Home Blog Page 194

Patrick Ricard, 300-Pound Fullback, Is the Giants’ Offensive Secret Sauce

0

As long as he keeps calling it “spaghetti sauce” rather than marinara, Patrick Ricard is unlikely to be mistaken for Tommy DeVito anywhere in New York or North Jersey.

Still, Ricard — the 300-pound fullback who represents John Harbaugh’s preferred brand of physical football while evoking Giants fans’ memories of the smashmouth 1980s — may be on track to build a DeVito-style cult following of his own.

“I’m like the spaghetti sauce on the offense,” Ricard said, explaining an analogy that run-game coordinator Greg Roman uses with him. “I’m like the secret sauce, where you put me in different spots to get the advantage, and I’m usually a mismatch with who I’m blocking because I’m usually bigger than them.

“It’s a lot of fun to be in this offense — to be moved around a lot in motion and shift and be in different spots. It’s almost like ‘Where’s Waldo?’ on Sundays, and it can be a lot to defend.”

Lindsay Clancy Hires Karen Read Lawyer for Double Jeopardy Fight

0

The Massachusetts mother accused of killing her three young children is adding the lawyer known for challenging Karen Read’s retrial as she seeks to have the charges against her dismissed.

Clancy’s high-profile murder trial reportedly ended with an 11-1 jury split favoring a finding that she was not criminally responsible. She has now brought veteran Boston attorney Martin Weinberg onto her defense team.

According to a Plymouth Superior Court filing obtained by News Media, Weinberg submitted a limited appearance Tuesday so he can file and argue an upcoming motion to dismiss the case on double-jeopardy grounds.

The court document says Weinberg will represent Clancy on the dismissal request as well as “related matters.”

Lindsay Clancy with lawyer

Lindsay Clancy sits beside defense attorney Kevin Reddington during her murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court on Aug. 11, 2026. (Jonathan Wiggs/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

The filing does not specify when Weinberg plans to submit the motion. Clancy is scheduled to return to court on Sept. 29.

Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4 after jurors deliberated for seven days and informed the court they were unable to reach a unanimous decision.

Afterward, several jurors said that 11 panel members favored a verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, while one juror supported a conviction.

The defense attorney walking into court.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington speaks with reporters while jurors deliberate in the case involving Lindsay Clancy and the 2023 deaths of her three children. (Joseph Prezioso/ AFP via Getty Images)

Clancy’s longtime defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, signaled immediately after the mistrial that he would fight any attempt to put her on trial again.

The defense is expected to argue that the way the mistrial ended bars prosecutors from taking another shot at the case. Prosecutors can generally retry a defendant after a jury deadlocks, but Clancy’s attorneys are expected to claim that the circumstances surrounding her mistrial make a second trial improper.

Karen Read exits court.

Karen Read outside the Norfolk County Superior Court, Friday, June 13, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (Richard Beetham for Fox New Digital)

Weinberg mounted a similar fight for Read after her 2024 trial ended without a verdict.

Read’s attorneys said jurors later told them they had unanimously agreed to clear her of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly crash, despite remaining divided on a manslaughter charge.

Weinberg argued that Read should not face those two charges again. A judge rejected the request, finding that the jury never formally returned not-guilty verdicts and that Read’s attorneys had agreed to the mistrial.

The battle continued in state and federal court before Read was retried in 2025. She was acquitted of second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a deadly crash but convicted of misdemeanor operating under the influence.

Lindsay Clancy at her trial

Lindsay Clancy looks on as jurors enter the courtroom during Clancy’s murder trial at the Plymouth County Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on Sept. 4, 2026. (Greg Derr / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

Clancy is accused of strangling her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and 8-month-old Callan, with exercise bands inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.

She then jumped from a second-story window in an apparent suicide attempt, leaving her paralyzed, authorities said.

Clancy does not deny killing the children but pleaded not guilty because her attorneys say she was not criminally responsible at the time. Her defense argued she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was heavily medicated when the children died.

Prosecutors countered that Clancy carefully planned the killings, sending her husband, Patrick Clancy, out of the house before attacking the children.

Lindsay Clancy in court for murder trial

Defendant Lindsay Clancy listens during her murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., on Thursday, July 30, 2026. (CJ Gunther/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)

Clancy remains in custody at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have not publicly announced whether they intend to retry her.

