Donald Trump has revealed a new agreement between the United States and Canada that will see a halt on 50% tariffs affecting $20 billion worth of Canadian imports.

The announcement comes after Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney engaged in talks earlier on Tuesday, racing against a deadline of 12:01 am Wednesday set by Trump himself.

“I have paused the 50% tariffs against Canada, which were set to start tomorrow morning, for a three-day period. This pause is based on a new deal between Canada and the U.S., pending document finalization,” Trump shared on Truth Social.

Although specifics were not provided, Trump hinted that the agreement might revive the Keystone XL pipeline project. This pipeline had been partly constructed before President Joe Biden revoked its permit in 2021, citing environmental concerns.

“The once-shelved Keystone XL Pipeline, terminated by Sleepy Joe Biden, could spring back to life!” Trump remarked.

Trump also posted an AI image of himself digging the pipeline out of a grave that read ‘Buried by Biden.’ 

Carney did not confirm a deal but said that he and Trump had made ‘substantial progress.’ 

‘Over the last number of weeks, Canada has engaged in intensive discussions with the United States to address outstanding trade issues and deliver greater certainty and real benefits for Canadian businesses, workers, farmers and families,’ he told The Daily Mail.

‘Substantial progress has been made, although there is important work still to be done. As this work is ongoing, the United States has agreed to postpone the implementation of its 50 percent tariff on a range of Canadian goods under Section 338 of the US Tariff Act of 1930 until end of day, August 21st.’

‘While we continue this work, Canada remains focused on building a stronger, more independent, and more competitive economy at home,’ Carney added.

Trump pulled the surprise on Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in mid-July after he met the liberal leader at the World Cup final – where the two appeared chummy. 

The White House said in a fact sheet that the tariffs would go into effect in 30 days and cover ‘products ranging from wine to hockey sticks to cement.’

Carney and Trump had spoken twice by phone in the past two days about the ongoing negotiations, including another call Tuesday afternoon, Carney´s office said, underscoring the last-minute push for a deal.

‘We are negotiating,’ Carney told reporters Monday, speaking in French. 

‘The negotiations are very intense and delicate. This is not the time to talk about negotiations in public.’ 

The two countries have wrangled for decades over trade, poking each other over sore spots like Canadian softwood lumber imports and US access to Canada´s protected dairy market.

Trump’s import taxes would have hit about five percent of what Canada ships to the United States every year, including products ranging from hockey sticks to tongue depressors.

But the political impact would likely have been bigger than the economic one. 

Canada had threatened to retaliate against any new tariffs with levies of its own, aggravating a trade fight between countries that sold each other $880 billion worth of goods and services last year.

Nearly 72 percent of Canada’s goods exports last year went to the United States. 

And the Trump administration might be wary of imposing a hefty new tariff — paid by US importers who try to pass along the cost to consumers via higher prices — ahead of November’s midterm elections. 

US voters are already frustrated with the high cost of living. 

The Canadians would like relief from US tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as softwood lumber, which the US says receives unfair government subsidies. 

Trump’s approach to dealing with Canada marks an extraordinary departure from the traditionally cooperative relationship between the two countries. 

He has hit Canadian goods with tariffs — in a push to bring manufacturing back to the US — and has repeatedly made inflammatory comments about turning Canada into America’s 51st state.

The Canadian public has responded in kind. 

A petition to expel the US ambassador, a Trump ally, has collected nearly 218,000 signatures since July 21. It accuses Ambassador Pete Hoekstra of having ‘normalized’ Trump’s talk of annexing Canada, among other complaints.

Trump has made tariffs the centerpiece of his second-term economic agenda. Last year, he imposed double-digit import taxes on almost every country, justifying them by declaring the longstanding US trade deficit a national emergency. 

The Supreme Court in February ruled that he’d overstepped his authority, striking down those tariffs and setting the stage for the federal government to pay refunds to importers.

So Trump has looked for other legal authority to impose tariffs.

