Home Blog Page 122

Ex-SAS Commander Fat-Shames Guards in Burnham-Zelensky Photo

0

A former SAS commander has sparked controversy by comparing Irish Guardsmen assembled outside Downing Street to “unarmed Teletubbies”.

Eleven soldiers in scarlet tunics and traditional black bearskin hats formed a guard of honour on Wednesday as Prime Minister Andy Burnham welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Retired Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams said the photograph represented “a picture of decline”, describing the Guards as “pseudo soldiers used as decorations” in “ill-fitting playground uniforms”.

In a scathing post on X, in which he called the image “awful”, Williams wrote: “The very opposite of martial excellence and so far from the hard steel and war-won standards of the past.

“No wonder IRGC [Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] finds it easy to roam free around the UK…”

In a second post, Williams, who commanded 22 SAS, compared the modern photograph with an image of the late Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother inspecting the Irish Guards at Old Chelsea Barracks on St Patrick’s Day in 1928.

A former SAS commander has accused Irish Guards of looking like 'unarmed Teletubbies' as they lined up outside Downing Street on Wednesday

A former SAS commander accused the Irish Guards of looking like “unarmed Teletubbies” as they stood outside Downing Street on Wednesday

Eleven soldiers, wearing traditional scarlet red tunics and black bearskin hats, formed a guard of honour as the Prime Minister welcomed President Zelensky

Eleven soldiers in scarlet tunics and black bearskin hats formed a guard of honour for Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s welcome to President Zelensky

Former SAS commander Richard Williams launched a scathing attack on the physical condition of the soldiers

Former SAS commander Richard Williams launched a scathing criticism of the soldiers’ physical condition

He accompanied the historical photograph with a brief caption: “The way it was…”

Irish Guards commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel Ben Irwin-Clark responded forcefully to the criticism. Speaking to The Sun, he said: “Those of you writing negative comments about the regiment need to give your heads a wobble.”

The dispute comes as the head of the Army warned that Britain must be prepared to make sacrifices to protect the country.

Earlier this week, General Sir “Roly” Walker, the Chief of the General Staff, said the UK’s response to emerging threats would be outlined in a “frank discussion” between political leaders and the public.

Sir Roly was speaking to 700 newly qualified troops at Catterick Garrison in North Yorkshire when he offered a rare insight into preparations for the possibility of direct conflict.

He praised the recruits and urged people across the UK to understand what may be required to ensure Britain is ready for such an eventuality.

“You didn’t know this but our nation is going to need you,” he said. “There was a time when our nation did not want to think of a time when it would need its soldiers to fight in a war.

“Indeed, very soon, the political leaders of this country will start to have a frank conversation with the citizens of this country about just what is going on and where the risk lies.

“They are going to try and explain to our citizens that our citizens have got to consent to sacrifices to prioritise defence and security.

“And then they are going to ask those citizens, to whom we are not necessarily at the front of their mind, that they too need to play a part in the defence and security of this country.”

Richard Williams, who led 22 SAS, launched a scathing attack on X and called the Irish Guards the 'very opposite of martial excellence'

Richard Williams, who commanded 22 SAS, criticised the Irish Guards on X and described them as the “very opposite of martial excellence”

Williams compared today's ranks with a photograph of the late Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother inspecting the Irish Guards at the Old Chelsea Barracks on St Patrick's Day 1928

Williams compared today’s ranks with a photograph of the late Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother inspecting the Irish Guards at the Old Chelsea Barracks on St Patrick’s Day 1928

Join the discussion

What do you make of the row over the Irish Guards’ appearance during President Zelensky’s Downing Street visit?

His intervention came as Labour is expected to continue investing 2.7 per cent of GDP for the remainder of the decade into the armed forces – despite calls for spending to reach 3.0 per cent by 2030.

The UK has until 2035 to meet the Nato defence spending benchmark of 3.5 per cent – which will require additional funding of around £25billion per year.

The Daily Mail has led calls for the armed forces to receive a spending boost as part of the paper’s Don’t Leave Britain Defenceless campaign.

Wes Streeting also vowed in July that he would follow his predecessor, John Healey, and quit as Defence Secretary if Labour does not increase military spending ‘as a matter of principle’. 

Malibu Wildfire Alerts Renew Debate Over Deadly Evacuation Failures

0

After years of deadly failures to alert residents about approaching wildfires, Los Angeles County officials have shifted sharply from silence to issuing warnings at every turn.

As the Bryson Fire ripped through the Malibu hills Thursday, emergency notifications lit up cellphones, evacuation warnings sent residents rushing to safety and traffic backed up along narrow canyon roads.

Some wildfire survivors praised the forceful response. Others questioned whether officials had moved from providing too little information to issuing too much.

The fire began at about 4:41 p.m. Thursday near Encinal Canyon Road on Malibu’s western edge. By Friday, the blaze had burned 146 acres as more than 414 emergency personnel worked to contain it. Containment stood at only 17%.

Mandatory evacuation orders covered two zones, while residents in 12 additional areas were under evacuation warnings.

The barrage of notifications represented a striking change from earlier wildfire disasters, when residents were often left searching for information as flames advanced toward their homes.

In 2018, the Woolsey Fire swept through the same mountain region, destroying more than 1,600 structures and killing three people.

Some residents first learned of the threat through frantic phone calls from neighbors. Others did not understand the danger until smoke became visible or filled the air.

