Home Blog Page 75

Justice Department Tells States to Preserve 2024 Election Records Amid Voter Data Requests

0

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration has directed election officials in more than two dozen states to preserve records tied to the 2024 election, escalating its push to obtain extensive voter data even after a series of setbacks in court.

The Justice Department issued letters to 29 states and the District of Columbia, telling officials not to destroy election-related records. Each of those jurisdictions has been targeted in lawsuits by the administration seeking access to voter registration files that include sensitive personal details such as home addresses, birth dates, driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.

One letter reviewed by The Associated Press informed Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, a Republican, that she is “under investigation” and remains involved in ongoing litigation over Utah’s refusal to provide statewide voter registration lists. The Justice Department on Thursday declined to provide further details about the investigation.

“The purpose of this letter is to notify you of your obligations to take reasonable steps to conduct a litigation hold and preserve and retain all hard copy documents and electronically stored information,” wrote Eric Neff, acting chief of the Voting Section within the Civil Rights Division.

The warning goes further, telling election officials that any “failure to preserve relevant data may constitute spoliation of evidence,” a finding that could expose them to “civil and criminal sanctions.”

In a social media post Thursday, Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Civil Rights Division, said the Justice Department sent the letters to ensure states do not destroy election records related to the lawsuits that seek to compel election officials to hand over voter registration lists.

“This is standard litigation practice, not a ‘threat,’” Dhillon said in a post on X.

Secretaries of state say they already are following the law

Henderson, Utah’s top elections official, said in an interview that her office received the letter Friday.

“No letter — and we’ve gotten a lot of letters from the Department of Justice over the past year — not a single one of them said that we were under investigation for anything,” Henderson said. “It was a little bit alarming at first to see those words.”

Henderson said her office understands the need to hold onto records during litigation.

“What’s not helpful is the constant barrage of attacks and harassment and accusations, baseless accusations, that do nothing to help secure our elections,” she said.

Her office also received a letter from the DOJ in July asserting that election officials could be prosecuted if votes from noncitizens are counted in their vote tallies.

Other election offices, including the secretaries of state for Arizona and Minnesota, confirmed they also received the letter.

“Our office will follow the law,” said Calli Jones, spokesperson for the Arizona office. “Any implication from this letter or others that implies we are not following the law is disrespectful to the work that election administrators do across Arizona and the country.”

Minnesota Secretary of State spokesperson Cassondra Knudson said the office will comply with the Justice Department’s request but noted that it goes beyond the federal requirement of maintaining records for 22 months following an election.

Justice Department is in long-running conflict with states over voter data

The preservation demand could set the stage for the Justice Department to seek access to the states’ election records as part of the administration’s hunt for fraud. The FBI has already obtained records or election equipment related to either the 2020 or 2024 elections from the most populous counties in the battleground states of Arizona, Georgia and Michigan without saying what it was searching for.

The letters escalate a fight between the Trump administration over access to the sensitive voter information. Federal officials have said they need the voter data to ensure that states are complying with federal election laws related to maintaining voter registration lists, even though states already have detailed processes to do that.

Some election officials have raised concerns that the request conflicts with state privacy laws. They also are concerned that federal officials will use the sensitive data for other purposes, such as searching for potential noncitizens. In one case, a Justice Department attorney acknowledged the department was seeking unredacted voter roll information so it could be shared with the Department of Homeland Security to check citizenship status.

Judges have repeatedly dismissed the Justice Department’s lawsuits seeking access to the detailed state voter information, and Attorney General Todd Blanche has suggested the administration might take the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The letters come as the administration continues to raise concerns about the potential for voter fraud — in particular, noncitizen voting. While voter fraud and voting by noncitizens does occur, it’s rare and gets prosecuted. There has been no evidence of widespread fraud marring American elections.

Trump issued an executive order earlier this year that sought to create a federal voter list and directly involve the U.S. Postal Service in election operations in a way that would limit mail voting. A challenge to that order is now before the Supreme Court. The president also has pushed Congress to pass a bill requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and have it take effect for the midterms.

__

Kelety reported from Phoenix.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Peter FitzSimons Takes Aim at Alan Jones in Court Testimony

0

Author and journalist Peter FitzSimons has told a Sydney court he is “almost proudly” opposed to broadcaster Alan Jones, a figure he has previously labelled a “malignant tumour”.

Wearing a white linen suit, FitzSimons entered the witness box on Thursday to give evidence in Jones’s trial over 22 charges of indecent assault and sexual touching without consent.

The court heard FitzSimons first encountered Jones in 1982, when Jones, then a rugby union coach, tried to recruit him to play for a Manly side.

FitzSimons later wrote admiringly of Jones, who went on to coach the national Wallabies team, describing him in print as an “absolutely brilliant” coach.

Under questioning, however, he accepted that he had also accused Jones in published articles of bullying, lying and pursuing agendas.

‘Alan Jones is a malignant tumour on the body politic of this city, this state and this country and the sooner he is excised the better,’ he wrote in a 2018 article.

When asked about the line on Thursday by Jones’s barrister Gabrielle Bashir SC, FitzSimons said he was ‘very proud of that’ and stood by it.

‘You were at that time, and you remain, publicly and unashamedly anti-Jones,’ Ms Bashir suggested.

Journalist, author and former sportsman Peter FitzSimons is proud of comparing Alan Jones to cancer

Journalist, author and former sportsman Peter FitzSimons is proud of comparing Alan Jones to cancer

Alan Jones has pleaded not guilty to 22 charges alleging non-consensual sexual touching

Alan Jones has pleaded not guilty to 22 charges alleging non-consensual sexual touching

‘Almost proudly,’ he replied.

Ms Bashir previously argued Jones’s media rivals are deeply involved in the case against him, which she says is characterised by rivalry, hatred, and double dealing.

Jones’s rival and prominent radio broadcaster Ray Hadley put FitzSimons in touch with a former radio staffer who had disclosed alleged indecent assaults by Jones.