To hit Canada, he reached back to the Great Depression, invoking Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to threaten 50 percent tariffs on products that account for about five percent of Canadian exports to the United States.

Nearly a century ago, with the U.S. and world economies in collapse, Congress passed the 1930 tariff law, imposing taxes on imports from around the world. 

Known as the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, named for their congressional sponsors, they are notorious among economists and historians for limiting world commerce and making the Great Depression worse.

Section 338 tariffs have never been used before.

They the president to impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on imports from countries that have discriminated against U.S. businesses. 

No investigation is required to justify the levies. Nor is there any limit on how long the tariffs can stay in place.

The US is renegotiating a North American trade pact — the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement — that Trump strong-armed America’s neighbors into accepting in his first term. 

The threat of Section 338 tariffs gives the United States leverage to seek fresh concessions from Ottawa.

An intriguing incident unfolded at the U.S.-Mexico border when a woman identified by federal prosecutors as a resident of Tijuana was apprehended at the checkpoint. The woman’s name, Georgina Bribiesca Chavez, became a focal point of interest after U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers discovered a cache of 69 live animals within her vehicle. Hidden inside taped-shut pillowcases, the collection included venomous vipers, caimans, and even a baby crocodile, all tucked away in a secret compartment of her Volkswagen. This discovery was made the day after her arrest, as disclosed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California.

On August 10, Chavez, at the age of 66, attempted to cross into the United States via the San Ysidro Port of Entry. Her entry was halted when she was detained following a routine questioning session in which she reportedly claimed to have nothing to declare. A subsequent records check uncovered an outstanding warrant related to a broader investigation into wildlife trafficking, adding another layer of intrigue to this unusual case.

Customs and Border Protection officials moved swiftly to confiscate the Volkswagen. Yet, the true extent of Chavez’s alleged activities was not unveiled until a thorough inspection was conducted the next morning. Officers discovered a cleverly disguised factory compartment nestled behind the car’s rear seat. Inside, they found pillowcases tied and taped shut, effectively creating a covert sanctuary for the illicit cargo she was purportedly smuggling.

Adding to the officers’ surprise, one of the pillowcases exhibited movements, hinting at the anxious, live contents concealed within.

The bags were taken to the San Diego Zoo, where workers found 60 abronia lizards, four venomous yellow-blotched palm pit vipers, three caimans, a baby crocodile and an indigo snake, according to the DOJ.

Prosecutors said Chavez never told officers about the animals, leaving them inside the vehicle for nearly 24 hours in the August heat. All three caimans died. The other animals were stable and remained in the zoo’s care as of last week.

Chavez pleaded not guilty to a federal wildlife trafficking charge and was ordered held without bond. Her alleged trafficking partner, Salvador Pelayo, 28, of Chula Vista, was arrested in July and has also pleaded not guilty.

The arrests followed an approximately 18-month undercover investigation by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, though prosecutors allege Chavez and Pelayo had trafficked wildlife together since 2023 and made tens of thousands of dollars selling exotic animals.

During one alleged undercover transaction in March 2025, Chavez delivered four protected Mexican box turtles to an agent for $2,600 cash shortly after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. All four turtles later died after being transferred to the Oakland Zoo, prosecutors said. The turtles were already in poor health when they were acquired during the undercover operation and were believed to have been wild-caught and suffering from respiratory disease, according to prosecutors.

Pelayo is separately accused of using the alias “Jose Lopez” to ship four protected Mexican and Yucatan box turtles to an undercover agent in New York.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Office of Law Enforcement is investigating the case with assistance from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Chavez and Pelayo face Lacey Act trafficking charges carrying a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

In an exciting development for downtown San Diego, a historic Wonder Bread factory is poised for a dynamic revival. Live Nation has announced its vision to transform the venerable site into a state-of-the-art music venue capable of accommodating 4,000 people.

The entertainment giant revealed its ambitious blueprint to revitalize the century-old structure, located near Petco Park. The project’s goal is to infuse the industrial landmark with modern energy, turning it into a stylish destination for music lovers.