A subsequent county review revealed major shortcomings in the emergency response. Officials, it found, lacked a clear and coordinated evacuation plan and failed to activate every warning system available to them.

Seven years later, when the Palisades and Eaton fires broke out in January 2025, another review concluded that emergency alerts had once again been delayed and confusing.

That same week, the county’s warning system made a dramatic error: An evacuation warning meant for Calabasas and Agoura Hills was mistakenly sent to nearly 10 million phones across the county.

Now, as another wildfire threatens the region, officials appear determined to avoid being caught unprepared. Yet the torrent of alerts has created a new dilemma: when does necessary warning become too much?

For Meg Gallagher, who nearly lost her home during the Woolsey Fire, the contrast is unmistakable.

When flames pushed toward her property in Cornell, a rural community in the hills above Malibu, no one called her. No one came to her door.

Her first warning came from her son’s school, which called to say it was closing because of smoke. By 7 a.m., she was hurriedly packing her car when firefighters driving along Mulholland Highway noticed she was still there.

“They were shocked that I was still here,” Gallagher told The Post.

The fire partially destroyed her home and damaged several properties nearby.

“An F for the Woolsey Fire, and I think a lot of people in this area would feel the same way,” she told The Post.

This week, however, Gallagher gave county officials a far better assessment.

“I would give them a B+ this time around, because ample notice, days in advance, notice of that day, so people really had time to prepare,” she said.

Gallagher used the extra time to charge her generator, replace flashlight batteries and prop open her electric gate in case the power went out.

With four dogs and chickens to evacuate, every extra hour mattered.

But not everyone believes the county has found the right balance.

Gina Marcione, owner of The Blue Table restaurant in Agoura Hills, lost her home at Malibou Lake during the Woolsey Fire.

Back then, she relied on frantic calls from neighbors, text chains and social media posts to figure out what was happening.

“There was no text or warnings,” Marcione told The Post. “There was really no PulsePoint back then or like a fire alert app that we all have now.”

She fled around 2 a.m. and spent the night at her restaurant, alongside birds and chickens her neighbors had rescued from the flames.

Today, she can track nearby fires on her phone, a technological leap she welcomes.

“I’m happy that we do have the PulsePoint and all these other apps,” she said.

But Marcione worries that repeated alerts could send too many residents fleeing at once, overwhelming narrow canyon roads already squeezed by construction.

“They need to get their communication a little bit better aligned,” she said.

Images posted on social media Thursday night showed bumper-to-bumper traffic out of the canyons as residents headed toward safety.

Yet just miles away, other residents weren’t going anywhere.

When The Post knocked on doors near the fire, a woman living directly across from the blaze shrugged off the danger, despite the warnings.

“We’re used to it,” she told The Post.

At Agoura High School, the county’s designated evacuation center, not a single evacuee was present when The Post stopped by.

Workers reported that some residents had come and gone, apparently waiting to see whether conditions would get worse.

That wait-and-see attitude was exactly what emergency officials warned against Friday.

“If someone comes to your home and says there’s an evacuation order, that means you need to leave now because there is an immediate threat to your life,” LA County Sheriff Robert Luna said at a morning news conference.

LA County Fire Chief Anthony Marrone warned that Santa Ana winds, low humidity and bone-dry brush would keep fire danger elevated through Saturday night.


Pope Leo Leaves Hospital After Lung Cancer Surgery, Angelus Set

0

VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo’s surgeon said Saturday that there were “no clinical reasons” to cancel the pontiff’s planned Latin America tour, scheduled for Nov. 6-17.

Dr. Stefano Margaritora told Vatican media that the pope had devoted himself fully to his recovery and was expected to make a complete recovery within roughly 10 more days.

“Considering a long journey that includes air travel in approximately three weeks, I see no clinical reason it should not go ahead,” Margaritora told Vatican News.

The remarks came soon after Leo returned to the Vatican, four days after Margaritora surgically removed the lower lobe of the pope’s right lung, where doctors had found a cancerous nodule.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back for updates. AP’s earlier story follows below.

Pope Leo left Rome’s Gemelli hospital and returned to the Vatican on Saturday, just four days after undergoing lung cancer surgery. Dozens of supporters gathered outside the hospital, calling out “Holiness” as he departed.

Asked about his condition as he was driven away in a black SUV, Leo replied, “I am much better, thank you.”

The 71-year-old pope greeted patients inside the hospital with Margaritora before walking to his vehicle and waving to the crowd outside.

His departure was briefly interrupted by a 13-year-old Ukrainian girl, who gave him a handmade papal doll. She said the doll had supported her during successful cancer treatment. The girl had met Leo briefly at an audience in St. Peter’s Square last December, an encounter she said gave her the strength to overcome her illness.

About 10 minutes after leaving the hospital, Leo passed through the Vatican gates. He is expected to resume limited duties Sunday by delivering the traditional Angelus blessing to the faithful, one week after openly telling a crowd in St. Peter’s Square that doctors had discovered a lung nodule — an unusually personal announcement from a pope.

Surgeons removed the lower lobe of Leo’s right lung Tuesday. The procedure confirmed that he had adenocarcinoma, the most frequently diagnosed form of lung cancer.

The pope has continued to show encouraging signs of recovery. While hospitalized, he spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin, met with senior aides and celebrated Mass in a temporary chapel.

Updates from Leo’s personal doctor and surgeon described his postoperative progress as positive, noting that he was able to perform his “normal daily activities completely on his own.”