Sullivan also ordered the identities of the 12 jurors and six alternates who served in Clancy’s trial to remain private indefinitely amid safety concerns and the unauthorized disclosure of jurors’ personal information.

The judge wrote that jurors had been identified without their permission and that at least one juror had asked for the protection to be extended indefinitely.

“Based on the circumstances of this trial and the fact that the case continues to receive daily, divisive attention in Massachusetts and beyond, the Court concludes that there is a real and present ‘risk of [personal] harm to the jurors [and] to the integrity of their service,’” Sullivan wrote in the order obtained by Fox News.

Sullivan also found “a risk of immediate and irreparable injury” if the juror list were made public. The order does not prevent jurors from identifying themselves or speaking with the media if they choose.

In a separate order, Sullivan temporarily extended the protection covering the names of the larger pool summoned for jury duty from July 20 through July 24. Those names will remain impounded for another 10 days because of concerns about juror safety.

Heart Disease Leads Hispanic Adult Deaths, Cardiologist Warns

0

As Hispanic and Latin American Heritage Month gets underway, a new American Heart Association report is underscoring serious cardiovascular health risks facing Hispanic adults across the United States.

Released this week, the report finds that cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death among Hispanic adults. Researchers cite an interconnected range of social, financial and environmental obstacles behind the disparity, from gaps in health insurance and food insecurity to language barriers.

Only one in five Hispanic adults in the U.S. meets the standard for ideal heart health, according to the American Heart Association.

“It is unfortunately not surprising,” said Dr. Amol Bahekar, an interventional cardiologist who has treated patients in the Sandhills community for nearly 14 years. He said the report mirrors the health trends he routinely encounters in his practice.

“There is unfortunately a high proportion of obesity in the Hispanic population. A large proportion of these patients tend to be diabetic, and a large proportion of these patients tend to be hypertensive,” Bahekar said.

Although there is no one-size-fits-all answer for Hispanic communities, Bahekar said modest changes in daily habits can still deliver meaningful benefits for heart health.

“Control the portion and control the amount of sodium in your diet. Any added amount of salt can contribute to high blood pressure eventually, and then can lead to heart disease,” Bahekar said.

The report stressed that the barriers to better cardiovascular health reach well beyond a doctor’s office.

Francisco Almodovar, a veteran who had triple-bypass surgery eight years ago, knows those obstacles firsthand.

“I was in denial when it happened to me. There’s no way this could be happening to me. I am in great shape,” Almodovar said.

“You hear the doctor tell you what they’re going to do, you know, cut you open and all that. You don’t really comprehend that at first. So finally sunk in, I was a little nervous, terrified,” he said.

Today, Almodovar is part of Mended Hearts of Fayetteville in North Carolina, a support group for heart patients and their families. He often helps bridge the language gap for Spanish-speaking patients.

“They’ll mention it or their loved one, whoever happens to be in the room, they don’t speak English. So I ask them, you know, they speak Spanish and they say, yeah, so we just go down that road and you know, I just talk to them,” he said.

Brenda Berkstresser, treasurer of Mended Hearts, Chapter 400 in Fayetteville, said the support group offers vital connection and firsthand experience for patients and families.

“You must be a heart patient of any kind to be a visitor. And we visit patients. We visit their families in the waiting room. In 2006, when I had my open-heart surgery, I thought I was the only person in Fayetteville with heart disease. You never heard anybody speak of it? We talk to people 1 to 1, and they see that they’re not the only people with this heart disease. They find out things that may be, you know, since their doctors and nurses do not have heart disease, things that don’t occur to them,” Berkstresser said.

The American Heart Association’s findings highlight the need for greater awareness and resource access in Hispanic communities.

“A lot of the Hispanic patient population don’t have awareness of their heart and or heart disease and health conditions, they do not have access to healthcare that they deserve,” Bahekar said.

Almodovar added, “The more information you have, the better your quality of life going forward can be.”

As Hispanic Heritage Month continues, advocates hope increased attention will help drive solutions to improve heart health outcomes for Hispanic families across the country.

Resources

Mended Hearts HeartGuide in English

Mended Hearts HeartGuide in Spanish

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Driver Accused of Leaving Boy to Die “Like Roadkill” After Crash

0

The devastated family of a teenage boy killed in a hit-and-run crash is demanding harsher penalties and changes to what they describe as a loophole in the law.

