Home Blog Page 46

49ers GM John Lynch Leaves Door Open for Blockbuster Roster Move

0

John Lynch is not publicly guaranteeing that the 49ers will swing another major in-season deal.

Still, he is making it clear San Francisco is not closing that door, either.

As the 49ers head toward a new NFL season with real Super Bowl ambitions, Lynch suggested the club’s play through the opening stretch could shape how aggressive the front office becomes ahead of the Nov. 10 NFL trade deadline.

“That’s not like a charge to a team, ‘Hey, you want us to keep adding? Go earn it,’” Lynch told The San Francisco Standard. “But that’s just the reality of this league. Put yourself in position, then if it fits and the deal’s right, then yeah.”

For the 49ers, that kind of move would hardly be unprecedented.

Lynch and Kyle Shanahan landed Christian McCaffrey from Carolina during the 2022 season, surrendering four draft picks for the running back who became one of the defining players of their current era. San Francisco also acquired Emmanuel Sanders at the 2019 deadline during its run to the Super Bowl.

“I think our history shows we’re not averse to that,” Lynch said. “But I do believe you have to put yourself in position to even have those conversations.”

It’s extraordinarily early to predict who might be available by November. The sellers likely won’t reveal themselves until struggling teams reach October and begin looking toward 2027.

But a few fascinating names have already surfaced.

ESPN’s Dan Graziano included Raiders star Maxx Crosby and Falcons tight end Kyle Pitts among his early potential deadline candidates in June.

Pitts is already an example of how quickly those projections can change.

Atlanta was reportedly open to trading Pitts before the NFL draft, but the former No. 4 overall pick subsequently signed a three-year, $54 million extension with the Falcons.

That makes a midseason move considerably less likely.

Still, if Atlanta unexpectedly struggles and changes direction, Pitts would offer San Francisco an intriguing luxury alongside George Kittle. The 25-year-old caught 88 passes for 928 yards last season, and pairing his receiving ability with Kittle would give Shanahan another weapon for an offense capable of leaning heavily into multiple-tight-end formations.

Crosby would represent an entirely different level of swing.

Las Vegas actually agreed in March to send Crosby to Baltimore for two first-round picks, only for the Ravens to back out because of medical concerns following his knee surgery. Crosby later acknowledged being furious about the failed transaction before recommitting himself to the Raiders. The bizarre failed Crosby trade left one obvious takeaway: Las Vegas has already demonstrated there is a price at which it will move its franchise pass rusher.

That price would be enormous.

And there is currently no indication the Raiders are looking to move Crosby again. But if Las Vegas starts poorly and San Francisco determines another elite edge rusher could push its defense over the top, Crosby’s name would be difficult to ignore.

Pairing him with Nick Bosa would constitute exactly the type of aggressive win-now gamble Lynch has made before.

The 49ers have plenty to determine first.

The 2026 trade deadline arrives Nov. 10 at 1 p.m. PT, giving Lynch through Week 9 to decide whether his roster has earned another major investment.

The names available then may look nothing like the names being discussed now.

But Lynch has already made the prerequisite clear: give the front office a reason to believe one more player could make the difference.

People Are Jumping, I Have to Go: Haunting Final Words to a 9/11 Widow

0

“I have to go.” They were the final words Monica Iken would ever hear from her husband — a brief, ordinary-sounding goodbye that, in the stunned minutes after their call ended that September morning, gave no hint of the devastation behind it.

About 10 minutes earlier, Michael had called from his desk on the 84th floor of the World Trade Center to say a plane had struck the North Tower, the building opposite his own. It was just before 9 a.m., and he told her not to be frightened.

A few minutes later, the phone rang again. Once more, Michael tried to calm her, insisting that he was safe and that there was no reason to panic.

“Then he said, ‘People are jumping out of the window. I have to go.’ And that’s the last thing he ever said to me,” Monica, now 56, recalls.

Moments afterward, inside the New York apartment they shared, she watched in horror as live television footage showed a second plane cutting through the clear blue sky and heading straight for the South Tower — the building where Michael was at work.

‘I remember standing there, just frozen, trying to process that I was looking at this huge jumbo jet. And by the time I snapped out of it, it had hit his building,’ she says. ‘That’s the moment my nightmare began.’

That day the man she had walked down the aisle with just 11 months earlier became one of the 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history. His body was never recovered. 

Monica, then 31, had gone to bed the night before a happy newlywed only to find herself transformed into a widow.

Monica Iken reveals she feels closest to her late husband Michael, a bond broker who was killed on the 84th floor of Tower Two in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when she visits the memorial at Ground Zero

Monica Iken reveals she feels closest to her late husband Michael, a bond broker who was killed on the 84th floor of Tower Two in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when she visits the memorial at Ground Zero

Monica with her husband Michael on their wedding day in October 2000. Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 - two years before everything would change forever

Monica with her husband Michael on their wedding day in October 2000. Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 – two years before everything would change forever

On September 11, 2001, Michael Iken became one of 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history

On September 11, 2001, Michael Iken became one of 2,977 victims of the worst terror attack in US history

While time has moved on, a part of her is anchored to the events of a quarter of a century ago.

‘You learn to live with it but each year brings with it the milestones he never saw,’ she says. ‘Last year we would have celebrated our silver wedding anniversary.’

For before Michael became one of the thousands whose lives were extinguished on a day seared into history, he was simply the man Monica had expected to grow old with – a man who, from almost the moment he saw her, had been convinced they were destined to be together.

Extraordinarily, they had met on September 11, 1999 – exactly two years to the day before the tragedy. Monica had just emerged from a two-year relationship. 

‘I was looking forward to being single for a while,’ she says wryly.

But around 10pm that evening, as she and a friend headed for a night out in downtown Manhattan, they stopped at a favourite bar and restaurant because her friend was hungry.

