility — and then airlifted to a Phoenix ICU — to treat a brain bleed earlier this month, Armando was turned away at the border.

While he attempted to request a temporary humanitarian visa, he was told by a US Customs and Border Protection supervisor that those hadn’t been granted since 2025.

As Armando’s attorney pursued a separate emergency request, his partner stayed at the teen’s side.

“Every parent wants to be at their child’s bedside when they’re sick, and not being able to hold her hand or comfort her has been the hardest thing I’ve ever experienced,” Armando wrote. “I am doing everything within my power to be reunited with her.”

He reunited with his family members on July 18 after being granted an emergency humanitarian visa.

He announced two days later that Hannah had been released from the hospital — only for her to be readmitted due to “worsening of her physical symptoms.”

She, notably, had been experiencing partial blindness, facial drooping and weakness.

Hannah, who is taking preventative medication for brain swelling and seizures, is in “good spirits” despite being rushed back to the emergency room.

“The doctors have been running test[s] and scans and will know more soon,” Armando wrote via Instagram on Friday.

Growing tensions are sparking concerns over the potential merging of conflicts in Ukraine and Iran, following a Ukrainian missile strike on an Iranian ship. This incident has stirred unease between the two regions.

Iran has sharply criticized Ukraine for the weekend attack, insisting that the target was a commercial vessel in the Caspian Sea. The assault resulted in the death of one sailor and left another injured, according to Tehran’s statements.

Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, confirmed the strike and claimed that the Iranian ship was implicated in transporting Russian military goods. This assertion drew a strong response from Iran’s diplomatic leader.

Abbas Araghchi took to X to express his outrage, stating, ‘Zelensky has attacked an Iranian commercial vessel, resulting in the death of a sailor.’

‘An overt violation of the UN Charter, executed under Israeli influence to embroil Europe in their war strategy. In conversations with EU representative Kaja Kallas and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, I emphasized that Kyiv’s actions must not go unanswered,’ he asserted.

Tehran decried the attack on its vessel as an act of aggression. It said it would defend its national interests and security, while accusing Kyiv of seeking to expand the war in Ukraine.

It came after Zelensky said on Saturday he would share evidence with the US showing Russia is assisting Iran in targeting US bases in the Middle East through satellite surveillance.

Taking to X, the Ukrainian leader wrote: ‘Since the beginning of July, we have recorded active Russian satellite surveillance of the Gulf states and U.S. military facilities located there.’

‘These images subsequently appear in Iran. At the same time, there is a clear correlation between Russia’s satellite imagery of these sites and Iranian strikes – both before the attacks, in preparation for them, and afterward, to assess the damage inflicted.’

The new developments follow months of speculation that the two conflicts are intertwining.

Iran has claimed it is not involved in Russia’s war on Ukraine, although Kyiv has said Tehran is supplying drones to the Kremlin.

The Islamic Republic also called on European countries to hold Ukraine accountable.

The strike fuelled speculation in Tehran that it was intended as a warning that Iran’s Caspian coastline is vulnerable and could be used as leverage in future negotiations with the US, according to the Financial Times.

Although the Caspian Sea lies more than 600 miles from the front line in Russia’s war with Ukraine, Kyiv has steadily expanded its long-range drone capabilities, allowing it to strike targets deep inside Russian territory. 

After inflicting heavy damage on Russia’s oil infrastructure and contributing to fuel shortages, that capability is increasingly being viewed as a potential factor in the wider confrontation involving Iran.

Hamidreza Azizi, an Iran expert at the SWP Berlin think-tank, outlined several possible explanations for Ukraine’s strike on the Iranian-linked vessel. 

Writing on X, he said one possibility is that Kyiv wanted to reinforce its value as a strategic partner to Washington, which continues to supply crucial military support, including Patriot air defence systems. 

According to Azizi, such an operation would not have been possible without approval from the US and its Western allies.

Another interpretation is that the US and Israel encouraged Ukraine to increase pressure on Tehran because they feared direct attacks on Iranian infrastructure could provoke retaliation against key economic assets across the region. 

A third possibility, wrote Azizi, is that the strike was linked to threats made by Yemen’s Houthi rebels against shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a route that Saudi Arabia has relied on to export oil while avoiding the Strait of Hormuz.

