(The Hill) — Following the release of emergency dispatch recordings revealing a “cardiac arrest” incident at Sen. Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) residence in Washington, D.C., speculation has intensified regarding his expected return to the Senate—or if he will return at all.

While McConnell’s office has been reluctant to share extensive health updates, they did convey earlier this week that he is grateful for the overwhelming support during his hospital recovery.

As of Thursday, the 84-year-old senator is reportedly “making progress” and is actively engaging with his staff on both Kentucky and Senate initiatives during the legislative break.

However, the lack of transparency about the events of June 14, coupled with the concerning dispatch audio, has led to mounting speculation that McConnell’s condition could be more serious than official statements imply.

Veteran Kentucky political analyst Al Cross, who has held detailed discussions with McConnell recently, noted that the senator’s guarded handling of his health crisis has contributed to widespread theories about more severe health implications.

“They’re causing themselves problems by not saying more about it, but he’s always been very private about his health matters,” said Cross, who conducted two interviews with McConnell in the past six weeks for a historical project.

McConnell has appeared frail while maneuvering around the Senate’s crowded hallways this year.

He is often pushed through the Capitol by staff in a wheelchair, and when he walks into the Senate chamber, he usually has an aide or security detail — or two — by his side to help steady him.

McConnell’s staff announced on June 14 that he was admitted to the hospital that morning and was “receiving excellent care” but didn’t give any clues about why or how serious his condition was at the time.

Then last week, a bombshell recording of emergency dispatch audio from the morning of June 14 indicated that paramedics rushed to an address matching that of McConnell’s townhouse on Capitol Hill and provided CPR to an unconscious person who may have suffered a cardiac arrest.

It has fueled speculation this week that McConnell may not return to the Senate this year. At the same time, it has raised questions about whether there would need to be a special election to fill his seat during the final months of 2026, when GOP leaders are still hoping to pass an emergency supplemental defense spending package and possibly a third budget reconciliation bill as well.

Conservative activist Laura Loomer, citing a “high-level source close to the White House,” posted Monday on X, the social media platform, that McConnell’s health condition is much worse than expected and is “not coming back” to the Senate.

Desirée Townsend, a digital journalist who was among the first to share audio of the dispatcher’s call describing a possible “cardiac arrest” at McConnell’s residence, retweeted Loomer’s claim and said, “I have heard the same thing from my sources for days.”

On June 15, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said he had spoken with his hospitalized colleague and he “sounded good.”

“He wants to be back, but I’ll defer to his staff on when,” Thune told Politico.

Earlier that day, Thune told reporters that he was “hopeful” that McConnell would be back in the Senate later that week.

But McConnell hasn’t voted since June 11. 

His absence on June 23 made a critical difference when four Republican senators crossed the aisle to vote with Democrats to approve a House-passed resolution directing President Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from the military conflict with Iran. The measure passed because McConnell and Sen. David McCormick (R-Pa.) missed the vote.

The former majority leader’s absence could make it more difficult for Thune to pass key items on the GOP agenda, such as an emergency defense spending bill, which would need 60 votes to pass and faces strong opposition.

Thune and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) are also looking at moving a third budget reconciliation package to fund the Pentagon and address other GOP priorities.

McConnell’s vote would be critical to passing another budget resolution or reconciliation package as several other GOP senators, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) are possible swing votes and have a history of defying Trump.  

Cross said there’s been little “reliable” information about McConnell’s health condition since he was admitted to the hospital over three weeks ago.

“I believe McConnell will return to the Senate,” he said. “We have very little news that’s reliable. This cardiac arrest thing appears to have been the supposition of a dispatcher, not somebody on the scene.

“My gut tells me he’s coming back,” he said.

Skepticism over whether public officials are truthful about their medical conditions has grown in recent years.

Many Republicans have accused former President Biden’s inner circle of not being honest with voters about the president’s cognitive abilities after he fumbled a crucial presidential debate against Trump in June of 2024.

More recently, Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr. (N.J.) provided little information to explain his extended absence from the House. Kean recently disclosed he missed months of work because he was battling depression.

Cross noted that McConnell’s staff has “been careful not to say he looks forward to returning to work.”

“That’s the thing I’ve been looking for, but they haven’t said that yet,” he added.

If McConnell were to resign because of a serious health problem, it could set up a special election in Kentucky to determine who fills his seat for the remainder of 2026.

The Kentucky legislature passed House Bill 622 in 2024 that stripped the state’s Democratic governor, Andy Beshear, of the power to fill a vacant U.S. Senate seat — a power enjoyed by most other states’ governors.

The law empowers the GOP-controlled state general assembly to call a special election to fill a vacant Senate seat for the remainder of a term.

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (WCIA) — For Tim Sinclair, the P.A. announcer for the Bulls, the Bears, and the Fighting Illini, the Olympics, the World Cup, and the Super Bowl were once just dreams on his career bucket list.

However, Sinclair, formerly known as a host for CI Living, recently had the opportunity to strike “World Cup” off that list. He was selected to announce four matches during the group stages in Guadalajara, Mexico.

“I announced the Mexico versus Korea Republic match in Mexico. Additionally, I got to cover Congo versus Colombia and the exciting Spain versus Uruguay match. Our first game was between Korea Republic and Czechia,” Sinclair shared.

Sinclair was invited to try out for the role last fall. As part of the selection process, he submitted demo tapes and participated in a live audition, where he read out lineups, he explained.

Sinclair spent four weeks in Mexico, spending time outside the broadcast booth as a tourist and days preparing for soccer’s biggest stage.

