Home Blog Page 1366

Kelsey Grammer’s Compassionate Message: Prayers for Pandemic-Stricken America Amid Trump Memorial Controversy

0

Kelsey Grammer expressed his concerns for Americans suffering from the virus, during a conversation about President Trump’s claims regarding vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

The acclaimed Frasier actor, now 71, joined Fox News’ Jesse Watters Primetime on Tuesday. During the broadcast, Watters spoke passionately about the contentious $16 million refurbishment of the iconic pool, which is part of the preparations for America’s upcoming 250th anniversary.

In a recent renovation project, workers applied a coating described as ‘American flag blue’ to the pool, only for it to be overtaken by algae that turned it green. Trump has repeatedly claimed, without providing substantiating evidence, that vandals are responsible for this and other issues.

Watters aired footage from the Department of the Interior that purportedly depicted individuals seen as vandals, in the act of submerging their hands into the pool. He suggested that the Democrats, whom he referred to as ‘party poopers,’ want the site to remain in disarray.

In his discussion with Grammer, Watters posed a provocative question: ‘Why can’t we have nice things?’

While Grammer, who is famously a lifelong conservative Republican, did not comment on whether he believed the people were vandals, he responded ‘Well, we can, and most Americans understand that we can, and should.

Kelsey Grammer revealed he is praying for 'virus-infected' Americans as he discussed Trump's allegations of vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on Tuesday's Jesse Watters Primetime

Kelsey Grammer revealed he is praying for ‘virus-infected’ Americans as he discussed Trump’s allegations of vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on Tuesday’s Jesse Watters Primetime 

The Frasier icon, 71, appeared on Fox News' Jesse Watters Primetime on Tuesday, where the irate host weighed in on the controversial $16million renovations of the pool as part of America's 250th birthday celebration - pictured algae in the pool

The Frasier icon, 71, appeared on Fox News’ Jesse Watters Primetime on Tuesday, where the irate host weighed in on the controversial $16million renovations of the pool as part of America’s 250th birthday celebration – pictured algae in the pool

‘There is a virus that has infected a very small number of people, I think, who just want to tear things down. They’ve been consumed by hatred. 

‘Of course, hatred ends up basically destroying you. They’re welcome to it. I pray for them. I pray for everyone to find decent sentiment in their hearts about this country and about the people who run it these days and about those who love it, because it’s worth loving.’

After Watters claimed that tourists visiting the United States for the World Cup respected the country more than Americans do, Grammer said, ‘It’s great that we’re given this chance to see it in the eyes of so many of our European fellows and South American fellows. This whole idea about many, we are one, it is one of the greatest things in the world.

‘It’s by definition a diverse nation, but we have a unifying concept that everybody’s worth reaching for the moon. And America will help you do it.’

Trump has claimed that vandals used a knife or blade to make a 250-foot gash in the surface and poured destructive chemicals into the water. 

A chain link fence was erected on Tuesday around the Reflecting Pool after another person was taken away in cuffs from the memorial.

 The fence went up after a number of arrests made in connection with the pool.

The president said on Tuesday morning that six arrests had already been made and that several had been cited for vandalizing the memorial.

The 'American flag blue' paint used by crews to coat the pool in the remodel has been shrouded by algae green - with Trump repeatedly claiming, without publicly providing evidence, that vandals have caused the array of problems

The ‘American flag blue’ paint used by crews to coat the pool in the remodel has been shrouded by algae green – with Trump repeatedly claiming, without publicly providing evidence, that vandals have caused the array of problems 

Grammer said, 'There is a virus that has infected a very small number of people, I think, who just want to tear things down. They've been consumed by hatred'

Grammer said, ‘There is a virus that has infected a very small number of people, I think, who just want to tear things down. They’ve been consumed by hatred’

'Of course, hatred ends up basically destroying you. They're welcome to it. I pray for them. I pray for everyone to find decent sentiment in their hearts about this country and about the people who run it these days'

‘Of course, hatred ends up basically destroying you. They’re welcome to it. I pray for them. I pray for everyone to find decent sentiment in their hearts about this country and about the people who run it these days’

The threat came after a bruising weekend for the project, which was meant to give one of Washington’s most recognizable landmarks a fresh look ahead of the country’s 250th anniversary celebrations on July 4.

Trump had ordered contractors to drain the pool and coat its surface in blue, saying the color would better reflect the Washington Monument.

But the makeover quickly ran into visible problems.

Algae bloomed after the pool was refilled, turning sections of the water a murky green. The new blue surface then began to peel, leaving loose strips and patchy areas across the bottom.

Trump has repeatedly blamed the problems on vandals, claiming without publicly providing evidence that people had used a knife or blade to make a 250-foot gash in the surface and poured destructive chemicals into the water.

He said Sunday that repairs would begin after he inspected the pool.

‘Work will begin immediately on fixing the seriously vandalized Reflecting Pool,’ Trump wrote. ‘I just inspected it, and could only say to myself, and those gathered around me, WOW, who would do such a thing?’

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool continues to show signs of an algae bloom on the National Mall. Trump said that another round of repairs to the iconic basin will begin right away

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool continues to show signs of an algae bloom on the National Mall. Trump said that another round of repairs to the iconic basin will begin right away

Grammer spoke last week about what his idea of conservatism leading to achieving the American dream means to him.

‘If you come from a place of kindness and you come from a space of respect for others, all the other things will fall into place,’ he said. 

 ‘If you understand you gotta balance a checkbook, you gotta pay your bills, you gotta pay your taxes, there’s a whole world of stuff you have to maintain. That’s your ticket to freedom. That’s your ticket to the American dream. It’s hard work.’

Brooks Nader Reveals Surprising Updates on Her Relationship with Taron Egerton

0

Despite being spotted together in what many interpreted as romantic encounters, Brooks Nader has clarified that she and actor Taron Egerton were “never” romantically involved.

