A senior official from the United Nations is once again at the center of controversy for allegedly maligning Israel. This incident occurred after the official shared a social media post originally authored by an individual currently facing charges of incitement to terrorism and showing support for Hamas.

On June 18, U.N. Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict Vanessa Frazier reposted an image of three small objects which the original poster, Sarah Wilkinson, claimed were cluster munitions “disguised as children’s toys” that Israelis had been “strategically dropping” over Lebanon. In her own post, Frazier stated, “If this is true it means that there is a deliberate, premeditated intent to kill children.”

Frazier, who has over 10,000 followers on X, has since deleted the post, but a screenshot of the original was provided to News Media.

When asked whether United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres supported Frazier’s decision to share the contentious post, his spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, informed News Media that “the retweet was removed some time ago and, as you are aware, a retweet does not mean endorsement of the original poster’s views.”

Andrew Fox, a senior fellow with the Henry Jackson Society, expressed to News Media that it is “absurd for a U.N. official to be so naive.”

Fox, a former officer in the British army who has expertise in Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) strategies, remarked that it is “quite significant that a U.N. official would hurry to propagate the age-old, antisemitic falsehood that Jews kill children. This reflects the harmful atmosphere built over nearly three years of deceit surrounding Israel. Any claim against the Jewish state, regardless of its implausibility, is instantly believed. This further erodes the credibility and reputation of the U.N. special representative.”

An IDF spokesman told News Media that the “allegation is baseless and unfounded. It is fake news, and we categorically reject it.”

The original poster of the cluster munitions accusation was arrested in the United Kingdom on terror charges in 2024, according to the World Socialist Web Site. The site, as well as Al Mayadeen English — Hezbollah’s media arm — link Wilkinson to the social media profile on X that shared the post Frazier elevated.

The BBC reported last week that Wilkinson will face trial in January on “two counts of encouragement of terrorism on social media, two counts of expressing an opinion or belief that was supportive of a proscribed organization, namely Hamas; and one of failing to comply with a police investigation.”

Though Wilkinson discussed her arrests and subsequent charges on her X account, she did not respond to News Media’s messages asking for comment about the charges she currently faces.

In response to questions about her removal of the X post and concerns about its original source, Frazier said that “regarding specific tweets, I understand why some of my social media activities have generated questions. Where concerns arose regarding posts, I took appropriate action. Nonetheless, the intended message is to emphasize the alarm of the Secretary-General in his Annual Report regarding the use of explosive weapons in populated areas in Lebanon, a matter that raises serious humanitarian concerns due to their long-lasting impact on civilians.”

Frazier said, “Ultimately, my mandate is not carried out through social media. It is carried out through the United Nations’ established monitoring and verification methodology, which applies the same standards to all parties to conflict.”

In March, JNS reported that Frazier posted that she was “deeply alarmed by reports of attacks on Iranian schools leaving a large number of casualties, mostly children.” A photograph accompanying the post showed numerous black body bags. When it became clear that the photo depicted victims of the Iranian regime’s crackdown on protesters, Frazier removed the post. She then created a new post with a similar sentiment featuring an updated picture.

On June 24, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon sent a letter to the U.N. Security Council president raising Israel’s “grave concerns regarding conduct that appears inconsistent with the neutrality, professionalism, and impartiality expected of a senior United Nations official.”

In his letter, a copy of which was provided to News Media, Danon said Frazier’s social media behavior suggests “a troubling pattern of engagement with unverified, disputed, or misleading material, alongside content raising concerns about antisemitic framing and extremist rhetoric.”

Danon also raised concerns about Frazier’s “abrupt interruption of [his] remarks during a United Nations side event,” which he said was “in disregard of basic procedural norms and the respect owed to Member States.”

Reuters called this exchange between Danon and Frazier “a furious shouting match.”

Frazier told News Media that her “intervention was procedural, not political. Its purpose was to help ensure that the discussion remained consistent with the standards expected in a United Nations forum,” where discussions “are expected to be conducted in accordance with established procedures and with respect for the dignity of participants and officials.”

The June 17 release of the Secretary-General’s Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict has also raised concerns.

Anne Bayefsky, president of Human Rights Voices and director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust, told News Media that the allegations in the report were “wild, dangerous blood libels divorced from reality.”

Bayefsky blasted the U.N.’s use of the term “verified” when describing allegations, despite a lack of description of how and through what sources those supposed verifications occurred.

She said, “It is important to recognize the direct connection between the ancient antisemitic blood libels accusing evil Jews of murdering non-Jewish children and the U.N. actors who repeat the same ugly falsehoods today. History teaches us just how dangerous these depraved lies are for Jews wherever they live.”

Frazier defended the report, saying it was “the product of a rigorous United Nations (U.N.) monitoring and verification process and reflects information reviewed at multiple levels of the U.N. system.” She said that “suggesting that the report is based on falsehoods does a disservice to all child victims, including Israeli children whose suffering is also documented in the report.”

Frazier also maintained she has “no bias against the State of Israel or against any Member States of the United Nations, and reject[s] the characterization,” saying that “as a U.N. official, accuracy, impartiality, and credibility are fundamental to my work.”

When asked by News Media if Guterres would examine Frazier’s tenure, Dujarric responded that “the Secretary-General has full confidence in Vanessa Frazier and her work.”

He defended Frazier, saying she “has not ‘vilified’ and is not ‘vilifying’ the State of Israel, or any other country for that matter. Her focus is not on any one single country but on the protection of children throughout the world. Under the mandate the Security Council has given her, she does not ‘blacklist’ Member States or other parties. The report exists to find ways to get all of the parties listed to improve their behavior, so that children can be protected in concrete ways. She has been effective in doing just that.” 

Danon said that “it comes as no surprise that Secretary-General Guterres expresses full confidence in Ms. Frazier.” He said Frazier’s report “is a symptom of [Guterres’] tenure. Under his leadership, the United Nations has repeatedly failed to uphold the standards of impartiality it claims to represent.”