On Friday, the Vatican released the first photographs of Leo since the operation. The images showed him wearing green vestments and standing at an altar in the hospital chapel. Doctors said medical tests showed his condition was continuing to improve.

Leo led the liturgy by himself and gave Communion to hospital workers and Vatican gendarmes, spokesman Matteo Bruni said. In his homily, the pope expressed gratitude to medical staff for caring for vulnerable patients every day and for the treatment they had provided to him.

The Vatican had originally anticipated that Leo would remain hospitalized for about a week and canceled his audiences through Tuesday. Medical specialists said an earlier discharge could be possible if his recovery progressed well, while Bruni emphasized that the final decision belonged to the pope’s doctors.

Signs that the trip preparations were continuing emerged Friday, when the Vatican published the list of journalists accredited to fly with Leo. Oncology surgeons generally consider patients fit to travel by air after about three weeks, depending on their recovery.

Doctors are still waiting for laboratory results that will reveal the tumor’s exact molecular and genetic characteristics, whether the cancer has moved beyond the removed lung lobe and whether Leo will require additional treatment.

Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

France Protests Turn Violent as Macron Warns Unrest Is Exploited

0

Violent confrontations erupted across France on Saturday as demonstrations entered their fourth week. Earlier in the week, President Emmanuel Macron delivered some of his strongest remarks yet on the unrest, which comes during the final six months of his presidency.

At the weekly cabinet meeting, Macron “stressed that young people have legitimate concerns,” government spokeswoman Maud Bregeon told the AFP, “but these are being exploited for political purposes and turned into urban violence.” Bregeon said Macron had instructed ministers to develop “concrete responses” to the unrest within weeks.

The latest violence followed a national day of action over the rising cost of living and additional student concerns. Although many demonstrations remained peaceful, police deployed tear gas and water cannons against violent groups in Paris. At Place de la République, hooded and masked demonstrators threw fireworks and other objects at officers. The Interior Ministry reported attacks on police, looting and damage to public buildings, with at least 272 arrests nationwide.

Policeman confronts rioters in Paris

A protester confronts French riot police during clashes at Place de la République in Paris. The demonstration, organized by the “Yellow Vests” movement, brought together high school and university students, teachers, parents, labor unions, workers, farmers and retirees to protest the cost of living, rising fuel prices, school conditions and government policies. France, Oct. 17, 2026. (Jack Taylor/Reuters)

Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu took a harder line than Macron, accusing the student movement of being “instrumentalized by the allies of France Unbowed (LFI)… for electoral reasons.” Jean-Luc Mélenchon, LFI’s presidential candidate, joined a Paris demonstration this week, while the party’s councilors, lawmakers and mayors have participated in student blockades in several cities.

The elections to replace term-limited Macron are scheduled for April and May, giving opposition parties an opportunity to capitalize on the unrest. Marine Le Pen, the leading candidate from the conservative National Rally party, has expressed support for police and blamed students for the violence.

Paris protests

Firefighters work to extinguish a burning emergency vehicle during student protests in Paris. (Reuters)

At the same time, students, labor unions, rights organizations and parents have accused police of using excessive force against demonstrators.

The Interior Ministry has launched internal investigations into 36 allegations of police violence against protesters, according to the AFP. The national police union, Alliance Police Nationale, meanwhile, says it has sued the government for “putting lives in danger” through what it described as “contradictory orders” issued to officers deployed during the demonstrations.

French President Emmanuel Macron speaks during a visit to the Istres military air force base in southern France, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2026. (AP Photo/Philippe Magoni, Pool) (AP Photo/Philippe Magoni, Pool)

The Alliance said officers felt “betrayed, abandoned, left to fend for themselves” by political leaders because of what it called “unclear instructions” and public statements expressing “empathy towards the rioters.”

“This is the country of the French Revolution. Everyone boasts about it,” Walid Hrar, a police officer and union representative, told The Associated Press. “Some political parties don’t hesitate to say that we need to disobey the law. That’s what Robespierre and other revolutionaries taught us in 1789.”

Paris rioting

A protester throws a projectile through tear gas during clashes with French riot police at Place de la République in Paris. The demonstration was part of nationwide protests organized by the “Yellow Vests” movement and joined by students, teachers, parents, labor unions, workers, farmers and retirees. France, Oct. 17, 2026. (REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq)

“France always tends to react rather than anticipate,” he added. “In other words, we’re always going to extremes.”

Speaking on the sidelines of Friday’s European Council summit in Brussels, Macron again urged restraint. “There is a constitutional right to protest and to express oneself. But this right comes with the need to respect,” he said, calling for “respect for people, respect for property, and therefore a commitment not to insult or destroy.”

Lecornu told Parliament that 937 police officers and 149 teachers and school employees had been injured since the protests began. The French Justice Ministry said nearly 8,000 people had been arrested.

The unrest has also reached neighboring Belgium. Several hundred, mostly young, demonstrators protested in Brussels on Saturday, according to Reuters, clashing with police in actions at least partly inspired by events in France. A similar demonstration took place in the French-speaking city of Liege. Student groups there say they oppose rising education costs and reforms they fear will make higher education less accessible.

Belgian Interior Minister Bernard Quintin posted on X that what is happening in his country: “is no longer mere protest! It is pure and simple violence, organized and repeated to destabilize our society… All necessary means will be used to restore order in the face of the rioters.”