The model addressed recent speculation while speaking with TMZ on Wednesday from the set of her upcoming series, “Baywatch.” She emphasized her single status, saying, “I’m just single, having fun, always.”

When asked about her dating life, Nader, 29, confirmed that she is not seeing anyone in particular. “I’m just going on fun dates, but not with anyone right now,” she said, underscoring her focus on personal enjoyment and professional endeavors.

As she prepares for her role in the much-anticipated “Baywatch,” Nader cheekily responded to inquiries about her relationship status by saying, “I’m working. I’m just Baywatching.”

Rumors of a romance between Nader and Egerton, 36, initially surfaced after Page Six reported their attendance at a screening of “Project Hail Mary,” which features Ryan Gosling, on March 27. However, Nader’s recent comments make it clear that the conjecture was unfounded.

The following day, they were seen grabbing drinks at the Shutters on the Beach hotel in Santa Monica, California.

We’re told the duo appeared “infatuated” with each other, and as if they’ve known each other for some time.

Nader and the “Rocketman” star seemingly spent a weekend together, as they were photographed holding hands and kissing on March 29.

That same night, they were seen out to dinner at the celebrity hot spot Giorgio Baldi. However, they notably kept their distance as they left the Santa Monica eatery.

Nader and Egerton took their romance overseas in April, as they were seen getting cozy off the coast of Australia.

The rumored couple’s outings continued into the following month when they enjoyed dinner with Nader’s family at Craig’s in West Hollywood, California.

They ensured to keep their distance while leaving the restaurant with the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model’s parents, Holland and Breaux, and her sisters, Mary Holland and Sarah Jane.

Nader’s previous romance was with her “Dancing With the Stars” partner, Gleb Savchenko, from September 2024 to April 2025.

She was also married to businessman Billy Haire from 2019 to 2025.

As for Egerton, his last relationship was with actress Chloe Bennet in 2024.

Elon Musk Questions Mystery Behind Texas Tesla Crash: ‘This Makes No Sense

KATY, Texas (The Hill) – Tesla CEO Elon Musk has dismissed accusations that the company’s full self-driving software was responsible for a recent accident in Texas that claimed the life of a local woman.

The tragic incident involved 76-year-old Martha Avila, who died when a Tesla vehicle careened through her home in Katy, Texas, last Friday. Authorities and the driver have suggested that the automated driving assistance system was active during the crash, according to a lawsuit filed by Avila’s daughter.

“This makes no sense,” Musk commented on X in response to the claims. “FSD [full self-driving] operates at low speeds on neighborhood streets, while this incident involved high speeds!”

Echoing Musk’s skepticism, Tesla’s Vice President of AI Software, Ashok Elluswamy, explained that the driver had “manually taken over by fully pressing the accelerator in this residential area,” possibly leading to the crash.

In the wake of the incident, Jennifer Barbour, Avila’s daughter, alongside her husband Justin Barbour, has filed a lawsuit against both Tesla and the driver, Michael Butler, seeking accountability for the crash.

The lawsuit alleges the accident was “caused by the concurrent negligence of Defendant Butler and the defective condition of the Vehicle and its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems as designed, manufactured, and marketed by Defendant Tesla.”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said it has launched a special crash investigation into the incident.

The federal regulator previously opened a probe into Tesla’s full-self driving software, which escalated in March from a preliminary evaluation to an engineering analysis. It is investigating nine other crashes, including one fatal, in which the system is alleged to have failed to detect poor driving conditions and alert drivers quickly enough.

Violent ‘Free Karmelo’ Mob Targets Woman in Brutal Attack Amid Rowdy Protest Supporting Convicted Killer

0

A Texas woman is on the road to recovery after sustaining severe injuries in what she described as a brutal attack by a group of women.

The alleged reason for this violent encounter? Her backing of Karmelo Anthony.

In a detailed post on social media, the victim recounted that she and a friend had just finished a night out and were returning to her car when they were confronted by the strangers.

image shows blurred photo of a victim in a neck brace

Texas authorities have confirmed to News Media that the woman was indeed attacked by multiple individuals repeatedly chanting “Free Karmelo” during this purported random assault. (Facebook / Meta)

The attack happened in Longview, Texas, over the weekend.

The victim wrote in part, “While getting jumped they [were] yelling out ‘Free Karmelo’ — saying they [were] going to target the smallest white girl they could find.”

photo shows blurred image of victim in hospital with neck brace

Police in Longview, Texas arrested one suspect in connection to an alleged random attack on a woman where a group of people reportedly chanted “Free Karmelo” in relation to the high-profile Karmelo Anthony case. (Facebook/Meta)

📩 Want me to look into something? kelsie.cairns@fox.com

📸 Instagram: kelsiecairns_tv

🎥 Facebook: Kelsie Cairns

Anthony was convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison after he stabbed and killed 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet. The verdict has sparked intense debate.

On Monday, a group of civil rights and criminal defense attorneys announced they were going to join Anthony’s fight to appeal his conviction.

He has a new legal team that includes Ben Crump’s law firm.

Attorney Ben Crump raising fist at Hollywood Unlocked's Fourth Annual Impact Awards in Beverly Hills

Attorney Ben Crump raises his fist while attending Hollywood Unlocked’s Fourth Annual Impact Awards at The Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, Calif., on June 21, 2024. (Robin L Marshall/Getty Images)

The Longview victim said the attack was unprovoked. She also wrote in the post she “never said a word to these girls,” she “never looked at them” and indicated she did not know them prior to the attack.

image shows three split photos of a woman's injuries that have been blurred

News Media has confirmed with police that a woman was brutally beaten and is pressing charges after a group of strangers assaulted her in an unprovoked attack while reportedly chanting “Free Karmelo.” (Facebook/Meta)

In the same post, the victim wrote that the Anthony case has “nothing” to do with her yet the assault resulted in injuries including a black eye, staples in her head and significant bleeding.

