Home Blog Page 557

Dolly Parton’s I Will Always Love You Isn’t a Breakup Song — The Real Story Behind the ’70s Classic

Dolly Parton, whose influence reached far beyond country music, died at 80 on August 25, 2026. She leaves behind a legacy many fans regard as almost immeasurable, with “I Will Always Love You” standing among its brightest chapters. The song became a global phenomenon in 1992 when Whitney Houston delivered her towering version for “The Bodyguard,” but Parton’s original, written in 1973, was something quieter and more intimate: a tender country farewell carried by acoustic guitar, her voice, and the bittersweet grace of its lyrics.

Although it is often remembered as one of music’s great breakup ballads, “I Will Always Love You” was not born from a romantic split. Early in her career, Parton performed duets with country star Porter Wagoner on his television show, and their partnership helped her land on his record label. Still, Parton felt a powerful need to step into her own future. In 2023, she reflected on that turning point during “The Howard Stern Show,” saying, “I had come to Nashville to be my own star. I really felt like I needed to move on. … I knew my destiny.” Unsure how to say goodbye to Wagoner, she put the feeling into a song. “I sang the song alone in his office — just me and my guitar,” Parton told Stern. Moved by what he heard, Wagoner reportedly teared up and told her, “You can go if I can produce the song.”

How Dolly’s friendship with Porter and I Will Always Love You survived despite rocky roads

The farewell anthem, which was not a breakup song in the romantic sense, became a country hit after its 1974 release. Its success soon drew the attention of Elvis Presley, who wanted to record his own version. But Presley’s manager, Colonel Tom Parker, made a demand Parton could not accept. “Colonel Tom had called and said, ‘You know that we don’t record anything with Elvis unless we have the publishing (rights) or at least half the publishing,’ and I said, ‘Well, that’s not possible,’” Parton recalled on “The Howard Stern Show.” Though she was thrilled that Presley admired the song, Parton refused to give up control of the publishing, and the Elvis cover never happened.

At its heart, the story of “I Will Always Love You” reflects Parton’s empathy and her complicated, deeply human bond with Porter Wagoner. Their friendship later fractured in a feud that shook country music after Parton’s star continued to rise. In 1979, Wagoner sued her, arguing that he deserved compensation for helping launch her career. The two ultimately reached a settlement, and in time, forgiveness followed. Before Wagoner’s death in 2007, Parton performed the song for him during the celebration of his 50th anniversary as a Grand Ole Opry member. Months later, she was at his bedside when he died. “I’m glad I was there that last day for him,” she told Knox News. “I’m glad I could be there at the end. We kind of book-ended our whole relationship.”

Helch Graffiti Artist Who Upset Queen Elizabeth II With Windsor Castle Tag Dies

0

Tributes are pouring in for Helch, the prolific graffiti artist whose huge roller-painted murals became familiar sights on motorway bridges, near Windsor Castle and on walls far beyond the UK.

Friends and admirers have remembered Michael Purdy, 34, an artist whose reach stretched across dozens of countries and whose work appeared on city rooftops, public walls and, most recently, in a successful December gallery exhibition attended by collectors.

Among those paying respects on Saturday was veteran club music DJ Doc Scott, who shared a picture of one of Helch’s canvas pieces alongside the simple message: “RIP Helch.”

Frontline, the well-known graffiti magazine and online platform, also honoured the street artist on Instagram, posting a compilation of his vivid pieces and writing: “Just heard sad news of Helch passing away. RIP Helch.”

For years, Helch’s bold graffiti art caught the eye of both commuters and contemporary art fans, turning everyday routes into unexpected showcases of colour and scale.

His graffiti on motorway bridges were regarded by some as entertaining sign posts for their travels home from work or the airport, with pieces seen on the M4, M1 and M25.

But not everyone was a fan, with royal sources previously claiming the late Queen Elizabeth II was upset over 60ft high white letters reading Helch near Windsor Castle.

His tags were even the subject of a sold-out show at BSMT Space in trendy Dalston, east London, where his pieces sold for tens of thousands of pounds.