Smaller solidarity gatherings were also held in neighboring Luxembourg and the French-speaking regions of Switzerland, but those events remained peaceful and no arrests were reported. Students in India also demonstrated over education-related issues this week, although their protests do not appear to be connected to the movement in France.

French authorities hope the demonstrations will subside in the coming days, as schools across the country are closed until Nov. 2 for the Toussaint, or All Saints’, holiday.

Street Fighter (2026) Ending Explained: What Really Happened

0

Contains spoilers for “Street Fighter”

The 1994 “Street Fighter” movie holds an unusual place in video game cinema. Critics largely dismissed it, and the film still sits at a lowly 20% on Rotten Tomatoes. Yet time has been kinder to the adaptation. Many fans now embrace its outrageous energy, while Looper has even named it one of the five best live-action video game movies ever made. It also carries emotional weight as Raul Julia’s final film before his death. Viewed in the right spirit, its over-the-top performances, campy action and unmistakable ’90s style make it an entertaining oddity.

The 2026 “Street Fighter” aims to introduce the franchise to a new audience without ignoring its past. Set in 1993, the movie is packed with ’90s references and familiar songs—including 4 Non Blondes—for Gen X and Millennial viewers to recognize. Still, beneath the martial arts mayhem and nostalgic soundtrack, the finale may leave some audiences wondering what actually happened—or whether the story ended at all.

The conclusion clearly points toward another chapter, but will a sequel really happen? More importantly, what could it involve? Here’s a breakdown of the ending, its mythology and the questions the next installment would need to answer.

What you need to remember about the plot of Street Fighter

In 1987, Ryu (Andrew Koji) wins the first World Warrior Tournament, but victory comes with a terrible consequence: the sinister entity Akuma (Joe “Roman Reigns” Anoa’i) takes over his body. The spirit later kills Gouken (Don Lee), the mentor who trained both Ryu and Ken (Noah Centineo), driving the two students apart. Ryu vanishes, while Ken turns into a hard-partying companion of Dan Hibiki (Andrew Schulz), earning money largely by punching cars in sideshow exhibitions.

By 1993, dictator M. Bison (David Dastmalchian) is determined to gather enough Psycho Power to increase his already formidable strength. Believing Ryu is the key to that power, Bison organizes a second World Warrior Tournament to lure the strongest fighters into the open. Chun-Li (Callina Liang), secretly working against Bison while posing as one of his allies for Interpol, tracks down Ryu and delivers his invitation. She also tells him that Ken will compete. Later, Chun-Li abandons Interpol’s orders and sets out to kill Bison herself after learning that he murdered her father years earlier.

Ryu reaches the tournament hoping to stop Ken from taking part. He explains that Bison is after Akuma’s power, but Ken refuses to listen. After defeating E. Honda (Hirooki Goto), Ryu claims his place in the competition. A nightclub fight then erupts among several contestants, including Ken, Ryu, Guile (Cody Rhodes), Dhalsim (Vidyut Jammwal), Vega (Orville Peck) and Balrog (Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson). Bison’s soldiers overwhelm the group and capture Ryu, forcing him to forfeit his opening match.

Bison attempts to unlock Ryu’s strength by making him fight Blanka (Jason Momoa). Ryu fires a Hadouken—a powerful blast of spiritual energy—which gives Blanka a chance to escape. Ryu, however, remains Bison’s prisoner.

What happened at the end of Street Fighter?

Ken advances by defeating Balrog and Dhalsim, earning a spot in the final round. Chun-Li then reveals her true identity and explains Bison’s plans for Ryu. Ken initially dismisses the warning, still bitter that Ryu abandoned him, but his anger eventually gives way to loyalty. He breaks Ryu out of captivity, effectively ending his own run in the tournament. As a result, the overlooked Joe (Alexander Volkanovski) is declared the winner.

During their escape, Ryu admits that he has repeatedly held Ken back. A flashback explains why: Ken had also been invited to the first World Warrior Tournament, but Ryu destroyed his invitation out of jealousy. The former friends fight in the street, and Ryu ends the confrontation by striking Ken with a Hadouken.

Once the tournament concludes, Akuma appears and challenges its champion, Joe. He kills Joe with ease, leaving Ryu to face him in the true final battle. Ryu transforms into his corrupted alter ego, Dark Ryu, and defeats Akuma—but loses control of the power coursing through him. He attacks Ken, Chun-Li and Dan until Ken discovers that he can produce a Hadouken of his own. The blast breaks through to Ryu and restores him to his normal state.

The heroes arrive too late to prevent Bison from taking Akuma’s body. With Bison and his forces gone, the four fighters end up stranded by the roadside. Guile and Dhalsim eventually find them and pick them up, having now joined the effort to bring Bison down.

Is Ryu’s Dark Hado gone for good?

Ryu’s internal struggle runs through the entire movie, as he fights to contain a dangerous force inside him. That darkness fully erupts during the final confrontation with Akuma, transforming him into Evil Ryu, a familiar character from the games. This alternate form represents Ryu surrendering to the Satsui no Hado, or the Surge of Killing Intent.

Ken is the one who brings Ryu back with his own Hadouken, a manifestation of the emotional connection they share. The pair were raised as best friends and essentially brothers, a bond Gouken foreshadowed when he told Ken that he would be vital to protecting Ryu. Ken never understood that warning because Ryu seemed to be the stronger fighter. By the finale, however, the meaning is clear: Ryu’s darkness is powerful enough to defeat Akuma, but Ken is the person capable of guiding him back toward the light.