News Media spoke to the victim’s father, who said she is still very shaken up over the incident but that she feels it’s important for the public to “know what happened,” when referring to her public social post.

News Media confirmed the Longview Police Department is investigating the attack and has arrested one suspect in connection to it. Police did not name the suspect.

The investigation is ongoing.

Tensions Flare as Trump Clashes with Senator in Heated Exchange: ‘You’re a Bully

0

In a heated meeting on Wednesday in Washington, DC, Donald Trump clashed with Republican senators over restrictions on his authority to lead military actions against Iran.

This intense private encounter followed the Senate’s bipartisan decision, led by Republicans, to pass a measure demanding Trump cease military operations in Iran unless Congress gives its approval. Notably, four GOP senators diverged from the party line to challenge the President.

This decision represents the most pronounced pushback from Republicans against Trump so far, highlighting the growing divide between him and his party.

Behind closed doors on Capitol Hill, Trump confronted the full Republican Senate majority, pressing them to explain their decision to curtail his war-making powers.

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana tried to articulate their perspective, only for Trump to respond with personal attacks. Cassidy, alongside fellow Republicans Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Rand Paul, aligned with Democrats to pass the war powers measure.

‘He [Trump] was asking why anybody would vote for the power’s accident. I said, “Is that a rhetorical question, or do you want to know?” He goes, “I want to know.”‘ Cassidy told the Daily Mail. 

Cassidy began ‘yelling’ at the President at one point, and Trump responded by calling him a lunatic and telling him to ‘sit down.’ 

The Republican lawmaker refused and referred to Trump as ‘brother.’ The President told him he wasn’t his ‘brother’ before Cassidy eventually settled back into his seat.

Trump also mocked the senator for losing his primary, which the senator perceived as the President’s attempt to bully him.

The Republican-controlled Senate passed bipartisan legislation ordering Trump to end the war with Iran or seek congressional approval to continue it

The Republican-controlled Senate passed bipartisan legislation ordering Trump to end the war with Iran or seek congressional approval to continue it

Trump met privately with the entire Republican Senate majority behind-closed doors on Capitol Hill to discuss why they had decided to vote to limits his power to wage war

Trump met privately with the entire Republican Senate majority behind-closed doors on Capitol Hill to discuss why they had decided to vote to limits his power to wage war

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana attempted to explain their rationale, but the President immediately resorted to personal insults

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana attempted to explain their rationale, but the President immediately resorted to personal insults

Cassidy lost his Republican primary in May, and will leave the Senate in January, making him the first elected incumbent senator to lose a primary since 2012.

‘I’m not going to be bullied when I feel like I’m asking a question the American people need to know. And so, at that point, it began to escalate,’ Cassidy told the Daily Mail.

Trump’s meeting with the senator followed his controversial decision to abruptly cancel a signing ceremony for a bipartisan housing bill. 

The President said he would not sign the bill until the Senate passed his controversial Save America Act, which requires Americans to present a voter ID to cast an electoral ballot.

Asked about Trump’s refusal to hold the housing bill hostage, Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters, ‘That was his call to make.’

As he left the Capitol building, Trump called it a ‘great meeting’ but said he was frustrated with some Republican lawmakers.

‘We like our leader. We like everybody, really, in the room,’ Trump said. ‘I don’t like a few people, but that’s okay, I think you know who they are.’

Thune did not escort the President out of the Capitol following his remarks to the press about GOP lawmakers.

Senator Cassidy referred to Trump as 'brother' during their heated argument

Senator Cassidy referred to Trump as ‘brother’ during their heated argument 

Thune appeared with the President at the Capitol building for his meeting with GOP lawmakers

Thune appeared with the President at the Capitol building for his meeting with GOP lawmakers

Trump’s relationship with the Senate GOP has been on the decline since the President endorsed primary challengers to two Republican incumbents seen as major allies of Thune: Texas Senator John Cornyn and Cassidy.

Once a reliably loyal bloc, the chamber’s GOP majority has grown increasingly willing to break with the President on questions of war powers, spending, and the limits of executive authority.

Discover Lorena Bobbitt’s Life Today After the Infamous Incident

0

Over thirty years have passed since the dramatic events involving Lorena Bobbitt, who severed her then-husband John Wayne Bobbitt’s penis with a kitchen knife before fleeing from their shared Virginia apartment.

The incident quickly became a sensation across the nation, capturing widespread attention in the ’90s and turning into a significant cultural reference point. Both Lorena and John faced trials as their conflicting accounts of what happened unfolded in court.

According to ABC News, Lorena claimed she reached a breaking point after enduring years of sexual abuse. She was ultimately deemed not guilty due to temporary insanity in the case of malicious wounding. In a separate trial, John was acquitted of charges of marital sexual assault.

Years later, with the rise of the #MeToo movement, Lorena’s story was revisited and gained renewed attention through the 2019 Prime Video documentary Lorena.

Lorena, who now goes by her maiden name Lorena Gallo, has transformed her infamous experience into a platform for advocacy. She leverages her notoriety to support victims of domestic violence, going so far as to establish her own foundation dedicated to the cause.

Here’s everything to know about the case and Lorena’s life today:

What Happened to Lorena Bobbitt and John Bobbitt?

John and Lorena were four years into their marriage when their union took a dark turn on June 23, 1993. 

Lorena told investigators that in the early morning hours, John returned home drunk after a night out, jumped on top of her and raped her, per ABC News. It was the final straw in what she alleged was years of abuse.

During their marriage, Kim Chinn—a retired sergeant with the Prince William County Police Department—told ABC News there had been “about half a dozen” domestic violence calls to the home. Charges were only brought once when John was charged with assault and battery. He later got a cross-warrant against Lorena, who was also charged with assault and battery, but both charges were ultimately dropped.

That night in June, Lorena told police that she went into the kitchen, grabbed a knife and cut off his penis.

“I went back to the bedroom. I took the sheets off and I cut him,” she told ABC News in 1993. “Everything went just fast.”