Michael Purdy, whose pieces appeared everywhere from the edge of Windsor Castle to the nation's motorway bridges and across the world, has died aged 34

Michael Purdy, whose pieces appeared everywhere from the edge of Windsor Castle to the nation’s motorway bridges and across the world, has died aged 34 

The late Queen was said to be 'extremely upset' after 60ft high white letters were daubed on to a railway viaduct near Windsor Castle

The late Queen was said to be ‘extremely upset’ after 60ft high white letters were daubed on to a railway viaduct near Windsor Castle

Network Rail, which owns the viaduct, removed the graffiti as it was deemed offensive

Network Rail, which owns the viaduct, removed the graffiti as it was deemed offensive

In one of his final social media posts he shared a photo of his 224-page photo book, titled Lost But Living.

The glossy publication features his work across 12 countries including America and Thailand during the period of 2022-24.

The circumstances around his death have not been disclosed but friends have been left reeling by his sudden passing.

One graffiti artist told the Daily Mail: ‘Helch was at the top of his game, having smashed it for years and funded the entire thing himself.

‘He lived life on his terms and had in many ways what could be described as total freedom. He did not submit to a life of drudgery.

‘He is a legend and will be greatly missed in London and the UK. It is not for me to say any more about his death.’

Meanwhile Zonk DDS, a notorious graffiti writer in London, shared a tribute online, which read: ‘Iconic British artist gone far too soon. Thoughts are with his family.’

And SMT crew, a nationwide graffiti collective, paid tribute to Helch as ‘a big figure’ within the scene.

Sharing a photo of the artist’s massive vibrant piece on top of a Shoreditch car park, a spokesman wrote online: ‘As a crew we are deeply saddened to hear of the passing of Helch.

Friends paid their respects to Mr Purdy, who enjoyed a successful gallery show in December

Friends paid their respects to Mr Purdy, who enjoyed a successful gallery show in December 

The Helch tag seen above the Central Line in London

The Helch tag seen above the Central Line in London 

‘A big figure in the London and UK scene. RIP Helch.’

Graffiti artist Lord wrote: ‘Sad news man, Helch was a genuine good brother, had good banter I used to give him stick how long they [his roller pieces] take.

‘One of the best roller writers we ever had.’

Bams, an active graffiti writer across London, posted a photo of Helch’s work at Paddington Station with the message: ‘So sad man’.

Another tribute read: ‘Sad news to hear one of, if not London’s biggest writer when it comes to rollers has passed away. What a shame. Got to give credit where credit is due, your work will live on for the rest of all our times.

‘A London king man, prayers are with your friends and family. RIP Helch.’

Other fans of the artist flooded social media with tributes and photos of Helch’s roller pieces, one with the caption ‘sad news. Good guy. Made refreshing cool moves in the scene.’

Another message read: ‘RIP Helch buddy. Admired your dedication to graffiti and showing it to the man, every time.’

One note from an artist who knew Helch contained the words, ‘Take care of yourselves and loved ones before it’s too late’.

Tributes were even paid as far as New York City, with a compilation of his photos shared online with the message: ‘He was known in London for being a legend.

‘He brought some refreshing graff[iti] to NYC a few years ago and I enjoyed going across all these spots as they appeared.’

Welcome to Plathville’s Isaac Plath Confirms Romance With Ex Kaylynn Is Back On

Welcome to Plathville star Isaac Plath appears to have rekindled his romance with ex-girlfriend Kaylynn Brinkley.

“Always been you,” the 20-year-old reality personality wrote in the caption of a joint Instagram carousel shared on Sunday, August 30. The post featured a series of romantic images from a couples’ photo shoot with Brinkley, set against a golden sunset in an open field. In the pictures, the pair cuddle, pose closely and share playful moments, including one shot of Isaac twirling Brinkley by the hand.

Isaac also tagged Brinkley in the Instagram post, making the reunion clear to fans who watched their breakup unfold on the April 14 episode of the TLC series.

Welcome to Plathville follows rural Georgia parents Kim and Barry Plath and eight of their nine children. Over the years, the conservative Christian family’s evolving relationships have become a major part of the show, as the Plath kids explore romance and independence beyond the strict, sheltered upbringing they experienced on the family farm.

Welcome to Plathville’s Plath Family’s Ups and Downs Through the Years- Feuds, Arrests and More 010

Since Welcome to Plathville premiered on TLC in 2019, the Plath family has faced significant personal changes. Kim Plath and Barry Plath, who rose to fame through the docuseries, announced their separation in June 2022 after years of filming their family life in rural Georgia.

