Home Blog Page 899

Court Filing Demands Contempt of Court for Trump Administration over ICE Church Surveillance Violations

0

UNITED STATES – MARCH 4: President Donald Trump arrives to deliver his address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 4, 2025 (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images).

A recent federal court filing accuses the Trump administration of violating an existing court directive that restricts “warrantless” immigration enforcement activities within churches, suggesting that the government should be held in contempt.

Back in July 2025, a coalition of churches from various denominations took legal action against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The 44-page lawsuit cited violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

The lawsuit detailed complaints regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducting unauthorized operations during church services. It also highlighted instances where parishioners were detained without judicial warrants as they arrived at churches. The plaintiffs described these activities as serious infringements on their religious freedom.

In February, U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, appointed by former President George W. Bush, issued a 62-page memorandum and order. In it, Judge Saylor largely dismissed the government’s justification for such immigration enforcement tactics, except under the most restrictive conditions. The ruling criticized the Trump administration’s prioritization of immigration enforcement over the protection of religious freedoms.

Now, the plaintiffs say the government has run afoul of its obligations in the accompanying preliminary injunction issued by the court.

“Plaintiffs write to alert the Court to recently disclosed evidence of Defendants’ multiple egregious violations of the preliminary injunction in this case, including deploying an undercover ICE agent into one of Plaintiffs’ protected churches to surveil and record people inside,” the notice of noncompliance begins. “Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court issue an order to show cause why Defendants should not be held in contempt for violating the preliminary injunction.”

According to the motion, DHS essentially admitted to the violations in a series of filings in an ongoing criminal proceeding in Minnesota.

In those documents, filed in early August, DHS said an ICE agent took part in “boxing/sparring practice” during a mixed martial arts meeting called “Left Jab” at University Baptist Church in Minneapolis in May.

“Due to the physicality of the event, [the undercover agent’s] concealed body-worn audio recorder erroneously fell to the floor of the gymnasium near the end of the training,” an investigative note in one document reads. “[The undercover agent] briefly left the gymnasium, realized she no longer had the device, and returned to the gymnasium to retrieve the device from the floor. “

During the boxing class, the undercover agent was “surveilling and recording attendees in the church gymnasium for approximately two hours,” the motion alleges. The filing explains, “the gymnasium is located within the church building, immediately below the sanctuary.”

In that same investigation, DHS also filed court records that show ICE agents were conducting surveillance “in the area of the University Baptist Church” and photographing license plates in April.

“[Special Agent] Briseno drove through the library parking lot to check which vehicles had departed once the individuals exited the church,” the second DHS filing reads. “Three of the vehicles had departed. Registration checks were conducted on those vehicles.”

The plaintiffs say the government was made aware it could not spy at the church in question — due to a court order which identified so-called “protected locations” covered by the injunction.

“Defendants have repeatedly violated the preliminary injunction at University Baptist Church in Minneapolis, including by sending an undercover ICE agent into the church itself in order to spy on those inside,” the motion goes on. “The church was designated by Plaintiffs as a Protected Location on every list of locations they provided DHS, the first of which was filed on February 27, 2026.”

The plaintiffs in the civil case went further than required to alert ICE to the protections afforded the particular church.

“Further, though not required to do so to receive the protections of the Court’s order, the church posted signage in March at all main exterior entrances stating, ‘These Premises are a Protected Area Pursuant to Federal Court Order in New England Synod v. Department of Homeland Security,'” the motion continues.

The plaintiffs say ICE’s actions were “blatant and repeated” and caused “harm to fundamental rights of religion and expressive association.”

In the Minnesota criminal case in which DHS extensively documented its undercover surveillance of immigration activists, 15 individuals face allegations of conspiracy to prevent, impede or injure federal officers.

“Members of the church learned of the violations last week and have been shocked and upset that ICE not only was monitoring the church, and doing so on Sundays, a holy day of worship, but even entered the church itself,” the motion goes on. “As stated by a current member and recent president of the church: ‘This is a complete violation of our sacred space. The Church is meant to be a place of sanctuary and safety—not infiltration by government agents.'”

To hear the plaintiffs tell it, ICE’s actions “constitute clear and egregious violations of the Court’s preliminary injunction order.”

“The Court therefore should issue an order to show cause and require the government’s prompt response why it should not be held in contempt for violations of the preliminary injunction,” the motion requests.

The post Trump admin should be held in contempt for ‘blatant’ violations of court order barring ICE from conducting surveillance inside churches, court filing says first appeared on Law & Crime.

Former Beauty Queen Embarks on New Chapter with Unexpected Pregnancy Announcement

0

To those who happen to pass by, she appears to be just another expectant mother making her way home from work, one hand gently holding her baby bump and a roll of carpet samples clutched under her arm.

However, beneath the elegant exterior of the glamorous blonde in a light blue dress and wedges lies a dark past. She is a convicted killer, infamous for brutally ending her Irish husband’s life with a baseball bat and a concrete brick, aided by her father, a former FBI agent.

Molly Martens, now 42, is six months into her pregnancy. It’s been 11 years since she murdered the man who refused to let her adopt his children, a detail revealed by the Daily Mail.

Martens made the announcement of her pregnancy via social media, reaching out to fellow expectant mothers for guidance on interpreting her 20-week scan, indicating a due date around the end of November.

Exclusive photographs from the Daily Mail showcase Martens tenderly cradling her baby bump in Knoxville, Tennessee. This marks an astonishing development in a story intensely intertwined with themes of motherhood and her quest to have children of her own.

She has been preparing herself for motherhood, upgrading her car from an aging sedan, to a brand new Hyundai Tucson, a practical family SUV with room for a baby seat.

The exclusive pictures show Martens leaving work at an interior design firm that appears to be her first return to employment since her release in June 2024.

She has also moved in with her toyboy lover, Josh Parrott, who the Daily Mail revealed she was dating back in January.