He knew FitzSimons had been researching similar allegations about Jones at the time and had offered him background information, the author told the court.

Jones faces eight charges in relation to the radio staffer, who claims he was subjected to unwanted kisses in lifts and groped while driving and at an event.

FitzSimons said the young man broke down in tears and was deeply upset when confiding in FitzSimons about the alleged indecent assaults years later.

The complainant had described Jones as ‘the most important, the most powerful person at 2GB’ – Sydney’s No.1 radio station at the time – and recalled how he had been drawn into his orbit, FitzSimons said.

‘Mr Jones had noticed his work, complimented him, drawn him in,’ he told the court.

‘Mixed in with the compliments were the occasional blasts.’

He said the complainant confided he had been driving when Jones put his hand on his knee and moved it to his groin to stroke his genitals, before he pushed it away.

‘He made it absolutely clear he was revolted at what happened but he was also deeply upset at himself for not being stronger,’ FitzSimons said.

‘He was very, very upset.

‘It was clear I was speaking to somebody who was completely emotionally traumatised.’

Under cross-examination, he accepted that his police statement placed Jones’s hand on the man’s thigh instead, quipping that the difference was ‘a matter of inches’.

He said the alleged victim also recounted getting into a lift at Jones’s Circular Quay home with fully laden hands and the veteran broadcaster pushing him against the wall, grabbing his groin, and kissing him ‘romantically’.

When he learned the man was panicking and spiralling after the phone conversation, FitzSimons said he wouldn’t take the allegations any further.

He had been unable to go to police about the allegations because he didn’t know the man’s identity, he said.

FitzSimons took a long look at Jones while facing him from the opposite side of the room, but the longtime shock jock appeared determined to avoid locking eyes.

The 85-year-old retired broadcaster has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which are alleged to have occurred between 2003 and 2020 across Sydney and the NSW Southern Highlands.

Jones, whose 35-year career spanned TV and radio, has dismissed the allegations by the six complainants as false.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

Denise Richards Shows Off Youthful Look After $200K Facelift

0

Denise Richards has been candid about her decision to have a facelift, openly discussing the cosmetic procedure rather than leaving fans to speculate.

That openness made her red carpet appearance alongside her plastic surgeon, Dr. Ben Talei, a fitting moment at the 2026 Daytime Beauty Awards in Los Angeles on Wednesday.

The 55-year-old Wild Things star appeared smooth-faced and radiant as she posed for photographers in a sheer dress detailed with floral embroidery.

Richards first stepped out for solo shots before being joined by Dr. Talei, who complemented the polished red carpet moment in a sharp powder blue suit.

The Beverly Hills-based surgeon performed Richards’ deep-plane facelift, a high-end procedure reported to cost around $200,000.

Richards also got a brow lift, an upper eyelift, a lip lift and fat grafting from her own thighs into her neck and face.

Denise Richards was all smiles at the 2026 Daytime Beauty Awards in Los Angeles on Wednesday

Denise Richards was all smiles at the 2026 Daytime Beauty Awards in Los Angeles on Wednesday

Her cosmetic surgery makeover, which includes a $200,000 facelift, was on full display as she posed for photos

Her cosmetic surgery makeover, which includes a $200,000 facelift, was on full display as she posed for photos 

‘Originally I had been thinking about doing just my neck,’ she previously shared on Bunnie Xo’s Dumb Blonde podcast. 

‘And then a friend of mine, she’s very well-known, and she’s not public about hers, and she said to me, “You have to do the whole thing”.’

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star had only ever done Botox and fillers before, but she ultimately decided to go all the way with her facial makeover. 

‘The only analogy I could give is like you remodel a house and do one room and the room looks great, but it doesn’t match the rest of the house,’ she explained. 

She then gushed about Dr Talei’s work, calling it ‘impeccable.’

‘He did the neck, the lower face, the upper, the brow lift. The only thing he didn’t do were my lower lids. He did my upper lids.’

She added: ‘It was the best thing I did for myself.’

Richards isn’t the only one in her family going under the knife, with her daughter Sami Sheen getting a nose job in 2024. 

The Wild Things actress, 55, looked fresh and wrinkle-free as she posed for photos in a sheer frock with floral embroidery

The Wild Things actress, 55, looked fresh and wrinkle-free as she posed for photos in a sheer frock with floral embroidery

The Wild Things star was joined by her plasic surgeon Dr. Ben Talei, who was behind her recent surgical makeover

The Wild Things star was joined by her plasic surgeon Dr. Ben Talei, who was behind her recent surgical makeover

Dr. Talei accompanied Richards on stage as they addressed the audience from behind the podium

Dr. Talei accompanied Richards on stage as they addressed the audience from behind the podium 

Richards also got a brow lift, an upper eyelift, a lip lift, and fat grafting from her own thighs into her neck and face

Richards also got a brow lift, an upper eyelift, a lip lift, and fat grafting from her own thighs into her neck and face

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star also showed off her surgical work at an event back in March

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star also showed off her surgical work at an event back in March

Sheen’s surgery was documented on Bravo’s Denise Richards & Her Wild Things, with Sami seeking out celebrity surgeon Dr Deepak Dugar for one of his famous ‘Scarless Nose’ jobs. 

It’s a closed rhinoplasty that involves making incisions inside of the nose so that none of the cuts are externally visible, and provides more natural results when done correctly.

Open rhinoplasties can sometimes lead to scarring on the underside of the nose, especially on the columella, which is the strip of tissue that separates the nostrils.

A scarless nose job costs roughly between $19,000 and $24,000, and healing can take as little as a week. 

Dr Dugar estimates that the vast majority of celebrities who have had nose jobs have done so with a closed, scarless approach.