Bryson Dimovski, 14, was travelling home on an e-scooter in Warners Bay, within NSW’s Lake Macquarie area, in July 2023 when he was struck by a vehicle driven by Jaycob Gemza, who was 21 at the time and had been looking at his phone behind the wheel.

The impact threw Bryson onto the car’s windscreen before he fell down an embankment. Police did not locate him until six hours after the collision.

Gemza initially stopped at the scene but left shortly afterwards without making a triple-zero call.

As the hours passed, Bryson’s loved ones repeatedly drove by the site in their desperate search for him, unaware that he was lying only metres away beneath the embankment.

‘He just left him there,’ Bryson’s father, Andrew, told A Current Affair.

‘He ran back to his car, drove off and left Bryson for dead. Like he was nothing, [but] he wasn’t nothing.’

His mother, Melissa, said: ‘He was left there like road kill.’

Bryson Dimovski, 14, was hit and killed by a car while rising his e-scooter home in 2023

Bryson Dimovski, 14, was killed after being hit by a car while riding his e-scooter home in 2023.

Bryson's body hit the windscreen and rolled down am embankment, where police didn't find his body until six hours later

Bryson was thrown onto the windscreen before falling down an embankment, where police found him six hours later.

‘Not being able to hold him when he passed is something very distressing as a mother.’

Gemza pleaded guilty to failing to stop and assist, and to negligent and dangerous driving, in Newcastle Local Court earlier this year.

The maximum sentence for each charge is 10 years’ jail.

Gemza was jailed for five years but will be eligible for parole after three years and three months. He could be freed as early as February 2029.

‘We’ve got a life sentence, he doesn’t have a life sentence,’ Ms Dimovski said.

Before handing down Gemza’s sentence, Judge Paul Marr asked everyone in the packed courtroom to turn off their phones and not switch them back on until they got home.

‘They [phones] are a distraction to you and to me,’ he told the courtroom.

‘We each share a responsibility to others on the road.’

Jaycob Gemza was recently jailed over the fatal hit and run

Jaycob Gemza was recently jailed over the fatal hit and run

Bryson's parents Andrew and Melissa are demanding change

Bryson’s parents Andrew and Melissa are demanding change

Join the discussion

Should hit and run drivers face harsher sentences?

‘Don’t do it for me, do it for Bryson Dimovski. Are they worth the life of a child? The answer will be ”no”.’

Bryson’s parents are also campaigning for the four-hour drug and alcohol testing window to be expanded.

The court heard that Gemza allegedly drank three full-strength beers at a pub and bought a fourth before getting behind the wheel that afternoon.

By the time he handed himself in to police, hours after the fatal hit-and-run, after seeing a social media post about Bryson being missing, it was too late for him to be tested for drugs and alcohol.

A 20,000-strong petition for ‘Bryson’s Law’ was recently rejected by NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley.

The Dimovskis have vowed not to give up the fight in the hope that a similar tragedy can be avoided.

‘It’s not about revenge. It’s about accountability,’ Mr Dimovski said.

‘It’s about deterrence, so no other family walks in our shoes.’

Andrew Dimovski (pictured with son Bryson) and his family are also campaigning for the four-hour drug and alcohol testing window to be expanded

Andrew Dimovski (pictured with son Bryson) and his family are also campaigning for the four-hour drug and alcohol testing window to be expanded

‘And if we can turn our pain into something that might help someone else, then it’s worth it.’

His wife added: ‘Bryson deserved nothing less than this.’ 

Newberry Woman Arrested After Allegedly Sending Death Threats to Ex-Husband

0

NEWBERRY, Fla. – A 32-year-old woman was arrested yesterday on an aggravated cyberstalking charge after authorities say she sent a series of death threats to her ex-husband. Teaira Denise Lewis is accused of sending the threatening messages on Aug. 26.

According to the responding Alachua County Sheriff’s Deputy, the victim received the following messages, which were allegedly sent by Lewis:

The deputy reportedly viewed the messages on the victim’s phone. Investigators said they came from a phone number known to be associated with Lewis.

The victim also told deputies that another person had reportedly seen Lewis with the man believed to be referenced in the messages. That man was allegedly seen carrying a gun. The victim said he feared Lewis would follow through on what he believed was a conspiracy to murder him.

Lewis, who told Court Services that she works for a home healthcare agency, has been charged with aggravated cyberstalking. She has two misdemeanor convictions (non-violent). Judge Susan Miller-Jones ordered her held without bail pending a hearing on a motion from the State Attorney’s Office to hold her without bail until trial; if the judge denies the motion, bail will be set at that hearing.