Molly Martens was seen cradling her baby bump and clutching a roll of carpet samples in exclusive Daily Mail photos, 11 years after the killing of her husband Jason Corbett

Dressed in a blue embroidered dress and wedge sandals, Martens, 42, is now six months pregnant and due to give birth in November

Martens has moved out of her parents’ house to live with the engineer in Kingston, about half an hour from Knoxville.

Parrott bought the house in October 2025, before the relationship began, and her name does not appear on the deed.

It is the first home she has made for herself since the one she shared with Jason Corbett: the $390,000 house in Meadowlands, North Carolina, that he paid for with the proceeds of his Limerick home and his life savings, and where he died on the bedroom floor.

Martens first made headlines in 2015 when she and her father Tom, now 75, killed Corbett, 39, from Limerick, at their marital home in North Carolina.

The case became the basis for one of Netflix’s most successful true crime documentaries, last year’s A Deadly American Marriage.

Father-of-two Jason was beaten to death with a baseball bat and a concrete brick in the early hours of August 2, 2015, sustaining so many injuries that the coroner was unable to count them all.

Prosecutors said it was because Jason planned to move home to Ireland, taking the children Martens wanted to adopt with him.

The father and daughter served just four years and three months for the voluntary manslaughter of Corbett, after a controversial appeal overturned their second-degree murder convictions.

Martens - who was convicted in 2017 of killing her husband Jason Corbett (pictured) two years earlier - served just over four years behind bars after her second-degree murder conviction was overturned on appeal and reduced to voluntary manslaughter

Martens – who was convicted in 2017 of killing her husband Jason Corbett (pictured) two years earlier – served just over four years behind bars after her second-degree murder conviction was overturned on appeal and reduced to voluntary manslaughter

In 2017, Martens was initially found guilty of second-degree murder and sentenced to between 20 and 25 years in prison - though on appeal, she took a plea deal reducing the sentence to voluntary manslaughter

Thomas Martens, a former FBI agent, called 911 after bludgeoning Jason to death and calmly told the dispatcher he may have killed his son-in-law

In 2017, Molly and her father Thomas Martens were initially found guilty of second-degree murder but the conviction was overturned and they later took a plea deal before a new trial, reducing the charge to voluntary manslaughter

Both had kept a low profile since their release in June 2024, until Martens returned to social media in January and the Daily Mail revealed her romance with Parrott days later.

When the Daily Mail spoke to him in January, shortly after the romance began, he would not discuss the relationship in detail but said: ‘It’s new and I’m just doing as I’m told right now.’

He was protective of Martens even then. 

‘I just feel bad for her,’ he said. ‘She’s dealt with so much as it is, and it’s something that happened ten years ago and she’s trying to finally move on with her life. And that’s hard to do.’

He added: ‘The experience has been horrifying. I just want to do what’s best for her. I’m not worried about myself, it’s her that deserves a break from it.’

Parrott, an engineer who works for his father’s company, lives just 20 minutes from the $1.1 million Knoxville home Martens shared with her parents after her release. 

Martens attended Farragut High School in the same grade as his older sister.

Martens wed Corbett in June 2011, after meeting him in 2008 following the death of his first wife Margaret, known as Mags, from an asthma attack.

Martens has kept a relatively low profile since leaving prison but is now building a new life in Tennessee as she prepares for the arrival of her first child

Martens has also traded her aging sedan for a new Hyundai Tucson, a family-sized SUV with room for a baby seat

The striking new images come almost exactly 11 years after Jason Corbett, 39, was killed in the bedroom of the North Carolina home he shared with Martens and his two children

Corbett had been left widowed at 30 with a 12-week-old baby daughter, Sarah, and a two-year-old son, Jack.

Martens, then a 24-year-old former beauty queen, was hired as their nanny. The couple fell in love and moved to Meadowlands, North Carolina, for a fresh start as a family.

But tensions over Martens formally adopting the children began to simmer, with Corbett reportedly becoming increasingly unhappy and considering a move back to Europe, which would have left Martens with no access to them.

Her failure to have a baby of her own is one of the key pressures that investigators believe caused a rift between the couple.

Corbett spent $25,000 on fertility treatment for his wife. During a family trip to Ireland in August 2014, he confided in his sister Tracey that the bill had left him with money worries.

Martens did not travel with them, with Corbett telling his sister she was having treatment back in America.

He also told his sister something more disturbing: that he doubted her repeated claims of miscarriage were real, and that he was not sure she had ever been pregnant at all.

In the year prior to Corbett’s death, Martens was allegedly shopping around for ‘superior sperm’ on Craigslist to have a child behind her husband’s back.

In January, Martens was snapped locking lips with her new boyfriend Josh Parrott,36, while the couple walked their dogs in Knoxville, Tennessee

The new romance marked Martens’ first public relationship since her release from prison in 2024

Parrott, pictured in January, is a 36-year-old engineer from Martens’ hometown

The Irish Independent, which obtained documents from prosecutors, reported that friends of Martens claimed she wanted ‘upper crust’ sperm, a plan funded by her parents.

According to Brian Carroll, author of A Deadly Marriage, which is based on his four-year investigation into the case, police records show Martens told neighbors her parents had given her $10,000 to buy fertility drugs. 

One neighbor she asked to store them cut off contact with her.

Her father had reportedly been encouraging his daughter to divorce Corbett for some time.

Emails released as part of the investigation show Martens mocked her husband over his ‘loser sperm,’ as well as tormenting him over his weight.

She also admitted placing recording devices around the family home and car, in an attempt to document Corbett’s alleged psychological and physical abuse.

At the time his body was discovered, paramedics said Corbett was cool to the touch, which prosecutors argued suggested the Martenses had delayed contacting emergency services to ensure he could not be saved.

In their closing statements, the prosecution claimed Martens ‘bashed Jason’s skull’ after learning he wanted to take the children back to Ireland.

