In a heart-wrenching courtroom scene, Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer passionately defended her character, portraying her as an exemplary mother who was blameless up until the tragic moment she took her children’s lives.

Kevin Reddington addressed the jury for nearly an hour on Thursday morning, steadfastly delivering his arguments before it was the prosecution’s turn. Soon after, the group of 12 jurors was sent away to contemplate their verdict.

Clancy, aged 36, has confessed to the killings but asserts her plea of not guilty for murder on the grounds of insanity, attributing her actions to postpartum psychosis. She is hoping for placement in a mental health facility instead of a prison term.

Throughout the court proceedings, Reddington staunchly defended Clancy, powerfully reiterating his stance during the emotional closing arguments.

“The evidence objectively shows that this young woman led a blameless life,” Reddington emphatically stated, urging the jury to consider her history of good conduct.

‘She was a nurse, a daughter, a wife, and a damn good mother.’ 

Reddington also made a point of mentioning Cora, Dawson, and Callan multiple times. 

‘When you consider what is at stake here, Cora, Dawson and Callan,’ Reddington said as he picked up a poster displaying a family picture. 

‘They are the victims in this case,’ Reddington added. ‘This prosecution has ripped the soul of this defendant.’

He said that what ruined the family was medication and the ‘lousy medical care that she got.’

Her attorney went on to blame Clancy’s mental health decline on when she started to see her psychiatrist, Dr Jennifer Tufts. 

Tufts testified as a witness during the trial. She prescribed Clancy a cocktail of psychiatric medications and admitted to never meeting her in person, only on telemedicine calls. 

Reddington told the jurors: ‘This woman lived for her kids until she had the pleasure of going into see Dr Tufts. After she went to Dr Tufts it was not a wonderful life anymore.’ 

Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague delivered her closing argument after Reddington.

She started off by saying: ‘There’s no dispute that she suffered mental illness and she tried to kill herself,’ Sprague said.

She called the focus on postpartum mental health a ‘distraction.’

The prosecution again emphasized that they believe Clancy was in her right mind when she killed her children, and pointed to the discussion she had with her husband and mom that she had thought of harming her kids in December – a month before. 

‘But she did not tell a single medical provider because she feared her children would be taken away, Sprague said. ‘That is a rational thought.’

Sprague went on to graphically detail what the children went through while they were being strangled to death. 

She also insisted that the bands were not tied. ‘You know they weren’t knotted. Patrick never testified they were knotted.’ 

‘You know to a moral certainty she is guilty,’ Sprauge said as she walked back to her seat.

Clancy has been on trial since July 20 in the Plymouth Superior Court as prosecutors have tried to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she intended to kill Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, on January 24, 2023. 

Afterward, she went upstairs, slit her neck and wrist, and jumped out of a second-story window in an attempt to take her own life. She has been left paralyzed from that.   

After closing arguments wrapped up, Judge William Sullivan gave the jury instructions. 

Now, a panel of 12 jurors will deliberate in a private room on whether they find Clancy guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter.

The jury is made up of nine women and three men. The foreperson is a woman. They have not been sequestered for deliberations.

Sullivan put manslaughter on the table during a charging conference on Wednesday. It is a lesser conviction than murder, which carries a life sentence. The maximum sentence for manslaughter is 20 years. 

If they cannot reach a unanimous verdict, the case will end in a mistrial. 

Clancy’s mother and father, Michael and Paula Musgrove, have been seated in the courtroom ever since the trial started. 

Her now ex-husband and father to the children, Patrick Clancy, testified early on in the trial and has not been back. 

Several medical professionals, friends, teachers, and other family members – including Patrick’s mother, Susan Clancy – took the stand. 

The trial has garnered national interest, with people showing up to watch the trial in person and others watching it via live stream. 

If Clancy is found guilty of murder, she will be sentenced to life in prison. If she is found not guilty due to a lack of criminal responsibility, she will be committed to a state mental health facility.

If you or someone you know needs help, please call or text the confidential 24/7 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in the US at 988. There is also an online chat available at 988lifeline.org.

In a devastating event that has rocked Nepal and Tibet, at least 273 lives have been claimed by severe floods. These floods were instigated by the collapse of a massive glacier and the subsequent debris flow, which created a phenomenon equating to a magnitude 5.2 landslide. This information has been confirmed by the U.S. Geological Service (USGS).

Initially, the USGS had attributed the deadly mudslides to a 4.4 magnitude earthquake. However, after a closer examination of nearby seismic data, long-period seismic waves, and satellite images, scientists adjusted their findings. The updated analysis indicated that there was no earthquake involved in triggering the disaster.

Experts in climate science from the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, based in Kathmandu, have shared insights with The Associated Press. They pointed to a glacial avalanche as the likely culprit behind Wednesday’s flash floods, explaining the sudden onset of the calamity.

“Our hydrological observations have highlighted the extraordinary speed and magnitude of the resultant flood wave,” the experts stated. They provided a striking detail, noting that in a brief span of thirty minutes, the water levels of the Trishuli River surged upwards by an alarming 27 feet.