Richards is pictured in 2019 before her facelift, when she was just relying on Botox and fillers to turn back the clock

Richards is pictured in 2019 before her facelift, when she was just relying on Botox and fillers to turn back the clock

The actress is seen in the 1999 James Bond film The World Is Not Enough

The actress is seen in the 1999 James Bond film The World Is Not Enough

The star's daughter Sami Sheen has also gone under the knife, most notably for a 'scarless' nose job from Dr. Deepak Dugar

The star’s daughter Sami Sheen has also gone under the knife, most notably for a ‘scarless’ nose job from Dr. Deepak Dugar

‘I’m part of an 80-year legacy practice here in Beverly Hills doing celebrity nose jobs and I can tell you that most celebrity rhinoplasty is closed scarless rhinoplasty because of the discretion,’ he told the Daily Mail back in 2024.

‘They don’t want people to know they had a nose job. There’s still a taboo and a stigma no matter who you are. They want very natural results that look like it could have been what they were born with,’ he continued.

‘The cookie cutter, TikTok, Instagram, Turkish upturned nose job, the “Barbie nose” as they call it, everyone knows you can’t really be born with that.’

Sheen, who now works as an OnlyFans creator, has also had a breast augmentation, fillers and Botox, and has porcelain veneers too. 

Richards is also one of the top creators on OnlyFans, with the actress raking in well over six figures a month on the site. 

Outside of OnlyFans, Richards currently stars on The Bold and the Beautiful. 

Zuckoff App Alerts Users to Nearby Meta Smart Glasses That May Be Recording

0

A newly released app called Zuckoff is giving people a way to tell when they may be close to someone wearing Meta’s AI-powered smart glasses, a product that has faced growing privacy criticism over fears that wearers can film others without permission.

Its creator, programmer Pawel Szydlowski, said he was motivated by reports of people using the glasses to secretly record women or bother strangers in public. The app’s cheeky name is also a not-so-subtle jab — one that becomes clearer when spoken aloud with a pause between the syllables.

Zuckoff works by identifying Bluetooth signals emitted by smart glasses and can also provide an estimate of how far away the device is. Since launching on Apple’s App Store last month, it has attracted roughly 5,000 users, Business Insider reported.

“There’s a need for such an application,” the 30-year-old Polish developer told the outlet. Szydlowski also said European Union regulators have reached out to him seeking additional details about how the privacy-focused app works.

“We as a society have the right to at least know that someone is recording,” Szydlowski said.

Zuckoff’s main scanning screen depicts the likely proximity of nearby smart glasses. A Zuckoff Pro version allows users to get notified of nearby recording smart glasses when the app isn’t open, according to Business Insider. 

Meta has been scrambling to address criticism about the device, which has been widely described as “perv glasses.”

Privacy advocates have panned the product, and the headware has even been banned at some locations. Those include exclusive New York nightclub Basement, which said it would permanently ban anyone who brought them into the venue. 

Recent weeks have seen Meta launching a PR blitz saying the product’s intended use is not to secretly record strangers.

“We designed this camera to be noticed by the people around you,” Meta Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth insisted in a recent Instagram video.

Earlier this month, the tech giant disabled thousands of glasses it found had been tampered with to keep a small light off that indicates the device is recording.

In July, Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri said the social media site, which is owned by Meta, was booting accounts that were using the glasses to post videos featuring harassment.

The social media platform is still awash in such videos, including clips of AI glasses wearers pretending to steal money from strangers’ bank accounts and recording their frenzied reactions. 

Szydlowski said he built the app by obtaining various models of smart glasses to study the Bluetooth signals they broadcast. That allowed him to determine their Bluetooth “fingerprint” and unique identifiers that indicate the glasses are in use. Some devices’ Bluetooth services are labeled “Meta” or “Ray Bans,” Szydlowski said.

“If the unique identifier matches, and also if the manufacturer identifier matches, then we have like an ultimate combo there,” he told Business Insider.

Szydlowski said he was particularly irked by how subjects of the videos rarely had their faces blurred and how they were sometimes being doxxed by people in the comments. 

“With this type of content, I’ve seen a lot of emotions in me,” he observed.

Meta released smart glasses with video recording capability last fall, with celebrities like Kylie Jenner jumping on board to promote them – generating swift backlash from people describing the devices as “dystopian.”

The Post has sought comment from Meta.

Hungry Kids, 5 and 7, Walk to Publix After Moms Locked Them Out: Police

0

Insets, from left: Latoya Garland and Mikequisha Gordon (Miami-Dade Corrections). Background: The area of NE 7th Avenue and 132nd Street in North Miami, where Garland and Gordon are accused of locking their children, ages 5 and 7, out of their home (Google Maps).

Two Florida mothers are accused of forcing their young children outside to play, then locking the door and refusing to respond when the kids knocked to get back in, according to police and a local report.

Mikequisha Gordon, 36, and Latoya Garland, 40, have each been charged with child abuse.

A school resource officer found the children unattended in the street at about 6:30 p.m. Wednesday near NE 7th Avenue and 132nd Street in North Miami, according to a probable cause arrest affidavit.

The children — a 7-year-old girl and a 5-year-old boy — later told officers they had been at a nearby apartment complex when Gordon and Garland allegedly instructed them to go outside and play before locking them out.

When the kids were tired, they tried to come back inside but their mothers did not let them in, despite them knocking on the door several times.

The kids were reportedly hungry, so they walked to a nearby Publix to try to get some food. They were unable to get any, so they walked back. That’s when the school resource officer allegedly saw them.

A neighbor tried to call one of the mothers, but she was not answering. Cops also knocked on the door several times but received no response though, they could hear the phone ringing.

Officers forced their way into the apartment and found Gordon and Garland passed out on the couch. Cops woke them up although they were “sluggish” and appeared to be “impaired by an unknown substance,” per the affidavit.

The two defendants were arrested and taken to the Miami-Dade County Jail, where they remain on $2,500 bonds. Their next court dates were not listed.

The post 5-year-old and 7-year-old kids forced to walk to Publix because they were hungry and their mothers locked them out: Cops first appeared on Law & Crime.