Molly Martens in police custody in 2016, following the bludgeoning of Jason Corbett

Molly Martens in police custody in 2016, following the bludgeoning of Jason Corbett

Martens wanted to adopt Jack and Sarah Corbett (pictured as children) but after Jason's death a judge sent the children back to his family in Ireland. The siblings are now adults

Martens wanted to adopt Jack and Sarah Corbett (pictured as children) but after Jason’s death a judge sent the children back to his family in Ireland. The siblings are now adults

Alan Martin, the assistant district attorney in Davidson County, told her 2023 sentencing hearing that she had married Corbett ‘in full and open contemplation of divorce’ in order to secure custody.

The marriage, he said, was ‘loveless’ and ‘a lie.’ For Martens it was ‘all about the kids’ and the ‘clock was running out.’

Within two weeks of the killing she withdrew $17,500 to pay lawyers to fight for the children, separately from her criminal defense team. She had been preparing that application for at least eight months.

Judge Brian Shipwash, who stripped her of the children 15 days after the killing and sent them home to Ireland, later said he believed Martens felt a ‘deranged entitlement’ to them.

Martens has always maintained the killing was an act of self-defense, and that Corbett was physically and emotionally abusive during their marriage.

The former nanny and her father were convicted of second-degree murder at their first trial in 2017 and sentenced to 20 to 25 years. The convictions were overturned on appeal in 2021.

In October 2023, they accepted a plea deal for voluntary manslaughter on the theory of imperfect self-defense or defense of another, and were sentenced to four years and three months.

Martens pleaded no contest and Tom pleaded guilty, with both walking free in June 2024.

Martens has moved out of her parents’ house to live with the engineer in Kingston, about half an hour from Knoxville 

Martens completed her sentence in June 2024 and moved back to her parents’ $1.1 million home in Knoxville

Martens initially rented a basement apartment near the family home because parole conditions barred father and daughter from living together.

But after a year of supervision, both were released from the system, allowing her to move back in and travel internationally again.

Corbett’s daughter Sarah Corbett Lynch, now 19, told the Daily Mail in January that she took comfort from the fact Martens had no children in her life.

‘I was a child victim of coercive control and abuse, so it is genuinely a relief to know there are no children involved now, because I know what that kind of control can do to a child,’ she said.

‘While she may be free to rebuild her life, our family is left living with the permanent consequences of what happened.’

Sarah, who won Biography of the Year at the An Post Irish Book Awards for her memoir A Time for Truth, added: ‘Wherever she goes, the truth will always find her.’

The Corbett family have never accepted the sentences, describing the plea deal as an injustice that left them with no room for closure or peace. 

In a post on the Justice for Jason Corbett page in January, after Martens returned to social media, they wrote that she was ‘still the same killer in 2026 as you were in 2015.’

Marking the anniversary of his death this month, Corbett’s family wrote that 11 years had passed since he was ‘cruelly taken,’ but that time had ‘done nothing to dim the bright light he left behind.’

His greatest legacy, they said, lived on in Jack and Sarah, who carry ‘his strength, his spirit and his smile’ with them, and who he would have been proud of.

They signed off: ‘Forever loved, forever missed and never forgotten.’

Sarah herself posted: ‘People often ask me what you were like and I always tell them you were my biggest cheerleader,’ she wrote. 

‘I think about all the times you stood at the side of the pool cheering me on even when I was doing the wrong stroke. You never cared about getting first place, you just wanted me to know you were proud of me.’

She added: ‘I will forever be proud to be Jason Corbett’s daughter.’

In a statement to the Daily Mail, Jason’s eldest child, Jack, expressed concern over Martens having a baby of her own.

‘I have zero interest in Molly Martens’ life,’ the 21-year-old said. ‘But where there is a child involved – I can only hope they are born healthy and grows up safe, protected from ever experiencing the kind of harm Sarah and I lived through. 

‘Given what I experienced growing up with Molly, I am deeply concerned for that child. I cannot pretend otherwise.

‘I am still recovering, 11 years on, from the abuse my sister and I endured for years. It broke me. I will never fully heal. 

‘I have already stood before a court and spoken about my fear that another innocent child or another family could potentially endure the pain and trauma that my family has endured. That fear comes directly from what I lived through myself. 

‘I can’t predict what will happen in the future, but I know what I experienced. My fear is that another child could one day find themselves living through something similar. I can only hope that this child is safe and that if concerns are raised, they are listened to and acted upon.’ 

Neither Martens nor Parrott responded to the Daily Mail’s request for comment. 

Royal Insider Reveals Marriage Drama Can Make or Break Harry & Meghan’s UK Comeback

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are making a return to the United Kingdom, though the duration of their stay might hinge on the health of their marriage. As reported by People on August 20, the couple plans to relocate to England with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Their transition seems well-organized, with Archie and Lilibet already registered in new schools for the fall term. While they have secured a non-royal residence near London, Harry and Meghan intend to maintain their California home along with a vacation retreat in Portugal.

To delve deeper into the implications and potential sustainability of this move, Nicki Swift consulted Brittany Provance, Editor-in-Chief of Royal News Network. Provance remarked, “The relocation back to the U.K. might be surprising to some, though it coincides with their slowing Hollywood pursuits.” She noted that Harry stands to gain significantly from rekindling his connections in the U.K., thus possibly resuming a semblance of an unofficial royal role.

Provance pointed out that the stability of Harry and Meghan’s relationship is crucial for the longevity of their move. “A lot depends on how their relationship evolves,” she commented. Despite Meghan’s previous discontent in England, this time she has their Portuguese getaway as a potential refuge. “Their property in Portugal offers a retreat with a Californian-like atmosphere,” Provance elaborated, though she expressed doubt that this alone would suffice amidst the likely frosty reception from the royal family. Furthermore, existing reports hint at possible tension between Harry and Meghan, suggesting their U.K. residence might be short-lived.