Then comma she fled the apartment and threw the severed member out the window of her car.​​​​​​

“I’m not a vindictive person,” she told The New York Times in 2019, “because I told them where it was.”

John, however, has consistently denied any claims of abuse and told ABC News that he came home and went to sleep. In his account, Lorena had been trying to initiate sexual contact but he was “exhausted” and couldn’t respond.

He insisted he “never raped anybody in my life” and said everything happened while he was in a “deep sleep.”

“She was never abused,” he added in his own 2019 interview with The New York Times. “She was always the abuser and she cut off my penis because I was going to leave her.” 

What Happened After John Bobbitt’s Penis Was Cut Off?

After the attack, John told ABC News that he immediately sprung out of bed.

“I was bleeding, I was applying pressure, then immediately I thought it was something out of a horror movie,” he recalled. “A nightmare… turned into reality.”

John was driven to the emergency room by a friend, who had been staying at the apartment that night, the outlet reported. 

“There was no hysteria,” Bobbitt’s plastic surgeon, Dr. David Berman later recalled to Oxygen. “He just kind of walked up [to the desk].”

After John’s penis was discovered in a field next to a 7-11, police were able to get it on ice and rush it to the hospital, where it was reattached.

“Obviously had a little squirrel, or bird, or something like that taken it,” Berman explained, “it would have been a very different story.”

According to Berman, John remained calm throughout the ordeal.

“Every guy is going to feel anxiety with his weenie cut off, but he never really had much pain that I am aware of or can remember,” Berman told Oxygen. “He never really said, ‘Why me.’”

What Happened at Lorena Bobbitt’s trial? 

After the surgery, John was arrested and charged with marital sexual assault due to Lorena’s allegation that he’d raped her that night, per ABC News. He was acquitted in November 1993.

Lorena was the next to go on trial for malicious wounding in a highly-publicized two-week event. She was found not guilty by reason of temporary insanity, according to NBC News.

What Did John Bobbitt Do After His Trial?

John infamously went on to star in pornographic movies and made a series of talk show appearances, becoming a regular guest on The Howard Stern Show. He also briefly worked as a host-chauffer-bartender at Nevada’s Moonlight Bunny Ranch, The Las Vegas Sun reported. 

John was later charged with domestic battery in connection with incidents involving two other women, according to ABC News, and served time in jail. 

He denied the abuse to the news outlet, claiming he got involved with the women “too fast” and didn’t know “their motives.”

“After the case, I would attract all the wrong people,” he said. “And I didn’t have that just—discernment of picking and choosing wisely.”

What Happened to Lorena Bobbitt After She Was Acquitted?

After her verdict, the court demanded Lorena spend five weeks at a mental hospital for treatment and evaluation, per ABC News.

Today, she believes today the sensational nature of her case overshadowed the domestic violence allegations she made against her husband.

“They were more concerned about his penis instead of domestic violence,” she told TIME in 2018. “They really missed the whole concept of domestic violence and abuse against women.”

What is Lorena Bobbitt Doing Today? 

The manicurist went on to find love with David Bellinger after the pair met in college, according to USA Today. They later welcomed a daughter together.

Though they’ve been together more than 20 years, Lorena told the news outlet in 2019 that they weren’t married.

“I believe in marriage as an institution, of course, and I respect that,” she said at the time. “It was my choice. He even says, ‘If you’re ready to marry, I’ll just show up!’”

Today, Lorena is focused on her work as an advocate against domestic violence. To aid in her efforts, she created the Lorena Gallo Foundation, which, according to its mission, strives to “expand domestic violence and sexual assault prevention education, emergency response resources and community engagement activities that will improve outcomes for survivors and their children.”

“Since her own escape from domestic violence, Lorena has dedicated her life to inspiring survivors to discover their own resilience and shining a light on the actions we can all take to help end the trauma of abuse,” the foundation’s website noted. “With her message that silence is not an option, Lorena has refused to be defined by the abuse she experienced.”

She’s also started sharing her own story, first in the documentary Lorena and later in the 2020 Lifetime docudrama I Was Lorena Bobbitt.

“People used to judge me before, saying that they don’t believe my story,” she told Entertainment Tonight in 2020. “To tell the story again is more than a blessing, to me it is an opportunity to tell it right.”

Comprehensive Recap: Everything You Need to Know Before Silo Season 3 Debut

0

Apple TV’s gripping series “Silo,” inspired by Hugh Howey’s acclaimed science fiction trilogy, takes viewers into the depths of an underground fortress resembling a grain silo. The residents are led to believe that the world beyond their concrete walls is perilous, insisting their only salvation is within these confines. Naturally, when a crowd of 10,000 lives under strict regulations, skepticism and unrest begin to stir. While many shows echo the themes presented in “Silo,” none quite capture its unique storytelling.

The story centers on Juliette Nichols, portrayed by Rebecca Ferguson, who assumes the role of the society’s newest sheriff, having previously worked in Mechanical, the gritty department tasked with keeping the silo’s machinery running smoothly. However, Season 2 takes a dramatic turn as she finds herself on the barren surface, making her way toward another silo, following her forced exodus by Bernard Holland (Tim Robbins) and Robert Sims (Common). Within her prior silo, her departure has ignited further chaos, fueling the embers of rebellion.

As Season 2 concludes, the veil over the silo’s hidden truths is lifted, revealing the extent of the leadership’s control. Characters step into new roles as the silo deals with increased turmoil and loss of life, pushing its stability to a breaking point that threatens all who dwell within. Before Season 3 premieres on July 3, here’s a reminder of the pivotal moments from “Silo” Season 2 you should remember.

What happened in Season 1?

The debut of “Silo” offers a detailed glimpse into the lives of those residing in the mysterious structure and traces the roots of rebellion within. The inhabitants are warned that the outside environment is hostile, trapping them inside until the day it’s deemed safe to emerge. However, a past uprising has left their historical records in disarray, adding another layer of complexity to their confined existence.