Isaac and Brinkley’s rekindled flame drew plenty of fan support in the post’s comments section, with one fan writing, “I’m so glad they are still together. I hope they marry and have lots of babies,” and another writing, “You sweet dolls!!!!! I just love this and seeing that you stayed together.”

During the pair’s breakup episode, which saw Isaac call time on the romance due to feeling overwhelmed by how quickly things were progressing, Isaac admitted that he regretted his decision. “That’s one of the things that makes me feel so stupid, and it’s one of those things where, right after you make the decision, you just know in your gut it wasn’t a good decision,” he said at the time.

SnapInsta-37439656-Plathvilles-Isaac-Reveals-Rekindled-Romance-With-Ex-Kaylynn.jpg


Isaac Plath
Courtesy of Isaac Plath/Instagram

Isaac added that he’d reached out to Brinkley in the hope of reviving their relationship. “I have no desire to do anything other than to rebuild it with her,” Isaac said. “That’s all I want. That’s all I can see myself doing. She’s going to have to decide what she wants to do. A few days of being by myself is too much already, and it’s killing me inside.”

SnapInsta-Plathvilles-Isaac-Reveals-Rekindled-Romance-With-Ex-Kaylynn.jpg


Kaylynn Brinkley
Courtesy of Kaylynn Brinkley/Instagram

Brinkley’s response to her ex’s change of heart was far from being impressed. “Honestly, right now, I don’t necessarily know where me and Isaac stand. I really believed so much that he was the one. But trust isn’t just given,” she said at the time. “It’s something that you have to earn with your actions. We’ll just see what he does. And just give it to God, because that’s the only other thing I can do.”

Season 8 of Welcome to Plathville wrapped in June, with a new season yet to be announced, or confirmed, by TLC.

Lanterns Rewrites John Stewart’s DC Origin in a Bold Twist

0

Contains spoilers for “Lanterns” Season 1, Episode 3 — “OutKast”

The opening moments of the “Lanterns” premiere jumped back to 1996, showing Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler, DC’s newest live-action Green Lantern) sitting for his first “60 Minutes” interview while a young John Stewart tried to watch from home before his father returned. Hal’s account of becoming a Green Lantern stayed largely faithful to the broad strokes of the comics: he grew up in the shadow of a pilot father who died when Hal was young, then was chosen by a dying alien who passed him a Power Ring. Hal later repeats that story to the adult John (Aaron Pierre). But while Hal’s origin remains familiar, the show immediately signals that John’s family history is heading in a very different direction from any version readers have seen on the page.

Before the series cuts to John and Hal working together in the present, John’s marine father drags him outside and tries to teach him the “no fear” mindset associated with the Green Lantern Corps by placing an apple on the boy’s head and shooting it off. At first, the scene seems designed to frame him as an abusive parent, a man so fixated on turning his son into a superhero that he terrorized his own household. It also raised a mystery: how could he know fearlessness was a Green Lantern requirement when Hal only revealed that detail publicly during the TV interview, which John’s father was not in the room to hear? Episode 3, “OutKast,” finally returns to that 1990s timeline and reveals what was really behind John Stewart’s childhood — and how sharply the HBO series is departing from DC Comics canon.

John Stewart’s origin story in Lanterns

The Guardians of the Universe are not usually known for conducting formal job interviews, but “Lanterns” reimagines them as quietly assessing possible successors to Hal Jordan. The one clear comic-book echo is the implication that they have been watching John Stewart for much of his life. The major twist is that John’s father, John Sr. (J. Alphonse Nicholson), had already been taken by the Guardians and tested. When they asked whether he was afraid, he answered yes — and failed his chance to become a Green Lantern, all while baby John watched from his crib. Years later, seeing Hal unmasked and hearing him describe that same question as part of his own selection sends John Sr. spiraling, with the episode making a passing reference to his alcoholism, though it stops short of portraying him as the outright abuser seen in some comic interpretations.

The episode deepens the reveal when a representative of the Guardians, played by “Ozark” star Laura Linney, arrives at the Stewart home to offer compensation for the harm the family suffered. She explains that, because of cultural differences, the Guardians failed to understand how their selection process could cause trauma in a country where unprovoked racial violence is tragically common. In her conversation with John’s mother, Bernadette (Nicole Ari Parker), Linney’s character says the same genetic qualities that made John Sr. a candidate are also present in his son. For John to be seriously considered as a future Green Lantern, however, he would need to be raised without fear. She promises the family that when the next opening among the Lanterns appears, John will get a fair chance. That revelation completely reframes the premiere’s cold open and John’s relationship with his parents, making John Sr.’s harsh training less the cruelty of a tyrant and more a misguided attempt to prepare his son for the destiny he himself was denied.