Judge Judy’s Son Faces Nepo Baby Label in TV Court Debut

Adam Levy has a legal résumé of his own, but that has not stopped viewers from scrutinizing his jump to daytime TV. Levy previously served as the presiding judge on the Amazon Prime series “Tribunal Justice” and “Justice on Trial,” yet his highest-profile move comes with a much bigger family connection: taking over the gavel from his famous mother, Judy Sheindlin, better known to millions as Judge Judy. Beginning September 14, 2026, audiences will see one of Judge Judy’s children headline the new syndicated courtroom show “Adam’s Law” — and many critics are already calling it a textbook example of nepotism.

“I’m gonna say it….. I don’t like him. He’s too full of himself for a nepobaby. If his mother wasn’t JJ, who would give him a show?” one Reddit user wrote bluntly. That reaction was hardly an outlier. Other commenters suggested Levy may struggle to establish an identity separate from Sheindlin’s towering television legacy. “He always seems like he is trying too hard to be JJ. It never comes off as his own voice,” another user said in response.

While many argued that Levy has proved he’s ready for the gig through his other shows, some others had an issue with the overall premise of making the court series into an overarching family ordeal. “No thanks, we fought monarchies 250 years ago,” an X user joked. It’s hard to escape the nepo baby label when trying to fill in the shoes of someone as iconic and long-lasting as Judge Judy, but Levy believes he can succeed.

Adam Levy disagrees with nepo baby accusations

The phrase “nepo baby” is often used to describe celebrity children who land major opportunities in the same industry as their parents, sometimes with questions about whether talent or family ties opened the door. Levy, however, rejects the idea that the label applies to him. “Despite the fact that I have a famous mother, I got the chops as well,” he told the New York Post in August 2026.

Unlike Judge Judy, who was a real-life judge before becoming a television icon, Levy has not spent significant time serving as a judge outside the TV courtroom. Still, the Hofstra Law School graduate brings more than 25 years of legal experience to “Adam’s Law,” including two terms as district attorney in Putnam County, New York. To him, that background matters. Levy acknowledged that following Sheindlin is no easy assignment, but he insists he is not stepping in merely as a stand-in for his mother. ” … I’m here to fill my own shoes and to put my own stamp on it,” he told the New York Post. “I’m confident in my own style.”

Sheindlin appears to share that confidence — with her usual sharp-edged humor. In the August 2026 trailer for “Adam’s Law”, Judge Judy joked that her son might even surpass her. “Quite frankly, I think he has the talent to beat me, and I don’t like the idea of that,” she said with a laugh. Levy may be eager to carve out his own place in the courtroom TV genre, but he has never denied his mother’s influence. “Since the fourth grade I knew I wanted to be a lawyer,” he told the New York Post. Whether “Adam’s Law” can help him escape Judge Judy’s long shadow is a verdict viewers have yet to deliver.

Family of 9/11 Hero to Retrace His Final Steps at Tunnel to Towers Finale

0

A quarter-century after the September 11 attacks, the family of fallen FDNY firefighter Stephen Siller will honor his final journey by walking the route he took through the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel on his way to the World Trade Center.

Frank Siller, along with relatives from the Siller family, will take part in the private tribute walk before gathering with hundreds of friends, supporters and first responder advocates at FDNY Ten House.

The remembrance will serve as the closing moment for Tunnel to Towers’ “Steel Across America” tour, a nationwide journey that began in May and has carried Stephen Siller’s legacy — along with a 21-foot steel beam from the South Tower — to communities across the country.

Tunnel to Towers CEO Frank Siller stands near a piece of World Trade Center steel

Frank Siller, CEO of the Tunnel to Towers Foundation, is seen beside a section of World Trade Center steel that will be part of the organization’s nationwide mission to honor the victims of the 9/11 attacks ahead of the 25th anniversary. (Courtesy: Tunnel to Towers Foundation)

On the morning of September 11, 2001, Stephen Siller had just finished his fire department shift when he learned that an airplane had hit the World Trade Center.

“Stephen drove his truck to the entrance of the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel, but it had already been closed for security purposes. Determined to carry out his duty, he strapped 60 lbs. of gear to his back, and raced on foot through the tunnel to the Twin Towers, where he gave up his life while saving others,” the tour’s website recounts.

Tunnel to Towers Foundation

The Tunnel to Towers Foundation was started in honor of FDNY firefighter Stephen Siller, who died responding to the attacks. (Tunnel to Towers Foundation)

Since its founding, inspired by Siller and his favorite quote, “While we have time, let us do good,” Tunnel to Towers has provided more than 1,700 mortgage-free homes to the families of fallen service members and first responders, as well as to disabled veterans and first responders. The organization has also delivered housing assistance and support services to more than 20,000 homeless veterans and holds hundreds of events nationwide to honor America’s heroes and preserve the memory of those who lost their lives for future generations.

The Tunnel to Towers 9/11 Institute has helped to educate students from kindergarten through 12th grade on the “extraordinary heroism and goodness of everyday people” on Sept. 11, “while demonstrating the strength and resilience of America’s spirit.” Its mobile 9/11 exhibit has traveled to nearly all 50 states as well as Canada.

Frank Siller speaks at Tunnel to Towers event at West Point

Tunnel to Towers Foundation Chairman and CEO Frank Siller speaks during the Steel Across America tour’s stop at West Point. (Jason Thiele Fotografik Memories/Courtesy Tunnel to Towers Foundation)

To mark the 25th anniversary, Tunnel to Towers also launched its 343 Homes Initiative this year to honor the 343 New York firefighters who died on Sept. 11. According to the group, this initiative will deliver 343 mortgage-free homes to the families of fallen service members and fallen first responders as well as to catastrophically injured service members across the country.

Andy Burnham Branded Naive as Scottish Independence Referendum Comments Spark Backlash

0

Andy Burnham is facing calls to prevent a fresh bout of constitutional turmoil by making clear that there will be no second Scottish independence referendum while he remains in Number 10, after critics branded his remarks “reckless and naive”.

The Prime Minister was still under pressure yesterday after indicating that “majority public support” could open the door to a repeat of the 2014 vote on Scotland leaving the UK. Opponents claimed the comments had effectively “pulled the pin on a constitutional hand grenade”.