‘There was this handsome guy dressed in black sitting by himself at the bar and as I was trying to move a stool, he starts telling me his whole life story,’ she recalls. It was the start of a conversation that, as Monica puts it, ‘never really stopped from there’.

Six years older and divorced, Michael revealed he had spotted Monica at the same bar the previous weekend. ‘He told his friend, “I’m going to marry that girl,” and he had come back a week later to find me. 

‘He’d been there for hours, just waiting,’ she recalls.

‘And the freaky thing is that we were never intending to go back to that bar that night. We only went because my friend decided she was hungry. The next time I looked at the clock it was 3am.’

And while Monica was initially ambivalent about plunging straight into another relationship, Michael was ‘all in’ from the start.

‘I was trying to see if I could date other people – obviously that did not happen. He was just determined,’ she says with a smile.

Then, one evening in October, she recalls watching Michael walk into a restaurant and something inside her shifting. ‘There was this moment where I just knew my soul had to be with his and from then on we were inseparable.’

Michael proposed just a month later and in February 2000 they moved into a rented flat in Riverdale, a serene residential neighbourhood north of Manhattan.

That October they married in an intimate beachside wedding in the Caribbean. After the ceremony, Michael changed his voicemail greeting to: ‘I am happily married. Leave me a message.’

Like any young couple, the Ikens had dreams and plans for the decades they assumed lay ahead. Michael, in particular, longed for children. 

‘He really wanted to be a father,’ says Monica.

Yet running oddly in parallel with those hopes for the future was a conviction that he would not live to see old age. ‘It was horrible. He said it all the time,’ Monica says now. Neither of them, of course, could possibly have envisaged how or when that premonition would come true.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, Michael left their apartment shortly before 6am to make the 15-mile journey from their home to his job as a bond trader.

‘He was in a good mood,’ Monica recalls. ‘He had been taking a sailing course and was collecting his certificate after work. He kissed me goodbye and we both said: “I love you.”‘

Having recently left her job as a teacher, Monica went back to sleep. ‘I had no idea it would be the last time I’d see him,’ she says.

Three hours later, she woke to the unexpected sound of the phone ringing. ‘He never called me in the morning because his work was particularly focused in the early hours,’ she says.

Around ten minutes earlier, at 8.46am, American Airlines Flight 11 had crashed into the World Trade Center’s North Tower, killing everyone on board and trapping those working above the impact zone.

‘He asked me if I was up and told me to turn on the TV,’ Monica recalls. ‘He told me a commuter plane hit the building but it wasn’t his building, it was Tower One. And I’m looking at this image on screen of a giant hole but he was cool as a cucumber and told me everything was fine. Then he said, “I gotta go. I’ll call you back.”‘

The phone rang again five minutes later, this time Michael asking his wife to call family and friends to reassure them he was fine because he didn’t have the capacity to respond to their panicked messages.

‘I ran to get the address book and when I got back to the phone, he told me people were jumping and he had to go,’ she says. ‘All I could get out of my mouth was, “OK,” before he hung up. Now I wish I’d screamed: “Get out.” I just assumed that he’d call me back.’

Instead, just moments later, Monica joined millions around the world in watching the unthinkable unfold live on television.

At 9.03am, United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower, striking floors 77 to 85. Michael was on the 84th. Only later would Monica learn that a handful of people from the 81st floor and above had managed to escape.

While some colleagues had fled in panic when the first plane hit the North Tower, Michael, along with several co-workers, had stayed behind to try to persuade a colleague in shock to come out from beneath her desk.

Monica was told that he would most likely have died from carbon monoxide poisoning. ‘That’s the only comfort I have,’ she says. ‘That he didn’t suffer.’

Unable to get through to her husband’s phone, Monica could do nothing but watch in horror as, less than an hour later, the entire South Tower collapsed.

‘I really thought I was in another dimension,’ she says. ‘I couldn’t process what was happening.’

Yet the mind does strange things in the face of unimaginable loss: Monica spent that afternoon lying on the sofa by the door, praying for Michael to walk through it and calling his phone, leaving frantic messages, before eventually collapsing into sleep.

What happened next remains extraordinarily vivid to her. ‘I had this incredibly lucid dream. We had a garden apartment with a red door and I was in the living room on the couch and Michael came through the door.

‘I jumped up, wrapped my legs around him and he said, “Monica. It’s so beautiful here.” And it felt so real but when I woke up I knew he was gone.’

Even so, in the dire days that followed, Monica clung to a sliver of hope – one that she admits she has never completely extinguished.

‘His best friend got out. His other friends got out. There was no ID card, no wedding ring,’ she says. ‘Deep down I knew straightaway but at the back of my mind there was part of me which felt like he’s wandering the streets somewhere and that’s very difficult.’

The days and weeks that followed passed in a torment of grief. ‘I wasn’t functioning at all. I was so not well,’ she says.

‘Drinking was the only thing that calmed my nerves. I’d not only lost my husband but all our dreams and plans, the family we were going to have.’ She pauses. ‘And not only that but he didn’t just die. He was murdered – and the whole world saw it.’

With no body, there could be no funeral in the conventional sense. Instead, Monica and Michael’s family held a memorial mass. 

Meanwhile, she found herself drawn repeatedly to the place where the towers had stood. ‘I wanted to remember him in the place where he took his last breath,’ she says.

Within a week of Michael’s death, she was seized by a conviction: there must be a permanent memorial at Ground Zero. 

‘The recovery hadn’t even been done yet but the city was already talking about rebuilding,’ she says. ‘I was horrified. I had lost my soulmate. We were married 11 months, looking forward to having a family. I had nothing to live for but his memory, so if they wanted to build over dead people, I determined they would have to build right over me.’

Grief had given her a cause: within weeks of Michael’s death, Monica launched September’s Mission, a non-profit organisation devoted to building a positive and meaningful legacy out of the events surrounding 9/11.