John Stewart’s various comic book origins

Introduced in “Green Lantern” Vol. 2 #87 in December 1971, John Stewart was initially depicted as the only son to a single mother, a budding architect who was chosen by the Guardians of the Universe to be Hal Jordan’s backup after Guy Gardner was injured in action. John and Hal had the same testy dynamic we’ve seen in this series, with John’s first mission of protecting a racist politician from an assassination attempt initially going as badly as you’d expect when entrusted to a Civil Rights activist. Hal was quickly won over when John proved it was staged to suit a right-wing agenda.

The character’s origin was rebooted twice during DC’s New Earth period, with the post “Crisis on Infinite Earths” and post “Zero Hour” iterations both having more tortured childhoods. The latter version’s father was an alcoholic who abused his wife regularly. In both cases, he had a far closer relationship with his Aunt Loretta (not depicted in this series so far). It was her who motivated him to become an activist and architect, in the latter origin because he stole her car to joyride at 15 and crashed into a drunk-driver, affirming that he wanted to change and do good.

“Lanterns” lifts more from the 2011 comics reboot, in which John’s a former marine (something that was introduced in the animated series “Justice League Unlimited” before being slowly incorporated into the comics by Geoff Johns in the late ’00s). Here, his childhood is different once again: He was constantly in trouble with the police and had a little sister who died young. Nobody in his life was aware of his destiny, and although the Guardians kept an eye on him, they put him through a heroic test rather than an unconventional job interview like in the series. While many of his traits from the comics are present in “Lanterns,” DCU John had a very different childhood to any incarnation we’ve previously seen.

If you or someone you know is dealing with domestic abuse, you can call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1−800−799−7233. You can also find more information, resources, and support at their website.

How Clarence Thomas Built Lasting Influence on the Supreme Court

0

A notable new book from Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, “Going Further,” is renewing attention on the life, influence and judicial career of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whom Cruz presents as the greatest living American.

When Thomas joined the Supreme Court in the early 1990s, his conservative approach and originalist reading of the Constitution often left him writing from the margins, most frequently in dissent.

More than three decades later, Thomas has become the second-longest-serving justice in Supreme Court history, and his once-isolated views now often help shape the court’s majority opinions.

In that sense, Clarence Thomas has prevailed over the long term. The more interesting question is how he did it.

Thirty-five years ago, much of mainstream legal education and judicial practice encouraged judges to interpret laws by searching for broad and often elusive ideas such as legislative history and legislative intent.

It’s now hard to believe, but the commonsense notion that one should begin the interpretive exercise with a document’s text and plain meaning was pretty much unheard of.

Thomas, along with his then-colleagues Justice Antonin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist, galvanized an intellectual revolution in American legal and judicial practice.

Today, law schools instruct students to begin the interpretive exercise with the text.

In fact, this is hardly controversial: As the liberal Justice Elena Kagan put it in a 2015 Harvard Law School lecture, “We’re all textualists now.”

A big part of the reason for this success is simple: sheer persuasiveness.

The straightforward nature of the originalist and textualist position quickly found mass appeal, putting defenders of legislative history or “living constitutionalism” on their back feet.

They haven’t been able to keep up.

In the area of legal interpretation, liberals have lost the public argument — badly.

In recent years, we’ve seen this manifest in conservative victories at the high court on religious liberty, abortion, gun rights, affirmative action and the administrative state.

There is an underappreciated additional ingredient in Thomas’ winning formula: his kindness, affability and genuine human decency.

Thomas’ life story is the stuff of legend.

He grew up in the most abject poverty imaginable in Jim Crow-era rural Georgia. English was not even his first language.

He overcame all that, in addition to his onetime wavering faith and even an infatuation with Malcolm X and the Black Power movement, to become one of the greatest conservatives in American history.

But here’s the thing: Thomas never forgot where he came from.

It is well known that, inside the Supreme Court building, Thomas is the personal favorite justice.

That’s true for the justices themselves, it’s true for the law clerks, and it’s even true for the janitors.