Scottish First Minister John Swinney moved quickly to seize on the intervention, calling for renewed discussions on how a lawful route to another independence vote could be agreed.

However, shadow Scottish secretary Harriet Cross has written to Mr Burnham demanding that he draw a firm line under the issue. She urged him to rule out another independence referendum during his premiership, reject the SNP leader’s appeal for further talks, and “categorically confirm” that he opposes a new vote and will continue to defend the United Kingdom.

Ms Cross said: “Your words have already created unnecessary uncertainty for Scots who remember well the divisive nature of the independence referendum.”

‘You opened the door to more constitutional uncertainty. You now need to shut it – and make it clear that there will be no repeat of 2014.’

At Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Mr Burnham said the position in Scotland was ‘exactly the same’ as in Northern Ireland, where there is a legal threshold for a poll on Irish reunification.

He implied the only obstacle to another Scottish independence vote was the lack of a ‘clear consensus’ and said that ‘I am not aware that there is a majority of public support for another referendum and until that changes there won’t be one’.

Andy Burnham has faced a fierce backlash over his blunder at PMQs on Wednesday

Andy Burnham has faced a fierce backlash over his blunder at PMQs on Wednesday

Nationalists seized on his comments in the Commons, with the SNP immediately demanding talks on how to secure another referendum

Nationalists seized on his comments in the Commons, with the SNP immediately demanding talks on how to secure another referendum

Mr Burnham has now tried to row back on his comments by writing to First Minister John Swinney

Mr Burnham has now tried to row back on his comments by writing to First Minister John Swinney

Mr Swinney yesterday attempted to capitalise on the Prime Minister’s comments, which he highlighted were a change in position from previously saying another referendum was off the table.

He said it is ‘important’ he and Mr Burnham discuss ‘how we turn that principle into an agreed legal mechanism, as exists in Northern Ireland’.

Ms Cross argues in her letter that the SNP’s failure to secure the target of an outright majority in May’s Holyrood elections, – which Mr Swinney said would be a clear mandate for another referendum – was a ‘clear message’ from voters that Scots don’t want another referendum.

She said: ‘Andy Burnham’s reckless and naïve comments risk plunging Scotland into yet more constitutional chaos.

‘He has played directly into John Swinney’s hands and gave the SNP the perfect excuse to continue their endless agitation for another independence referendum.

‘The last thing Scotland needs when school standards are falling, drug deaths are the highest in Europe and too many Scots are on an NHS waiting list, is a rerun of 2014.

‘The Prime Minister needs to clean up the mess his has created and make crystal clear that the future of our United Kingdom will not be dictated by an opinion poll.’

Mr Burnham last night attempted to clarify his remarks in the House of Commons in a letter to Mr Swinney.

He said: ‘As we all recognise, Northern Ireland and Scotland have different historical experiences and therefore distinct constitutional arrangements.

‘In my remarks, I was simply highlighting that there is no consensus for an independence referendum in Scotland and nor is there a clear basis to suggest that a majority of people in Northern Ireland presently wish to separate from the United Kingdom.’

He said there was a consensus in 2014 and the people of Scotland backed remaining in the UK, a position Labour backed in its manifesto for the 2024 general election.

Mr Burnham said: ‘As I made clear to you personally when we met recently in Glasgow, independence and a referendum are off limits as it would take our focus away from growing the economy and helping families with the cost of living.

‘I and my Government are keen to work with you and the Scottish Government to ensure Scotland, as part of the UK, is rewired to work for people and I am looking forward to progressing that shared agenda with you at our meeting of the National Economic Council where the focus will be on driving growth, opportunity and prosperity in every part of the UK.’

Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay said: ‘Andy Burnham has pulled the pin on a constitutional hand grenade – which John Swinney has now thrown back at him.

‘The ex-Manchester mayor is dangerously naïve about the SNP’s relentless agitation to break up the United Kingdom.

‘It was inevitable that John Swinney would pounce on Burnham’s naïve comparison between Scotland and Northern Ireland.

‘Opening the door to another divisive referendum is further evidence that Labour can’t be trusted to defend the Union.’

In his letter, Mr Swinney said: ‘By concluding a clear, understandable mechanism, both sides of the constitutional debate can move forward constructively in the full knowledge of an agreed process by which the Scottish people can exercise their democratic right at a time of their choosing.’

Elections expert Professor Sir John Curtice said that the Prime Minister’s comment ‘does read like something of a misstatement’.

Secret NFL Pundit Power List Revealed in New Report

0

The 2026 NFL season has arrived at last, bringing with it another year of nonstop coverage, high-stakes storylines and primetime drama from the world’s richest and most watched football league.

The NFL broadcast picture keeps shifting as the league expands deeper into the streaming era. Netflix is increasing its presence after Amazon Prime Video’s overhaul of Thursday Night Football, while traditional powerhouses ABC, FOX, NBC and CBS remain central to many of the sport’s biggest national TV moments.

The offseason has not been without controversy. CBS Sports will begin the campaign without Tony Romo, who was stood down from early-season duties following his recent arrest, with fast-rising media figure JJ Watt stepping in as his replacement.

Tom Brady, meanwhile, has used his time away from the microphone to stay heavily involved in football, playing a role in reshaping the Las Vegas Raiders before returning to FOX for the third year of his massive 10-year, $375 million broadcasting deal.

With a mix of fresh voices, former NFL stars and seasoned commentators set to guide fans through the season, the question remains: which broadcaster stands above the rest?

The Daily Mail breaks down and ranks the top analysts in the NFL booth as the action gets back underway… 

Jason Kelce brings a unique element of star power thanks to his family dynamics, and he will now be making his way into the broadcast booth as an analyst for NFL Network on some International Series games.

The news was not met with the best reaction by fans, with many getting sick of the sight of Kelce on TV screens at almost every corner these days. But nobody can doubt the enthusiasm and energy he brings, and his knowledge as a former Super Bowl-winning center should not be underestimated.

