Home Blog Page 85

Coleen Rooney Considered Separating From Husband Wayne Over His ‘Careless’ Behavior

0

Longtime Lakers PA Announcer Lawrence Tanter Dies at 76

0

Lawrence Tanter, the longtime public address announcer whose voice became synonymous with Lakers basketball, has died, the franchise announced Wednesday night.

He was 76.

“We are deeply saddened to share the news of the passing of legendary Lakers public address announcer Lawrence Tanter,” the team said in a statement. “For 43 years, LT’s voice served as the soundtrack to Lakers games at the arena. He will be remembered as a cherished member of the Lakers family.”

Tanter took over as the Lakers’ P.A. announcer during the 1982-83 season. His polished delivery and unmistakable baritone soon became a defining part of the game-night atmosphere at the team’s home arena, where he worked for more than four decades.

During Tanter’s tenure, the Lakers captured 10 NBA championships.

“A true original that added his unique style to Showtime,” Lakers governor and co-owner Jeanie Buss said in a statement. “Rest in peace, LT.”

Tanter retired from his role in June after a 43-season run. At the time, the Lakers said he would remain involved with the organization as a special adviser on game presentation.

He remains the longest-tenured public address announcer in Lakers history.

“Lawrence Tanter has been an integral part of the Lakers gameday experience for more than four decades, setting the tone for countless memorable moments with his professionalism, energy and signature booming voice,” Buss said in June. “Since the 1980s, LT has narrated every chapter of Lakers basketball, connecting generations of fans, players, coaches and staff while becoming a trusted and unforgettable part of the Lakers experience. I am incredibly grateful for everything he has given to this franchise.”

Tanter was absent for the Lakers’ final six regular-season home games and their playoff run after suffering a health setback.

ESPN reported that Tanter had suffered a stroke in March.

The Lakers had not announced a permanent replacement when Tanter retired.

Jason Barquero, the public address announcer for the Lakers’ G League affiliate, stepped in to handle the role during the closing stretch of the 2025-26 season.

“He’s an iconic voice,” Lakers coach JJ Redick said in March after Tanter missed his first game. “It’s almost a comfort level with him being in this arena.”

Tanter was born in Chicago in 1949.

At 6-foot-7, he played forward in high school and later received a basketball scholarship to the University of Dubuque.

He relocated to Southern California in the early 1970s, worked at radio station KJLH and eventually began his historic run with the Lakers.

‘I Guess the Light Bulb Went Off’: CNN Lawyer Mocks Trump DOJ’s ‘Magic Words’ Used to Get the President What He Wants

0

Main: President Donald Trump and Marco Rubio, United States Secretary of State, attend a press conference at the NATO Summit at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkiye, on July 8, 2026 (Photo by Klaudia Radecka/NurPhoto via AP). Left inset: U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly (Historical Society of the D.C. Circuit).

A high-profile First Amendment attorney representing CNN sharply challenged the Justice Department during a fast-moving hearing Wednesday in Washington, D.C. Ted Boutrous accused the DOJ of invoking “national security” as though the phrase alone could serve as a legal shortcut for President Donald Trump’s decision to bar the media organizations CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee whom the president called “totally disloyal” shortly before the hearing, kept the proceeding to less than an hour. The session came only two days after the news organizations filed their lawsuit, which argues that the White House violated the First Amendment and denied them due process under the Fifth Amendment.

Kelly opened by noting that Boutrous had previously appeared before him nearly eight years ago. In that earlier case, the lawyer successfully persuaded Kelly to reinstate then-CNN correspondent Jim Acosta’s White House press credentials.

The judge said the procedures established by the D.C. Circuit in the Acosta litigation—and in a comparable case involving Playboy reporter Brian Karem—“wasn’t followed here.”

Boutrous argued that the White House’s latest ban should be overturned because it was imposed with “no notice, no process, and no warning.” He described the administration’s treatment of the outlets as an especially obvious example of viewpoint discrimination.

The attorney reserved his strongest criticism for the DOJ’s last-minute national security arguments, which appeared in a filing submitted Tuesday evening.

The filing, signed by DOJ lawyer Michael Velchik, maintained that access to the White House is “a privilege—not a right.”

The department also argued that the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in Sherrill v. Knight was wrongly decided and should be overturned. According to the DOJ, Trump has “compelling interest[s]” in setting baseline standards for legitimate journalists and protecting sensitive national security information.