Thomas is the justice who will talk NASCAR with the court security guard (he’s a big fan of the sport), and he is the justice who will regale law clerks with funny stories from years gone by — with his signature, boisterous laugh.

The one topic Thomas will not talk about, because it would offend his old-school Southern manners, is himself.

The Supreme Court, unlike Congress or the executive branch, is a small, intimate institution.

Passions can run high, but a justice can best achieve success over the long haul if he can persuade his colleagues in conferences, memoranda and other communications.

As the saying goes, you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

That was not always Scalia’s way, but it is definitely Thomas’ way.

The next Supreme Court term begins in just over month, and the court’s senior-most member will once again anchor the court’s originalist bloc.

There will be Viramontes v. Cook County, a prime opportunity to extend a Second Amendment guarantee to modern sporting rifles (“AR-15s”).

There will be St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, another case out of stubborn Colorado that could, and should, extend otherwise-universal preschool voucher access to religious schools.

Other big cases on the docket touch on voting rights, climate change and more.

Thomas’ influence will be palpable.

He will once again serve the role he always has: that of dependable workhorse and beacon of intellectual clarity.

He will once again be the court’s most principled originalist, establishing a barometer off of which other originalists can assess their own instincts and rulings.

In a nation short on exemplary role models, Thomas fills the void.

He would never dream of saying so himself, but Thomas is an American hero and the nation’s most inspiring man.

The only question is whether he will stay on the court until May 20, 2028, at which point he will become the nation’s longest-serving justice ever.

If there’s one thing we know from Clarence Thomas’ life: Don’t bet against him.

Josh Hammer is Newsweek senior editor-at-large and host of “The Josh Hammer Show.”

Phillip Jablonski’s Audio Diary Exposed a Serial Killer’s Trail of Mutilated Victims

0

This article includes graphic references to mutilation and sexualized injuries.

The disturbing trail that would eventually lead investigators to serial killer Phillip Jablonski started with a horrifying find in the barren desert near Indio, California.

On April 23, 1991, authorities discovered the naked body of a woman lying face down. Carved into her back was a chilling message: “I (heart symbol) Jesus.”

“When I saw that, I didn’t know what to think,” retired Riverside Sheriff’s Department investigator Mark Barfknecht told Oxygen’s Unknown Serial Killers of America. “It was possibly a signature. It was just a phenomenon that none of us had ever witnessed personally.”

When investigators rolled the victim over, they found she had also suffered a gunshot wound to the head.

“She was also missing her eyeballs. She had been stabbed in the throat, her ears had been cut off and her nipples had been removed,”  he added. “These appeared to be trophies that were taken from the victim. It was elevated to a different level of horror.” 

Yet it was only the beginning. In the days that followed, investigators uncovered more bodies—including Jablonski’s prison penpal turned wife—as they raced to stop the sadistic killer. When he was finally captured in Kansas, investigators discovered Jablonski had been keeping a macabre audio diary reliving all his dark crimes.

Victim Fathyma Vann is Identified 

As the investigation in Indio got underway, Riverside County investigators were able to match the desert victim to a missing person’s report for 38-year-old mom Fathyma Vann, who vanished one day earlier after attending night classes at College of the Desert. 

“When I found out my mother was gone, I tore up everything I could because now life is gone,” her daughter Yolanda Robinson- Vann recalled. “I’m crying. I can’t do anything. Now it’s just me and my sister.”

Yolanda, then 20, also attended the college and remembered her mother introducing her to a older, white male classmate that occasionally gave her mom rides home from class. According to Yolanda, the man’s “vibe was not good at all.” 

Bodies of Eva Peterson, Carol Spadoni Are Found Inside Home

As investigators tried to track the man down, they learned that detectives hundreds of miles away were looking for a parolee matching the same description after the bodies of a mother and daughter had been discovered murdered in their Burlingame home. 

Much like in Vann’s case, Eva Peterson, 72, and Carol Spadoni, 46, had been shot with a .22 and had their breasts mutilated. 

The bodies were discovered after a friend requested a welfare check. Peterson’s half-naked body was found in the garage near the entryway of the house. She had a towel stuffed in her mouth and a bullet fired straight through the towel. 

As retired Burlingame Police Det. Sgt. Eric Haseleu said, “We knew we had a monster on our hands.” 

Inside, the body of Spadoni was discovered in the cluttered living room, with duct tape wrapped around her head and stab wounds to her neck, stomach and genitals.