Business ventures reportedly caused a rift between Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

Provance also emphasized that the success of their relocation is not solely linked to personal factors but also hinges on their business prospects. “This marks Sussex Brand launch 3.0,” Provance revealed to Nicki Swift, viewing the move as a strategic gamble. “Repositioning in the U.K. presents a chance to leverage the weight of their Duke and Duchess titles,” she added, indicating a fresh start for their public persona.

Reportedly, struggles within their business dealings have contributed to strains between Harry and Meghan. Just a day before news of their move broke, royal biographer Andrew Lownie discussed the impact of these business disagreements on their relationship. “It seems Harry is realizing that Meghan’s plans haven’t played out as expected,” Lownie told News24. Lownie speculated that Harry might be distancing himself from Meghan’s efforts in the U.S., adding that their romantic bond has weakened, with Harry appearing to assert his independence.

The state of their marriage has been called into question by other sources as well. A report from a month earlier pointed to signs that Harry and Meghan were headed for divorce. “They’re living very separate lives now,” a source told Rob Shuter for his Substack on July 22. “They have different priorities, different routines, and they’re spending much less time together than people realize,” the insider added. The following week, a separate source told Star that King Charles III would be there for Harry if he needed to talk about his rumored marital woes. So Harry’s feud with Prince William might not be his biggest problem when he returns home.

Prosecutors Accuse Murdaugh’s Defense of Falsifying Polygraph

0

A fresh court filing has surfaced, shedding new light on the defense strategy of Alex Murdaugh, who stands accused of having previously murdered his wife and son. This document suggests the defense might have misrepresented the results of his lie detector test.

Released on Wednesday in Colleton County, South Carolina, the filing accuses Murdaugh’s lawyer, Dick Harpootlian, of potentially misleading practices, as detailed by state prosecutors.

In 2023, Murdaugh was initially found guilty and condemned to two consecutive life sentences for these homicides. However, in a twist this past May, those verdicts were vacated after evidence emerged that court clerk Becky Hill had improperly swayed jury members.

Alex Murdaugh in court

On June 29, 2026, Alex Murdaugh appeared at a legal proceeding at the Marc H. Westbrook Judicial Center in Lexington, South Carolina. With his previous conviction nullified due to jury interference, he is set to face a new trial regarding the June 7, 2021, killings of his wife and son. (Tracy Glantz/The State via Pool)

In an August 14 hearing, Harpootlian asserted, “Mr. Murdaugh passed a polygraph with flying colors, using the same examiner. It might become relevant in this upcoming trial.”

Prosecutors argue that when Murdaugh was initially tried in 2023, he never took a polygraph, or lie-detector, test.

The time that he did in fact take a lie-detector test was after the trial in the fall of 2023. He took the test with the FBI when he was under investigation for serious financial crimes.

Alex Murdaugh's lawyer, Dick Harpootlian in court in Lexington, South Carolina

Defense attorney Dick Harpootlian represents his client, Alex Murdaugh, on June 29, 2026, at a status hearing in Lexington, South Carolina. (Tracy Glantz/The State via Pool)

The new document says:

“Defense council’s claim on the record at the hearing that defendant Alex Murdaugh passed a SLED [South Carolina Law Enforcement Division] polygraph as to the murders, much less than any governmental polygraph on any subject, is categorically false, and clearly said for no other reason that an attempt to prejudice this court and the public.”

Read the filing below.

In response to the state’s filing, Harpootlian emailed a letter to Judge Debra McCaslin on Thursday saying that he incorrectly stated in court that Murdaugh had taken a polygraph and passed “with flying colors, saying he had mistakenly conflated several facts. 

Harpootlian said, “I want to offer my apology to both the court and state for any confusion I may have caused.”

Here is the letter:

Murdaugh is scheduled for his new trial in April of next year. That trial will not take place in Colleton County.

Judge McCaslin presides over the Alex Murdaugh hearing

Judge Debra McCaslin oversees a judicial hearing on June 29, 2026, at the Marc H. Westbrook Judicial Center in Lexington, South Carolina. (Tracy Glantz/The State via Pool)

On Friday, McCaslin ruled the retrial must move out of Colleton County, but she did not yet mention a new location.

It’s possible the retrial could be in Richland County, as Murdaugh’s defense recently pressed to move it – arguing the possibility of a larger jury pool in a new location.

New York Times Hit with $9.2M Defamation Payout to Former Alabama Player Kai Spears

0

In a significant legal defeat, The New York Times has been ordered to compensate a former college basketball player for defamation, with damages amounting to millions, as decided on Thursday.

An Alabama jury concluded that the Times had defamed Kai Spears, who was just an 18-year-old freshman walk-on for the University of Alabama’s Crimson Tide when he was wrongly implicated in a 2023 investigative piece regarding a fatal shooting incident.

After deliberating for nine days, the eight-person jury awarded Spears $9.25 million in damages, recognizing the significant impact of the fallacious report on his life.

In the contentious March 2023 article, authored by New York Times sports journalist Billy Witz, Spears was erroneously named.

The report inaccurately alleged that Spears had been a passenger in a vehicle at the scene of a January 2023 shooting, which tragically resulted in the death of 23-year-old Jamea Harris.

The Times issued a lengthy editor’s note to the report in June 2023, but only after Spears filed the defamation lawsuit at the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

“The original version of this article, published March 15, misidentified the person who was in the car with [Crimson Tide star player] Brandon Miller when the shooting occurred,” the note began. 

“Based on information from a person familiar with the case, the article erroneously identified that person as Kai Spears, a freshman basketball player. After the article was initially published, Alabama’s athletic director and Spears’s father denied that Spears was present. The Times included those responses and reviewed its reporting, but did not conclude that any other change to the article was warranted at that time.

