In a shocking twist to a controversial incident on the Jersey Shore boardwalk, the husband of a Canadian woman detained by ICE has attracted attention for his disturbing online rants. The woman’s spouse, Matthew Geroni, openly expressed wishes for the demise of President Trump and his family, including Trump’s young children.

Geroni, an American citizen married to Kaitlyn E. Tracey, the Canadian national involved in the boardwalk altercation, frequently voices his disdain for conservatives through erratic videos on TikTok. His posts have gained notoriety for their inflammatory content.

In particular, two videos released last August on his TikTok drew significant concern. Within these clips, Geroni audaciously articulated a desire for the President’s death, unsettling many viewers with his brazen declarations.

One video displays text that reads, “Praying the entire Trump family gets cancer. And I mean everybody, like little kids and s–t,” as Geroni dramatically falls to his knees and clasps his hands in mock prayer.

In another video posted just a day later, which seemingly recycled the same footage of Geroni energetically moving around his disordered apartment, he added the chilling text, “Praying the next assassination attempt works.” These inflammatory remarks have sparked outrage, raising concerns about the impact of such rhetoric.

Both videos play out to the soundtrack of George Michael’s “Faith.”

The Post has reached out to Geroni — who proudly calls himself the “Jester of the Jersey Shore” and, aptly, the “Clown of Asbury Park,” where the dim-witted couple lives — but has not heard back.

Since his wife’s arrest, the middle-aged man has taken to begging for money on TikTok to put on Tracey’s Ocean County Jail account and retain an immigration lawyer.

“I’m so f–king broke,” he whines in one such video.

The pair were married about three years ago, according to Geroni’s social media.

The Spanish Royal Family was visibly elated, celebrating enthusiastically as Spain secured its place in the World Cup final after a suspenseful showdown with France last night.

King Felipe VI, 58, shared a heartfelt embrace with Queen Letizia and their daughters, Leonor, 20, and Sofía, 19, after Spain’s 2-0 triumph over a formidable French team on Tuesday.

They congratulated the team on Instagram, writing: ‘You have proved again why you are one of the great teams in the world.

“Now, with an entire nation backing you, it’s time to pursue the title. Thank you for this incredible journey. Go for it!”

Dressed in customized Spanish jerseys, the family was captured on film watching the match on a large TV screen from a cozy, small white sofa.

While their celebration was subdued in the comfort of their home, the streets of Madrid came alive last night as ecstatic fans rejoiced over Spain’s advance to the World Cup final.

Felipe’s enthusiastic display of support comes just hours after members of the Spanish Royal Family divided football fans as they were seen wearing ‘French colours’ ahead of the clash with France at the Princess of Girona Foundation Awards in Barcelona.

The annual ceremony, which seeks to celebrate the lives of talented young people across Spain, saw the Royal Family meet with those committed to public service and youth leadership.

However, several eagle-eyed onlookers couldn’t help but notice the colour scheme of the royal women’s outfits – as all three stepped out in outfits that appeared to directly match with the red, white and blue of the French flag.

While Queen Letizia opted for a dark blue suit, Princess Leonor looked stylish in a bold red look. Meanwhile, Infanta Sofia, who recently completed three years of military studies, stepped out in an elegant wraparound white suit.

Taking to X in response to their outfits, one royal fan wrote: ‘Letizia, Leonor and Sofia dressed in the colours of the French flag. I don’t know if that was the best choice today.’

Meanwhile, another added: ‘I think it’s been a bad coincidence. There’s no subliminal message. But for these things they have entire teams (among them, a stylist). It’s a blunder.’

‘Oops! Someone in the Spanish royal house didn’t remind them about the World Cup?? French flag colours for the Spanish royal women,’ quipped another.

However, several came to the Spanish royals’ defence and suggested that the lighting of the photograph may have made their outfits look more distinct than they necessarily were, while others noted that the match was ‘still several hours away’.

‘It’s because today is the anniversary of the French Revolution and the Bourbons are of French origin,’ suggested another.

During the game, Spain’s star player Lamine Yamal wore a headband with the number 08304.

It’s the postcode for the working-class suburb of the Catalonian district which he calls home.

He was standing there with his teammates hearing the anthems played, looking for all the world as if he had just wandered in from that neighbourhood.

But he set his nation on their way to the World Cup final on Tuesday night, winning the penalty to secure a lead from which they never looked back.

Spain dominated the midfield and choked off the supply line to France’s stellar forward line, which struggled to find a way past the Spanish defence.

It was a complete performance, and sent a strong message to England and Argentina that whoever reaches the final will have their work cut out.

NEW YORK — Vast clouds of heavy smoke, originating from a series of extensive wildfires in both Canada and Minnesota, are predicted to blanket large regions of the Midwest and Northeast U.S. this week. This atmospheric disturbance is expected to subject millions to harmful levels of air pollution.

Minnesota authorities have announced an air quality alert effective from Tuesday through Friday. This warning covers key areas including the Twin Cities metropolitan region, Alexandria, and Two Harbors. The state’s northeastern region, grappling with widespread wildfires, is anticipated to experience intense smoke. Alarmingly, air quality in places like Two Harbors and the Tribal Nation of Grand Portage is projected to reach hazardous levels, posing risks to all residents.

Dan Westervelt, an associate professor at Columbia University’s Climate School, explained that a combination of severe drought conditions and high temperatures in both Canada and the U.S. has created an ideal setting for these massive wildfires. He noted, “a perfect storm for really dry conditions to provide a lot of fuel for these wildfires to burn.” Studies have shown that rising temperatures linked to the burning of coal, oil, and gas are resulting in fires that are both more frequent and intense.

