Share and Follow
In an effort to tackle the ongoing issue of streetlight repairs in Los Angeles, two city council members proposed an additional funding of over a million dollars on Friday. This initiative comes as the city spends more than $20 million annually on streetlight maintenance, yet many neighborhoods remain in the dark.
The proposals were put forth at City Hall by Nithya Raman, a councilwoman and mayoral candidate, along with councilmember Bob Blumenfield. They are specifically addressing the rampant theft of copper wires, which has severely compromised the city’s lighting infrastructure and contributed to a backlog of non-functioning streetlights.
Blumenfield’s proposal suggests reallocating $787,000 to the city’s street lighting budget. Of this amount, $472,200 is designated for labor costs, $236,000 is allocated for supplies, and an additional $78,700 is set aside for materials needed for repairs and system upgrades.
A substantial portion of these funds will be directed toward staffing and overtime expenses.
Blumenfield’s district, located in the San Fernando Valley, has been particularly affected by the thefts, necessitating repeated visits by repair crews to the same streetlight poles.
Raman’s motion follows a similar pattern. She is asking to move $380,000 into streetlight repairs in her district, with $324,000 of that total set aside for overtime costs alone.
Copper wire theft now racks up more than $20 million annually in repair costs, according to city figures.
At the same time, City Hall is asking residents to help foot the bill.
Ballots have started landing in mailboxes across Los Angeles, asking roughly 600,000 property owners to approve higher fees to fund a massive streetlight overhaul.
The proposal would boost the city’s lighting budget from about $45 million to $125 million a year to repair and replace roughly 200,000 streetlights.
The pitch from leaders, including Karen Bass, is that the system is overdue for a full rebuild.
But the timing is colliding with frustration from residents who are being asked to pay more while watching the same lights fail repeatedly.
What makes the latest motions more contentious is that a cheaper fix is already on the table.
A private company, End Metal Theft, has been pushing a hardened locking cover that bolts over the access point where thieves reach the copper wiring.
The idea is simple: make the pole harder, louder and riskier to break into so thieves move on. The cost is about $300 per pole.
Mark James, a spokesman for the company, put it bluntly: “The most cost-effective theft deterrent isn’t replacing what thieves are after, it’s making it not worth their time to try.”
The company says the concept has worked elsewhere. In nearby cities, theft reportedly stopped after locking covers were installed, only to shift to unprotected areas. The pattern is straightforward: thieves target the easiest poles.
Los Angeles has seen the opposite dynamic play out on a massive scale.
The city has leaned toward replacing traditional poles with solar street lights that eliminate copper wiring altogether, but come with a price tag between $3,000 and $6,000 per unit, plus ongoing maintenance and battery replacement costs.
Both motions must now be formally filed and scheduled for a vote at City Hall. That date has not yet been set.