“On Wednesday, Spears filed a defamation suit against The Times that included new details about the incident. Based on that information, editors assigned further reporting, which determined that the other person at the scene was not Spears but Cooper Lee, a student manager for the team. The Times regrets the error in the initial report.”

Witz, who began reporting for The Times in 2008, relied on one anonymous source who claimed Spears was at the site of the shooting.

Witz testified the source was a “high-level person, professional.”

“I think the way I was looking at it, Source A, by their job title and by virtue of their access to the transcript, videos and impound photos, was somebody who knew a lot about this case,” Witz said, according to a report from The Tuscaloosa Patch. 

“In my mind, the story had a focus, and this tragedy, as bad as it was, could have been much worse.”

A separate anonymous source had told Witz, “I can tell you it’s a White guy on the basketball team, I just don’t remember his name,” according to Witz’s testimony.

According to The Patch, Witz ultimately conceded from the witness stand, “Yes, [the story] had a mistake, no question.”

The Times noted in its own report about the verdict that it had not lost a defamation lawsuit brought in the United States over one of its articles in more than 50 years.

“We’re disappointed the jury found The Times liable for an honest mistake,” a Times spokesperson told Fox News Digital. “We thank the jury for its service, but believe the verdict and award of damages are contrary to law and not supported by the evidence. We are reviewing our legal options.”

Spears’ legal team did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.

Ariana Grande Criticizes Trump Administration for Unauthorized Use of Her Song on TikTok

Ariana Grande once again finds herself in the spotlight as she pushes back against President Donald Trump’s administration.

The 33-year-old pop sensation swiftly countered after a TikTok post from the Trump campaign on August 20 featured one of her songs.

In the video, the Team Trump account used the lyrics from Grande’s 2024 release “We Can’t Be Friends” by captioning, “Me and my truth we sit in silence…” alongside a clip of the president.

Accompanying the clip was a provocative message that stated, “Men can’t have babies and should never compete in women’s sports.”

Taylor Swift Has Her Music Removed From TikToks By Donald Trump

This isn’t the first time that music icons are distancing themselves from political misinformation. Recently, Taylor Swift reportedly ensured her track “I Bet You Think About Me” was scrubbed from various TikTok videos shared by Donald Trump’s social media crew. In an attempt to rally his base, the White House previously overlaid Swift’s 2021 hit on footage of the 80-year-old Trump addressing his followers, drawing attention to the song’s lyrics with a compelling caption.

“This shouldn’t be controversial! #trump #arianagrande #maga,” said the caption.

The post was set to the tune of “We Can’t Be Friends” but has since been removed. (“This sound isn’t available,” the post now reads.)

Grande commented on the post, “Never use my music again. Also, your truth is false.”

Grande previously hit out at the White House for using her song “Bye” in a video promoting the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in June.

katyperrydonaldtrump.png

Katy Perry is slamming President Donald Trump’s administration after the official White House TikTok account featured her hit song “Firework” in a video highlighting ongoing U.S. military strikes in Iran. “I am deeply appalled and angry to see ‘Firework’ used on the @WhiteHouse TikTok account as a backing track for video footage of military strikes,” […]

“Bye-bye 👋 President Trump has delivered the most secure border in history,” the White House captioned the video.

“Please do not ever use ⁠my music in relation to this barbaric, inhumane, heinous ​nonsense. Fck ice,” Grande commented on the post, and the audio was subsequently removed.

In a statement to Us at the time, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said, “We’ll say this one last time: what’s actually barbaric, inhumane, and heinous are the criminal illegal aliens who have injured and murdered innocent American citizens.”

Grande previously clashed with Trump’s White House in September 2025 when she reshared influencer Matt Bernstein’s Instagram post calling out people who supported Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

Kesha Slams Trump After White House Uses Her Song in Pro-War Video

Kesha has called President Donald Trump a “criminal predator” and condemned the White House’s use of her song “Blow” in a pro-war TikTok video. “It’s come to my attention that The White House has used one of my songs on TikTok to incite violence and threaten war [prior to the Iran conflict],” Kesha, 39, wrote […]

“It’s been 250 days,” the post began. “Now that immigrants have been violently torn from their families and communities have been destroyed, now that trans people have been blamed for virtually everything and live in fear, now that free speech is on the brink of collapse for us all — has your life gotten better?”

The post continued, “Have your groceries gotten cheaper? Has your health insurance premium gone down? Has your work/life balance improved? Can you take a vacation yet? Are you happier? Has the widespread suffering of others paid off for you in the way he promised it would, or are you still waiting?”

At the time, White House spokesperson Kush Desai hit out at Grande in a statement to multiple outlets.

“Save your tears, Ariana, because President Trump’s actions ended Joe Biden’s inflation crisis and are bringing in trillions in new investments,” Desai said. “He even signed an executive order just like magic that paved the way for the FTC to crack down on Ticketmaster for ripping off Ariana Grande’s concert-going fans. Get well soon, Ariana!”

Unlocking Insidious: Out Of The Further’s Mystifying Ending

0

Contains spoilers for “Insidious: Out of the Further”

The conclusion of “Insidious: The Red Door,” released in 2023, signaled what many believed to be the end of the Lambert family’s saga with the supernatural, dating back to the first “Insidious” film. This seemed like the ultimate finale; producer Jason Blum even hinted as much in an interview with Discussing Film. He remarked, “[‘Insidious: The Red Door’] is going to be the last we’re going to see of ‘Insidious’ for a while. It may not be a forever rest, but it’s certainly going to be a very long rest … if someone comes up with some idea in 10 years, who knows?”

Surprisingly, Blumhouse didn’t need a decade to reignite the franchise, as “Insidious: Out of the Further” emerged just three years later. Horror franchises rarely remain dormant for long, and fans will undoubtedly be thrilled to venture once more into the eerie realm of the Further, infamous for housing malevolent demons and spirits.