She met politicians, building consultants and the families of other victims and, 11 months after the tragedy, was one of 5,000 people who took part in Listening To The City, an innovative town meeting held in New York in which citizens from every walk of life came together to discuss how Lower Manhattan should be rebuilt and how those who died should be memorialised.

The extraordinary event, largely forgotten in the intervening years, has now become the subject of a compelling new film, 9/11: Reclaiming Ground Zero, which tells the story of an ambitious democratic experiment that has never been repeated since: thousands of ordinary people, still living amid the raw aftermath of the attacks, being given a voice in how their city should remember its dead and chart its future.

‘It was extraordinary,’ Monica recalls. ‘Everybody was calm and listening and I wonder why we can’t do this now. It feels like we need it more than ever.’

Yet if campaigning gave Monica’s days purpose and structure, it could not mend what was happening inside her. ‘I was a wreck,’ she says. ‘For years I was basically a functioning alcoholic.’

Then, in June 2004, she met the man who would change her life again. In a Manhattan bar, Monica got talking to Bob Murphy, a 6ft firefighter who had been off work on September 11 but been called to the site in time to see the collapse of Tower 7, a separate 47-storey building just north of the main complex. 

He lost his entire company that day. ‘We were mourning, but in different ways, and that helped,’ she says.

The pair started dating and, within months, Monica discovered she was pregnant. Her eldest daughter, Madison, now 21, arrived in the autumn of 2005 followed, in 2007, by their second daughter, 19-year-old Megan.

By then she and Bob had married, Monica’s wedding ring incorporating diamonds from the ring Michael had given her six years earlier. 

It was a new chapter, although from the start, Monica was clear that building a new family did not mean erasing Michael from her life.

‘Michael wasn’t a parent in this life but I was passionate about the fact he would be a parent in the life he was in now,’ she says.

‘I talked to him, asking him to watch them and take care of them and he has. He’s forever a part of me, they’re part of me, so he’s a part of them.’

It has not always been the easiest emotional landscape to navigate. ‘I don’t think many people could handle the fact that their wife is still in love with someone else who’s not even here,’ Monica says. ‘Bob has been as accepting as anyone could be but it’s not always been easy.’

She has also shared Michael’s story with her daughters, a process which has become ever more urgent as she gets older. ‘I have this panic about what happens if I’m not here – who’s going to carry the torch? So I’m always putting things in place to make sure the legacy of him stays alive,’ she says.

Next Friday, Monica will again visit the memorial at Ground Zero to commemorate her husband. ‘I’m there all the time,’ she says. ‘That’s my happy place. I feel close to Michael there.’

She tries not to dwell on the men who robbed Michael of his future and her of the life they had planned, although she cannot forgive the terrorists for the destruction and heartbreak they unleashed. 

Yet nor does she want the defining message of the 25 years since Michael’s death to be one of hatred.

Instead, she wants it to be one of hope. ‘I could have crawled into a hole and never come out, because it felt like my whole life was over,’ she says. ‘But I came out of that and made a difference.

‘And I hope that can inspire someone in despair that things can and do get better.’

  • 9/11: Reclaiming Ground Zero is available now on some digital channels and on Amazon Prime from September 11

Judge Explains Why Tyler Robinson Still Faces Death Penalty

0

PROVO, Utah — In allowing prosecutors to continue pursuing the death penalty against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, Utah Fourth District Judge Tony Graf Jr. said the mere allegation that Robinson opened fire in a crowded setting was not, by itself, enough to establish probable cause that he knowingly placed a bystander in “great risk of death.”

Robinson, 23, is charged in the fatal shooting of Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two and founder of Turning Point USA, during a daytime campus event at Utah Valley University last year. Thousands had gathered to watch Kirk speak when he was shot.

What met the legal threshold, Graf determined, was the evidence showing where several people were positioned in relation to Kirk at the moment he was killed.

Charlie Kirk surrounded by a large audience, tosses hats to the crowd shortly before his assassination in Utah

Charlie Kirk is seen at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking during his “American Comeback Tour” when he was shot in the neck and killed before a crowd of thousands. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

“The Court therefore considers the actual spatial circumstances surrounding the shot, the proximity of other individuals to Mr. Kirk, and the evidence bearing on Defendant’s knowledge of those circumstances,” Graf wrote in his ruling.

Kirk was sitting under a Turning Point USA-branded tent, on a small stage, responding to questions from audience members — one of whom was standing at a microphone “east of and in front of Mr. Kirk,” Graf wrote. There was a security guard under the tent with Kirk and two more nearby, to the left and right in front of the canopy.

The fatal gunshot is alleged to have come from the east — the rooftop of the Losee Center on the far side of the courtyard.

charlie kirk at uvu before shooting, facing the crowd

Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

The first part of Graf’s reasoning is based on those “documented positions,” Graf wrote.

“Second, the physical evidence establishes that the shot was fired from an elevated position approximately 415 feet from the canopy and 68 feet above it, and that the bullet traveled anatomically from front to back and downward after striking Mr. Kirk,” he continued.

Because the bullet did not exit Kirk’s body, Graf wrote that he did not “assign a quantitative probability” of ricochet, over penetration “or a hypothetical deviation in aim.”

People run after Charlie Kirk was shot at UVU

People run after shots were fired during an appearance by Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

“Rather, the relevant evidence is that Defendant allegedly discharged a .30-06 rifle toward a seated victim while several other individuals occupied positions in and around the canopy area,” he wrote. “Viewed favorably to the State, their documented positions in relation to the intended target, considered together with the elevated location and downward direction of the shot, permit a reasonable inference at the preliminary-hearing stage that at least one third party was within the relevant zone of danger and that the risk was more than an abstract possibility.”

Thirdly, he wrote, the state showed probable cause that Robinson was aware that people near Kirk were in danger after allegedly visiting the scene in advance and having a scope on his rifle.