Scheduled to open in 2028, this adaptive reuse initiative seeks to address a significant gap in San Diego’s music scene. By providing a mid-sized venue, it will cater to tour sizes that sit comfortably between intimate clubs and expansive arenas, thereby attracting a wider array of artists.

“The absence of a venue this size has been evident, and this project will not only help draw a diverse lineup of touring artists but also boost the number of shows in the area,” remarked John Schalk, Vice President of the San Diego Market at Live Nation. “This will contribute significantly to the vibrant growth and buzz of downtown.”

Rather than demolishing the historic site, Live Nation plans to restore the building’s original brick exterior, which has long been concealed under layers of concrete. In collaboration with Gensler, their in-house Blueprint Studio aims to seamlessly blend the building’s historic charm with cutting-edge acoustics, optimized sightlines, and advanced production facilities, along with enhanced backstage amenities.

The building dates back to the late 1800’s and grew over the years into four interconnected structures before becomes associated with the Wonder Bread brand.

Live Nation reportedly shelled out $16.8 million for the property. The building’s longtime owners said they backed the vision because it offered a way to keep the old landmark standing while giving it an entirely new life.

Once the doors swing open, the old bread factory won’t just host concerts, but will also be a place for private, corporate and community events. An analysis by Oxford Economics for the project estimates the venue could generate roughly $97 million in annual economic impact, have some 316,000 fans a year and back 660 jobs. The project is also expected to bring in $12.6 million in state a local tax revenue.

This is where the true performances begin.

In the wake of another young celebrity’s tragic passing, the reaction from her well-known contemporaries has been a dramatic display of shock and sorrow.

Spare me.

Hayden Panettiere’s recent press tour, meant to promote her memoir three months ago, was telling to any attentive observer. Her demeanor was off, raising clear red flags about her well-being.

Nevertheless, as she engaged with Gayle King, conversed with the panel on The View, and was interviewed by the motivational personality Jay Shetty, the collective pretense was that nothing was amiss with Panettiere.

She spoke in a low monotone, as if she were utterly detached from life itself. She slurred her words. Her eyes were glassy. She looked and sounded profoundly depressed and under the influence – and this was a woman with an open history of drug and alcohol abuse, which she wrote about in This is Me: A Reckoning.

One passage concerned her struggling through postpartum depression while trying to get to work on her network drama Nashville.

‘I rolled over and wiped my eyes, and a dull pain seized my head,’ Panettiere wrote. ‘My stomach turned over, and I sat up, feeling the room start to spin. Oh my God, I need a drink, I thought. If I get a drink now, I can get out of bed and make it to work. It’s 6am, I thought, and I’m trying to get buzzed. The first thing I’d thought of when I woke up was alcohol. I needed a drink to function — at 6am. If I didn’t get some help as soon as possible, I was screwed.’

To suspect that Panettiere may have been using again strikes me as a logical thought. Did anyone say anything in the moment?

It seems not.

King interviewed Panettiere on CBS Mornings on May 18 and asked how she was feeling as she launched her book tour.

Hayden, visibly struggling to enunciate and keep her eyes open:

‘Honestly, I’m always nervous, but this time I’m the rawest version of myself that I’ve ever been.’

That’s one way to put it.

‘I’m not walking out, you know, promoting a project or a character that I played or able to hide behind anything.’

King played along during this lengthy interview. But on Monday, as the news of Panettiere’s death at age 36 dominated the cycle, King had new insight to share.

The real story. Not the fake one she helped promote back in May.

‘It was hard when she was here that day,’ King said on air. ‘When she was here in the studio… and I was talking to her off-camera, she was saying she felt that she was in a good place. But she was still, clearly still, struggling’.

Of course she was. We all saw it.

Just as we all see Ariana Grande in her new music video looking skeletal.

Her rib cage is protruding through her skin. Somehow, her record company and management thought it advisable to release said video, only for the public to express revulsion and horror.