In a shift from their past haunting escapades, the Lambert family takes a backseat in “Out of the Further.” This installment centers on Gemma (played by Amelia Eve), a single mother who has supernatural abilities attracting sinister forces eager to exploit them. Although the film’s conclusion appears to tie up loose ends, there are subtle hints and details that viewers might overlook.

What you need to remember about the plot of Insidious: Out of the Further

The story flashes back to 1999 when a young Gemma, portrayed by Charli Penton, witnesses her mother Ingrid (Laura Gordon) exhibiting bizarre behavior before tragically taking her own life. Two decades later, Gemma has her own daughter, Maya (Island Austin), while residing in the house inherited from her mother. Despite her determination to be different from Ingrid, Gemma begins encountering unsettling occurrences, such as the inexplicable reappearance of a flashlight she believed lost 20 years ago.

Gemma enters the Further, where she spots all sorts of demonic figures. During one excursion, she meets demonologist Elise Rainier (Lin Shaye), who rescues her and tells her to meet up with her in reality. This sends Gemma to tattoo artist Clare (Maisie Richardson-Sellers), who works with Elise and allows her to enter her body from the Further, seeing as how Elise died at the end of the first “Insidious” movie. 

Elise informs Gemma that she’s a courier, meaning she can bring items from the Further into the mortal plane as well as items from her reality into the Further. Acolytes working on behalf of the evil Further inhabitant Cyrus Lam (Sam Spruell) have been wearing Gemma down in order to make her susceptible to Cyrus’ powers. Once Cyrus knows that Gemma can transport full-blown demons, he’ll use her to bring forth all sorts of untold horrors into the real world and unleash chaos.

The acolytes are hiding in a house across the street, so Gemma breaks in while her boyfriend Nick (Brandon Perea) distracts them. She learns more about Cyrus, and how he learned the ways of the Further while still mortal. Now, seemingly after years of waiting, he’s ready to make a move.

What happened at the end of Insidious: Out of the Further?

Elise concocts a plan to stop Cyrus. Nick will strip the acolytes across the street of the gas that allows them to enter the Further, so that they can’t guard Gemma’s red door. Meanwhile, Elise will guide and protect Gemma while she’s in the Further. However, once there, Elise and Gemma find themselves within Ingrid’s memories. They discover that Ingrid was a courier like Gemma and that Cyrus was manipulating her to try to get her to move demons to the real world years prior. Ingrid died to protect her daughter, recontextualizing everything Gemma had previously thought about her.

However, this also means the courier gift is hereditary, so Maya is one too. Cyrus turns his attention to Maya, who’s staying with a neighbor, and successfully uses her to enter the mortal plane. Back at Gemma’s house, Cyrus manipulates Maya repeatedly to bring over more and more demons. The house is soon filled with malevolent entities, so Elise tells Gemma to return to her plane of existence, where Gemma is held back by hordes of demons as she tries to get to Maya.

Elise manages to take hold of one of the acolytes’ bodies to carry Maya out of the house to safety, where Nick and Clare are also hiding out for the time being. Gemma holds the door shut to prevent Cyrus or anyone else from escaping, and she uses her courier powers to transport the entire house (and all the demons inside) back to the Further. 

Seeing as Cyrus broke his promise, the demons attack him. Meanwhile, Gemma returns to her realm and embraces her daughter over the missing home’s foundation.

What the end of Insidious: Out of the Further means

The “Insidious” franchise has always had families front and center. Even going back to the first one, Josh (Patrick Wilson) had a connection to the Further that he passed down to his son, Dalton (Ty Simpkins). The idea is that parents, willingly or not, often pass along their own baggage to their children. Since Josh didn’t deal with this trauma, his son now pays the consequences. 

A similar theme can be found in “Insidious: Out of the Further.” However, Gemma is very aware of her own messed-up baggage and desperately doesn’t want to bring Maya into it. When we first meet Gemma in 1999, her relationship with her mother looks like a child dealing with a parent suffering from addiction. When Gemma becomes a mother herself, she doesn’t talk to Maya about Ingrid at all or reveal the things that were wrong with her. Gemma doesn’t want to become her mother, but that’s not how it works: Gemma has the same powers as her mom, so the demons are now after her. 

That idea was a guiding light for director Jacob Chase. As he said in an interview with Variety India, “When I was writing ‘Insidious: Out of the Further,’ my wife was pregnant, and I had a deep fear about becoming a dad.” Tapping into that fear gives “Out of the Further” a more universal idea that’s bound to be relatable to any parent in the audience.

Who is Cyrus Lam? And could he return?

“Insidious: Out of the Further” introduces a very different kind of supernatural threat. In the past, we’ve had creatures like Lipstick-Face Demon and the Bride in Black (Tom Fitzpatrick), who looked scary but didn’t say much. “Out of the Further” introduces Cyrus Lam, who instantly differentiates himself by actually talking a good deal. He has no issues letting Gemma know about his grand machinations, which is something Jacob Chase wanted to explore in the film. 

Chase told AFP (via ABS-CBN), “I wanted someone that was a bit more human and someone that had a real goal in the film. To me, a charming villain is so much scarier because I could see myself wanting to follow them.” Cyrus certainly has a cult leader aesthetic to him. When Gemma breaks into the house across the street, she sees a TV playing footage from one of Cyrus’ seminars when he was still alive. We also see much younger versions of his acolytes, as he promises them some greater purpose. 

Cyrus is eventually killed, which explains why he’s now in the Further: His soul is trapped in this realm, and he wants to use Gemma’s power as a courier to free himself and others. It’s a much more grandiose goal than we’ve seen before in the series.

Whether Cyrus Lam will become a recurring presence in future “Insidious” movies remains to be seen. The demons quickly turn on him when his plan fails, and there’s also a quick mid-credits scene of Cyrus being tortured by a dentist demon. It seems unlikely they’ll let him loose anytime soon. 