Witness in the Charlie Kirk murder pretrial hearing

Sgt. Jennifer Faumuina, of the Utah Department of Public Safety, describes the distance from Charlie Kirk’s tent to the position from which prosecutors allege that Tyler Robinson fired the rifle round that killed Kirk, during a preliminary hearing at the Fourth District Courthouse in Provo, Utah, July 9, 2026. (Spenser Heaps/AP via Pool)

“From the southwest roof area, there was a clear line of sight to Mr. Kirk’s canopy,” Graf noted. “The rifle also contained an optical accessory. Without making findings about the degree of magnification or precisely what Defendant saw through the optic, these circumstances support a reasonable inference that Defendant was aware that other individuals were positioned near Mr. Kirk when he fired.”

Robinson faces seven charges total, all of which Graf green lit for trial.

An aerial view of UVU campus with marked locations showing the suspected movements of Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin

An approximation of the suspected movements of Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin, based on court documents, video from the scene and conversations with law enforcement. (Google Maps, News Media)

The top charge, aggravated murder, is the only one that carries the potential for capital punishment. It requires prosecutors to show that “the defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than Charlie Kirk and the defendant.”

Other charges include felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in front of a child. The violent offense in front of a child allegations reclassify count 7 from a class B to a class A misdemeanor and are a sentencing consideration for count 2.

Judge Tony Graf sits at the bench during Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing in a Utah courtroom.

Judge Tony Graf presides over Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. (Pool)

Another aggravator is that prosecutors allege that Robinson targeted Kirk over his political expression — which does not factor into the potential death penalty.

The reasoning is laid out in the official written order binding over the case against Robinson for trial, which was published Wednesday — and it mirrors what Graf said in court earlier this week.

The scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination in Utah

The scene after shots were fired at an appearance by Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

Kathy Nester, one of Robinson’s defense attorneys, entered not guilty pleas on his behalf to all charges Tuesday.

He’s due back in court on Oct. 23 for a pretrial conference, where Graf may set a trial date.

What Jurors Heard in the Lindsay Clancy Trial’s Key Moments

0

PLYMOUTH, Mass. – Jurors in the trial of Lindsay Clancy have been working through deliberations as they consider whether she should be found criminally responsible for the 2023 deaths of her three young children inside the family’s Massachusetts home.

There is no dispute between prosecutors and the defense that Clancy killed the children. The central question is why. Her attorneys say she was in the grip of postpartum psychosis and that inadequate mental health care worsened her condition. Prosecutors contend the killings were intentional and planned.

During 21 days of testimony, jurors heard from a wide range of witnesses, including medical professionals, first responders, family members and Clancy’s former husband.

A conviction could lead to a sentence as severe as life in prison. If Clancy is found not guilty, she could either be released or continue to be held in a mental health facility. Should jurors remain deadlocked, the judge could declare a mistrial.

As deliberations continue, these are some of the key moments from the trial:

___

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.

___

Judge declined to remove a juror

Before sending the deadlocked jury home Thursday, Judge William Sullivan declined a defense request to remove one of the jurors following heated discussions from both sides.

Earlier, the jury’s foreperson sent the judge a note saying a single juror won’t follow the court’s instructions about reasonable doubt.

Details of the jury room conflict weren’t revealed and only briefly discussed in open court, but it raised the possibility that a single holdout was standing in the way of a verdict.

Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington said the juror should have been dismissed from the case. Sullivan said removing a deliberating juror is a sensitive undertaking.

The judge questioned each juror individually in private, then reread his instructions about reasonable doubt in court.

Reddington said afterward outside the courthouse that the juror would be questioned again by the judge Friday.

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said in court that she believed Sullivan’s instruction was appropriate and no further action was necessary.

Jurors have struggled to agree on a verdict

Jurors have sent notes to the judge at least three times since they began deliberating Aug. 27.

On Tuesday, the fourth day of deliberations, jurors sent a note in the morning saying they could not unanimously agree.

The note did not elaborate, and there were no clues as to whether a majority of jurors were leaning toward a conviction or acquittal. It also did not provide any insight into the tone of deliberations or whether they had been cordial or acrimonious.

Sullivan asked jurors to keep deliberating.

On Wednesday they sent the court another short note saying they were still at an impasse. Sullivan again told them to keep trying.

Clancy’s former husband made anguished 911 call

Clancy’s former husband, Patrick Clancy, was first to take the stand.

In emotional testimony, he described the day he found his wife after she tried to kill herself.

Lindsay Clancy had sent him out to get takeout food and medication for their daughter, which prosecutors argue was an excuse to get him out of the house.

He came home to find the house unusually silent, before finding blood throughout the main bedroom and a window open.

Jurors listened to the 911 call Patrick Clancy made after finding his wife outside in the snow. Clancy can be heard speaking with his wife, then tells the dispatcher he’s going to check on the children.

Moments later, he howls and cries after finding his children in the basement. The confused dispatcher repeatedly asks what happened.

“She killed the kids!” he yells.

Everyone knew Clancy was struggling

Clancy’s mother, mother-in-law, sister, friends and co-workers testified that Clancy struggled with her mental health after giving birth to Callan, the youngest of her three children.

Clancy’s mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, said she and her former daughter-in-law were close. Both worked as labor and delivery nurses. She described Lindsay as a wonderful mother.

But Susan Clancy testified that Lindsay had become anxious, paranoid and suicidal, and that the psychiatric care she was getting wasn’t helping.

“She felt unwell. She had insomnia. She was losing her appetite. She was very anxious and sad,” Susan Clancy said. “She was begging for help.”

Lindsay Clancy’s mother, Paula Musgrove, testified that her daughter was scared of sleeping alone, became paranoid and believed the medications she was taking “were destroying her mind.”