Boutrous portrayed that position as another instance of the Trump administration deploying “national security” to change the direction of courtroom disputes. He pointed to the administration’s broader use of the argument in recent litigation.

In his view, the national security claims were designed to draw attention away from what he called a plainly unconstitutional act of retaliation against critical news organizations.

Boutrous told the court that Trump did not mention national security until after the media groups announced Monday morning that they planned to sue. He suggested the argument emerged only after the lawsuit became imminent.

“They’re just saying national security,” Boutrous said, arguing that the phrase was being treated as a set of “magic words” capable of resolving every legal question. He said the administration had offered no concrete explanation, no specific reporting incidents identified by the president and no facts that could justify bypassing due process. Instead, he characterized the filing as a retrospective attempt to defend what he called a blatant constitutional violation.

Boutrous also warned that winning a temporary restraining order on due process grounds might not end the dispute. He repeatedly referred to Trump’s effort to remove Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook as an example of why he feared the administration could continue taking aggressive steps.

“I’m very concerned that even if the court grants a TRO [temporary restraining order] on due process grounds, the shenanigans will continue,” Boutrous said. Citing the Supreme Court’s Trump v. Cook decision, he argued that judges should not approach the administration’s next move with the same level of naivete expected from ordinary citizens.

Velchik, representing the DOJ, reiterated that White House access is a privilege rather than a constitutional entitlement. He said Trump had personally issued notice of his decision and provided a detailed, though non-exhaustive, list of the reporting incidents at issue.

The government attorney said the outlets had been given an opportunity to challenge those incidents and would have until 5 p.m. Friday to submit their response.

In his rebuttal, Boutrous rejected that timeline as a meaningful legal process and again invoked Cook v. Trump to support his warning.

He argued that offering the organizations a chance to respond by Friday afternoon did not guarantee a fair review. If the administration continued changing its rationale or shifting the terms of the dispute, he said, the procedure would not satisfy the requirements of due process.

Kelly issued no ruling at the conclusion of the hearing. The judge told the parties he would try to provide an answer as quickly as possible.

The post ‘I guess the light bulb went off’: CNN lawyer mocks Trump DOJ’s ‘post hoc’ use of ‘magic words’ to get whatever the president wants first appeared on Law & Crime.

Rapper Asian Doll Celebrates Daughter Mi’Lani’s 1st Birthday Picnic

0

Asian Doll and her fiancé, Jugg, marked daughter Mi’Lani’s first birthday with a charming Strawberry Shortcake-inspired picnic.

The waterfront gathering was styled in shades of red, pink and white, complete with gingham blankets, strawberry details, floral arrangements and a picnic table facing the water. Birthday girl Mi’Lani wore a pink gingham dress decorated with strawberries, while her mother coordinated in a matching gingham ensemble.

“It’s My 1st Birthday,” the couple wrote in a joint Instagram post. “Strawberry Shortcake Picnic With Mom & Dad.”

Asian also shared a heartfelt message celebrating her firstborn daughter on Instagram.

“Happy Birthday To My 1st Born My Life Time Bestie,” she wrote.

“I Cany Believe I’m Even Writing This Right Now Cause Time Has Flew I Just Had You In My Tummy Crying From Heart Burns,” she continued. “I Love You So Much More Than Life It’s Self Your My EVERYTHING GIRL I Promise To Give You Everything I Never Had Plus More…”

The rapper went on to add, “My Phat Phat My Baby Doll My lani Pop Watching You Grow Has Been My Favorite Show Thank You For Turning Me Into A Real Women. I LOVE YOU FOREVER & EVER @dadolls2.0”

Mi’Lani arrived on Sept. 22, 2025, weighing 7 pounds, 13 ounces. Asian later shared that her daughter’s delivery took less than 20 minutes.

“I can’t believe it took me less than 20 mins to push my daughter out. God Is Good,” she posted soon after giving birth. “Being able to birth a kid is truly [a] blessing.”

Just days after welcoming Mi’Lani, Asian described her early experience with motherhood in an enthusiastic Instagram update.

“I love being a mom WTF it was the best decision of my entire life !!!!!!!” she wrote.

Asian is now expecting another child. In June, she announced that she and Jugg are preparing for the arrival of a baby boy, who is due in December—on her birthday.

“I’m pregnant with my son & I give birth in December on my birthday I’m so tired of hiding it,” she revealed at the time.

The upcoming arrival will be the second child Asian Doll and Jugg share.