Ryu’s Dark Hado has not disappeared permanently. The power remains within him and could surface again, potentially becoming an asset—or a threat—in a future story. For now, both fighters understand that Ken can help Ryu regain control whenever the darkness becomes too powerful.

Is there a Street Fighter post-credits scene?

“Street Fighter” includes a mid-credits scene, so viewers should remain in their seats. The sequence shifts to a remote beach or jungle, where Bison and his warriors approach a scarred, eyepatch-wearing fighter. That man is Sagat, whom Ryu defeated during the opening World Warrior Tournament. Bison appears to be recruiting him for the next stage of his scheme, and Sagat’s likely resentment toward Ryu gives him a compelling reason to accept.

For viewers unfamiliar with “Street Fighter” mythology, Sagat’s appearance may seem like a minor tease. In the original “Street Fighter” video game, however, he serves as the central villain. Although the new movie gives him limited screen time, the games eventually place him alongside Bison as one of his most powerful enforcers. Sagat later becomes disgusted by Bison’s cruelty and turns toward the forces of good.

Bison is certainly dangerous in this film, but he largely operates behind the scenes while Akuma serves as the immediate primary threat. The credits scene suggests that the sequel could finally elevate Bison into the franchise’s main villain. He and Sagat may initially work together, but the larger question is whether “Street Fighter 2” will plant the seeds of Sagat’s eventual redemption. That possibility is especially significant given the 1994 film’s infamous credits tease for a sequel that never materialized. Hopefully, the new movie will not meet the same fate.

What does the ending of Street Fighter mean for the sequel?

At this stage, a sequel to the new “Street Fighter” feels almost unavoidable because the film stops before delivering a true resolution. The hope is that its unanswered questions eventually receive a follow-up instead of joining the long list of movie cliffhangers that were never resolved.

The most immediate issue is that Bison remains free. Ryu manages to overpower Akuma, but the heroes fail to capture Bison before he and his followers escape with Akuma’s body. A sequel would likely show Bison activating his plan to absorb Akuma’s power rather than targeting Ryu. The credits scene also confirms that Sagat is returning to the conflict, giving Bison an even more formidable ally as he prepares to make his next move.

There are a couple of antagonists who are kind of forgotten about by the film’s end. Chun-Li beats Vega and Juli (Rayna Vallandingham) in a fight at Bison’s compound. Will Bison go back for them, or will they work on their own to get revenge?

Much of “Street Fighter” focuses on Ken and Ryu coming back into each other’s lives, which they accomplish by the end. However, Chun-Li’s arc is still unresolved. While Interpol just wanted her to gather intel on Bison, she’s out to kill him now. Since he’s on the run, she still has a mission to do, so it’s possible that a “Street Fighter” sequel would focus more on Chun-Li and her destiny. 

What could Bison’s plan be for the sequel?

It’s clear Bison wants to absorb Akuma’s power for his own gain. But what happens after that? To make any predictions about what the possible plot of “Street Fighter 2” could be, it’s probably best to look toward the games.

Given Akuma’s prominence in this movie, it would make more sense to cast him aside so that Bison can have a chance to shine. And if the sequel takes it cues from “Street Fighter Alpha 3,” it’s possible that Bison could become subsumed with Psycho Power to the point where his own body starts failing him. In the game, since he sees this coming, he creates a clone body named Cammy that eventually gains self-awareness and goes rogue. “Street Fighter” already introduced a version of Cammy (Mel Jarnson), so it’s unclear if this particular storyline will get retconned.

It’s possible a sequel could just have Bison try to transfer his essence into Cammy or if he’ll create another clone body to inhabit. “Street Fighter Alpha 3” eventually sees Bison possess Rose’s soul, so it’s possible the sequel would skip the whole Cammy plot line and instead bring Rose, a fortune teller who wields immense power, into the fold. 

Fans are upset about the lack of an ending

“Street Fighter” has gotten pretty mixed-to-negative reviews from critics. The new film is currently standing with a Rotten Tomatoes score of 43%; however, audiences are far kinder on the platform, as the film has an 78% rating with general viewers. But there’s one thing even hardcore fans have to admit: “Street Fighter” is basically half a movie, with major storylines lacking resolution. And people are going online to voice their frustrations. 

On X, content creator @AxelTalksFilm wrote, “This movie ends just as it’s about to head into the climax in the most unbelievably abrupt way ever … Just as it was going to get really good, I’m kind of appalled.” X user @KazekunForever shared a similar opinion: “That ending made my jaw drop why the hell would you end it like that?”

It’s normal for movies like this to tease sequels, but they at least wrap up whatever story they were trying to tell in the first place. Chun-Li wanted to kill Bison but didn’t even get close to doing so. Akuma is still at large, and the heroes pretty much just let Bison walk out with his body. “Street Fighter” could rank amongst the most unfulfilling endings in movies ever, but maybe that sequel will make everything worth it in the end. 

Street Fighter 2 is already in the early stages

1994’s “Street Fighter” infamously failed to launch a sequel, leaving its post-credits scene forever unfulfilled. Hopefully, that same fate doesn’t befall the current “Street Fighter,” but things are looking promising that a sequel will move forward.