Tyler Hasenstein, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Chanhassen, Minnesota, emphasized the importance of staying indoors as much as possible. He advised people to minimize exposure to the extreme heat and smoke as the latter sweeps through the area.

“Those two things coinciding with each other is not good from a health perspective,” he commented, highlighting the compounded health risks brought on by the soaring temperatures and dense smoke.

Officials in Michigan and Wisconsin warned residents Tuesday about air quality issues that could last for days. High levels of fine particulate matter in the air from wildfire smoke may be unhealthy for sensitive groups, such as children and people with heart or lung conditions.

In parts of Maine, residents were reporting a yellowish and brownish color in the sky. “There is plenty of smoke upstream, so expect periods of hazy skies over the next day before the cold front pushes through,” the National Weather Service in Gray, Maine, said on social media Tuesday.

By Wednesday afternoon, intense smoke will spread into the East Coast and Midwest, including parts of the New England coast, northern Pennsylvania, Detroit and Milwaukee, Hasenstein said.

Multiple counties in western and central New York were under an air quality advisory Wednesday until midnight. The most intense smoke could spread as far south as Washington, D.C., by midday Thursday, Hasenstein said.

Fine particle pollution from wildfire smoke can cause shortness of breath, coughing, dizziness or fatigue and aggravate heart and lung diseases and other chronic health issues. Experts suggest reducing or eliminating outdoor activities, wearing a N95 mask if you have to be outside and keeping your indoor air cleaner by closing windows and running an air purifier or air conditioner. Long term, exposure to fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke is one of the leading causes of premature death.

In another legal twist, a Democratic legislator from New Hampshire is challenging speeding charges. Alleged to have driven in excess of 100 mph in one instance and at 92 mph in another, she claims a historical clause in the state constitution shields her from being stopped when commuting to or from legislative sessions. Court documents accessed by News Media detail her argument.

State Representative Ellen Read asserts that her detainment by the police was unlawful. She believes the New Hampshire Constitution offers lawmakers protection against being “arrested, or held to bail” when participating in or traveling to and from the General Court. Her defense argues that the charges are the result of an unconstitutional traffic stop and should be dismissed.

Her first alleged violation took place in December 2024, when authorities accused her of driving at speeds exceeding 100 mph on Interstate 93 in Windham. The second incident was reported in June 2025, with claims of her driving 92 mph in a 65 mph zone in Londonderry.

In both cases, Read argued she was driving a vehicle displaying a New Hampshire state representative license plate and told officers she was returning from a legislative session.

“At the time of the stop, Ms. Read was a sitting member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives,” her petition states. “She was traveling in a vehicle bearing a New Hampshire State Representative license plate. Upon being stopped, Ms. Read informed the deputy that she was returning from the General Court.”

In response to questions from News Media, Read said she is not arguing the Constitution shields lawmakers from prosecution, but instead protects them from being stopped while traveling to or from legislative duties.

“The plain reading of the Constitution says that legislators cannot be stopped on their way to or from their duties,” Read said. “It says nothing of being ticketed or arrested at the end of the commute, and nothing about prosecution.”

“Under the plain language of the New Hampshire Constitution, defendant was unlawfully detained/seized/arrested in violation of her Legislative privilege,” one motion states. “All evidence illegally obtained should be suppressed, and the charge dismissed.”

At the center of Read’s defense is a 1784 provision of the New Hampshire Constitution that states, “No member of the House of Representatives, or Senate shall be arrested, or held to bail, on mesne process, during his going to, returning from, or attendance upon, the Court.”

Read said the provision was intended to prevent local officials from delaying lawmakers and interfering with legislative votes, not to exempt legislators from criminal liability.

“It was always the commute itself that was meant to be protected… Not the legislator protected from breaking the law,” she said.

Read’s petition argues the New Hampshire Supreme Court has never interpreted the scope of the provision in the roughly 240 years since it was ratified, calling it a constitutional question of first impression that the state’s highest court has never squarely addressed.

“The question is not whether a sitting legislator is ‘above the law,'” the petition states.

Instead, Read argues, lawmakers traveling to and from legislative duties should receive the same “functional analysis” applied to police officers or emergency medical technicians who violate traffic laws while performing official duties.

A judge rejected that argument in Read’s first speeding case.

Court records show she was found guilty of negligent driving in August 2025 and fined $1,240, with half the fine deferred.

She was also allowed to keep her license as long as she maintained good behavior for two years, completed a safe-driving course and avoided additional moving violations.

Read later asked the New Hampshire Supreme Court to take up the constitutional question before the second speeding case proceeded. The court declined, denying her petition without prejudice and allowing her to raise the arguments again in a future appeal that complies with court rules.

Read defended her handling of the case in an Instagram statement, saying she accepted the reduced negligent driving charge “to end the case” and did not appeal the constitutional issue.

In the same statement, Read’s office disputed allegations that she exceeded 100 mph, arguing the 2009 Toyota Yaris she was driving, which she said has more than 440,000 miles on it, “simply cannot go that fast.”

Her office also said the officer did not use radar or clock her speed and instead estimated it while accelerating to catch up to her vehicle. Read’s office further claimed a State House employee who was on the phone with her during the traffic stop later testified to an account that conflicted with the officer’s version of events.

Read’s office also criticized the lack of body-camera footage from the stop and said she now encourages motorists to use dashboard cameras.

Read said her challenge focuses on the legality of the traffic stops rather than the underlying charges.

“The unconstitutional manner of the stops, and not the charge, therefore, was the topic of discussion in the case,” she said.