“Mom, will you please come up and stay with me for a bit? I’m really sick. Something is wrong,” Clancy wrote in an October 2022 text message that Paula Musgrove read in court. “I had horrible insomnia all night, and I just don’t know how I am going to get through the day. … It’s just really scary, and I don’t want to be alone.”

The defense questioned the quality of Clancy’s medical care

Clancy saw several doctors about her declining mental health, and eventually checked herself in to a psychiatric hospital.

Her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that she was misdiagnosed and overmedicated.

As he cross-examined one of her psychiatrists, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Reddington questioned her expertise, prescribing decisions and use of 25-minute video appointments with limited time for talk therapy.

At one point, Reddington implied that Tufts was a box-checking “robot.”

“What did you do? You had a woman who was telling you she felt hopeless,” he asked as they discussed an appointment about two months before the killings.

“I told her that this was something we could address, that there was hope, that there are treatments, that there are different types of programs,” Tufts said, “so she knew that she still had options and a reason to hope.”

Clancy said she heard a voice telling her to kill

Paul Zeizel, a clinical and forensic psychologist who visited Lindsay Clancy in the hospital after she killed the children, testified that he overheard her saying that a disembodied male voice had told her she had no choice but to kill her children and then herself. Zeizel said he believed Clancy wasn’t responsible for her actions because of her deep mental illness.

Prosecutors called a rebuttal witness, forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun, who said he didn’t believe Clancy had hallucinated voices.

“One of the things that she said when I asked about what happened, is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, ‘Go to God, baby. Go to God,’” he said. “That was part of her expectation that she and the children would be together in heaven with God.”

Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a senior psychiatrist for the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit, testified for prosecutors that Clancy “had the capacity to know right from wrong.”

The lawyers got the last word

After testimony was complete, each side got about an hour to make their closing argument to the jury.

Reddington showed the jury a photograph of the Clancy family, looking happy, and a second one of Lindsay Clancy in the hospital.

“How does this turn into this?” Reddington asked. “How? Because of the damn medicine and the lousy medical care that she got.”

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said criticizing the mental health system was “a distraction.” She said Clancy chose to kill her children because doing so would make it easier to kill herself.

“She was depressed. She was exhausted. She was done. She didn’t want to try anymore. She felt damaged,” Sprague said. “But those kids, those kids were her protective factor. Those kids were keeping her from ending her misery.”

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Lindsay Clancy Trial Reaches Its Most Dramatic Day Yet

0

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy reached its most tense moment so far Thursday, as her defense attorney raised alarm over a deliberating juror he said was unwilling to apply the law as instructed.

Judge William Sullivan halted deliberations for the day after the jury foreperson submitted a note indicating that one of the 12 jurors was not adhering to the legal standard for reasonable doubt.

Clancy, seated in a wheelchair, was brought to the judge’s bench by her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, as prosecutors looked on. Sullivan then questioned each juror individually, asking whether they could follow the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Each appeared to answer that they could.

After the questioning, Sullivan again reviewed his reasonable doubt guidance with the panel and directed the jurors to resume their work.

‘You are required to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you,’ the judge told them.

‘Reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is on the Commonwealth to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the charges made against her.

‘If you evaluate all the evidence and you still have a reasonable doubt remaining, the defendant is entitled to the benefit of that doubt and must be acquitted.’

Reddington then revealed that one holdout juror is holding up the verdict in a courtroom outburst.

The Lindsay Clancy jury has deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether she is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions

The Lindsay Clancy jury has deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether she is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions

Judge William Sullivan dismissed the jury for the day on Thursday after the foreperson sent a note saying one of the 12 jurors was not following the law on reasonable doubt

Judge William Sullivan dismissed the jury for the day on Thursday after the foreperson sent a note saying one of the 12 jurors was not following the law on reasonable doubt

‘The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that jury who’s been working for a week now, saying that there’s one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you’ve given him or her on reasonable doubt,’ Reddington said, growing animated.

‘I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction that you gave them, saying at the sidebar, “Can you listen to the law as I instruct you?” does not focus on the issue. The question is not sufficient enough. It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions on the law.

‘If we come back here in a half hour with a mistrial because a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it’s a shame.

He then demanded that the juror to be removed. 

The panel of 12, nine women and three men, has now deliberated for 35 hours to determine whether Clancy is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not criminally responsible for her actions.

They are still deadlocked, and a verdict has not been given. 

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023.

She admitted to killing her children but pleaded not guilty to murder by reason of insanity, citing postpartum psychosis as a result of overmedication.

During the five weeks of testimony, prosecutors argued the killings were intentional and well planned, not the work of someone who had lost control.

The defense attorney speaks to his client Clancy during the tense moment in court

The defense attorney speaks to his client Clancy during the tense moment in court

Reddington demanded that the one juror who is allegedly not following the law be removed

Clancy was then wheeled up to the judge¿s bench by her attorney, Kevin Reddington, and watched, along with the prosecution, as the judge asked each juror, one by one, whether they could follow the law on reasonable doubt

Clancy was then wheeled up to the judge’s bench by her attorney, Kevin Reddington, and watched, along with the prosecution, as the judge asked each juror, one by one, whether they could follow the law on reasonable doubt

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023

Clancy, 36, is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in 2023

The jury has not been sequestered during their deliberations.

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague insisted the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt were sufficient.

‘We have the note from the jury. There’s no way to determine what the deliberations are, who’s correct, who’s incorrect, nor should we attempt to, because that is part of deliberations,’ she said.

‘I think what Your Honor has done, by asking each juror if they’re able to follow the law and then giving a general instruction on reasonable doubt, is appropriate.’

Judge Sullivan noted the defense’s motion and acknowledged that removing a juror is a ‘sensitive undertaking.’

‘I’m sure the parties understand that the discharge of a deliberating juror is a sensitive undertaking,’ Sullivan said.