FBI Director Kash Patel Grilled Over Drinking, Girlfriend’s SWAT Detail

0

FBI Director Kash Patel urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to end a contentious oversight hearing Tuesday after Democrats questioned him for hours about both his leadership of the bureau and his personal life, including his relationship with his girlfriend.

Alexis Wilkins, a 26-year-old country singer, sat several feet behind Patel throughout the hearing, maintaining a stone-faced expression.

During the nearly five-hour session, Patel faced a broad range of questions concerning his time as FBI director, alleged drinking habits, use of FBI resources and overall suitability for the position.

(Patel said earlier this year that he had ‘never been intoxicated on the job.’)

At several points, the hearing erupted into shouting exchanges. Patel accused Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff and other committee Democrats of ‘baselessly’ targeting him and those close to him for political advantage instead of conducting meaningful oversight of the FBI.

Schiff and other Democratic members later questioned Patel about reports involving Wilkins’ security detail, including claims that he used the FBI’s SWAT team to protect her.

‘I’m trying to get an answer from you – a very simple answer – about the reporter who wrote an article about the potential misuse of an FBI SWAT team,’ Schiff began.

‘It didn’t happen. Total lie,’ Patel fired back.

‘So, let me repeat it – because you didn’t answer the question,’ Schiff said as he attempted to continue, before Patel interrupted him again in a louder voice.

‘It’s a total lie!’ Patel told Schiff. ‘I’m not going to answer it.’

Alexis Wilkins, Kash Patel's girlfriend, looks on during FBI Director Kash Patel's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on FBI oversight

Alexis Wilkins, Kash Patel’s girlfriend, looks on during FBI Director Kash Patel’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on FBI oversight 

Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Senator Chuck Grassley speaks during Patel's testimony, which stretched for nearly five hours

Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Senator Chuck Grassley speaks during Patel’s testimony, which stretched for nearly five hours

Kash Patel's girlfriend performs at a wrestling match in the fall of 2025

Kash Patel’s girlfriend performs at a wrestling match in the fall of 2025

Alexis Wilkins is seen with Patel and President Donald Trump during the beginning of his second term

Alexis Wilkins is seen with Patel and President Donald Trump during the beginning of his second term

Alexis Wilkins poses with Kash Patel for a selfie during a wrestling match in the fall of 2025

Alexis Wilkins poses with Kash Patel for a selfie during a wrestling match in the fall of 2025

 Schiff then observed that the back-and-forth would only extend the hearing longer, prompting Patel to turn to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and urge him to end the hearing entirely.

‘You don’t have to extend anything,’ Patel said, before turning to the chairman. ‘Mr. Chairman, I’ve maintained decorum through this entire hearing,’ the FBI director said. 

He then told Grassley that Democrats ‘have called me a thug, a liar, [and] baselessly attacked my loved ones – continuing to jeopardize the safety of me and mine.’

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa listens to testimony from Patel at a hearing on Capitol Hill

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa listens to testimony from Patel at a hearing on Capitol Hill 

Senator Cory Booker speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Booker described Patel as more a 'lackey' than an FBI director in one particularly heated moment

Senator Cory Booker speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Booker described Patel as more a ‘lackey’ than an FBI director in one particularly heated moment

 ‘I would appreciate it if you concluded this hearing,’ Patel continued, ‘because this guy’ -referring to Schiff – ‘has no interest in oversight.’

Grassley did not immediately yield Patel’s request. 

Instead, he attempted to urge calm, once again, and reiterated instructions on decorum to Patel and Schiff to govern the remainder of the proceedings. 

The rest of the day was marked by heated confrontations between Patel and Democrats – and featured remarks that at were, at times, both combative and personal.

‘We have a lackey. And frankly, he’s not even a good lackey,’ said Senator Cory Booker a Democrat from New Jersey.

‘He’s like an 18-year-old kid who wants to join a fraternity that he could never be a member of, doing keg stands and chugging with friends,’ Booker continued of Patel, adding: ‘He’s an embarrassment to the agency – and wouldn’t qualify even to be an FBI agent.’ 

College Sports Bill Advances Past First Major Senate Hurdle

0

WASHINGTON – A sweeping bill aimed at reshaping the rules of college athletics has moved past its first major Senate test, as the NCAA, influential coaches and other prominent backers intensify their campaign for passage before the midterm elections.