In the immediate aftermath, her representative issued a flowery statement to People magazine saying that ‘Ariana will be taking a step back from visibility’ – after she completes her Eternal Sunshine tour, currently in London.

After she completes the tour. Money is still to be made, it seems.

If Rod Stewart can cancel his tour over health issues, as he has just done, so can Ariana Grande.

But this is the entertainment industry’s sick ecosystem, propped up by the likes of celebrity-friendly outlets such as People magazine.

It’s all about access. If anyone really told the truth, or dared venture to ask the obvious questions, access to celebrities would be cut off.

Remember Matthew Perry’s press tour for his memoir in late 2022, which was all about how he got clean and sober?

We learned, after his death, that Perry had been an active addict the entire time – which we all knew, because he was slurring his words and was barely able to sit up straight in every TV interview he did.

Not that a single reporter, including the esteemed Diane Sawyer, asked Perry about any of that.

So Jenna Ortega, 23, gives an interview to Esquire in which she says that as a child actor, age nine, she was so afraid to be considered problematic – clearly, so desperate to make it in the industry – that ‘I wasn’t asking for a sip of water. I would go all day without eating, drinking, whatever, because I wanted so badly to not be in the way of anybody.’

How was no one looking out for that little girl? Where were her parents? What about an on-set guardian?

Instead, Ortega – who, like Grande, now seems dangerously thin – blames herself.

‘Maybe that was my mistake,’ Ortega says. ‘Not actually looking after myself.’

She was a child.

Former Nickelodeon child star Jennette McCurdy, who came up at the network alongside Grande, wrote of the alleged abuse she suffered as a child star – and Panettiere was one as well, starting work at 11 months old – in her bestselling memoir I’m Glad My Mom Died.

‘No child is psychologically, emotionally, mentally equipped for the obstacles of child stardom,’ McCurdy told Canada’s CBC in 2022. ‘Even if they have the greatest support system around them.’

Panettiere, who was publicly estranged from her stage mom and was with her abusive boyfriend, Brian Hickerson, at the time of her death, clearly did not have a support system.

Her celebrity peers, however, would like to take this moment to remind everyone that they’re still here – and maybe even attempt a little reputational rehab.

Blake Lively, fresh from attempting to destroy Justin Baldoni’s career: ‘Be. Kind. You never know what others are going through.’

Is she for real?

Actress Connie Britton, whose relationship with Panettiere on the set of Nashville was ‘deeply complicated’ according to the late star’s memoir – because, Panettiere suggested, her character was more popular with the audience than Britton’s – wrote this on Instagram:

‘Bursting with brilliance, shining so bright. I have no words for this sad song. Just heartbreak. I love you girl. Sleep easy now.’

Perhaps nothing can top Selma Blair’s tasteless post:

‘Don’t be gone… I’m dying.’

Even in literal death, Panettiere suffers competition for the spotlight. She may be dead but Blair is dying.

If only the industry told the truth about what that spotlight costs. Assuredly, no one in their right mind would want it.

Prosecutors in Utah are advocating vigorously to ensure Tyler Robinson stands trial for every charge linked to Charlie Kirk’s murder. They argue that the amassed evidence compellingly points toward Robinson’s guilt, countering the defense’s attempts to eliminate the death penalty as a feasible outcome.

This Tuesday, in a detailed 19-page response, the prosecution addressed the defense’s request. They appealed to Judge Tony Graf to dismiss the defense’s plea to discard the aggravating factor that might lead to Robinson facing capital punishment.

The defense team challenged the prosecution by claiming that they failed to prove the shooting posed a significant risk of death to anyone beyond Charlie Kirk.

Prosecutors said the evidence shows otherwise, arguing Robinson allegedly fired his grandfather’s high-powered rifle toward a crowd of thousands, with several people in the line of fire or close to Kirk.

They rejected the defense’s argument that the bullet traveled above the crowd, saying people near Kirk were still within the “zone of danger” created when Robinson allegedly fired the rifle.