According to Haseleu, “It must have been a horrific, horrific death.”

Victim Carol Spadoni Was Prison Penpals With Phillip Jablonski

The mother and daughter had lived a very secluded life, but investigators discovered a clue to their killer after finding correspondence between Spadoni and Jablonski, then an inmate at San Quentin prison with a violent past.

Spadoni began writing to Jablonski as part of a religious program and the letters began “sweet and nice” but later turned sexual, Haseleu said.

“Carol was sort of a lonely heart of sorts,” San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe added. “She had not been married before, she was clearly not a strong personality, easy to manipulate.”

In 1982, she married Jablonski while he was still serving time for beating and strangling his common law wife Linda Kimball to death. 

Over time, Barkfnecht said Spadoni started to fear her husband, especially after he was paroled in 1990 to Riverside county.

Investigators Link Jablonski to Both Murder Scenes

Detectives were able to find a moving citation given to Jablonski on April 23, putting him in Burlingame around the time of the murders. They also learned that Spadoni had repeatedly denied his requests for conjugal visits behind bars as his letters to her had gotten increasingly sexually violent. Eventually, he even began writing sexually explicit letters to her mother, terrifying both mother and daughter. 

“He didn’t like rejection, especially from a woman,” Haseleu explained. “It made him furious.”

Investigators also learned that Jablonski had been enrolled in the same auto repair course at College of the Desert as Vann and was seen leaving with her the night of her death, linking him to both crime scenes. Classmates also told investigators that Vann had turned down Jablonski’s request for a date before her death.

Convinced they had their killer, investigators went to Jablonski’s home and found bloody clothes, letters and an address book with the names of other penpals, but no sign of the missing parolee himself.

“He was on the run,” Haseleu explained, “had a three day head start, and we had no idea where he was going.”

How Was Phillip Jablonski Caught? 

Authorities put out a national alert for Jablonski’s 1965 Ford Fairlane. It would prove to be the key to catching the killer. 

On April 28, 1991, a Kansas State Trooper noticed a vehicle with its hood up and ran its plates, quickly learning the driver of the vehicle was wanted for murder. 

Jablonski was taken into custody in McPherson, Kansas, finally putting an end to his reign. But investigators would soon learn another woman had lost her life during his cross-country trek.

Just one day earlier, Margie Rogers—the 59-year-old owner of a small, remote convenience store in Thompson Springs, Utah—was discovered dead inside the shop after she’d been shot with a small caliber weapon. There was also evidence to suggest the killer also fondled her breast.

Phillip Jablonski Describes Kills, Stalking Women on Audio Tape

Though Jablonski refused to discuss the killings with investigators, authorities found a treasure trove of chilling evidence inside his car. 

Along with a .22 caliber handgun hidden under the front seat, detectives also found a handmade leather belt that had the names and dates of his victims and blood stains later matched to Vann on the seat of the car.

But perhaps the most disturbing discovery was a tape recorder and tapes that he had used to create a morbid record of his dark deeds. 

In them, he described killing Vann in the car.

“I pulled a gun on her. She said, ‘Please, don’t.’ She sat there with a tear in her eyes,” he said. “Looked at her. I said, ‘Sorry, sweet thing. Can’t have no witnesses.’” 

He also recorded himself describing how he’d attacked Spadoni and Petersen, shot Rogers and hunted for potential new victims as he made his way across the country.

“Hopefully, this woman ahead of me is my next victim,” he said at one point in the recording, later adding, “God, what I’d give for this woman. Come on you guys, leave the [expletive] restroom so I can have her.” 

Though the victim got away, forensic psychologist Paige Wilcoxson said the recording spoke to Jablonski’s predatory nature, while also providing him with a way to relive his gruesome crimes. 

“When I heard that tape,” Haseleu added, “it sent chills up my spine.”

What Happened to Phillip Jablonski?

Jablonski was found guilty in San Mateo of the first-degree murder of Spadoni and Petersen and sentenced to death.

He later also pled guilty to killing Vann and received a sentence of life without the possibility of parole in that case. Authorities never formally charged him with Rogers murder. 

Jablonski died in December 2019 of natural causes while on death row at the San Quentin prison.

Trump Says Iran’s Kharg Island Is Being Blown to Smithereens After US Strikes

0

Donald Trump said early Monday that Iran’s key energy hub on Kharg Island was being “blown to smithereens,” as renewed US-Iran hostilities rattled markets and sent oil prices higher.