The Senate voted 74-24 on Tuesday to take up the measure, giving the college sports legislation crucial momentum. The proposal seeks to establish limits and standards amid rapidly rising spending across college athletics, which is navigating a new era in which universities can directly compensate players. It has the support of major athletic conferences, Senate leaders and President Donald Trump.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Congress must step in to bring order to what he described as mounting turmoil in college sports.

“It threatens the viability of many college athletic programs, it threatens the roster spots and scholarship positions of hundreds of thousands of student athletes,” Cruz said. “It threatens women’s sports. It threatens Olympic sports. If Congress does not act, all of that is in jeopardy of going away.”

Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington, the leading Democrat on the Commerce Committee, framed the proposal as “the last chance to save college sports.”

Even with its strong procedural vote, the bill faces resistance from multiple groups, potentially making final Senate approval difficult during the chamber’s final three weeks of work before the November elections.

Some Republican senators want the legislation to include further provisions involving transgender girls and women’s sports. Labor organizations argue that the measure falls short on athlete protections. The NAACP has also pledged to oppose it, saying Congress should not reward universities and athletic conferences “while many remain silent as Black voting rights come under attack in the states where they operate.”

Ahead of Tuesday’s vote, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey contended that the proposal hands the NCAA excessive authority without creating sufficient accountability to the athletes affected by its decisions.

“Look at their history, it is not about player protection,” Booker said. “This is a money play, plain and simple.”

Bill seeks to rein in rapidly escalating college sports spending

The legislation aims to allow schools to enforce national rules for competing and recruiting and create new guidelines around transfers and eligibility, the likes of which have landed the NCAA in court dozens of times just over the last month.

It would provide a limited lawsuit immunity for the NCAA with the goal of eliminating some of these lawsuits, which most recently have come up over the new college rule allowing players five seasons of eligibility over five years.

Another big feature in the bill is a redefinition of “third-party” NIL — the name, image, likeness sponsorship deals that most blame for spiraling costs in college sports. Under current rules, schools can share revenue of up to $21.3 million among all players across their athletic program.

The legislation would double the salary cap to nearly $49 million per school, with the hope that shifting the money from third-party NIL to under the cap will set a more realistic limit on what schools can spend.

There’s a last-minute push before the elections

Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority in the chamber. Democrats are trying to flip the Senate in November’s midterms, which can complicate the legislative agenda.

“We’re going to get one shot at this, and I don’t know if we ever will again soon,” said Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt just ahead of the vote. “We’ve got a moment.”

The bill, he said, could “define the trajectory of college athletics.”

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Prince Harry and Meghan Tested Route to Archie’s New School Only Once in Summer

0

Meghan and Harry reportedly tested the journey to Archie and Lilibet’s new school only during the summer break after deciding to move back to Britain, but were shocked by the traffic when term began.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex withdrew their children from the private school after only two days, it emerged today, after their convoy was split up during the congested school run.

Sources close to the couple said security concerns intensified whenever their vehicles were brought to a halt in traffic, leaving the family feeling like “sitting ducks”.

Their private security team had not been able to fully assess the route between the family’s new home and the unnamed school while classes were in session. This week, the journey reportedly took as long as an hour in each direction.

Archie and Lilibet attended the prep school for just 48 hours before their parents “reluctantly” removed them on the advice of their protection team, which warned that the commute was putting their operation under “strain”.

Friends of the Sussexes stressed that the decision was not a reflection on the school. Instead, they said Archie and Lili, aged seven and five, were taken out because of the long journey from the family’s new home and the severe traffic en route.

A source close to Harry claimed the couple were particularly concerned after an incident this week in which their vehicles were unable to remain together as a convoy.

The children’s withdrawal came on the same day reports emerged that Harry’s entitlement to state-funded VIP police protection was under review following the family’s full-time return to the UK.

Prince Harry, who turned 42 today, was reportedly seen helping Lili settle into reception, while he and Meghan were also added to school WhatsApp groups.

Other parents said they had seen Harry escorting one of the children through the school gates. A mother with two children at the school said the Sussexes’ decision to enrol Archie and Lilibet had been viewed as a coup and had generated excitement among parents.

But she added: ‘Parents at the school are completely baffled. You don’t need to be an expert to know how congested that area is. It’s one of the worst places to drive in the UK.’