Rescue teams are now searching for the more than 1,300 people who went missing during the floods along the Nepal-China border. Many of them were foreigners and pilgrims.

Nepal Police on Thursday began posting lists of Nepali and foreign nationals missing. Several dozen Americans were listed.

Dozens of bridges were destroyed and nearly 25 miles of roads were damaged, hampering search and rescue efforts, according to Nepalese officials.

The Nepalese army rescued more than 100 people from flood-hit areas by helicopter Thursday morning, according to army spokesperson Brig. Gen. Raja Ram Basnet.

Bishal Kumar Bhandari, chairman of the Nepal Red Cross Society, told the AP that they have shifted focus to large-scale relief operations. He said that around 1,200 people were displaced from at least three villages.

MORE STORY: Legendary ‘Transformers’ Voice Actor Peter Cullen Passes Away at 85

Videos of the disaster showed raging floodwaters sweeping away cars, engulfing people trying to flee and destroying homes and bridges.

Debris was left tangled in tree branches and power lines, vehicles were buried and mud-covered survivors emerged as flooding cut off travel in some areas.

The village of Soley in Nuwakot, which has about 25 homes, was almost entirely destroyed, according to Kathmandu-based journalist Nirajan Paudyal, whose parents and other relatives live there. Desperate for news, he traveled to the area Thursday to check on his family.

“There is no update till now. I fear there won’t be any update,” Paudyal told the AP.

The disaster in Nepal and Tibet underscores a broader threat, as increasingly unstable Himalayan ice poses risks to communities, infrastructure and water supplies across one of the world’s most densely populated regions.

The region experienced similar flash flooding in August 2025, when high temperatures caused a glacial lake in Tibet to overflow. The resulting floods killed nine people and damaged critical infrastructure, including a bridge linking Nepal and China.

Everyday habits and the surroundings we live in play a significant role in the health of our cells and the pace of biological aging.

This insight comes from Dr. Will Cole, a functional medicine expert and the co-author of the forthcoming book “Heal Your Cells.” Dr. Cole argues that modern lifestyle choices could be a root cause of cellular issues, which in turn may impact inflammation, disrupt sleep patterns, and affect other vital processes essential to health.

“Our genetic blueprint has remained stable for millennia, yet in a remarkably short span, our environment has shifted dramatically,” said Cole in a conversation with Fox News Digital from his base in Pennsylvania.

“We’re dealing with the repercussions of our dietary choices, exposure to environmental pollutants previously unknown, and the pervasive presence of stress and trauma,” he added.

Cole points out that these factors may lead to what he terms an “accelerated aging problem,” where one’s biological age could vastly outpace their chronological age.

“Many people in their 20s, 30s and 40s have the cells of a senior citizen,” he said. “That’s common, [but] not normal.”

Cole noted that people may normalize persistent symptoms, such as brain fog and fatigue, instead of discussing them with a health professional.

Those symptoms are non-specific and can stem from a range of medical, lifestyle and mental health factors.

Cole said that, in some cases, changes tied to cellular dysfunction may begin years before a person receives a medical diagnosis — but that people often dismiss or push through early symptoms.

He identified the following three factors that can most disrupt cellular communication, creating “cellular noise” that may contribute to accelerated aging and disease.

No. 1: An unhealthy diet

Eating foods that “don’t love human body back” is the first agitator of cell health — particularly inflammatory foods, according to Cole.

Failing to stick to a consistent eating window — and instead eating over long stretches of the day without giving the body time to digest and fast — can also disrupt cellular balance, he said.

No. 2: Exposure to toxins

Cole cited certain environmental exposures, including pesticides, herbicides and PFAS — sometimes called “forever chemicals” — as potential concerns for overall health.

RELATED: Georgia Manhunt Ends: Top Fugitive Captured Amid Investigation into Woman’s Death

The effects of an exposure depend on the substance, dose and duration of contact, experts say.

He also pointed to infectious pathogens, such as bacteria and viruses, and exposure to mold as factors that can affect health.

Evening exposure to blue-enriched light can interfere with circadian timing for some people, while a consistent sleep-wake schedule and daytime light exposure may support healthy sleep and cellular health, Cole added.

No. 3: Chronic stress, trauma and disconnection

Cole also pointed to chronic stress, unresolved trauma and a lack of social or spiritual connection as factors that could be linked to more cellular noise.

Some observational research has linked religious or spiritual involvement with lower levels of certain inflammatory markers and better health outcomes, although such studies cannot prove that faith itself causes those effects.

“That’s something that’s not talked [about] a lot in the biohacking world,” Cole said.

“What’s your relationship with God and how does that show up in the cells on a somatic level?”

“The research shows that people who have a ‘faith walk’ tend to live longer, healthier, more youthful, vibrant lives.”

Cole said a person may find similar benefits through any belief system or community that “shifts your state,” as well as through a connection to nature.

Giving the body a ‘fighting chance’

Modern stressors may affect the body in ways that are not always immediately visible, Cole noted.

“The cell becomes confused and doesn’t know how to function well and doesn’t know how [to] repair itself,” he said.