Sheriff Becker’s (David Oyelowo) wife Allison (Rashida Jones) went out to clean, or rather, leave the silo and go to the surface, three years previously after they struggled to conceive. She learned more about the silo thanks to a forbidden hard drive, which showed detailed building plans and videos of other people cleaning. This leads her to believe the powers that be are lying about the nature of the outside world, and she wants to see it for herself. The sheriff follows her outside after investigating her statements, and that is the catalyst for the events of Season 1.

Juliette Nichols, a worker in Mechanical, becomes the new sheriff thanks to a recommendation from Becker. It’s unconventional, but after the sudden death of the mayor, Bernard, the Head of IT, is willing to go with it to prevent further unrest in the population. Unfortunately, his plan doesn’t work, and Season 1 ends with him and Robert Sims, Judicial’s Head of Security, forcing Juliette out to clean as an effort to quell the rising rebellious nature of the silo citizens.

The resistance damages Silo 18

After Juliette is able to walk over the hill outside, something no one else who has gone out to clean has been able to do, the uprising only grows with the hope that they could survive on the surface. It’s later found out that the higher ups have been intentionally sabotaging the cleaning suits with faulty tape so people die. Bernard’s intent is for Juliette’s death to help quell dissent, but when she doesn’t die, things quickly become hard to control.

In an effort to silence those questioning the vitality of the outside world, Bernard and Sims implement new sheriffs, place undercover raiders in lower levels to listen in on rebellion-related activity, and, per the guidelines of governing document The Pact, try to blame those in Mechanical for the death of Judge Meadows (Tanya Moodie). Many begin to see through their lies, including new sheriff Paul Billings (Chinaza Uche), making Bernard and Sims’ hold on the population slip even further.

The residents in the bottom levels of the silo, which consist of hard laborers and other “lower class” citizens, use Bernard’s efforts against him, intentionally feeding him fake information through his hidden camera and informants. This causes Bernard to send raiders down to the bottom level, but those from Mechanical are already in the top levels due to their multi-day walk to speak with Judge Meadows. They then set off an explosion, causing significant damage to the silo’s staircase and cutting off the top levels from the bottom ones.

Sims is the new Head of IT shadow

With the death of the mayor, Bernard is pulling double duty as acting mayor and Head of IT, making it essential for him to have a shadow. However, his chosen shadow for Head of IT, Judge Meadows, wanted to go outside and clean. So, he killed her to try and use her death to further his own cause, which doesn’t work as intended.

He then makes Lukas Kyle (Avi Nash), an IT employee, his new shadow. Lukas was originally convicted to time in the mines because he had an illegal artifact from the before times, but Bernard sees potential in him because of his ability to decode old letters on a hard drive. The letters lead him to uncovering information about the Safeguard Procedure, a built-in mechanism that the silo’s operating system — the Algorithm — can activate at any time to kill the population. This causes Lukas to resign and for Bernard to, once again, be shadowless.

With no one left to turn to, Bernard makes Sims his shadow. It’s a role Sims wants, but Bernard has continuously told him he’s not good enough. Sims’ wife Camille (Alexandria Riley) is happy about the new position, since she has been pushing him to go for it. As Bernard’s new shadow, Sims is sent down to the IT vault with Camille and their son. However, the Algorithm only allows Camille to stay inside, implying that Sims isn’t worthy to know the secrets of the vault.

Juliette makes it back to Silo 18

After walking over the hill at the end of Season 1, Juliette finds another silo. She discovers a man inside the vault, going by the name Solo (Steve Zahn), and spends the season trying to befriend him and find a new suit so she can head back to her silo. However, the longer it takes to find a suit safe enough to go back outside in, the more she finds out about the silos and what could happen if the uprising continues.

She determines she’s spent her life in Silo 18 and is now in Silo 17 with Solo. It fell apart after the residents went to the surface, who then died from the environmental conditions they discovered. The silo, meanwhile, is steadily filling with water, so not all of it is accessible. However, in looking through different rooms, she figures out that Solo’s parents were part of the group that went outside. They figured out what the Safeguard Procedure was, leading to Juliette realizing she needs to get back to her own silo before the Algorithm activates it.

With a firefighter suit, Juliette heads back, determined to clean and inform those inside Silo 18 that it isn’t safe to come outside. She shows them a message on a piece of cloth, warning them not to leave the protection of the silo, before being let inside by Bernard.

Who is Solo/Jimmy?

When Juliette tries to get into the vault of Silo 17, she discovers that there is someone living inside it. He calls himself Solo, and he’s initially fairly aggressive, threatening her when she tries to break in. However, the two steadily get on better terms as they talk through the door, with Solo even giving Juliette food, and he begins to help her find a suit, offering up different ideas.

Solo, also known as Jimmy Conroy, is the only surviving citizen of his silo. During his youth, there was a riot, and the residents went outside, eventually dying on the surface. His father was the Head of IT, so he knew about the Safeguard Procedure and the other secrets of the silos. Based on his parents’ notes, they were trying to figure out how to disable the pipe that would push the airborne poison into the silo.

Based on the flashbacks in Season 2, Solo’s parents were working with the rebellion and against the sheriff, who was trying to arrest Solo’s father when he accidentally killed him. As an adult, Solo’s focus is on protecting the vault, something his father told him to do.

Bernard has lost all control

With the explosion destroying the stairs, the sheriff and deputies joining forces with the rebellion, and Mechanical seemingly having the last word, Bernard has officially lost control of the silo. He seems to recognize that the Algorithm will activate the Safeguard Procedure sooner rather than later thanks to his glowing key, and decides he will take his chances on the outside, suiting up and opening the air lock to go to the surface.

In doing so, he lets Juliette in, and the two are in a stand off. He’s pointing a gun toward her as a defensive mechanism, wanting to know why she’s bothered to come back. Bernard sees her as the reason everything is crumbling, whereas Juliette believes she is the only one who can give them the information they need to stay inside. He’s surprised that she knows about the Safeguard Procedure, and makes no attempt to lie to her about it.