Prince Harry wears a Santa Barbara Fire Department cap as he kisses his daughter Lilibet, five, in pictures shared by Meghan today to mark his 42nd birthday

Prince Harry wears a Santa Barbara Fire Department cap as he kisses his daughter Lilibet, five, in pictures shared by Meghan today to mark his 42nd birthday

Harry and Meghan's security team advised the couple that traffic on the school run and the distance covered was putting a strain on them

Harry and Meghan’s security team advised the couple that traffic on the school run and the distance covered was putting a strain on them

Harry drives a quad bike with Lilibet and Archie in the back - and an M&S bag of shopping - as their dog Pula follows behind following their return to the UK. The Sussex convoy was split up due to congestion this week, with their security team raising fears

Harry drives a quad bike with Lilibet and Archie in the back – and an M&S bag of shopping – as their dog Pula follows behind following their return to the UK. The Sussex convoy was split up due to congestion this week, with their security team raising fears

Another mother said of the slow school run: ‘This was obviously going to happen.’

But a Labour MP suggested that he believes the Sussexes have been left exposed.

Mike Tapp, who represents Dover and Deal in Kent, said: ‘Nearly three weeks after their arrival, the King’s son, Meghan, and their children remain without protection. 

‘Whatever the eventual outcome, there are serious questions about how this process has been handled. In the cold light of day, there should be a proper review to ensure decisions of this importance are made swiftly, independently and on the basis of risk.’ 

Archie and Lili will now join another school in the area after visiting for a taster session on Monday. 

Harry and Meghan’s security are said to be much happier with that choice as the commute is shorter. 

The decision to take their children out of their prep school for security reasons was first reported by HELLO! magazine last night.

A spokesperson for the Sussexes said: ‘The decision for the children to move school was taken following a discussion with the family’s security team about the practicalities of their current arrangements. 

‘The parents remain extremely grateful to all the teachers and staff for the love, care and effort they have shown their family. This decision should in no way be interpreted as a reflection on the school or the exceptional care the children have received there.’ 

HELLO! then quoted a friend of the couple saying: ‘It’s a real shame, because they absolutely adored the school, the kids and their parents. It was perfect for them in every way and the children really enjoyed their time there. 

‘They really wanted to make it work, but they had to make a difficult decision based on the fact that the team couldn’t make the school run operationally secure.’ 

Meghan and Harry kiss while Lilibet and Archie are seen playing in the background

Meghan and Harry kiss while Lilibet and Archie are seen playing in the background

Harry looks out at a lake with Lilibet, in a photo released today to mark his 42nd birthday

Harry looks out at a lake with Lilibet, in a photo released today to mark his 42nd birthday

Harry plays archery with Archie in another one of the nine images shared by Meghan today

Harry plays archery with Archie in another one of the nine images shared by Meghan today

The dramatic development came as it emerged that Harry’s demand for taxpayer-funded police protection is being ‘reviewed’ now he is back in Britain.

The duke and duchess are said to have been informed that ‘a decision’ was made at a meeting last week to examine the threat to both of them.

The prince has been at loggerheads with the Home Office for years over its decision to remove his automatic right to security. Harry has long argued that he was born a prince and needs police protection when in the UK.

But he lost a series of legal battles against the Home Office which deemed he had forfeited the right to be able to call at will on taxpayer-funded protection after he quit as a frontline royal in 2020 and moved to a new life in California.

Only last year, after yet another defeat at the Royal Courts of Justice – against his father His Majesty’s government – the prince declared in a petulant BBC interview that he could not imagine a time when he could safely bring his family to his country of birth.

But now that he has had a sudden change of heart, bringing Meghan, Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, to live in the UK, his access to police protection is being reviewed, it was reported on Monday evening.

The decision is said to involve reviewing the risks to Prince Harry and also to his wife.

ITV News said the Home Office committee that decides on security provision for high-profile royals and politicians – known as Ravec – has written to Harry informing him a ‘full review’ will take place.

If true, then this decision defies complaints made by Team Sussex about the meeting held last week by Ravec, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures.

Meghan shared scenes of the family enjoying the British countryside as they settled into life in the UK

Meghan shared scenes of the family enjoying the British countryside as they settled into life in the UK 

Some in Harry’s camp had accused Buckingham Palace of trying to scupper the Ravec meeting with King Charles’s bombshell letter last week which made clear Buckingham Palace’s view that the Sussexes were ‘private citizens’ not working royals. 