Whether he can deliver that in a more serious and concise manner in an analyst role vastly different to the positions he has generally held, which have been better suited to showing off his personality, remains to be seen. On a reported three-year, $24million salary, the pressure is on. Watch this space.

Luke Kuechly will be the newest name in a top announcing role after he was picked up by Netflix in a surprising hire for its NFL team. Kuechly will partner Noah Eagle after reportedly wowing executives during a tryout to jump to the top of the line.

The former Carolina Panthers linebacker has always been a hugely popular figure among fans, and he will now look to take the success of that tryout into the public broadcast. The streaming giant has five NFL games this season, at an estimated cost of $500 million, meaning Kuechly has a small and irregular runway to work with but plenty of expectation.

The assignment begins in Australia as the San Francisco 49ers face the Los Angeles Rams, and also features Christmas Day action. Kuechly is not the traditional sort of hire to jump straight into a big role given he is not a former quarterback, which makes anticipation even higher to hear him in action.

It is claimed he had immediate chemistry with Eagle in their tryout, and their relationship in the booth will be something to watch as Netflix looks to stamp its authority on the NFL. It’s a bold move, but Netflix clearly believe it could be a masterstroke.

Total: 25/40

Luke Kuechly wowed Netflix executives to land the coveted analyst role for the company.

Luke Kuechly wowed Netflix executives to land the coveted analyst role for the company.

8) Drew Brees

Network: FOX Partner: Adam Amin

Drew Brees is destined for the Hall of Fame as a player, but that didn’t initially translate to the broadcast booth. He had a short and ill-fated stint at NBC, but made a shock return with FOX last year when Mark Sanchez was stabbed and subsequently arrested.

He still has work to do, but Brees was much improved. He no doubt brings star power and a wealth of knowledge, but his popularity as a broadcaster is yet to take off, with his delivery sometimes flat compared to other voices. His chemistry with Adam Amin is still developing, with some awkward pauses as Brees gets to grips with his role, but improving all the time and potentially primed to continue rising from his current spot on the third-string FOX team.

Ratings: Star power 8/10, Knowledge 8/10, Popularity 4/10, Chemistry 5/10

Total: 25/40

Drew Brees is back for another shot in broadcasting after he replaced Mark Sanchez last year.

Drew Brees is back for another shot in broadcasting after he replaced Mark Sanchez last year.

7) Tony Romo

Network: CBS Partner: Jim Nantz 

Tony Romo was the latest big-name quarterback to be tempted into the booth by a big deal after retirement, and unlike Brady, he hit the ground running. Romo earned rave reviews in his first year alongside Jim Nantz in 2017.

The former Cowboys quarterback was widely praised for his ability to call plays before they happened, often being teed up expertly by Nantz to outline exactly what was about to happen before it actually unfolded.

But as time has passed, the novelty has worn off. Romo has faced criticism for going off on tangents or telling confusing stories during games, or simply talking too much with his chemistry with Nantz seeming to get worse rather than better.

This offseason he’s become embroiled in scandal after his DWI arrest saw him stood down indefinitely by CBS, and while he says he intends to return, his future appears unclear. While his star power and knowledge cannot be questioned, his popularity is at a low point, while he’s also left Nantz to prepare for a new partner just weeks before the season.

Ratings: Star power 8/10, Knowledge 9/10, Popularity 2/10, Chemistry 6/10

Total: 25/40

Tony Romo is out at CBS for the start of the season after his arrest in the offseason.

Tony Romo is out at CBS for the start of the season after his arrest in the offseason.

6) Greg Olsen

Network: FOX Partner: Joe Davis 

Olsen was already preparing for his broadcast career as his playing days wound down, and the tight end slotted right into the picture seamlessly at FOX. But just as he was hitting his stride, he was replaced by the star power of Tom Brady, a demotion he knew was coming while he was earning strong reviews in his final year on the A-team.

Since then, Olsen has continued to impress on the No.2 broadcast. But while Brady continues to improve, the path back to the top job seems blocked at FOX, leading to speculation he could be in-demand elsewhere.

Olsen’s popularity has skyrocketed as a result of fans being sympathetic of his plight, and it will be fascinating to see if he gets another opportunity to take his talents elsewhere as a No.1 analyst at another company.

Ratings: Star power 4/10, Knowledge 7/10, Popularity 9/10, Chemistry 6/10 

Total: 26/40

Greg OIsen lost his spot in the FOX No.1 crew when Tom Brady joined the network.

Greg OIsen lost his spot in the FOX No.1 crew when Tom Brady joined the network.

5) J.J. Watt

Network: CBS Partner: Jim Nantz

Former Houston Texans defensive end J.J. Watt is being thrown into the deep end as the lead CBS analyst to replace Tony Romo at the start of the season after his arrest. At this stage, we don’t know how his chemistry with Jim Nantz will unfold.

But Watt enters the role as something of a rising star. He had a very impressive debut season on the No.2 team alongside Ian Eagle, knowing when to interject with his thoughts and clearly offering an abundance of research and thoughtfulness to his new role.

Watt is one of the most likeable players in recent NFL history, and he’s now got a big opportunity to stake his claim for his rapid rise to step up a notch with Romo’s future up in the air.

Ratings: Star power 7/10, Knowledge 7/10, Popularity 7/10, Chemistry 5/10 

Total: 26/40

JJ Watt is a rising star at CBS and is stepping in to replace Tony Romo to start the season.

JJ Watt is a rising star at CBS and is stepping in to replace Tony Romo to start the season.

4) Kirk Herbstreit

Network: Amazon Prime Video Partner: Al Michaels

There are not many busier men in the industry than Kirk Herbstreit, as he juggles his ESPN College GameDay role with partnering Al Michaels in the Amazon Prime Video Thursday Night Football booth. And what he lacks in terms of resume as a player – he started a year at Ohio State and never made the grade in the NFL – he makes up for in enthusiasm.