Bernard is determined to do something for himself, to feel an ounce of control, implying that, even when he “had control” in the silo, it wasn’t really his because of the Algorithm. Even he, when it comes down to it, is only a puppet for others, for the individuals who designed them. He plans to die on the surface, but he and Juliette end up trapped in the incinerator.

The history of Silo 18 becomes clearer

While much of Season 2 centers around Juliette’s friends in Mechanical trying to figure out what she knew and Bernard grasping for control, it’s all rooted in what Lukas and others are learning about the silo. The current population knows that 140 years ago all of the silo’s history was lost, but they don’t know why.

The letters Lukas decodes are from the Head of IT during that period, Salvador Quinn. During the uprising, Quinn made the decision to put something in the water supply that caused the citizens of Silo 18 to forget about the issues that were causing the rebellions. Quinn discusses that the discontent happened once every generation, which was about every 20-25 years, but since adding something to the water supply, there hasn’t been one. He then burned the documents and blamed Mechanical for it, effectively removing any trace of previous dissent from the population’s brains and records.

It’s alluded to that the substance Quinn put in the water supply is the same thing that is being used on Gloria Hildebrandt (Sophie Thompson), the fertility counselor, in Season 1. Gloria is known for sharing the idea that they are controlling who can reproduce, even if they give you permission, to try and artificially select for specific personality types. In attempts to stop her from sharing those ideas, which could help cause riots, she is monitored and sequestered, always under the influence of the drug.

Is Silo 18 about to experience the Safeguard Procedure?

Based on Lukas’ reaction to learning about the Safeguard Procedure, and Bernard’s lack of control over the silo, it seems more and more likely that the Algorithm will activate the safeguard and deem Silo 18 a loss. There’s technically nothing Bernard can do. It gave him plenty of chances to quell the rebellion, and each of his attempts failed, proving the silo may be too far gone in the eyes of the computer (and whomever is behind the silo project).

But, that’s why Juliette is trying to get back to the silo. In Silo 17, she reads Solo’s parents’ notes, and learns that there is a chance to survive the Safeguard Procedure if the citizens act fast. While they can’t stop the computer from flipping the switch, they can plug the pipe that would disperse the poison through the silo, effectively preventing it from spreading through the air supply.

However, Juliette’s future is unclear. She’s stuck in the incinerator that purges anything trying to come into the silo with Bernard, so she may not make it fully inside to tell the population what she learned. While Lukas knows what the Safeguard Procedure is, there’s no indication that he knows how to prevent it, and Bernard obviously doesn’t know how to either, leaving it on Juliette’s shoulders to save everyone.

There’s a flashback to the before times

The most surprising part of Season 2 of “Silo” is the ending sequence. After watching the incinerator turn on with Bernard and Juliette inside, audiences are taken back in time, to before the silos and when people lived on the surface.

A man and woman appear to be on a date in Washington, D.C., meeting up at a bar and restaurant. The man, Daniel (Ashley Zukerman), is a politician representing Georgia, and the woman, Helen (Jessica Henwick), is a reporter. They discuss a bomb that seemingly landed on United States soil, and that Iran is being blamed for it. The scene ends with a close up of Helen holding a duck PEZ dispenser Daniel gifts her, a play at her being an alum of the University of Oregon, but also the same PEZ dispenser Juliette has in Season 1.

The conversation gives a hint into what life was like before the silos, particularly that, at least to serve in the House of Representatives, you have to be a veteran. The reporter pointedly asks if the detonation was a radioactive bomb and if the government is considering retaliation, giving a look into the political climate. It presents the idea that the beginnings of a nuclear war are already present, and a possible reason for the creation of 50 underground silos. We’ll see how this all connects when Season 3 is available.

Australia’s Ambitious Energy Project Sparks Intense Debate

0

“Call it off. Let’s minimize our losses.”

During her appearance at the National Press Club last week, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson labeled the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric initiative as “nothing more than a debt-ridden abyss,” highlighting that its budget could escalate from an initial $2 billion to over $40 billion.

This statement marked the most recent critique of the troubled energy venture, which has faced extensive delays and inflated expenses, prompting doubts about its future financial viability.

Adding to its challenges, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) released an evaluation last week, exposing “significant deficiencies” in the management strategies applied to the endeavor.

Despite undergoing a reorganization in 2023, the oversight of the renewable energy facility located in the NSW Kosciuszko National Park by Snowy Hydro remains “partly effective,” according to the review.

A schedule for completion had not been agreed upon, the ANAO found, future costs were not being reliably tracked, and contractors were not being held to account.

Responding to the audit, Snowy Hydro accepted four of the five ANAO recommendations and partially accepted the fifth.

The company running it argues Snowy 2.0 is the nation’s “most critical energy project” and it will provide more than half of Australia’s total energy storage needs by 2050.

Snowy Hydro chief executive Dennis Barnes recently told an Australian Energy Council conference in Sydney that, although Snowy 2.0 is “bloody hard to build”, it’s “pretty good value” for money and will deliver “generational benefits.”

Why is Snowy 2.0 taking so long?

Commissioned under Malcolm Turnbull’s coalition government in 2017, Snowy 2.0 expands on the original Snowy Mountains hydroelectric complex. Originally planned for completion in 2024, it is now expected to open by December, 2028.

The project is one of the biggest engineering feats in the country, digging 27km of some of the deepest tunnels on Earth to connect the Talbingo reservoir to the Tantangara reservoir.

With Tantangara higher than Talbingo, the two dams will act like a gigantic battery, pumping water up using renewable energy when charging, and letting it flow back down to generate electricity.

A gif showing the movement of water from the Talbingo reservoir to the Tantangara reservoir through a power station.

The project has been hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic, subsequent global supply chain disruptions, and more complex-than-expected geological conditions.