How Pink Became Involved in the Ed Sheeran-Macklemore Controversy

0

Pink performs on stage in Austria

Notable People

Pink was never connected to Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour. She was not part of the lineup and had rarely spoken publicly about Macklemore or Sheeran before the tour became embroiled in controversy. Now, however, the singer has become a central figure after publicly supporting demands for Macklemore to be removed from the bill. Here’s how the dispute unfolded.

Pink had no involvement with Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour and was not present when the controversy began. Her name entered the story only after she endorsed calls to remove rapper Macklemore from the tour. The dispute started with remarks Macklemore made during an opening performance in New Jersey.

What is the Ed Sheeran and Macklemore controversy about?

The incident took place earlier this month at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford. During his set, Macklemore spoke in support of Palestine, telling concertgoers that one reason he accepted the tour was to say “Free Palestine” in stadiums throughout the United States. He also said he wanted people in Gaza and the West Bank to know they had not been forgotten before performing his protest track “Hind’s Hall” as images from Gaza appeared on screen.

Macklemore was removed from the tour less than two weeks later. Promoter Messina Touring Group said the shows could not proceed with him scheduled to perform. Macklemore later claimed that New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft pressured other stadium owners to issue Sheeran an ultimatum: remove the rapper or risk losing the venues. Neither Sheeran nor representatives for Kraft has publicly verified that account.

The decision triggered a wider backlash. Other opening performers, along with members of Sheeran’s band, reportedly pulled out in protest. Sheeran has maintained that the choice was made by the promoter rather than by him, adding that he does not want to be pulled into a public political fight. The singer has also expressed opposition to incorporating politics into his music for years.

How did Pink get involved?

Although Pink had no role in the tour and did not attend the performances at the center of the dispute, she addressed the issue on Instagram. Soon after the MetLife shows, she reposted a statement from StopAntisemitism criticizing Macklemore’s comments and urging tour organizers to remove him. The post accused him of subjecting fans to anti-Israel messaging, rejected allegations that Israel is committing genocide, and called for both an apology and ticket refunds.

Pink’s post quickly drew criticism from people who said she was supporting an attempt to silence Macklemore for speaking on behalf of Palestinians. Her social media comments filled with angry responses. More than a week later, she published a lengthy explanation, saying Macklemore’s remarks were deeply alarming to her as a Jewish woman. She also acknowledged that the original post included wording she would not have used herself, though her clarification did little to ease the backlash.

The controversy continued to follow Pink. According to The Independent, actor Javier Bardem promoted a Change.org petition seeking her removal as a UNICEF ambassador, a position she has held since 2015. At press time, the petition had gathered more than 180,000 signatures.

Judge Orders White House to Restore Access to Trump-Banned Outlets

0

WASHINGTON – A federal judge early Thursday temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s effort to bar three news organizations from the White House grounds, ordering the restoration of access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

The ruling marks the latest turn in an intensifying dispute between Trump and media outlets whose reporting he has criticized. Trump announced the ban Sept. 18, accusing the organizations of producing what he called “fake news.” More recently, he has argued that negative coverage poses a danger to the country.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico argued that they were targeted because of the viewpoints expressed in their coverage. The outlets described the ban as a “blatant violation” of the First Amendment.

In an order issued shortly after midnight, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly said the outlets had satisfied the legal requirements for a temporary restraining order. Those requirements include showing a likelihood of success in the case and a risk of irreparable harm without court intervention.

“This is a high bar, but Plaintiffs have met it,” Kelly wrote.

Kelly, whom Trump nominated in 2017, heard arguments Wednesday but concluded the hearing without issuing an immediate decision. The judge previously ordered the restoration of access for a CNN journalist in a similar case in 2018.

The temporary restraining order took effect Thursday and will remain in place for 14 days. Such orders are generally intended to preserve existing conditions while the court conducts a more detailed examination of the dispute.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Kelly questioned whether the administration had fulfilled its legal obligations and given the three outlets adequate due process before revoking their access.

Two earlier press-access cases, including one that reached the U.S. Supreme Court, established that journalists must receive an opportunity to respond before their press credentials are revoked.

Justice Department attorney Michael Velchik contended that the precedents from those cases were wrongly decided.

Kelly said he would follow the precedents from comparable First Amendment cases in reaching his decision, even though the government disputes those rulings.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Tennessee Police Raided Man’s Home Over Speeding Criticism, Lawsuit Says

0

A Tennessee man has sued a police department, claiming officers violated his First Amendment rights after he recorded and publicly criticized one of them.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) filed the lawsuit in 2023 on behalf of Joshua Gibbons against the city of Kingsport, its police chief and several officers. Gibbons has now made the complaint public after the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals overturned his conviction and dismissed the final charge against him.