Director Kitao Sakurai revealed to MovieWeb that he already has a ton of ideas for where “Street Fighter 2” could head. And he’s getting a jump on working on the story even though a sequel hasn’t formally been confirmed as of this writing. “It’s something that we’re thinking about and developing,” Sakurai explained. “I don’t want to say anything that locks us in. It also kind of depends on how people react to this one, and whether they, you know, support this vision of the story. We definitely have a lot of ideas, and we’re writing currently, but you know, I wouldn’t want to make any promises one way or the other about what exactly we’re gonna do.”

It’s probably for the best to keep things vague at this point, seeing as how the film just entered theaters. But the fact that he already has an idea of where the sequel could go is promising to fans. It suggests that if “Street Fighter 2” gets the greenlight, the team can move ahead quickly, and maybe produce a sequel as soon as 2028. But given the mixed reception, “Street Fighter” will have to make bank at the box office to justify another installment.

What are the chances right now of a sequel happening?

Right now, box office projections for “Street Fighter” are looking strong. The film pulled in $4 million from Thursday preview showings, and it’s tracking at press time to pull in between $25 and $35 million in its opening weekend domestically. With another roughly $30 million from international territories, “Street Fighter” could be looking at a total opening haul of $60 to $70 million. With a reported budget of $82 million, that’s a healthy start.

The real question comes down to staying power. Mixed reviews could convince some audiences to stay at home and wait until “Street Fighter” becomes available to watch on Paramount+. On the other hand, “Street Fighter” doesn’t have much in the way of competition in the weeks ahead for folks who just want to see a dumb action movie. October 23 sees the release of the DC horror film “Clayface” and animated fantasy “Wildwood.” The latter at least will target a different audience than “Street Fighter,” so it’s possible it could have a solid second weekend. 

Even if “Street Fighter” isn’t a runaway success at the box office, Paramount decide that a sequel is still a worthwhile investment. After that ending, the studio may also feel like it owes viewers some kind of concrete resolution, even if the second film winds up being the end of the road for this new version of “Street Fighter.”

What has the cast said about returning for Street Fighter 2?

One positive thing about “Street Fighter” is that the cast is clearly having a blast. Most of the actors understand the assignment — that this is meant to be bloody, stupid fun — and they deliver. If “Street Fighter 2” happens, fans would undoubtedly want to see these same actors back in their roles, and at least one star says he’s ready to return repeatedly to this world. 

Noah Centineo, who plays Ken Masters, told The Latin Times, “I just love this character so much. There’s nothing about it that I wouldn’t want to do over and over and over again.” Centineo even stated that he wouldn’t mind getting back into the gym to continue looking like Ken for a follow-up. 

“Street Fighter” clearly wasn’t everyone’s cup of tea (or Jolt Cola as the case may be). But if it finds a passionate fanbase, there could definitely be a market for more stories set in this universe. And with so much exposition out of the way, a prospective “Street Fighter 2” could dive headfirst into non-stop action. 

How an Unexpected Email Led a 30-Year-Old Mum to Devastating Diagnosis

0

Ellen DeGeneres Leaves Fans Baffled by Awkward Norton Appearance

0

Ellen DeGeneres left viewers puzzled after appearing on The Graham Norton Show on Friday, with many questioning why she had been invited onto the programme after spending so long away from the public eye.

The 68-year-old comedian was once the host of her hugely popular self-titled talk show, but stepped back from television after the programme was cancelled in 2022 following allegations of bullying.

During her conversation with Graham Norton, DeGeneres spoke openly about her extended absence from television. She admitted that she missed being on screen, while revealing that she currently has no new project in the works.

DeGeneres announced the end of her talk show in 2021, following an internal investigation into claims of bullying and misconduct in the workplace.

Since leaving the spotlight, she has been based in the Cotswolds with her wife, Portia de Rossi.

Discussing her time away, DeGeneres said: “I’ve got nothing really going on and I really miss being on TV. I miss so much about it — laughing with the writers and the audience. I think about doing something here.”

Ellen DeGeneres's appearance on The Graham Norton Show has baffled fans, as they asked why she'd been invited to appear on the sofa following her absence from the spotlight

Ellen DeGeneres’s appearance on The Graham Norton Show surprised viewers, who questioned why she had been invited onto the sofa after years away from the spotlight

She joked: “I think it’s pretty easy to get on TV here — there’s a pottery show, a sewing show, and even a programme about people watching TV shows!”

The comedian also looked back on her self-titled sitcom, which made television history by featuring the first openly gay lead character on a US series.

“In the US, they weren’t very thrilled about my character or me coming out, so to have it celebrated in London was such an honour,” she said. “To be treated that way when everyone else was done with me was extraordinary.”

Because DeGeneres did not appear to be promoting a forthcoming project — usually the main reason guests visit The Graham Norton Show — her appearance left many viewers confused.

One viewer wrote: “Why does it look so awkward that Ellen DeGeneres is on The Graham Norton Show?”

Another commented: “Ellen not clapping and sitting so ominously in the corner… evil beaming through the screen. Why is Ellen DeGeneres on Graham Norton?”

DeGeneres experienced a significant public backlash after former employees of The Ellen DeGeneres Show accused the programme of fostering a toxic workplace, with claims involving racism, bullying and sexual harassment.

For nearly 20 years, DeGeneres ended each episode of her daytime talk show with a smile and the familiar reminder to “be kind to one another”.