What the end of Insidious: Out of the Further could mean for the franchise

“Insidious: Out of the Further” includes many things that happen in every “Insidious” movie, like ample jump scares and family trauma. But it also introduces a new idea, namely that there exists people who can bring items into the Further and vice versa. This is something that could be explored in sequels, even if the franchise decides not to bring Gemma and her daughter back into the fold. 

Up until this point, we’ve only known about travelers, who can astral project themselves into the Further, various memories, and even other people’s dreams. Couriers add an extra layer to the mythos. Even if a future “Insidious” movie follows other characters, it’s possible we could see Gemma return and lend her assistance, much like how Elise operates in this movie. Maybe Gemma and Elise could form some kind of benevolent Further team and help individuals trapped in this realm.

As it stands, “Out of the Further” might merely exist as a standalone entry. You don’t need to know all of the lore to know what’s going on, while certain elements, like Elise’s inclusion, function as neat fan service rather than essential knowledge. This could be the path forward for “Insidious,” where each new installment brings in a different set of characters and twists. It would be a good way to keep each new movie fresh — and ensure that newcomers don’t feel like they’re getting lost in the Further. 

Heartbreak in Lake Bluff: Beloved Pet Snatched by Coyote in Tangley Oaks, Presumed Lost

0
ByABC7 Chicago Digital Team

WLS logo

Friday, August 21, 2026 3:34AM
A small pet dog that was taken by a coyote in the Tangley Oaks community in Lake Bluff, Illinois is presumed dead, village officials said.

LAKE BLUFF, Ill. (WLS) — Tragedy struck a family when their beloved canine friend was snatched by a coyote right from their yard, later disappearing into nearby woods in the northern suburbs.

According to village officials, this distressing event took place on Thursday afternoon within the Tangley Oaks neighborhood in Lake Bluff.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

Officials stated that a coyote took the family’s small dog from their yard, fleeing into the wooded area that borders the community.

The dog, affectionately called Stan, remains missing and is presumed to have succumbed following the harrowing incident.

The heartbroken owners shared with ABC7 that they were supervising Stan closely and were within just 10 feet when the sudden coyote encounter unfolded.

Lake Bluff police and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources are investigating the incident.

Village officials said they believe this is the first incident of its kind in Lake Bluff.

Officials shared the following tips for pet owners:

  • Keep small pets close and supervised when outdoors, including in fenced yards.


  • If you encounter a coyote, do not run. Stand tall, make yourself appear larger, yell, clap your hands, wave your arms, or use a whistle or other noise-making device.


  • If the coyote moves away but stops and looks back, continue making noise and appearing large until it leaves the area.


  • Never intentionally feed coyotes, and remove outdoor food sources that may attract coyotes or their prey.


Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Taxpayers Cover Trudeau’s Security Costs for Travel with Katy Perry: Report

0

Reports suggest Canadian taxpayers might be footing the bill for Justin Trudeau’s security detail as he travels internationally with pop sensation Katy Perry.

Former Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau is reportedly accompanied by officers from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) on his recent adventures with Perry, according to the Journal de Montréal.

A source claims that Trudeau, now 54, continues to utilize the RCMP for both personal and political journeys, treating them as a personal security team.

Although Trudeau stepped down from his role last March, his high-profile romance with Perry has kept him in the public eye this year.

Trudeau and Perry have been spotted enjoying themselves at Coachella and on multiple excursions across Europe, including stops in Greece, Italy, and Switzerland.

He would have been accompanied by the RCMP while spending time with the famous musician, according to the report.

The RCMP has not disclosed Trudeau’s security provisions, including the cost or their nature.

The agency stated that this was because of ‘the evolving threat environment and operational and security considerations related to police protection services,’ as information could ‘reveal or facilitate inferences about the protective measures taken for an individual,’ according to Le Journal.

Former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, 54, is still using the RCMP as a 'private security agency' as he travels the world with new girlfriend Katy Perry, per a new report

Former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, 54, is still using the RCMP as a ‘private security agency’ as he travels the world with new girlfriend Katy Perry, per a new report

Perry and Trudeau went public with their relationship on Instagram in December following months of speculation

Perry and Trudeau went public with their relationship on Instagram in December following months of speculation

Since then, the couple has been seen traveling the world, sometimes sharing snapshots of their time together

Since then, the couple has been seen traveling the world, sometimes sharing snapshots of their time together

Trudeau requires three or four federal officers at once, according to the outlet.

Taxpayers would cover their travel, lodging, meals, salaries and overtime pay as they ensure the former prime minister’s safety.

Former RCMP deputy commissioner Pierre-Yves Bourduas told the outlet that Trudeau’s ‘hectic love life’ could cause ‘headaches’ for the officers.

Bourduas added that the RCMP has ‘limited personnel,’ which meant that Trudeau’s needs could be putting a strain on the police force.

Perry has her own team of bodyguards, who have previously stepped in during potentially concerning situations at concerts.

However, Trudeau cannot be expected to rely on his girlfriend’s detail, according to Bourduas.

He explained that this was because Perry’s bodyguards had ‘a different mandate than that of the former prime minister’ and were not fully responsible for him.

Trudeau reportedly needs three or four federal officers at once, even as he travels with Perry

Trudeau reportedly needs three or four federal officers at once, even as he travels with Perry

Trudeau's 'hectic love life' and his relationship with Perry could cause 'headaches' for the RCMP, according to a former deputy commissioner of the agency

Trudeau’s ‘hectic love life’ and his relationship with Perry could cause ‘headaches’ for the RCMP, according to a former deputy commissioner of the agency

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police has not commented on Trudeau's security detail after leaving office

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police has not commented on Trudeau’s security detail after leaving office

Trudeau and Perry went public with their relationship on Instagram in December after the Daily Mail published exclusive photos of the couple embracing on a yacht two months before.

