Share and Follow
The 2026 midterm elections are fast approaching, and the Democratic Party seems to be struggling with a persistent issue: understanding why it lost the support of working-class voters in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and across the Rust Belt to Donald Trump, not once but twice. Instead of addressing this challenge, the party’s activist base has intensified its focus on ideological purity, imposing more litmus tests and vehemently opposing anything linked to Trump. Meanwhile, the party’s most vocal members seem preoccupied with scrutinizing their peers.
Amid this turmoil, Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has stepped forward—not to abandon the Democratic Party, but to offer a candid critique through a Thursday op-ed on what he believes is fundamentally wrong with it. In his piece, Fetterman provides one of the most straightforward assessments of the Democratic Party’s current political trajectory.
Fetterman’s article, titled “I haven’t changed. Here’s what has,” reads less as a call for party unity and more as a farewell to a version of the Democratic Party that seems to have vanished. He argues that his current stances—such as advocating for border security, fiscal responsibility, and strong support for Israel—were once core Democratic values. The party has shifted, he maintains, while his principles have remained constant. As a result, he has faced public criticism, calls for his resignation, and protests outside his Braddock home.
The facts support Fetterman’s case.
Regarding immigration, Fetterman took the lead among Democrats on the Laken Riley Act, named after a Georgia nursing student who was tragically killed by an illegal immigrant. He also supported a bipartisan border reform bill in 2024. Furthermore, when his party considered using government shutdowns as a political tool against the Trump administration, potentially leaving TSA agents and other federal workers without pay, Fetterman voted to keep the government running.
The receipts back him up.
On immigration, he was the lead Democrat on the Laken Riley Act, named for a Georgia nursing student killed by an illegal immigrant, and voted for a bipartisan border reform bill in 2024. When his party wanted to weaponize government shutdown deadlines against the Trump administration, leaving TSA agents and federal workers without pay, Fetterman voted to keep the lights on.
“The demand to keep the lights on weighed more heavily than partisan games,” he wrote.
On foreign policy, he’s backed Israel throughout its war against Hamas terrorists and praised the Trump administration’s posture toward Iran. Every one of these positions, he noted, was once considered unremarkable for a Democrat.
“These once-common views have become increasingly toxic in the Democratic Party, a result of catering to the fringe and agitated parts of our base.”
The left’s response has proven his point.
Democrat National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta, a Philadelphia state representative, called Fetterman “a mess” on social media after the senator suggested Democrats had Trump Derangement Syndrome for opposing the White House’s ballroom construction.
The Monroe County (PA) Democrat Party labeled him a “traitor” and demanded he be voted out after he declined to rule out supporting Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) for a cabinet position in the Trump administration. Cumberland County’s (PA) Democrat Party chair called for his resignation in 2025 after he backed some of Trump’s cabinet nominees.
Fetterman’s response to all of it? He’s staying put.
“Plus, I’d be a terrible Republican who still votes overwhelmingly with Democrats.”
He’s still pro-choice, pro-labor, pro-LGBT, pro-SNAP. He’s not a Republican. He says so himself, and the voting record supports it.
But Republicans would take him anyway.
Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA) said this week he’d “welcome him” and called their working relationship one “of real trust.” Pennsylvania GOP Chairman Greg Rothman said he wouldn’t rule out backing Fetterman in 2028 if he switched parties.
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D), by contrast, offered a noticeably stiff response, telling reporters that Fetterman needs to “reflect the will of the people.” Which is a remarkable thing to say about a senator whose party just called him a traitor for keeping the government funded and standing with a U.S. ally.
Fetterman says he’s staying. Fine. But the larger question his op-ed raises isn’t about him, it’s about whether the Democrat Party is even capable of the self-correction it needs before 2026.
If a senator who supports border enforcement, keeps the government open, and backs a U.S. ally gets called a traitor by his own party apparatus, what exactly is the Democrat pitch to the working-class voters they’ve been hemorrhaging for a decade?
Fetterman has an answer. His party, so far, does not. And until it does, Democrats will keep losing the voters they need, while one of their own senators puts their failures in writing for the whole country to read.
Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress.
Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.