Harry and Meghan were taken by surprise by the letter and would prefer to be known as ‘public figures’, it was made clear by sources close to them.

They believed the timing of the letter may have been an attempt to influence the Ravec committee on whether to reinstate Harry’s taxpayer-funded security.

At the time, the Daily Mail reported that such claims were incorrect, and the letter was sent out by the palace to offer clarity ahead of a busy programme for the Sussexes, not to interfere with his battles with the Home Office committee. In fact, those close to the King believed the move could make it easier for him to see his son privately.

Last night, Harry’s fears that the letter could have been designed to block his bid for security appeared unfounded with the news that Ravec is going to fully review his need for protection for him and his family.

ITV News’s royal correspondent Chris Ship said: ‘It was decided that Harry should get a full review of his security now that he is resident in his home country and his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, have started classes at a British school.’

It was said the official review carried out by Ravec, called a Risk Management Board (RMB), would be conducted for both Harry and Meghan. It would be the first review of the potential risks and threats facing Meghan since the couple left the Monarchy in 2020.

In fact, Harry had a new ‘RMB’ completed in July, eight weeks ago, but this was conducted before those assessing his case knew about his plans to relocate his family to the UK.

Currently, said ITV News, the only protection the Sussexes have been given by British police is the phone number of a police liaison officer. The duke has been told to call the phone number should he need police help, but he believes this is essentially zero protection as it would take officers a long time to reach him, were he or his family to be in distress or under attack.

Harry argues he is the son of the British monarch, the fifth in line to the throne and a veteran of the British Army who completed two tours of duty in Afghanistan. He was criticised by some British officers for his decision to boast in his 2023 memoir Spare about how many people he had killed during his battles against the Taliban. Some suggested this had massively increased his need for protection against those who might seek revenge.

Scotland Yard does not discuss the security arrangements of royals but it is understood that protection is arranged on a case-by-case basis and is constantly under review. During some recent UK events attended by Harry, such as charity evenings, he has clearly been afforded police security.

Harry and Meghan also pay millions for private security. But in America, their bodyguards may be able to shoot people deemed a threat. In Britain, their close protection agents are not allowed to carry guns, explaining why the duke is desperate to reinstate his automatic police protection.

The Home Office said: ‘The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.’ 

Team Sussex has been contacted for comment.

READ MORE: ‘Simply the best’: Meghan’s gushing birthday photo tribute to Harry after Archie and Lilibet were ‘removed from school’ due to security fears

Seven Noncitizens Charged in North Texas Election Integrity Case

0

Federal authorities have charged seven noncitizens in North Texas in a broad election-integrity crackdown, part of the Trump administration’s expanding effort to investigate and prosecute alleged election crimes ahead of the midterm elections.

Fox News was granted exclusive access to accompany Homeland Security Investigations agents during arrests across the Dallas-Fort Worth region, offering an inside view of how federal investigators track down suspected instances of noncitizen voting.

Ryan Raybould, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas, said six of the defendants were indicted on Sept. 10. A seventh person was charged through a criminal complaint one day later.

Six defendants were taken into custody by federal agents in the days that followed. The remaining defendant, previously regarded as a fugitive, later turned himself in to federal authorities.

Polling Center

People vote at a polling location during an election. (iStock)

“One of the individuals, an illegal alien from Mexico, actually was a 2023 convicted felon for lying on a passport application,” Raybould said. “So this person has already interacted with our office, the Department of Justice, and chose to then again commit a serious federal violation.”

Speaking exclusively with Fox News, Raybould said the seven North Texas cases represent the start—not the end—of his office’s election-related enforcement work.

The cases follow other recent action by the DOJ, which earlier this month charged five people in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin over allegations involving unlawful voting or fraudulent voter registration in the 2022 and 2024 elections.

“It’s important to clean up our elections and make sure that they’re free and fair,” Raybould told Fox News.

“And my job as U.S. attorney is to prosecute cases and controversies. And so if fraud happens, whether it’s our elections, our health care fraud system, stealing from the American taxpayer, I’m going to go after it.”

Raybould said prosecutors are focused on whether federal law was broken, not which candidate received an allegedly illegal vote.

“We don’t even know who they voted for, frankly, like we don’t care,” Raybould said. “You can vote for whoever. That is not what we are focused on, it’s the act. You’re not allowed to vote if you’re an illegal alien.” 