He made frequent social media posts about his trip. One of the videos explained how he prepared to announce 180 names from seven teams.

“NBA and college basketball, you have a lot of foreign names. But this was kind of that on steroids,” said Sinclair.

He said he does not know if he’ll be working the 2030 World Cup yet, but he said being selected at all was the honor of a lifetime.

“It’s been called the biggest sporting event in the history of the world. And so, to say you’re a part of that, even in a small way is pretty cool,” said Sinclair.

WASHINGTON – In a striking political move, Rahm Emanuel, who is being watched as a potential Democratic presidential contender, is set to deliver a stern critique of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a speech in Tel Aviv this week. Emanuel, who has a long-standing reputation as a supporter of Israel, plans to tell his audience that the strong ties between the United States and Israel are “at a crossroads.”

According to prepared remarks obtained by The Associated Press, Emanuel will assert on Wednesday at Tel Aviv University, “It cannot stand or survive as it has been.” He underscores the need for “significant changes and a new direction” to preserve and strengthen bilateral relations.

This anticipated speech by a central figure in the Democratic Party’s moderate faction is indicative of a broader shift in party lines, illustrating the growing distance from their historical support for Israel.

Recent findings from a survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research reveal that about 58% of Democrats feel that the U.S. has been “too supportive” of Israel, increasing from 45% at the start of 2024. Additionally, approximately half of the Democratic respondents believe that Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to genocide against Palestinians, an accusation that has been firmly denied by both Israel and the U.S. government despite being echoed by some human rights groups.

In his propositions, Emanuel is expected to advocate for sanctions against Israelis who engage in violence against Palestinian civilians and their properties, as well as against companies and banks that facilitate settlements deemed illegal by much of the international community. Moreover, he is pushing for an end to U.S. financial assistance to Israel’s military budget, insisting that Israel should purchase American arms under the same financial conditions and regulatory obligations as other trusted allies who respect U.S. laws.

In addition, Emanuel will blame Netanyahu for driving Israel to a “dead end,” emboldened by poor decisions from American leaders.

“For too long, American policy toward Israel operated under the assumption that the best thing Washington could do for Jerusalem was to blindly and silently stand behind your government, without conditions, without demands, and without consequences when we disagreed,” he will say. “That has been our mistake. Unconditional support has produced a prime minister who has presumed that his strategic interests would incur no cost if he ignored America’s concerns.”

There’s little precedent for an American with presidential ambitions to travel to another country, much less one as fraught as Israel, to deliver such a stinging rebuke of its political leadership. Centrist figures like Emanuel have been more reluctant than Democrats’ progressive base to question longtime U.S. support for Israel in recent years.

How will Netanyahu react?

His remarks could prompt a similarly fiery response from Netanyahu, who famously once called Emanuel, who had ambitions of being the first Jewish speaker of the U.S. House, a “self-hating Jew.” Netanyahu faces his own battle for reelection in October, and the veteran leader may try to use a confrontation with Emanuel for political gain by appearing to stand strong in the face of international criticism.

But for possible Democratic presidential contenders gauging how to address the fallout from Israel’s war in Gaza and Netanyahu’s perceived tilt toward the Republican Party, led by President Donald Trump, the speech represents an especially frontal strategy. The war has disrupted political coalitions in both major political parties in the U.S., with younger voters recoiling at Israel’s approach to the conflict pressing American leaders to take a tougher stand. The issue has roiled some Democratic congressional primaries this year and could continue to be a dividing line in the contest for the party’s presidential nomination in 2028.

Castigating Netanyahu for doing little to advance diplomatic efforts to end the war, Emanuel will note that “support for Israel is plummeting around the world.”

“You’ve lost Europe,” he will say. “Your scientists face exclusion from international research networks. Your artists and academics are shut out of exhibits and conferences.”

Support for Israel wanes

While Netanyahu has forged generally strong ties with Trump and the Republican Party, Israel’s support among Democrats has slipped in recent years. But in portraying Israel as increasingly isolated, Emanuel’s comments have echoes of recent remarks from Vice President JD Vance, a sign of how criticism of the country is taking hold in both parties. Speaking recently from the White House briefing room as the U.S. worked to close a deal to end the war with Iran, Vance said Trump was “the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time.”

For all his tough words, Emanuel, who is Jewish and whose father was born in Jerusalem, will offer notes of sympathy and understanding. He acknowledged the toll of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in which Hamas-led militants launched air and ground strikes on Israel, killing nearly 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages. He noted disappointments from previous rounds of peace talks with Palestinian leaders.

“But even while acknowledging that history, the path forward cannot be held hostage to a past defined exclusively by recriminations,” he will say.

He will call the two-state solution “discredited” and instead push for a “23-state solution” that includes Israel, the Palestinians and the 21 other members of the Arab League in a peace deal.

“The 21 Arab nations that have exploited Palestinian rights as a slogan for decades now need to roll up their sleeves and stand up a governing authority capable of accepting the historic Jewish connection to this land,” he will say.

While no prominent Democrat has formally entered the 2028 contest, that could change soon after the November midterms with a field that could ultimately swell into the dozens. Few have been as open about their intentions as Emanuel, a former White House chief of staff, congressman, Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador who has spent much of the past three decades holding one public office or another. Absent such a post now, he’s gained attention by releasing a string of policy proposals, biking through the early voting state of New Hampshire, appearing on podcasts and stepping up his social media presence.

___

Peoples reported from New York.