Alongside the ageing Al Michaels, 81, Herbstreit brings much of the energy to the Prime Video broadcast. He’s become excellent at breaking the game down and offering natural insight into what is happening on the field.

He’s a safe pair of hands and an experienced operator on the call known for his calm, measured approach, even if he is possibly more at home in his college football capacity.

Ratings: Star power 4/10, Knowledge 9/10, Popularity 6/10, Chemistry 8/10 

Total: 27/40

Kirk Herbstreit has partnered Al Michaels since Prime Video took over Thursday Night Football.

Kirk Herbstreit has partnered Al Michaels since Prime Video took over Thursday Night Football.

3) Cris Collinsworth

Network: NBC Partner: Mike Tirico 

Collinsworth might not have had a playing career to match Brady or Aikman. But these days, he’s known more as a broadcaster and his chemistry with Mike Tirico on the NBC A-team is the reason why.

Yes, he has his fair share of critics for his well-documented love of Patrick Mahomes. But his voice has become synonymous with Sunday Night Football and some of the NFL’s most memorable moments.

What he lacks in star power compared to other play-by-play commentators, he makes up for in his enthusiasm and engaging delivery.

Ratings: Star power 5/10, Knowledge 8/10, Popularity 7/10, Chemistry 9/10 

Total: 29/40

Cris Collinsworth remains one of the NFL's most recognizable voices next to Mike Tirico.

Cris Collinsworth remains one of the NFL’s most recognizable voices next to Mike Tirico.

2) Tom Brady

Network: FOX Partner: Kevin Burkhardt 

All eyes were on Tom Brady, the biggest star in the NFL, when he stepped into the broadcast booth in a $375 million FOX deal after taking a year sabbatical after retiring from playing.

It is fair to say he got off to a shaky start, with plenty of critics during his first season in the role. But Brady took a massive leap in 2025, and continues to build up an excellent relationship with his lead announcer, Kevin Burkhardt.

It is hard to look past the knowledge of the seven-time Super Bowl champion, and he continues to be more and more willing to share his insights on the Xs and Os and weave them into his commentary, rather than relying on cliches as he often did in his first year.

He’s not popular with all viewers, yet the ultra-competitive Brady is fast winning people around with his performances in the booth and proving people wrong – just like he did in his NFL career. But, Brady being Brady, only being the very best counts.

Ratings: Star power 10/10, Knowledge 9/10, Popularity 7/10, Chemistry 8/10

Total: 34/40

Tom Brady has grown into his role at FOX after he signed a 10-year, $375M contract.

Tom Brady has grown into his role at FOX after he signed a 10-year, $375M contract.

1) Troy Aikman

Network: ESPN on ABC Partner: Joe Buck

Troy Aikman has made just as much of a name for himself in the broadcast booth as he did on the field – and that is no mean feat. 

The three-time Super Bowl champion quarterback with the Dallas Cowboys jumped straight into his new role after retiring in 2000 and has been there alongside Joe Buck ever since.

The longest tenured play-by-play duo continue to be at the top of their game as the A-list pairing for ESPN on ABC, covering each Monday Night Football. This year, they’ll be back on the Super Bowl call for the first time since 2020.

Joe Buck and Troy Aikman remain the best in the business as the ESPN/ABC No.1 crew.

Joe Buck and Troy Aikman remain the best in the business as the ESPN/ABC No.1 crew.

Aikman and Buck’s chemistry has been honed over years of working together, and it doesn’t get much bigger in terms of star power than the quarterback of ‘America’s team.’ 

While the game has changed somewhat since his days playing quarterback, Aikman remains knowledgeable, engaging and concise when it comes to offering his analysis of what he sees on the field.

Ratings: Star power 9/10, Knowledge 8/10, Popularity 9/10, Chemistry 10/10 

Total: 36/40

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Say They’re ‘Happy to Be Back’ After Sussexes’ Return

0

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are said to be “happy to be back” on British soil, according to sources offering the first insight into the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s UK return, even as tensions with Buckingham Palace intensify over Uganda’s decision to withdraw from the Invictus Games.

People close to the Sussexes claim Uganda’s exit from the 2027 Invictus Games came as a “direct result” of correspondence from King Charles that reportedly emphasized Harry and Meghan’s status as “private citizens.”

The same insiders argued that the fallout has harmed the wrong people, saying the Ugandan athletes who had been preparing to compete are the “only people suffering” from the situation.

“They made it very clear that the reason they pulled out was a direct result of perceived guidance from the Lord Chamberlain,” a source told People, the US outlet often regarded as a preferred platform for the Sussexes.

“This was an unintended or intended consequence of the letter — and that was always going to happen,” the source added, suggesting that was why there had been a desire not to release it hastily.

Yet despite the swirling row between the Sussexes and Buckingham Palace, sources say getting their children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, settled as they begin a new school year ‘has been, and remains, their focus’.

‘Everything else will fall into place when the time is right,’ the source told People. ‘There is a lot to do. They have just moved halfway across the world, and it’s been really busy getting the kids settled.

‘Their focus has been on that, and will remain on that, for the time being. They are happy to be back.’

It comes after the couple, who left the UK for America in 2020 in a move famously dubbed ‘Megxit’, are understood to have moved to a non-royal home in the UK last month while also keeping their residence in Montecito, California. 

Meanwhile, on Wednesday morning, Ugandan General Muhoozi Kainerugaba said his nation would not participate in any event without approval from Charles, adding that he felt motivated to quash ‘that Harry-Meghan nonsense’.

Insiders close to the Sussexes also insisted that getting their children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, settled as they begin a new school year 'has been, and remains, their focus'

Insiders close to the Sussexes also insisted that getting their children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, settled as they begin a new school year ‘has been, and remains, their focus’

In a letter of 'guidance' released on King Charles' behalf, the Palace confirmed that the Sussexes have not returned to being working royals

In a letter of ‘guidance’ released on King Charles’ behalf, the Palace confirmed that the Sussexes have not returned to being working royals 

The move came less than 48 hours after the King outlined that the Duke and Duchess are still not working royals despite the couple relocating to the UK a fortnight ago. 