The federal effort to identify potential noncitizen voters has drawn scrutiny from Democrats over how investigators are accessing and analyzing voter information.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, (D-N.Y.), and Sen. Alex Padilla, (D-Calif.), on Monday made public a complaint from an anonymous DHS whistleblower alleging that personnel working on the department’s “Unlawful Voter Initiative” were directed to access state voter records in ways that may violate state laws.

DHS has pushed back on those allegations.

DHS seal

The Department of Homeland Security seal displayed. (Getty Images)

“The Department accessed publicly available data from states’ voter rolls and cross-referenced them with known aliens in our systems. It’s not rocket science; it’s an easy step to secure our elections,” a DHS spokesperson told Fox News.

Asked about the allegations, U.S. Attorney Ryan Raybould defended investigators’ use of federal databases and publicly available information.

“HSI has access to databases, and they have a right to access that database,” Raybould told Fox News.

“They also can cross-reference that database with publicly available information.”

Raybould compared the investigative approach to health care fraud cases, in which federal authorities analyze government data to identify potential outliers for further investigation.

“We look at Medicaid data to identify outliers all the time, to pick targets,” Raybould said. “Everybody should be in favor of making sure that illegals do not vote in our elections.

Raybould said prosecuting election fraud should have bipartisan support.

“If someone is illegal, and they vote in an election, that draws down the value of the vote of American citizens, and so it also undermines our democracy, and the vote is absolutely critical,” Raybould said. “It’s how we elect our leaders. It’s an important voice for American citizens when they get to cast the ballot.” 

American voters cast their ballots at a polling station during an election.

American voters cast their ballots at a polling station during an election. (Reuters)

The seven non-citizens are charged with the following offenses:

  • Helen Sayen Adams, is a 67-year-old citizen of Nigeria and lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) since May 2024, is charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and false statement of citizenship in order to register to vote. Adams allegedly falsely claimed U.S. citizenship on a Texas voter-registration application in June 2024 and voted in the November 2024 general election in Tarrant County. She later admitted she was not a U.S. citizen.
  • Joshua Nmelichukwu Akpom, is a 27-year-old citizen of Nigeria and lawful permanent resident since 2016, charged with false statements in relation to naturalization. As alleged, Akpom falsely denied on his 2026 naturalization application that he had ever claimed U.S. citizenship, registered to vote, or voted, despite registering in 2017 and voting in the 2018 general election. Due to the five-year statute of limitations, prosecutors relied on the naturalization offense rather than the voting conduct.
  • Carlos Salas Barrios, is a 41-year-old Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident since 2018, charged by complaint with allegedly voting by an alien in a Federal Election. Barrios unlawfully cast a provisional ballot in Tarrant County in the November 2024 general election despite not being a U.S. citizen and not being registered. Although the ballot was ultimately rejected, casting it was still unlawful under Texas and federal law.
  • Khalwinder Singh Bhengura, is a 69-year-old citizen of India and lawful permanent resident since 2022, charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and false statement of citizenship in order to register to vote. Bhengura falsely claimed U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in January 2024 and again when applying for a Texas driver’s license later that year in August. He voted in the November 2024 general election and later admitted he knew he was not a citizen. He was arrested on Sept. 11.
  • Celestin Katubadi, is a 20-year-old citizen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and lawful permanent resident, charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and false statement of citizenship in order to vote. Katubadi cast a provisional ballot in Tarrant County during the November 2024 general election after falsely claiming U.S. citizenship on an affidavit of provisional-voter. Although his ballot was rejected, casting it was still unlawful by Texas and federal law.
  • Rocio Thrasher, is a 38-year-old Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident since 2017, charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and false statement of citizenship in order to register to vote. According to the indictment, Thrasher allegedly falsely declared U.S. citizenship when registering in June 2024 and voted in the November 2024 general election. She later admitted knowing she was not a citizen.
  • Moises Anwar Arellano Alba, is a 36-year-old illegal alien from Mexico ordered deported in July, charged with voting by an alien in a federal election and false statement of citizenship in order to register to vote. He allegedly falsely claimed U.S. citizenship when applying for a Texas driver’s license in 2023 and voted early in the 2024 general election in Dallas County despite being a noncitizen and convicted felon. He admitted in immigration proceedings that he had voted. Arellano Alba was a fugitive until this morning when he surrendered himself to federal agents.