One of the three massive tunnel boring machines used to excavate the system, nicknamed Florence, became stuck in a sinkhole just 150m into a 15km dig. It took roughly 11 months to get the machine out.

Strikes, gas leaks, safety concerns, and the collapse of the original construction firm contracted to build the project have all delayed it further.

Will Snowy 2.0 be worth it?

The original rough estimate of the project was $2 billion, updated to between $3.8 and $.45 billion following a feasibility study.

In October last year, the project was reported to be 67 per cent complete but was set to overrun its $12 billion budget forecast.

In recent Senate estimate hearings, Barnes could not provide a figure on how much had been spent so far, but rejected speculation that it was as high as $20 billion.

However, he did reject a critical $42 billion assessment made by two energy experts in April, arguing that the figure includes transmission costs which Snowy Hydro is not responsible for.

At full capacity, Snowy 2.0 is expected to generate 2.2 gigawatts of electricity and 350 gigawatt hours of energy storage — roughly a week’s worth of power for around 3 million homes.

However, there have been accusations that the project may not generate as much electricity as advertised — down to as little as 40 gigawatts of storage under real-world conditions.

Andrew Blakers, professor of engineering at the Australian National University, rejects those claims, arguing that such notions “overlook” the integrated nature of the Snowy Mountains dam system, allowing for “extremely flexible” water movement.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison, wearing a suit, speaks into microphones outside. There are three men and a woman in suit standing behind him, and in the background pipelines running up a hill

When it comes to cost, the renewable energy researcher said Snowy 2.0 will work out to about a quarter of the cost of standard battery storage in 10 years.

“Snow 2.0 provides the same energy storage as 7 million electric vehicle batteries,” he told SBS News. “It works out to about $3000 per EV battery.”

A replacement battery for a Tesla EV is between $7,000 and $15,000, according to the vehicle maintenance website AutoGuru.

In addition, Snowy 2.0’s planned 100 to 150 year lifespan means it will last “at least seven times longer” than traditional battery storage, Blakers said.

Could Snowy 2.0 be cancelled?

Hanson is not the only one who wants to see Snowy 2.0 scrapped. While she proposes the country invest in nuclear power instead, others say renewable energy efforts could be better invested.

Dr Bruce Mountain of the Victoria Energy Policy Centre at Victoria University has long been a vocal critic of the project, branding it a “costly white elephant” and an “international laughing stock”. Mountain and former energy executive Ted Woodley have assessed the total price tag could be $42 billion.

Civil engineers, energy economists, and environmental groups have similarly demanded a halt to the project, arguing that better alternatives are available.

Blakers said that, at present, coal covers 90 per cent of the country’s overnight electricity demand and, given that it is expected to exit the grid over the next decade, long-term battery storage is required.

“Snowy 2.0 all by itself will be 80 per cent of all the energy storage in Australia,” when it comes online, he said. “This is serious storage, whereas batteries are not serious energy storage.”

Small-scale batteries can discharge power for hours, but during wind droughts and overcast days, they can quickly run dry. Snowy 2.0 underpins the renewable energy transition, Blakers argued, and the idea of cancelling it would be “totally nuts”.

“It’s approaching 80 per cent completion,” he said. “It’s sunk money whether you like it or not, and the soonest that Pauline Hanson could become prime minister would be 2028, when it would be six months out from completion.

“She’s not going to do that.”

Still, if the project was scrapped, he argues there “would be panic” as it would force Australia’s already “well past their use-by date” coal power stations to remain on.

“That carries the risk that you would get explosions, failures, collapses,” he said. “The biggest disruption nowadays to wholesale electricity is the unexpected failure of coal power stations.”

A dam with a narrow lake in the background

When Snowy 2.0 comes online, it will make Australia the number one country in the world for renewable energy storage per capita, having long been number one for solar generation, Blakers said.

“We are a renewable energy pathfinder,” he said. “Of course, we find cracks in the pavement as we move down the path, but we are finding that it’s really quite straightforward to solve those problems.”

Once the project is completed, he argued most Australians will think about the costs and the delays about as much as they think about similar issues with the Sydney Harbour Bridge or the Opera House.

“There has been more misinformation and disinformation and outright nonsense written about Snowy 2.0 than almost any other project,” he said.

“We are an example to the rest of the world. We should be proud of it.”


YouTube Reaches Settlement in Florida Teen’s Social Media Addiction Lawsuit, Marking Significant Big Tech Challenge

0

YouTube, a subsidiary of Google, has agreed to a settlement in a lawsuit filed by a Florida teenager who claimed the platform contributed to a mental health crisis among young people. The teen asserted that YouTube’s design features encourage excessive screen time among kids.

The settlement, which remains confidential and was reached just weeks before the case was set to go to trial, highlights the ongoing struggles of major tech companies as they face increasing legal challenges. These legal pressures focus on allegations that tech platforms are intentionally crafted to boost user engagement, often at the expense of young people’s mental health.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiff, referred to as RKC in court documents, claimed that YouTube and other social media platforms are intentionally addictive. The lawsuit pointed to features like autoplay and infinite scrolling, which are designed to keep users engaged by providing a constant stream of new content.

Google verified the settlement on Monday.

“We have reached a friendly resolution, and our commitment remains firm in creating age-appropriate products along with parental controls that fulfill this commitment,” remarked Google spokesperson José Castañeda in an official statement.

The settlement removes YouTube from a closely watched California trial that is currently scheduled to begin July 27 in Los Angeles.

RKC’s lawsuit against Meta, TikTok parent ByteDance and Snap remains active.

The case is the second bellwether trial overseen by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl as part of a broader effort to resolve more than 1,000 similar lawsuits filed in California alleging social media platforms harmed children through addictive product design.

The litigation has emerged as one of the biggest legal threats facing the social media industry.

Plaintiffs across the country claim tech companies knowingly exploited children’s psychological vulnerabilities to increase engagement, advertising revenue and time spent on their apps.