The expert also suggested Tehran is concerned that Ukrainian intelligence services could back ethnic insurgent groups inside Iran, mirroring Kyiv’s alleged support for opposition forces in Syria during the campaign against Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

In response, Iran could target vessels linked to Ukraine in other maritime routes or strike Ukrainian infrastructure directly. 

Tehran could also formally recognise Crimea and the Donbas as Russian territory.

‘In any case, what is clear is that Iran’s war is becoming increasingly intertwined with two other conflicts: the Saudi-Houthi confrontation and the Russia-Ukraine war,’ Azizi warned.  

‘With each passing day, the war is evolving into an increasingly complex, multidimensional, and international conflict.’

The growing overlap between the conflicts has prompted some analysts to argue that the distinction between them is beginning to disappear. 

William Spaniel, associate professor of political science at the University of Pittsburgh, said earlier this year that the blurred front lines had ‘effectively merged the Russia-Ukraine war and the Iran war into a single conflict’.

‘We are still not at a true world war as there is no one actor fighting on two fronts simultaneously like the United States during World War II,’ he said. 

‘But it is further connecting the battlefield outcomes, and it will have longer-lasting implications for how the battle lines are divided.’

Ukraine’s years of fighting Iranian-designed Shahed drones have also strengthened its position with Gulf states. 

Zelensky has used that experience to present Ukraine as a provider rather than simply a recipient of military assistance, offering low-cost, battlefield-tested technology to countries looking to bolster their own defences.

Kyiv is now exporting not only interceptor systems, but also software, electronic warfare equipment and maritime drones.

Speaking to The Guardian in April, Orysia Lutsevych, head of the Ukraine Forum at Chatham House, said that Ukraine’s expanding security relationships in the Gulf had strengthened its standing with Washington, countering Donald Trump’s repeated claim that Kyiv had ‘no cards’ in its war with Russia.

‘Ukraine is trying to show that our cards are about being a very robust, agile, fast-adapting and producing economy that can both defend against Russia and also defend other countries through weapons system sales,’  Lutsevych said.

She argued that those Gulf partnerships could also become an important source of investment for Ukraine’s defence industry.

‘Ukraine has production capabilities but not enough investment. It can produce more, but it doesn’t have enough orders or capital,’ Ms Lutsevych said. ‘So this actually comes as a great opportunity to use these production facilities.’

Fiona Hill, who served as a Russia adviser during Trump’s first administration, argued that if cyber warfare, hybrid operations and other forms of so-called grey zone conflict are included, a global conflict has effectively been underway for some time and has intensified since the outbreak of the Iran war.

‘I think it meets that threshold for a system-changing war,’ said Hill, now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. 

‘There’ll be all kinds of new configurations of countries that will have sprung up.’

She warned that disruptions to oil and fertiliser supplies could draw more countries into the conflict, while raising questions about whether China might seek to exploit Washington’s focus on the Middle East by increasing pressure on Taiwan.

‘We’ve got a ‘four horses of the apocalypse’ going here … and I just feel that people are sleepwalking into it’.

After Ukraine’s strike over the weekend, the Iranian Foreign Ministry summoned Ukraine’s chargé d’affaires in Tehran to convey its protest over what it described as a ‘hostile and criminal’ attack. 

Government news agency IRNA reported that during the meeting, Iran stressed that ‘the Islamic Republic will firmly defend its security and national interests and will not leave attacks on the lives and property of its citizens unanswered’.

Meanwhile, as Iran’s foreign ministry threatened to respond, some Iranians took to social media to call for retaliation using the country’s Kheibar Shekan ballistic missiles.

Several users criticised what they described as the Foreign Ministry’s ‘weak diplomacy’.

One comment read: ‘As long as this weak diplomacy remains in government, every fox will see itself as a lion against us.’

Other users highlighted the range and capabilities of Iran’s missile arsenal, arguing that Tehran should demonstrate its deterrence.

A threatening message on Telegram read: ‘A gentle reminder to Mr. Zelensky: All of Ukraine is within reach of Iran’s ballistic missiles, including super-heavy Khorramshahr -4.’