“The evidence here easily establishes at least probable cause” that Robinson knowingly created a great risk of death to others, prosecutors wrote. They said the evidence is “more than sufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The state also took aim at the defense’s broader challenge to the evidence presented during Robinson’s preliminary hearing.

“Defendant does not challenge the substance of the evidence demonstrating that he was the person who crawled to the sniper’s perch on the Losee Building rooftop, fired the fatal shot that killed Mr. Charlie Kirk, hid the rifle in a wooded area, got rid of some of the clothing he was wearing, and told his roommate to delete their texts about the shooting,” prosecutors wrote.

Prosecutors also accused Robinson’s attorneys of relying on case law that was later rejected by the Utah Supreme Court while failing to alert the judge to those later decisions.

“This blatant omission violates counsel’s duty of candor to the court,” prosecutors wrote.

The filing also defends a witness-tampering charge involving Robinson’s roommate and an allegation that Robinson committed a violent offense in the presence of a child.

Prosecutors also argue there is evidence Kirk was targeted because of his political expression, pointing in part to a cartridge engraved with the words “Hey fascist, catch.”

Robinson, 23, is accused of fatally shooting Kirk, 31, as he spoke at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025. Robinson has not entered a plea.

Graf is expected to decide at a Sept. 1 hearing whether prosecutors have shown enough probable cause to send the case to trial.

Outside the federal courthouse in Oakland, parents stood clutching pictures of their children as Meta faced a pivotal trial, accused of intentionally getting kids addicted to their social media platforms.

Inside the court, emotions ran high with the commencement of opening statements. A coalition of 29 states, spearheaded by California, has charged Meta with designing Facebook and Instagram to captivate young audiences while obscuring the potential dangers of these platforms.

Amid a sea of worried parents, a large white sign carried the names of nearly 600 children reportedly harmed by social media’s grip, including young Giovanni, aged 11, and Bubba, aged 13, according to a report by the Associated Press.

Among those present was Mary Rodee, whose heart still aches following the tragic suicide of her 15-year-old son, Riley Basford, in 2021—an event connected to a predator exploiting Facebook.

“They label it as spontaneous suicide,” Rodee explained to Reuters. “I see it as a foreseeable consequence of a system that prioritizes corporation security over the well-being of our children.”

The mother of 14-year-old Alexander Neville was also at the courthouse. Her son died from fentanyl after she said he was tricked by a drug dealer on Snapchat.

“We want Meta, in short, to stop hurting our kids, stop knowingly hurting our kids, stop using features that you know create mental health harms to kids,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta told NPR.

Inside the courtroom, California Deputy Attorney General Megan O’Neill told the eight-person jury that Meta’s business model was to “hook the users, hold them for as long as they can, harvest their data, and then hide the truth from the ⁠public.”

“It worked especially well for kids,” O’Neill added. “Meta needed kids, and it needed to reassure the people who cared about those kids that the kids are safe.”

Meta pushed back hard, arguing there is no clear evidence that social media use causes poor well-being among adolescents.

Meta attorney Paul Schmidt said there was “no dispute” that some users struggle with social media, but argued the company does not believe its products are dangerous.

“They don’t believe they’re going to do well if people don’t like their service,” Schmidt said.

The case could have massive consequences for Meta, with the company warning that penalties could reach as high as $1.4 trillion if it loses.

The states are also seeking sweeping changes to Facebook and Instagram, including eliminating likes and infinite scrolling, imposing time limits on younger users and enforcing restrictions designed to keep children under 13 off the platforms.

Former Meta safety engineer Arturo Bejar, the states’ first witness, testified that “move fast and break things” was a mantra at the company and that safety was sometimes an afterthought.

“Many products were shipped into the world,” including Reels, “and safety was not a consideration in how it was initially deployed,” Bejar said.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram chief Adam Mosseri are expected to testify during the trial, which is scheduled to last six weeks.