The former Canadian prime minister was married to Sophie Grégoire before they separated in August 2023 and he later started dating Perry.

Since then, the pair have been spotted on ritzy trips all over the world, sometimes sharing snaps of their time together.

Trudeau’s security cost Canadian taxpayers more than $30 million while he was prime minister, CBC previously reported.

That marked the highest of any leader in the country’s history, according to the outlet.

Trudeau’s father, former Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau, was the first former leader of his country to be offered protective services after his time in office.

The elder Trudeau was offered security because his track record as prime minister could invite future threats against him, according to The Globe and Mail.

However, he did not face any ongoing threats at the time he left office, per the outlet.

Other Canadian PMs, such as Brian Mulroney, Jean Chrétien and Stephen Harper, have also accepted RCMP protection after departing their position.

The Daily Mail has reached out to the RCMP and representatives for Perry and Trudeau for comment.

5 Morning Moves to Shed Belly Fat Faster Than Pilates

0

Forget the Pilates class! Tackle that stubborn belly pooch with these 5 effective exercises—done before your morning coffee brews.

>

While Pilates undoubtedly offers an excellent core workout, sometimes mornings require a simpler approach. Whether it’s before the caffeine kicks in, prior to running errands, or before the day’s clamor deters you from exercise, a straightforward routine can work wonders.

For those over 60, reducing belly pooch is more about maintaining consistent habits rather than chasing a one-time miracle workout. Engaging the core strengthens your midsection, fostering improved posture and mobility. Complement these exercises with regular walking, strength training, and balanced nutrition, and watch these small daily efforts compound over time.

This no-fuss routine eliminates the need for reformers, lengthy classes, or complex sequences. By working your abs from various positions—lying down, on hands and knees, and standing—you’ll add the necessary variety to challenge your core without complicating your morning.

Incorporate these five exercises into your mornings three to five times a week. Focus on moving slowly, controlling each rep, and breathing deeply, prioritizing precision over speed.

​​

Dead Bug

The dead bug is one of the most useful core exercises after 60 because it teaches your abs to brace while your arms and legs move. That’s the job your core has during everyday life. It helps keep your lower back steady while your body shifts around it.

Keep this one slow. If you rush it, you’ll miss most of the benefit. A good dead bug should feel controlled, almost like you’re trying to make the movement quiet.

Muscles Trained: Abs, deep core, hip flexors.

How to Do It

  1. Lie on your back with your knees bent and your feet lifted.
  2. Reach both arms toward the ceiling.
  3. Brace your core and gently press your lower back toward the floor.
  4. Lower one arm behind you as you extend the opposite leg.
  5. Return to the starting position.
  6. Repeat on the other side and continue alternating.

Recommended Sets and Reps: Perform 2 to 3 sets of 6 to 8 reps per side.

Best Variations: Bent-knee dead bugs, heel-tap dead bugs, single-leg dead bugs.

Form Tip: Shorten the range if your lower back starts to arch.

5 Kitchen-Counter Exercises That Rebuild Knee Strength Faster Than Leg Presses After 60

​​

Heel Taps

Heel taps are simple, but they work well when you do them with patience. Your abs have to control your pelvis as each foot lowers toward the floor. That makes the exercise a strong choice for rebuilding core strength without getting into a long plank or twisting drill.

This one also fits a morning routine because it doesn’t take much space or energy to get started. Lie down, brace, and let the reps build.

Muscles Trained: Abs, deep core, hip flexors.

How to Do It

  1. Lie on your back with your knees bent.
  2. Lift your feet so your knees stack over your hips.
  3. Brace your core and keep your lower back steady.
  4. Lower one heel toward the floor.
  5. Lightly tap the floor and bring the leg back up.
  6. Switch sides and continue alternating.

Recommended Sets and Reps: Perform 2 to 3 sets of 8 to 10 reps per side.

Best Variations: Single-leg heel taps, slower heel taps, smaller-range heel taps.

Form Tip: Move from your hips while your lower back stays still.

​​

Bird Dog

Bird dogs train your core without making you lie on your back the whole time. You’re on your hands and knees, reaching one arm and the opposite leg while your midsection keeps you from shifting side to side. It’s simple, but it can expose sloppy control fast.

The goal isn’t to reach as far as possible. Reach only as far as you can while staying steady. That’s where the core work happens.

Muscles Trained: Abs, deep core, glutes, lower back, shoulders.

How to Do It

  1. Start on your hands and knees.
  2. Place your hands under your shoulders and your knees under your hips.
  3. Brace your core.
  4. Reach one arm forward and the opposite leg back.
  5. Pause for one second.
  6. Return to the starting position and switch sides.

Recommended Sets and Reps: Perform 2 to 3 sets of 6 to 8 reps per side.

Best Variations: Leg-only bird dogs, arm-only bird dogs, slower bird dogs.

Form Tip: Keep your hips level and avoid rocking as you switch sides.

5 Daily Moves That Make Getting Off the Floor Easier After 65

​​

Standing Cross-Body Knee Drive

Standing cross-body knee drives bring your core work upright. That’s useful because your abs need to help you control movement while you stand, walk, turn, and reach. This exercise adds a little rhythm to the routine without turning it into a high-impact workout.

Move with control at first. Once the pattern feels smooth, pick up the pace slightly and let your breathing come up.

Muscles Trained: Abs, obliques, hip flexors, glutes.

How to Do It

  1. Stand tall with your feet about hip-width apart.
  2. Place your hands behind your head or hold them in front of your chest.
  3. Brace your core.
  4. Drive your right knee up toward your left side.
  5. Lower your foot with control.
  6. Repeat on the other side and continue alternating.

Recommended Sets and Reps: Perform 2 to 3 sets of 20 to 30 seconds.

Best Variations: Slower knee drives, standing marches, seated cross-body knee lifts.

Form Tip: Lift your knee with your abs engaged, rather than yanking your torso down.

​​