‘I was just specifically responding to the specific question that was asked. I don’t feel that it is proper for me to side with one side or the other of the deliberations. I don’t feel it’s appropriate for me to say I agree with one juror or the 11.

‘At this point, I’ve asked if they are able to follow my instructions; they swore earlier that they could.’

‘Ernie the Uber’ Arrested in Southern California Undercover Child Exploitation Sting

0

Santa Ana police arrested a Westminster man in an undercover operation after investigators say he arranged what he believed would be a meeting with a 16-year-old boy, using the name “Ernie the Uber.”

The case started when the teenager’s mother contacted the Santa Ana Police Department after finding alarming messages on her child’s phone. According to a department social media post, police identified the sender as 45-year-old Ernesto Orozco Villa of Westminster.

Patrol officers worked with the department’s drone unit to plan a targeted sting, persuading Villa to agree to meet the boy at a location in Orange County, authorities said.

Officers moved in shortly before 1 a.m. Wednesday as Villa waited in his car near Bristol Street and McFadden Avenue, where he was taken into custody.

Video of the arrest released by Santa Ana police shows Villa smiling and briefly speaking in Spanish before getting out of the vehicle. Officers then handcuffed him and placed him in the back of a patrol car.

Villa was booked into the Santa Ana Jail. Police reported that the suspect had allegedly requested explicit photos from the teen and was actively trying to arrange a sexual encounter.

“Parents, talk to your children about the dangers of communicating with strangers online and consider monitoring their devices,” Santa Ana police wrote. “Know who your children are talking to.”

Farage Vows to Stop Small Boats in 100 Days as Reform UK Unveils Border Plan

0

Nigel Farage is set to promise today that a Reform UK government would stop small boat crossings and tackle the cost of living within its first 100 days in office.

The Reform UK leader will say Parliament may have to sit seven days a week to drive through a rapid package of new laws aimed at confronting what he describes as a “national emergency” facing Britain.

Reform’s proposed first 100 days agenda includes ending Channel small boat arrivals and removing green levies from energy bills, a move the party says would save the average household £250.

The party’s Treasury spokesman, Robert Jenrick, yesterday pledged that an emergency Budget would be used to slash £80billion from public spending, with half of the savings targeted at what he called the swollen welfare bill.

Mr Jenrick said the plan would reduce Britain’s annual debt interest payments by £28billion, creating room for tax cuts intended to ease pressure on household budgets and help revive economic growth.

Mr Farage acknowledged this week he has been left ‘ratty and upset’ by a string of controversies about his party’s funding, including a £5million ‘personal’ donation from a Thai-based crypto-billionaire he failed to declare.

Reform has also slipped in the polls in the wake of Andy Burnham’s political honeymoon and a Tory revival under Kemi Badenoch. 

Mr Farage will use his party’s annual conference in Birmingham this weekend to try to get back on the front foot.

Nigel Farage pictured at the business day at the Reform UK Annual Conference at the NEC in Birmingham

Nigel Farage pictured at the business day at the Reform UK Annual Conference at the NEC in Birmingham

Migrants on board a taxi boat at the beach at Camiers in France before they cross the English Channel

Migrants on board a taxi boat at the beach at Camiers in France before they cross the English Channel

A person attending the business day of Reform UK Annual Conference on September 3

A person attending the business day of Reform UK Annual Conference on September 3

He will repeat his claim that a general election will be held next year. And, despite his party’s recent difficulties, he will insist Reform can win it, adding: ‘The two-party system that’s lasted for 100 years is coming to an end.’

Reform frontbenchers have been ordered to come up with a series of ambitious changes for the party’s first 100 days. 

Mr Farage will warn today that those who fail to deliver within weeks of the party coming to power will be sacked.

Reform has already set out radical plans to stop the boats, including ditching international human rights laws, banning illegal migrants from claiming asylum and towing boats back to France.

Mr Farage will use talks today with France’s National Rally party president Jordan Bardella to discuss co-operation on halting illegal immigration in the Channel. 

National Rally’s hard-Right leader Marine Le Pen is among the favourites to succeed Emmanuel Macron in next year’s presidential elections. 

Mr Bardella said last year his party was willing to work with Reform on stopping the small boats – including allowing UK Border Force to push dinghies back to France.

Reform yesterday dismissed Labour’s £660million deal with France, which ministers claim has helped cut migrant crossings this summer.

Reform UK Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick speaking during a press conference at Hoxton Docks in east London

Reform UK Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick speaking during a press conference at Hoxton Docks in east London

A Reform UK taxi inside the NEC in Birmingham for the party conference which will last three days

A Reform UK taxi inside the NEC in Birmingham for the party conference which will last three days

Deputy Leader Richard Tice speaks at a fringe meeting at the Reform UK Party Conference

Deputy Leader Richard Tice speaks at a fringe meeting at the Reform UK Party Conference

Deputy leader Richard Tice said: ‘We should not be sending hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ cash to the French to not do the job properly.

‘The way to solve this is to pick up, rescue and return. It is the humanitarian thing to do. The French are in breach of their international obligations by not stopping the boats and if we have to do the job for them then that’s what we’ll do.’

Mr Farage will today pledge to take personal charge of the mission to stop the boats, overseeing the work of the party’s home affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf.

And he will warn Establishment figures in Parliament, the civil service and the courts that Reform will not allow them to obstruct its plans. 

Mr Farage will vow to do ‘anything and everything to make the first 100 days work’, adding: ‘If the Lords, judiciary or civil service get in our way, they will discover just how determined we are.’

A party spokesman said: ‘Within days of winning the election we will introduce dozens of Bills and force Parliament to sit all through the summer for seven days a week to pass them.’

Reform plans to spell out its plans in its election manifesto in the hope that the Establishment ‘Blob’ will respect their mandate and not try to block them.