In a brief Truth Social post, paired with an AI-generated video that appeared to depict Kharg Island consumed by flames, Trump wrote: “Kharg Island being blown to smithereens!!! President DJT.”

No independent evidence immediately emerged to support the claim that the Iranian energy hub was under attack, and Iranian media did not issue an immediate response to Trump’s post.

The claim came after US forces carried out their first strikes on Iran in more than a month on Sunday, targeting two rocket launchers near the Strait of Hormuz, while Tehran responded with an attack on American forces in Jordan.

The latest escalation followed reports that Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces had been preparing to launch rockets fitted with sea mines into the strait, Central Command spokesman Captain Tim Hawkins confirmed to the Daily Mail.

‘US forces are monitoring the area closely and remain prepared to protect the free flow of commerce through this essential waterway,’ Captain Hawkins said.

The US military last week completed clearing sea mines from the strait, he added. Iranian news outlets reported sounds of explosions near Larak Island on the strait.

The IRGC in a statement carried by Iran’s state broadcaster noted ‘the martyrdom and injury of several of our fighters and compatriots’.

Trump published a Truth Social post accompanied by an AI-generated video purporting to show Kharg Island engulfed in flames

Trump published a Truth Social post accompanied by an AI-generated video purporting to show Kharg Island engulfed in flames

US forces made their first strikes at Iran in over a month Sunday, firing at two rocket launchers on the Strait of Hormuz

US forces made their first strikes at Iran in over a month Sunday, firing at two rocket launchers on the Strait of Hormuz 

US Central Command said they are 'monitoring the area closely and remain prepared to protect the free flow of commerce through this essential waterway'

US Central Command said they are ‘monitoring the area closely and remain prepared to protect the free flow of commerce through this essential waterway’

The statement said the attack will ‘result in punishment of the aggressor’.

Meanwhile, the renewed strikes in Iran caused oil prices to surge in early Asian trade on Monday. 

Brent futures climbed 2.7 per cent to $90.51 a barrel after US forces struck two of Iran’s launchers on Larak Island in the strait on Sunday.

Shortly following the US strikes, Fox News reported that Iranian forces were attacking American troops stationed in Jordan.

Almost all of the incoming missiles have been intercepted and there have been no significant impacts, Fox said.

The return to hostilities followed weeks in which the Trump administration has stepped up efforts to punish Tehran and its business partners with costly economic sanctions, shifting away from military options.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Reuters on Sunday new secondary sanctions were likely to be unveiled weekly to pressure Iran, with an initial focus on banks.

‘We’re starting with the banks, and we’re telling the banks it’s not okay to have Iranian money and to aid the regime,’ Mr Bessent said in an interview.

After imposing penalties on the United Arab Emirates branches of Egypt’s Banque Misr on Friday over alleged financial links to Iran, Mr Bessent said the next step may be cutting off an institution entirely from the dollar-based financial system.

‘You’re ​going to see a lot more of these every week,’ he added ahead of a meeting of G20 finance leaders.

As the conflict grinds on, Mr Trump’s talk of finding a quick end to the war also appears to be fading.

He stressed last week that he’s ‘not in a hurry’ to get Iran back to the negotiating table, and he continues making the case that the Islamic Republic’s leadership is on the ropes.

Mr Trump has consistently emphasised that the US and Israel campaign has been devastating for Iran’s navy and air force. Iranian officials have said the country has suffered $270billion in direct and indirect damage.

Israeli military strikes in the first weeks of the war wiped out much of the theocratic government’s leadership structure.

But Iran has found leverage through its own strikes in the critical Strait of Hormuz where relatively few vessels carrying oil and liquefied natural gas are risking passage.

Iran still has enough drones and missiles to fire at vessels transiting the vital energy waterway, through which 20 per cent of the world’s oil normally flows, effectively controlling much of the traffic in the strait.

Mr Trump has repeatedly declared that the ‘Strait of Hormuz is open’, saying 24 vessels passed through last week. 

Semi-official news outlets in Iran reported sounds of explosions near Larak Island on the strait

Semi-official news outlets in Iran reported sounds of explosions near Larak Island on the strait

Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman

Vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman

But that’s a fraction of the roughly 130 vessels that passed through the vital waterway daily before the war began.