“They tried to intimidate me, but I’m not backing down,” Gibbons said in a statement. “I can’t let this injustice stand, because my family doesn’t feel safe anymore. There’s no coming back from that raid on our home. They sent eight heavily armed officers to arrest me because I embarrassed them.”

The dispute began in October 2022, when Gibbons recorded a Kingsport Police Department SUV allegedly traveling at high speed at night without its lights or siren activated. The lawsuit says that conduct violated both department rules and Tennessee law. Gibbons followed the vehicle to a fast-food drive-thru, where he filmed himself briefly confronting the officer about the driving.

Joshua Gibbons

Joshua Gibbons sued the police department, alleging that officials violated his First Amendment rights. (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression)

“When he caught up with the officer, the officer did the right thing. He ignored Joshua Gibbons, didn’t arrest him, didn’t view it as a crime, and went and got his hamburger,” FIRE Senior Attorney Adam Steinbaugh told News Media.

Gibbons regularly posts videos of officers performing their duties, saying the recordings help hold police accountable. He later uploaded another video showing an officer making an obscene hand gesture toward him.

According to FIRE, another resident complained to the police department about the officer’s behavior. Officials then reviewed Gibbons’ YouTube channel, allegedly looking for material that could be used against him.

Investigators located the video showing the police SUV speeding. Rather than discipline the officer, the department sent officers to arrest Gibbons, FIRE alleges.

“The First Amendment protects the right not only to criticize and film police, but also to post it online. The police department didn’t treat this as a crime until Joshua posted this online and embarrassed the department,” Steinbaugh said.

Joshua Gibbons, who sued after filming and criticizing a speeding cop

Joshua Gibbons endured two trials over nearly four years before a Tennessee appeals court dismissed the charges. (Zelina Photography)

Steinbaugh described the case as “as lawless as it was hypocritical,” arguing that the department’s actions were intended to punish Gibbons and “make an example out of a critic.”

The lawsuit says police obtained an arrest warrant within two hours of learning about Gibbons’ video. The warrant accused him of speeding, using a cellphone while driving and disorderly conduct. FIRE says the document was secured from a court clerk rather than a judge.

Shortly before dawn the next day, eight armed officers arrived at Gibbons’ home and arrested him in front of his elderly mother and daughter. Security and cellphone video captured the raid, which occurred nine days after he recorded and criticized the officer.

Gibbons ultimately went through two trials during a nearly four-year legal battle before the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the remaining charge.

“That’s a long process that can take a mental toll on someone. I think that Joshua wants to send a message to this department. I think he wants to see some reforms to this department, and we’re happy to support him,” Steinbaugh said.

Kingsport Police in Tennessee

The lawsuit names the city of Kingsport, its police chief and individual officers as defendants. (Kingsport Police)

At the first trial, a judge cleared Gibbons of the speeding and cellphone allegations but convicted him of disorderly conduct. The judge said he was “offended by the way” Gibbons was “talking to that officer.” Gibbons appealed to the county circuit court, where a jury also found him guilty of disorderly conduct.

In June, however, the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals unanimously reversed the conviction and dismissed the charge. The appellate court concluded there was “no evidence” that Gibbons’ criticism had prevented anyone from carrying out a lawful activity.

The court found that Gibbons had not threatened anyone, acted violently or created a physically offensive or dangerous condition. It also emphasized that “‘profane and insulting’ words alone will not rise to the level of a crime,” particularly when directed at police officers, who “are trained to exercise a higher degree of restraint than the average citizen.”

“If you are a law enforcement officer, you are required by your uniform and by the First Amendment to tolerate criticism. Some of that’s going to be fair criticism, some of it’s going to be unfair criticism. But you don’t get to go and arrest people for it. That’s the message we want to send to this department and to departments around the country,” Steinbaugh said.

Kingsport Police did not respond to News Media’s request for comment in time for publication.

Atlanta Murder Fugitive Captured in Jacksonville After Three Years

0

Jonathan Soto, 43, is suspected of killing Michael Gidewon, the co-owner of Atlanta’s Republic Lounge, in 2023.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — Jonathan Soto, who was placed on Atlanta’s Top 10 Most Wanted list after a high-profile 2023 homicide, has been arrested in Jacksonville, Florida, more than three years later.