But they are also drawing up plans to override opposition, including packing the House of Lords with hundreds of peers.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham meets with Jewish community leaders in Downing Street

Prime Minister Andy Burnham meets with Jewish community leaders in Downing Street

The electoral challenge facing the party was underlined by a new study yesterday showing it is likely to face significant tactical voting at a general election.

The Policy Institute at King’s College London found that 41 per cent of voters named Reform as the party they most want to stop from winning. 

Almost a third of voters (29 per cent) would consider voting Conservative to keep Reform out in a close contest. 

Almost half of Green and Lib Dem voters would consider voting Labour to keep Reform out.

Join the discussion

Do you think Reform UK will stop the boats and cut the cost of living in the first 100 days of a Reform government?

Get your news delivered straight to you by 7am – sign up to our new Morning Mail newsletter for FREE

Exclusive: FBI Extraditions Surge as Patel Expands Global Push to Deny Fugitives Sanctuary

0

FBI Director Kash Patel has significantly increased direct communication with law enforcement counterparts abroad as part of a broader push to return international fugitives to U.S. soil.

According to FBI figures obtained exclusively by News Media, Patel placed 100 calls to foreign partners during his first 18 months in the role. By comparison, his predecessor made nine such calls during the final 18 months of the Biden administration.

The bureau said the stepped-up outreach coincided with a sharp rise in international returns. Extraditions increased 65% compared with the final 18 months of the Biden administration, while foreign transfers of custody, known as FTOCs, climbed 54%. FTOCs occur when a fugitive or suspect is detained overseas and handed over to U.S. authorities.

During that period, the FBI said it completed 157 extraditions and 86 foreign transfers of custody.

FBI BRINGS BACK FUGITIVE ACCUSED IN $3.7B MEDICARE FRAUD SCHEME AFTER CAPTURE IN TURKEY

Kash Patel speaking at a witness table during a Senate committee hearing.

FBI Director Kash Patel touted the agency’s facilitation of foreign transfers of custody and the uptick in extraditions of high-profile targets seeking to evade U.S. justice abroad. (Win McNamee/Getty Images/File)

“When I became FBI director, I made clear that we would relentlessly manhunt high‑value targets from overseas, and we’ve delivered,” FBI Director Kash Patel told News Media. 

“It’s a direct result of President [Donald] Trump’s relationships with foreign governments, which allow us to work in spaces where we were never permitted to before and Attorney General Todd Blanche’s leadership giving us the legal tools we need to return these subjects back to America to face charges.

“These targets are literally the worst of the worst, and we will give them no sanctuary.”

Split with a mugshot in an inset and the Philadelphia FBI building

Alexis Flores was previously a top 10 FBI fugitive, according to officials. He was arrested Wednesday in Honduras in the 2000 murder of a young girl in Philadelphia. (FBI and Google Maps)

On Monday, a Honduran citizen on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted Fugitives list was extradited to Philadelphia after 25 years on the run for the alleged rape and murder of a 5-year-old girl, Fox News exclusively reported.

Alexis Flores was arrested in February, and Honduran authorities agreed to extradite him to the U.S. The FBI said Flores had been removed from the fugitives list in March 2025 due to the prior Honduran government’s refusal to extradite him for his offenses, citing local laws limiting extradition.

EXCLUSIVE: ALLEGED $32M COVID-19 FRAUD FUGITIVE CAPTURED IN JAMAICA AND RETURNED TO US, FBI SAYS

FBI agents escorting a man across an airport tarmac toward a private jet during extradition.

FBI agents escort Zobaidul Amin after his transfer from Malaysia to the United States to face charges in an alleged international sextortion and child exploitation scheme. (Department of Justice)

Since June, the FBI has conducted more than 70 extraditions, Patel said at the time of Flores’ extradition to the U.S.

In March, Zobaidul Amin, a Bangladeshi national, was extradited from Malaysia to the U.S. to face charges related to one of the most prolific online child exploitation schemes.

Prosecutors allege Amin posed as a teenager on Instagram and Snapchat and coerced hundreds of minor victims — some as young as 11 — into producing sexually explicit images and videos. Authorities said he then threatened to share those images with friends, family and classmates unless the victims sent more.

Another recent example is the case of Abdullah Anwar, 28, a Texas resident who was brought back from Qatar to face fraud charges. Anwar fled the U.S. for Pakistan but was arrested in Qatar before authorities there agreed to extradite him to Texas.

The FBI has prioritized the extradition of suspects and fugitives abroad. From 2022 to 2025, former FBI Director Christopher Wray made 20 calls to foreign partners, including nine in his last 18 months during the Biden administration, the agency said.

Patel has made 100 calls in his first 18 months, a 400% increase over those made during Wray’s four years and a 1,011% call increase over Wray’s final 18 months with the Biden administration.

FBI agents stand on the tarmac as a plane arrives carrying Zobaidul Amin following his extradition from Malaysia to face federal charges in Alaska.

FBI agents stand on the tarmac as a plane arrives carrying Zobaidul Amin after his extradition from Malaysia to face federal charges in Alaska. (Department of Justice)

Typically, the FBI works with foreign authorities and governments to track and arrest suspects hiding in other countries. Once someone is arrested, the Justice Department will formally request that person be handed over to U.S. custody using existing international treaties.

Once the foreign government approves the handover, FBI agents travel abroad, take physical custody of the fugitive and fly them back to the U.S. for trial.

Spencer Pratt Blasts Ryan Reynolds Over Woke 1980s Comments

0

Spencer Pratt is taking aim at Ryan Reynolds after the Hollywood star offered a less-than-glowing take on 1980s nostalgia.

Reynolds, the Canadian actor starring as a U.S. Navy pilot in Apple TV’s Mayday, recently described the era as both “tumultuous” and emotionally complicated — comments that led Pratt to dismiss him as a “tool.”

“What’s interesting is when you get far enough away from a time period that’s distinct, there’s always a lovely feeling associated with it,” Reynolds, 49, told Variety.