Ellen appeared on Graham Norton alongside Quentin Tarantino, Colin Farrell and Gemma Chan

Ellen DeGeneres appeared on Graham Norton alongside Quentin Tarantino, Colin Farrell and Gemma Chan

Given Ellen didn't appear to be promoting a new project on Graham Norton, which is typically the reason why guests appear, many viewers shared their bewilderment over her interview

With no apparent new project to promote, viewers questioned why Ellen DeGeneres had been booked for an appearance on The Graham Norton Show

However, former staff members claimed that the presenter did not always follow that message of kindness away from the cameras.

Sources close to DeGeneres told the Daily Mail that she ran her household like a boot camp, allegedly “laying traps” for workers and “always choosing the opposite” of kindness in her dealings with staff.

The Ellen DeGeneres Show remained on air after the 2020 controversy, but declining ratings and the findings of a company investigation eventually contributed to its cancellation. The programme filmed its final episode in 2022 after 19 seasons.

She previously told The Hollywood Reporter: ‘I have to just trust that whatever happened during that time, which was obviously very, very difficult, happened for a reason.

‘I think that I learned a lot, and there were some things that came up that I was shocked and surprised by. It was eye-opening, but I just trust that that had to happen.’

Ellen and her wife Portia left the United States after Trump’s re-election as 47th president in November 2024.

Both she and de Rossi originally moved into an $18million house in The Cotswolds area, but the six-bedroom home was met with severe flooding due to Storm Bert.

An insider previously informed the Daily Mail: ‘Ellen and Portia have had several issues with the place they initially moved into.

‘First there was the flooding, of course, then there was an issue with some locals complaining about some building work carried out at the property.’

Ellen and Portia then moved to a different property which is only a 30-minute drive from the original home that they had bought.

However, an insider told The Mail on Sunday late last year that there is a possibility the couple could move back to the US, despite Trump still being in office.

And it was later revealed that Ellen and Portia purchased a $27million Montecito property last year in November.

Landman Season 3 Release Date: When Will the New Season Premiere?

It’s shaping up to be a major weekend for Paramount+. Alongside the latest episode of MobLand—Season 2, Episode 5, “Birdland”—viewers can finally enjoy the return of Sylvester Stallone’s hit crime drama Tulsa King.

There’s even more good news for fans of both series: Paramount+ has already renewed MobLand for Season 3 and Tulsa King for Season 5. The next chapter of Tulsa King will relocate the action to New York, making the upcoming season particularly exciting.

Unfortunately, Landman won’t be joining them with new episodes this week. Taylor Sheridan’s popular drama is currently being filmed for Season 3, but fans shouldn’t expect its return in 2026.

So when will Landman Season 3 arrive on Paramount+? Here’s what we know about the show’s renewal, production timeline, cast and likely release window.

Is Landman Airing a New Episode This Week?

Sadly, the answer is no. The Season 2 finale of Landman premiered on Paramount+ on January 18, 2026, and the series is not returning with new episodes this week.

Will Landman Be Back For Season 3?

The outlook for the future is much brighter. Following the immense success of Season 2, Paramount renewed Landman for a third season.

Is Billy Bob Thornton Being Replaced in Landman?

And no, Tommy isn’t going anywhere. Billy Bob Thornton will return to lead the cast when Landman comes back for Season 3.

LANDMAN SEASON 2 ENDING EXPLAINED

Photo: Paramount+

When Does The New Season Of Landman Come Out?

Paramount+ has not revealed an official premiere date yet, but production on Season 3 began earlier this month in Fort Worth, Texas.

Filming is expected to continue through early 2027. Based on that schedule, the best estimate is that Landman Season 3 will premiere on Paramount+ sometime in the middle or latter half of 2027.

How To Watch Landman On Hulu, Amazon, YouTube, and Paramount+ for Free:

The first two seasons of Landman are currently available to stream on Paramount+.

Paramount+ has two subscription options: Essential and Premium. At the moment, new subscribers can begin with a seven-day free trial of the Premium plan.

The ad-supported Essential tier normally costs $8.99 per month. The ad-free Premium plan is priced at $13.99 per month and includes Showtime programming as well as live CBS.

Although Paramount+ does not offer a direct free trial, viewers can add the service to an existing Prime Video or Hulu account for an additional $13.99 per month. Paramount+ is also available through YouTube, where a free trial is offered.

Landman Season 3 Casting Info:

Season 3 will also expand the cast. Lioness star Michael Kelly has joined the series as a “titan of industry who leads the largest oil management firm in the world.” Colm Feore (Nathan), Mustafa Speaks (Boss), Bobbi Salvor Menuez (Paigyn Meester) and Francesca Xuereb (Cheyenne) have each been promoted to series regulars.

Seasons 1 and 2 of Landman are now streaming on Paramount+.

School Shooting Survivor Helps Son Cope After Oregon Attack

0

More than two decades after surviving a school shooting herself, an Oregon mother was forced to guide her son through the same terrifying experience when a gunman attacked an elementary school Thursday, according to reports.

Michelle, who has not publicly shared her last name, sent a series of frantic text messages to her son, reassuring him that he and his brother would make it through the violence while repeatedly writing, “I love you so much.”

“I was just in shock. I was like, how can this happen? How can lightning strike twice?” Michelle told CNN.

“How can I go through this and then my children go through this?”

Her fifth-grade son called her from his Apple Watch at 1 p.m. Thursday, one minute after authorities received a report that teen gunman Griffin J. John II had fired his first shot outside Silver Rail Elementary School.

“Mom, there’s a shooter,” the boy said. He confirmed the danger moments later in a text, initially typing “shroterr” before sending a second message: “shooter at school.”