Earlier on Sunday, a multinational coalition overseen by the US Navy said commercial traffic through the strait remained at ‘reduced levels’.

And a monitoring agency run by the British military said an unknown projectile struck a tanker ship on Saturday north of Khasab, Oman, in the strait.

Last week, Mr Trump said all mines had been detonated or removed from the international waters of the strait and Iran had been warned that any vessel placing new mines would be destroyed.

While Mr Trump has repeatedly said the Strait of Hormuz is open, Iran’s ⁠Revolutionary Guards’ navy had called those statements ‘an obvious lie’, reiterating that it remained closed to ships without Iranian permission.

The waterway carried nearly a fifth of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas shipments before it was blockaded in the six-month-old Iran war.

Iran is the third largest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

A return to open conflict would be dangerous for the region, where Iran has targeted US military bases and infrastructure in Gulf countries since the war began on February 28.

Attacking Kharg, which handled 90 per cent of Iran’s oil exports before the war launched by US and Israeli attacks on February 28, would severely disrupt its energy trade and put huge pressure on its economy. 

The last time the US military confirmed it was targeting Iran was on July 29, when it announced a ‘heavy wave of strikes’ on dozens of Revolutionary Guard targets including coastal surveillance and defense sites.

On August 1, Mr Trump said he would order the military to hold off on new strikes at the urging of Gulf allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Tinubu Takes South Africa to African Union Over Recurring Xenophobic Attacks

President Bola Tinubu has expressed deep concern over the repeated incidents of xenophobic and Afrophobic violence in South Africa, urging the African Union (AU) to respond with a united continental approach.

Tinubu conveyed Nigeria’s position through Vice President Kashim Shettima, who represented him at the 21st Extraordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union held in Luanda, Angola.

The Brandspur Politics Desk reports that the Nigerian leader appealed to African heads of state and government to take up the matter during the 40th Ordinary Session of the AU Assembly, which is scheduled for January 2027.

Tinubu calls for collective action

Although Tinubu recognised South Africa’s sovereign authority to regulate migration and enforce its immigration laws, he warned that attacks directed at Africans and other foreign nationals weaken the spirit of African unity, integration and peaceful coexistence.

In his message, Nigeria urged the AU Assembly to formally include the issue on its agenda for consideration and appropriate action.

Tinubu said, “Nigeria wishes to express its concern over the recurring xenophobic and Afrophobic attacks against Africans and other nationals in South Africa.”

He further stated, “such attacks undermine African solidarity, unity and peaceful coexistence, and require urgent collective attention.”

Nigeria seeks protection for African nationals

The president also urged African leaders to reaffirm their commitment to the safety, protection and dignity of all African nationals, regardless of where they reside on the continent.

His call places the recurring xenophobic attacks in South Africa before the continent’s highest political body for further consideration.

The matter is expected to receive attention at the AU Assembly’s 40th Ordinary Session in January 2027, where African leaders will be asked to consider appropriate action.

Clyburn Says Supreme Court Is Steering America Back Toward the Dred Scott Era

0

Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., used a Sunday appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” to deliver a sharp warning about the direction of the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the court is moving toward reviving elements of the infamous 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling.

The South Carolina Democrat said he believes recent decisions from the current Supreme Court reflect an effort to echo the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who declared in that case that Black people “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

Clyburn raised the comparison while defending his support for enlarging the nation’s highest court, a proposal that has become a recurring flashpoint in debates over Supreme Court reform.

Moderator Kristen Welker pressed Clyburn on the issue, noting that former Vice President Kamala Harris has voiced similar concerns about the court and has supported increasing the number of justices from nine to 13. Welker asked whether Clyburn backed the addition of four seats.

Clyburn said he did, arguing that the moment demands “significant actions” from Congress. He called 13 justices “a pretty good number,” referring to it as “a baker’s dozen,” and said he hoped any new members would respect what he described as the constitutional foundations of the country. Pointing to the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, Clyburn said the Warren Court had once offered an interpretation he believed could guide the nation’s future, but he accused the current Supreme Court of reversing course and steering the country back toward Taney’s view that Black Americans had no rights white Americans were required to respect.

“That was the Supreme Court that made that decision,” he added. “I hope that Clarence Thomas would follow the modern underpinnings of that constitution of ours. But he has not done so. In fact, he has decided to go all the way from an angry leftist to a very angry rightist.”

Follow Jeff Poor on X @jeff_poor