He added that people tend to soften difficult memories over time, saying it can feel “almost like you pave over all the trauma with puppy dogs and ice cream.”

In Mayday, Reynolds’ character forms an unexpected bond with a quirky former KGB operative, played by Kenneth Branagh, whose fascination with 1980s American pop culture helps drive the story.

Speaking on the red carpet at the AMC Lincoln Square in New York City on Tuesday night, Reynolds, born in 1976, listed what he thought we often gloss over.

Spencer Pratt is lashing out at Ryan Reynolds after the actor shared a controversial stance on ¿80s nostalgia

Spencer Pratt is lashing out at Ryan Reynolds after the actor shared a controversial stance on ¿80s nostalgia

Spencer Pratt is lashing out at Ryan Reynolds after the actor shared a controversial stance on ’80s nostalgia

Pratt took to X on Thursday to complain about Reynolds' comments in an interview with Variety

Pratt took to X on Thursday to complain about Reynolds’ comments in an interview with Variety

 ‘The 80s was a brutal, brutal time for people. It was a fucking mess and people forget that. It was a tremendous strife,’ he explained. ‘Socio political tensions everywhere. We were still pretty fresh off a Cuban missile crisis, which was only 15-20 years before.

‘It’s a tumultuous period, but you look back at it now and you’re like, ‘Oh, yeah. Top Gun. Cocaine!’ Like, ‘No!’ It was really scary.’

With that in mind, the Deadpool star suggested that when we look back on 2026 and this era we’ll pick on the ‘big ticket items that didn’t really leave the footprint, culturally, that we thought it would’ve.’

Explaining that much of the oughts felt like a mix of decades previous, while the decade previous were their ‘own thing,’ he predicted the ‘COVID era’ would be looked at with rose-colored glasses.

‘We’re living in the frickin’ salad days. We just don’t know it.’ he exclaimed.

The comments were enough to rub up reality star Pratt the wrong way.

Despite endorsements from some of Hollywood’s biggest stars this year, it wasn’t enough to secure Pratt a win in the LA Mayor’s race in June. But his social media comments on Thursday showed he still has plans for the city. 

‘Here I am trying to bring back American film jobs, and then these tools keep saying stupid crap like this and making every normal American hate them,’ Pratt posted on X. 

'Just stick to the Cricket wireless ads,' Pratt wrote about Reynolds, who holds a 25 percent stake in Mint Mobile

‘Just stick to the Cricket wireless ads,’ Pratt wrote about Reynolds, who holds a 25 percent stake in Mint Mobile

  ‘Hollywood is seriously its own worst enemy. Just stick to the Cricket wireless ads, dude.’

Reynolds holds a 25 percent stake in Mint Mobile and appears in their commercials.

When Pratt lost, President Trump renewed his criticisms of Los Angeles’ mayoral primary election in a Truth Social post.

‘Not possible for Spencer Pratt to have lost the L.A. runoffs after the big lead he had. 3rd World Nation. Rigged Elections!’ Trump wrote.

Last year, Pratt and wife Heidi Montag’s family were dealt a devastating blow when their home was one of the thousands destroyed by Los Angeles’ most destructive fire in history.

Enraged by the government’s response to the natural disaster, Pratt announced his plan to run for mayor on the one-year anniversary of the fires.

They’re both no strangers to Hollywood. They both appeared on MTV’s The Hills, Celebrity Big Brother among other shows.

CPS Board Hopefuls Question Jessica Biggs’ Do-Not-Hire Appeal

0

CHICAGO (WLS) — As the contest for president of the Chicago Board of Education heats up, a supporter of one candidate is urging officials to investigate how a do-not-hire designation connected to Jessica Biggs was reversed.

That reversal occurred while Macquline King was serving as Chicago Public Schools CEO and superintendent.

Before she was elected to the Chicago Board of Education, Biggs worked as interim principal at Burke Elementary School on the South Side. She was later dismissed over issues she has characterized as minor administrative violations.

“We were marking students tardy in cases when they may have arrived to school so late that they were absent for a half a day,” Biggs said.

Findings from the CPS Office of Inspector General also said Biggs violated district rules by not keeping driver’s license and insurance documentation for staff members who transported students.

“When a parent made a request and wanted help with a ride to school, there were cases where a staff member would go and pick students up,” Biggs said.

Biggs said she was fired in 2018 and, under CPS policy at the time, was automatically placed on the district’s do-not-hire list. She contends she was targeted because she was an outspoken principal on other issues.

Biggs appealed the designation in 2023 and was denied. She said a second appeal was also denied a year later. After being elected to the school board, she appealed again and was successful under King’s leadership.

Andre Smith, a former school board candidate who lost to Biggs and now supports her opponent, Victor Henderson, has questioned the circumstances surrounding the successful appeal.

“The question is was it done with integrity or was it a back room deal? I’m calling for an investigation,” Smith said.

Smith alleges Biggs’ appeal was granted after she led the search process that selected King as CPS CEO and superintendent, despite not initially supporting her candidacy.

Biggs rejected the accusation.

“This is a false political attack. My appeal was sent to be reviewed by an outside counsel to avoid even an appearance of a conflict of interest. No one within the CEO’s office was able to even touch that appeal,” she said.

Other candidates in the race for school board president have also raised questions about the appeal process but said they are more concerned about the circumstances that led to Biggs’ firing.

In a written statement, Chicago Teachers Union-endorsed candidate Hilario Dominguez said, “The revelations are damning. It’s hard to imagine someone who got fired for how she ran her school being put in charge of running the whole district. It makes you ask why Ms. Biggs couldn’t follow the rules herself. And then worse, she may have used her power on the board for her personal benefit when she had the chance.”

While Smith has called for an investigation, Biggs has received endorsements from several current school board members who are not aligned with the Chicago Teachers Union, as well as from Service Employees International Union.

Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.