RKC’s allegations closely mirror those raised in the first bellwether case earlier this year.

That trial was brought by a California woman identified as KGM who accused Meta and YouTube of intentionally designing products that fostered compulsive use among young people.

Snap and TikTok settled before that case reached a jury.

In March, jurors awarded KGM $6 million after finding Meta and YouTube liable for the mental health effects their platforms had on certain users.

The verdict marked the first time a jury held the companies legally responsible for harms tied to social media addiction claims.

The same week, another jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375 million after finding the company misled users about the safety of its platforms for children.

RKC alleges that YouTube’s design features contributed to compulsive use that led to anxiety, sleep deprivation and other mental health problems.

Google has rejected claims that YouTube was irresponsibly designed.

Last month, YouTube, Meta, Snap and TikTok settled another case that was headed to trial in federal court in California.

That lawsuit was brought by a Kentucky school district that accused the companies of contributing to a student mental health crisis through addictive platform features.

Jonathan Alpert, a psychotherapist and author, told The Post the litigation is increasingly focused on platform design rather than user behavior.

“The question is no longer whether social media can affect mental health. The bigger question is where personal responsibility ends and product design begins,” he said.

“Every settlement and verdict sends a message. If they see companies writing checks instead of fighting these cases to the end, more lawsuits will likely follow,” Alpert added.

Barry Morphew’s Double Life: Secret Identity and Girlfriend Revealed Amid Murder Investigation

0

Barry Morphew is reported to have used a false identity while residing in Arizona prior to his arrest concerning the murder of his wife. According to a recently unveiled arrest report, he allegedly lived with a woman for a month, all the while keeping his true identity hidden.

A grand jury indicted Morphew for first-degree murder after careful consideration on June 20, 2025. The charges are linked to the death of Suzanne Morphew, his 49-year-old wife and mother of their two daughters. She vanished in Colorado on Mother’s Day in 2020, where the family resided. Barry Morphew was apprehended nearly 11 hours away in Goodyear, Arizona, from where her disappearance occurred.

He is slated for a status conference in court this Wednesday afternoon, ahead of his trial set for October.

The arrest report, accessible through a public records request by News Media, accuses Morphew of adopting the alias “Lee Moore” during his time in Arizona. The report mentions he cohabitated with a woman approximately a month before he was taken into custody.

Barry Morphew entering Alamosa court building.

Barry Morphew is seen entering a courtroom in Alamosa, Colorado, on July 1, 2025. In an undated image, Suzanne Morphew is shown, as provided by law enforcement officers. (Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office and Pool via KRDO)

News Media isn’t naming the woman, as she hasn’t been charged with a crime. The woman told troopers with the Arizona Department of Public Safety that she had only known Morphew as “Lee Moore.” She said he began living with her on May 1, 2025, and moved in much of his personal property. Barry Morphew and the unidentified woman met in late December 2024.

On June 15, for unknown reasons, the woman said that Morphew revealed his actual identity and claimed his wife, Suzanne Morphew, was “abducted” in Colorado, the arrest report stated.

According to an arrest report, authorities found an AR-15-style rifle and a silencer inside Morphew’s safe that was at the house he was living in.

Notably, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation first reached out to the Arizona Department of Public Safety in February, asking them to keep tabs on Morphew’s movements as a grand jury indictment was expected. A warrant was also obtained to place a GPS tracking device on his truck.

Barry Morphew standing for booking photo at Alamosa County Jail

Barry Morphew’s booking photo was taken at the Alamosa County Jail. (Alamosa County Sheriff’s Office)

As News Media has previously reported, Morphew paid property taxes for a property at the Stardust Trailer Park in Cave Creek, Arizona, and was self-employed.

One restaurant employee in Cave Creek, Arizona, told News Media he knew Morphew by an entirely different name: Bruce.

Charlie Loots, bar manager at Harold’s Cave Creek Corral, told News Media that he didn’t know Morphew’s real name until June 20, when news reports began to surface about murder charges relating to Suzanne Morphew’s death.

Barry Morphew standing in court in Salida, Colorado.

Barry Morphew appears in court in Salida, Colo., on May 6. He was later seen leaving jail with his two daughters by his side. (KUSA/AP Pool)

“I was shocked that, again, I mean, I was very caught off guard about all of it,” Loots said. “I spent, honestly, as soon as I found about it, I spent like two hours reading articles about it. I was like, I was so intrigued, because I was, like, this s— doesn’t happen,” he said.

Loots said he began seeing Morphew, or Bruce, as he knew the murder suspect, after the coronavirus pandemic. He said Morphew’s go-to drink was beer, often switching between Miller Lite and Coors Light, adding that he was at the bar on June 13, exactly one week before his arrest.

Prosecutors wrote in the June 2025 indictment that the chemicals butorphanol, azaperone and medetomidine were found in Suzanne Morphew’s bone marrow. They alleged that Barry Morphew used “BAM” deer tranquilizer to sedate and transport deer on his farm when he lived in Indiana. He has pleaded not guilty to one count of first-degree murder.

Suzanne Morphew smiling in a close-up portrait

Suzanne Morphew, 49, went missing after leaving her Colorado home for a bike ride on May 10, 2020. Her remains were later discovered. (Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office)

Morphew was also the only person with a prescription for the deer tranquilizer within the area of the state he lived in, prosecutors said. The only two other entities with access to the BAM compound within the surrounding counties were Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the National Park Service, officials said.

“Ultimately, the prescription records show that when Suzanne Morphew disappeared, only one private citizen living in that entire area of the state had access to BAM: Barry Morphew,” the indictment states.

Morphew’s attorney, David Beller, previously told News Media Morphew “maintains his innocence.”

“Yet again, the government allows their predetermined conclusion to lead their search for evidence,” Beller said. “The case has not changed, and the outcome will not either.”

News Media reached out to Morphew’s lawyer for comment.