Soto is accused of killing Gidewon outside the Republic Lounge on Feb. 4, 2023. Atlanta police responding to the nightclub on Brady Avenue NW found Gidewon, the club’s co-owner, suffering from a gunshot wound to the head.

According to Atlanta Police, which spoke with Atlanta partner station WXIA, the suspect had been removed from the nightclub for being intoxicated. Investigators allege he returned with a gun and fatally shot Gidewon.

Gidewon was a husband and father of four who operated the club with his brother, Alex. The Republic Lounge announced its closure shortly after Gidewon’s death.

In a statement directed at Soto after the killing, Alex Gidewon wrote, “You executed my brother, in front of the club, in front of people, and walked home like it was nothing.” Alex said Soto had been a longtime friend whom he considered family.

The Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office, working with the Atlanta Police Department and the U.S. Marshals Service, located the 43-year-old fugitive at an apartment complex in the city’s Southside on Wednesday afternoon, the sheriff’s office said.

Authorities surrounded an apartment on Gate Parkway North, but Soto reportedly refused to surrender. He was taken into custody safely after a SWAT team breached the door.

“We are proud of our partnerships with law enforcement agencies, not just locally but across the country. Working together, we get dangerous fugitives off our streets,” the sheriff’s office said Wednesday.

Soto remains in the Duval County jail on a fugitive warrant.

Australians on Alert as ATO Targets Melbourne Tax Dodgers

0

Australian business owners are being warned after the Australian Taxation Office carried out an unannounced compliance operation at 25 fast-food outlets, restaurants and cafes.

The venues, located in Melbourne’s CBD, were visited on September 22 and 23 as the ATO examined suspected tax evasion, unpaid superannuation and income that may have been underreported.

Data obtained by news.com.au shows the ATO received more than 52,000 tip-offs across Australia during the last financial year—around 1,000 leads each week. More than 2,500 concerned the hospitality sector.

ATO assistant commissioner Tony Goding said information supplied by the public was crucial to identifying businesses that were not complying with their obligations.

“Much of our most valuable intelligence comes directly from community tip-offs,” he said.

“Often, it’s a worker, customer or competitor who recognises something that doesn’t seem right.”

Mr Goding said businesses could come under scrutiny when their declared income appeared inconsistent with the level of activity at their premises.

“Melbourne diners know a busy cafe when they see one, so do we,” he said.

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has swept through more than 25 Melbourne fast food outlets, restaurants and cafes in its latest compliance blitz

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has inspected more than 25 Melbourne fast-food outlets, restaurants and cafes as part of its latest compliance operation.

“When a venue is packed, staff are flat out and the coffee machine never stops, but the books tell a different story, that’s something we’re going to take a closer look at.”

The Melbourne operation is part of the ATO’s wider Shadow Economy Taskforce, which also visited farms in Griffith, NSW, in July and vineyards throughout South Australia’s Barossa Valley, Adelaide Hills and McLaren Vale in April.

The agency said its work over the past couple of years had identified more than 350 individuals and entities, leading to fines totalling more than $2.7 million.

Beyond hospitality, the ATO said a significant number of tip-offs involved the building and construction sector, as well as hairdressing and beauty businesses.

The allegations most commonly involved undeclared income, cash-in-hand payments and lifestyles that appeared out of step with the earnings reported to authorities.

Mr Goding said people who intentionally avoided paying tax or meeting their superannuation responsibilities would ultimately be detected.

“Tax crime leaves telltale signs, and the community is getting better at spotting them, and less tolerant of people getting away with these activities,” he said.

“The message is simple: if you’re deliberately avoiding your tax or super obligations, there’s a good chance someone will notice.

The hospitality venues in the city's CBD were raided on September 22 and 23 amid concerns over suspected tax evasion, unpaid superannuation and underreported income

The hospitality venues in Melbourne’s CBD were visited on September 22 and 23 amid concerns about suspected tax evasion, unpaid superannuation and underreported income.

In data obtained by news.com.au, the ATO received more than 52,000 tip-offs in the last financial year, with more than 2,500 of those directed towards the hospitality industry

According to data obtained by news.com.au, the ATO received more than 52,000 tip-offs during the last financial year, including more than 2,500 relating to hospitality businesses.

“Whether it’s an employee, customer, supplier, former partner, competitor or member of the public, there are eyes everywhere.”

– READ MORE: ATO puts Australians on notice over commonly abused tax deduction: ‘We’re watching more closely than ever’ 

Australia’s ‘High Immigration or Else’ Claim Branded a Sick Lie

0