Meanwhile, PR gurus have claimed Harry and Meghan’s swipes towards the King following his letter threatens the future of the Invictus Games. 

Mark Borkowski said Uganda’s decision to pull out of Birmingham 2027 out of respect for Charles III should serve as a stark warning to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Mr Borkowski said that ‘briefing furiously’ against the King and portraying themselves as victims does not resonate with the public, yet ‘they keep making the same mistake’.

He told the Daily Mail: ‘Uganda is the warning. The Sussex soap opera is now damaging Invictus, the one unimpeachable thing Harry created. The brand is beginning to consume the cause.

‘Harry and Meghan want the freedoms of private citizens but the power of royalty, and they brief furiously whenever anyone points out the contradiction.’

Uganda’s outspoken military chief, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, announced yesterday that the country would not participate in the 2027 Invictus Games because of ‘that Harry-Meghan nonsense’, adding: ‘I support the monarch. Period.’

It came hours after the Sussexes renewed their criticism of the King’s decision to classify them as ‘private citizens’ and make clear they are no longer working royals in a letter released following their return to Britain.

Combative statements and extraordinary claims in briefings by sources close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have dominated headlines since the King released his letter on Monday.

Mr Borkowski said: ‘They drive the PR. They keep making the same mistake, with their certainty that the narrative should start to unravel. ‘Woe is us’, the poor victims of the mighty establishment machine.

‘They’ve confused briefing with strategy. They want the freedoms of private citizens with the power of royalty and brief furiously whenever anyone points out the contradiction.’ 

On Monday King Charles confirmed Harry and Meghan were still not working royals despite returning to the UK and were not allowed to use their HRH titles.

Just two months ago, Uganda’s defence minister Kiryowa Kiwanuka posed for photographs with a smiling Harry at an Invictus Games gathering in London. 

But General Kainerugaba, the president’s son, said in a post on X yesterday: ‘In order not to be construed as being opposed to His Majesty King Charles III of the United Kingdom, whom we deeply revere, Uganda hereby withdraws from the Invictus Games.

‘We shall not participate in anything that does not have His Majesty’s approval.’

Asked by The Times why he made the announcement, General Kainerugaba said: ‘I have factions in the Ministry of Defence that support that Harry-Meghan nonsense. I had to quash it straight away. I support the monarch. Period.’

Last night the Sussexes appeared to have blamed Uganda’s decision on the King’s letter.

Today it was revealed that fewer than one in six Britons want Harry and Meghan to return as working members of the Royal Family now they are back in the UK.

This week King Charles made it clear the Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain ‘private citizens’. And a major poll reveals a majority of the British public agree it should stay that way. 

YouGov asked 4,506 adults whether the Sussexes should become working members of the Royal Family again ‘at some point’ now they are back in Britain.

Just more than half (51 per cent) said they would rather the couple did not return to official duties.

Less than a sixth (16 per cent) said they should become working royals again, while a third (33 per cent) said they did not know.

Sources close to Harry and Meghan have said Uganda's decision to pull out of the Invictus Games was a 'direct result' of the monarch's letter

Sources close to Harry and Meghan have said Uganda’s decision to pull out of the Invictus Games was a ‘direct result’ of the monarch’s letter

The poll was conducted on Wednesday, a day after the Sussexes hit back at Buckingham Palace after it released a letter of ‘guidance’ confirming the couple were not returning as working royals.

Harry and Meghan then hit out at the King’s decision to label them ‘private citizens’ – reportedly because they want to be known as ‘public figures’ instead.

Their spokesman said on Tuesday the couple were ‘surprised’ by its release – and claimed they did not have enough time to respond before it was circulated.

Rather than accept the letter, which said nothing had changed since ‘Megxit’ – briefings by sources close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a string of extraordinary claims.

Team Sussex has suggested that, despite being given just over an hour’s notice of the impending release, Palace aides did not give Harry enough time to ‘clarify one or two points’ in the letter written by the Lord Chamberlain on His Majesty’s instruction.

In particular, the Sussexes seem to have taken issue with the statement that they should not be treated like royalty. 

‘In short, their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests,’ the letter read.

The Palace also made the point the letter was in full accordance with the Sussexes’ stated wish to remain ‘private citizens while in the UK’ and in keeping with the ‘Sandringham Summit’ agreement of 2020, after which the couple set up a new life in the US.

This prompted a jaw-dropping briefing to the Telegraph, which read: ‘The duke is understood to have taken particular issue with the notion that the couple were to be treated as private citizens. If that were the case, it was claimed, such formal guidance would not be required.

‘The Sussexes prefer the term ‘public figures’, and would have liked an acknowledgement that, on a personal level, they remained members of the Royal Family, despite no longer receiving public funding.’

Buckingham Palace declined to comment, feeling the letter is sufficient.

But insiders suggested this insistence they be classed as ‘public figures’ who want their royal links burnished in public is evidence why the Sussexes’ preferred ‘half-in, half-out’ model would never be sustainable alongside their commercial activities.

A Sussex spokesman also suggested they had been caught ‘off guard’ by the King’s announcement, which was a letter written by Lord Benyon to officials across the country.

Team Sussex claimed the letter’s contents were shared with them at 1.59pm.

They replied at 2.19pm ‘in the hope’ the Sussexes could have ‘the chance to clarify one or two points’.

Unbeknown to the Palace, Harry was visiting Tower Bridge Studios in London and ‘could not be contacted’ until 3.09pm.

At 3.11pm, they received confirmation it had already been sent to the media five minutes earlier.

Sources close to the couple have suggested the letter was timed to come ahead of a meeting yesterday of the Ravec security body.

They believe this may have been an attempt to influence the committee on whether to reinstate Harry’s taxpayer-funded security.

But the Daily Mail understands such claims are incorrect and the letter was sent out to offer clarity ahead of a busy programme for the Sussexes. 

Those close to the King also think the move could make it easier for him to see his son privately.