“Baby I love you don’t call anyone please be as quiet as possible,” Michelle replied.

“If you can safely, text me, that’s OK just don’t make any calls. The police are going to help you. I love you so much. Do you know anything that’s going on?” she asked.

About an hour later, Michelle checked in again, asking her son what was happening and continuing to reassure him with the words, “I love you so much.”

“Everything is going to be okay. This happened to me too, and I am okay,” she wrote. Michelle told CNN it was the first time she had ever shared the details of her own shooting trauma with her children.

“I love you so much. It’s going to be okay,” Michelle continued.

“They will load you on the bus and it will be kind of slow but we will get to you, I promise.”

Michelle was a freshman at Granite Hills High School in El Cajon, California, when senior Jason Anthony Hoffman opened fire during an attack in March 2001.

The shooting wounded three students and two teachers. No one was killed.

Michelle said the experience has continued to affect her, leaving her with panic attacks and a constant habit of identifying the nearest exit whenever she enters a public place.

She also said she felt a persistent sense of dread each day her sons went to school.

“Every single time I dropped them off, and I would see them walk in the front doors, I would get a pit in my stomach thinking, ‘I hope I see him again,’” she told CNN through tears.

“It’s probably because of the trauma I went through.”

Michelle’s sons survived Thursday’s attack, but four other people were killed.

The victims were three students — 5-year-old Rhoam Summer, an 8-year-old and an 11-year-old — along with 25-year-old teacher Megan Lambert.

A hero teacher managed to wrestle John, 16, to the floor in the midst of his rampage until a student’s brave father, Kaylub Giamanco, stormed into the classroom and fatally shot the gunman.

Investigators are still probing a motive for John’s massacre, but law-enforcement sources say he went to extreme lengths to carry out the bloodshed.

John’s weapon had been legally purchased by his mother around the time of his August birthday, sources said.

Trump’s Russian Sanctions Waiver Angers Congress, No Quick Reply

0

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s decision to indefinitely waive sanctions on Russia, just days before they were scheduled to take effect, sparked bipartisan fury Saturday. Congress had approved the measures by an overwhelming margin, signaling broad U.S. support for Ukraine as it continues its war with Russia.

Lawmakers from both parties criticized the executive order issued late Friday, saying it marked the latest in a series of moves bringing Trump’s administration closer to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has also announced a diesel agreement with Putin to import Russian energy, a long-shot attempt to ease surging U.S. fuel prices ahead of the Nov. 3 midterm elections.

“Beyond irresponsible,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., wrote on social media. His comments came hours after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy voiced hope that the sanctions targeting Russia’s economy, which were set to begin Sunday, could still be reinstated.

“What part of enforcing a law passed 86-11 by the Senate does the President and his advisors not understand?” Tillis asked. “It’s unconscionable that this administration is capitulating to a Russian dictator who illegally invaded Ukraine.”

Tillis argued that Trump should address the Iran war, which has been widely blamed for the jump in gasoline prices, if he wants to lower costs for Americans — rather than “doing a solid for Vladimir Putin.”

Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said the late Sen. Lindsey Graham “would be appalled.” Graham, R-S.C., had spent months working on the legislation before his death this summer. The measure is named the Lindsey Graham Russian Sanctions Act.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., accused Trump of “thumbing his nose” at Congress and “enabling Vladimir Putin to continue his war of aggression.” She called on lawmakers to act against the administration’s decision.

The policy shift comes as Ukraine prepares for another difficult winter under continued Russian attacks on its power infrastructure, threatening the electricity and heating systems that keep homes warm. Zelenskyy, whose relationship with Trump has been strained at times but who has maintained close ties with U.S. lawmakers, urged supporters to push for the sanctions to move forward.

What Congress can do next remains unclear. The House and Senate are away from Washington until after Election Day, making an immediate response unlikely. Trump said he was suspending the sanctions indefinitely on national security grounds, and lawmakers may not be able to challenge the decision until they return.

Skeptics in Congress warned Trump would not follow the law

Graham spent nearly a year persuading Trump to support the sanctions package. The law was designed to impose steep tariffs on countries buying significant quantities of Russian oil and energy products, with the goal of cutting off revenue that has helped finance Putin’s four-year war against Ukraine.

Even after Zelenskyy watched from the Senate visitor gallery as lawmakers advanced the package following Graham’s death, congressional critics questioned whether Trump would enforce it. Their doubts intensified after he signed the legislation into law a month ago.

Last week, a bipartisan group of senators pressed the Trump administration to accelerate pressure on Moscow, including action against Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet” of tankers. The vessels are used to move oil while evading U.S. sanctions. The senators emphasized that most of the new law was scheduled to take effect Sunday.

Trump instead unveiled the diesel agreement with Putin, saying Russia would provide tons of fuel to the United States. Gas prices have surged in parts of the country, and voters have ranked affordability among their leading concerns.

Outraged lawmakers have vowed to block the Trump-Putin agreement.

Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced legislation Friday to stop the diesel deal. Meeks had opposed the Graham sanctions bill and warned at the time that Trump would ignore the law. “At a time when the United States should be increasing pressure on the Kremlin, Donald Trump is cozying up to Putin and striking self-enriching deals instead of standing with Ukraine,” Meeks said in a statement.

Meeks called the agreement “corrupt” and said it “goes against everything the United States stands for.”

__

Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.