“We just need to give our body a fighting chance to hear through the noise.”

He added that addressing physical, mental-emotional and spiritual well-being may help reduce what he calls “epigenetic noise.”

A senior executive at Canada’s taxpayer-funded broadcaster, the CBC, is reportedly in the spotlight for allegedly instructing journalists not to describe 9/11 as ‘terror attacks.’

According to a leaked memo obtained by the Toronto Sun, Basem Boshra, a key figure at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, directed reporters and editors to avoid labeling the September 11 events as terrorist attacks.

The memo advises journalists to describe the incidents as ‘hijackings that led to passenger jet crashes in Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania, and Manhattan.’

Continuing in its guidance, the memo states, ‘The World Trade Center (WTC on second reference) was destroyed,’ referencing CBC’s internal language guidelines.

Boshra, who serves as the senior director of journalistic standards and public trust at CBC News, seemingly issued this directive as the organization gears up to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the attacks initiated by the terrorist group al-Qaeda, which claimed 3,000 lives.

The reported directive has sparked outrage amongst taxpayers and Canadian lawmakers who say that refusing to call 9/11 a terror attack ‘dishonors’ victims and first responders. 

When approached by the Daily Mail, CBC’s director of public affairs Kerry Kelly, said it was, ‘wholly inaccurate to state our journalists have been urged to declare that this was not a terrorist act.’ 

‘We regularly send reminders about adherence to CBC’s longstanding language guidance regarding the terms “terrorist” and “terrorism”,’ Kelly wrote. 

‘CBC preferences use of these words with attribution to credible sources, a practice shared by many of the world’s top journalistic organizations.’

But when asked specifically if CBC was denying the existence of Boshra’s memo, Kelly seemingly rushed to his defense.

She said it is the ‘practice of the CBC to exercise extreme caution before using the words terrorist and terrorism.’

Kelly further alleged that the memo served as a ‘reminder’ of the broadcaster’s ‘longstanding practice’ to use terrorist and terrorism with ‘attribution’ in its reporting.

She then cited an October 2023 blog from CBC general manager and editor-in-chief Brodie Fenlon that states the broadcaster does not designate groups or acts as terrorist.

‘Our focus is to report the facts of such atrocities with accuracy, clarity and detail; to convey the scale and scope of violent acts wherever they occur; to quote the people affected, and to convey the views of officials and experts on these events. We bear witness,’ Fenlon wrote at the time.

‘But CBC News does not itself designate specific groups as terrorists, or specific acts as terrorism, regardless of the region or the events, because these words are so loaded with meaning, politics and emotion that they can end up being impediments to our journalism.’

Fenlon’s blog went on to advise that journalists should ‘generally avoid’ referring to any specific bombing or assault as a terrorist act unless it is ‘attributed’ in a direct quote.

ALSO READ: Menace II Society’s Samuel Monroe Jr Passes at 52 from Meningitis

He claimed the use of the words terrorist or terrorism can ‘become impediments to reporting’ and ‘can lead to virtually endless questions about consistency and impartiality in our coverage of various attacks around the world.’

His blog also specifically referenced 9/11, noting that the broadcaster prefers to refer to the assault as ‘the September 11 attacks.’ 

‘Terrorism generally implies attacks against unarmed civilians for political, religious or some other ideological reason. But it’s a highly controversial term that can leave journalists taking sides in a conflict,’ he added.

‘By restricting ourselves to neutral language, we aren’t faced with the problem of calling one incident a “terrorist act” (e.g., the destruction of the World Trade Center) while classifying another as, say, a mere “bombing” (e.g., the destruction of a crowded shopping mall in the Middle East).’

Although Boshra’s memo appears to be aligned with Fenlon’s guidance three years ago, it has angered the Canadian public. 

Rachael Thomas, Conservative MP for Lethbridge, Alberta, branded CBC ‘absolutely shameful’ and accused the broadcaster of ‘choosing to redefine terrorism in a way that downplays the atrocity of 9/11.’

‘Refusing to call it an act of terrorism dishonors the victims, their families, the survivors, and the first responders who witnessed the horrors of that day,’ she wrote on X.

‘Trying to sanitize or rewrite that history is deeply offensive and does a disservice to everyone who was affected by the attacks.’

Mike Fegelman, the director of Honest Reporting Canada, a non-profit that monitors Canadian media for bias regarding Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish community, urged that CBC be held accountable for its ‘recurring failures.’

‘Reporters work inside an editorial culture created by managers, standards departments, senior executives and the people ultimately responsible for enforcing journalistic judgment. If the failures keep recurring, accountability has to move up the chain,’ he tweeted.

‘A public broadcaster should help Canadians understand reality, not rewrite ordinary language until terrorism becomes something too delicate to name.’ 

Public funding equates for approximately 70 percent of CBC’s total budget, the broadcaster reports.

It received $1.38 billion in federal funds for its 2026/27 fiscal year, according to the Canadian government.

The remaining 30 percent of its budget is generated through advertising, subscription fees and content licensing.