Home Blog Page 1815

Exploring Betty Broderick’s Complex Bond with Her Children Following Dan Broderick’s Tragic Murder

Betty Broderick’s children shared a complex relationship with her, yet they stood by her side during her last moments.

Betty gained national notoriety after she was convicted of fatally shooting her ex-husband, Dan Broderick, and his new wife, Linda Kolkena, in 1989. She passed away at the age of 78 while in custody on May 8 at Chino Valley Medical Center.

“She died of natural causes with three of her children at her bedside, while the fourth joined via FaceTime,” shared her youngest son, Rhett Broderick, with The San Diego Union-Tribune. “We all managed to be there for her.”

Over the years, the shocking double murder caused a rift among Betty’s children. Some voiced their support for her, while others believed she should remain incarcerated.

Betty and Daniel “Dan” Broderick III’s marriage began with high hopes. They tied the knot in a grand ceremony in April 1969. Betty supported Dan by working as a teacher while he pursued his medical education, as reported by The Los Angeles Times. As Dan progressed in his career as a medical malpractice attorney, obtaining both medical and legal degrees, they welcomed four children into their family.

The marriage of Betty and Daniel “Dan” Broderick III had began with such promise. After marrying in a lavish ceremony in April 1969, Betty helped support her husband by working as a teacher while he attended medical school, according to The Los Angeles Times. As Dan set up his career as a medical malpractice attorney, earning both his medical and legal degree, they welcomed their four children.

The family eventually settled in Southern California and became a part of La Jolla’s elite social scene. But by the early 1980s, the marriage was falling apart, according to The Los Angeles Times.

In 1983, Dan hired Linda as his legal assistant and began an affair, per the new outlet. When Dan moved out in 1985 a desperate Betty began dropping the kids off at his house one by one, The Los Angeles Times reported, as their divorce grew even more contentious.

Then, on the morning of Nov. 5, 1989, Betty—whose story was once featured on Oxygen’s Snapped—used a key she stole from one of her daughters to enter the home of her ex-husband and his new wife. As the couple slept, Betty snuck into their bedroom and fired a .38 caliber revolver, killing Linda instantly and fatally wounding Dan, according to Los Angeles Magazine.

“He said, ‘OK, OK, you got me,’” Betty told the magazine. “There was no pain, and there was no blood. It was simple.”

She ripped the telephone off the wall to prevent Dan from calling for help and then left the house, later turning herself in to police that same day.

Betty Broderick’s Children Testify During Murder Trial

Although Betty’s first trial ended in a hung jury, she was convicted of second-degree murder in the second trial in 1991 and sentenced to 32 years to life in prison, NBC News reported.

Two of her children—daughters Kim and Kathy “Lee”—took the stand in the sensational trials.

While testifying for the prosecution, Kim told jurors, per CBS 8,  that her mother had harbored intense anger against her father for years, once burning his clothes in the yard and another time driving a car into the front of his house.

Kim recounted one time Betty had been planning to visit her apartment and then called her and allegedly said, “I just remembered I hate your guts. You just make me sick and why would I want to come over and visit you?” 

Kim questioned why her mother felt that way, testifying that Betty told her it was because she was a “traitor.”

Meanwhile, Lee testified for the defense, recounting the moment her mother called her to report the murders. 

“She said, ‘He said it himself that one of us was going to have to die,’” she said, according to the news outlet. “She said also that she felt empty and dead inside and that she was so miserable that she couldn’t go on another day.”

Betty Broderick’s Children Were Divided After Father’s Murder

The children remained divided in their views as the years went on. 

Rhett said he hadn’t been surprised that his mother turned to violence that day. 

“On multiple occasions [my brother and I] went to my dad,” he recalled to The Oprah Winfrey Show, “and said to him that we wanted to live with my mom, and that not having her kids was driving her crazy—and that she could do something extremely irrational if she didn’t have us.”

In another interview years later, he said he felt his mother should be granted parole. 

“Keeping her in prison isn’t really helping her,” he said, according to Oprah Daily. “She’s not a danger to society—the only two people she was a danger to are dead.”

Lee also voiced her support of her mother at parole hearings, according to CBS News, saying in 2010, “She should be able to live her life outside prison walls.” 

Yet, at the same hearing Betty’s son Daniel argued that she was still “hung up on justifying what she did.”

“In my heart, I know my mother is a good person,” he said, per CBS News. “But along the way she got lost. Releasing a lost person into society could be a dangerous mistake.”

Despite their differing views, over the years Betty’s children and grandchildren visited her in prison.

She reflected on the relationship she had with family in the 2015 memoir Betty Broderick: Telling on Myself.

“I absolutely adore my children, from the first moment of the day to the last, and still do,” she wrote. “They were my priority and I wanted so badly for them to have a happy childhood.”

How Did Betty Broderick’s Children Feel About Her When She Died?

After decades in prison, Betty’s health took a turn in April after she tripped and broke some ribs, Rhett told The San Diego Tribune.

After the injury, Betty got an infection that turned into sepsis, he said.

In a statement to , the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation confirmed Betty was brought to an outside medical facility on April 18. 

She died at 3:40 a.m. on May 8. The medical doctor treating the 78-year-old determined her death to be the result of natural causes, although the official cause of death will be determined by the San Bernardino County Coroner, officials said.

After her death, Daniel told TMZ that his relationship with his mother had been complicated. 

Though he called her actions unforgivable, he said she was also his mother and he chose to remember her in her good moments. 

Rhett expressed a similar sentiment.

“We always try to remember her as her best self – an amazingly fun and smart mother – and she will be missed,” he told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “We are saddened that our time with her as our mother was so short.”

Exploring the Resilience of a Lebanese Christian Border Town Standing Firm Against Hezbollah

0

In the border town of Rmeish, nestled between Lebanon and Israel, the sound of church bells continues to resonate.

While much of southern Lebanon has borne the brunt of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, this predominantly Christian village has largely been spared. Its churches stand unscathed, and homes remain undamaged. Locals attribute their relative safety to their firm stance against allowing Hezbollah militants to use their town as a base for launching attacks.

“They attempted multiple times to set up rocket launch sites at the village’s outskirts,” a resident shared with Jusoor News. “But the young men of Rmeish stood their ground and blocked their entry.”

“This resistance helped shield Rmeish from Israeli attacks,” the resident explained. “The Israelis are strategic in their targeting, focusing specifically on launch sites.”

Churches in the southern Lebanese town of Rmeish

In Rmeish, churches remain intact as villagers took a stand against Hezbollah’s efforts to use their community for launching rockets. (Jusoor News)

The account offers a rare public glimpse into open resistance to Hezbollah inside southern Lebanon, where criticism of the Iranian-backed terrorist group is often met with accusations of treason or collaboration with Israel.

Tarek, a Christian social activist from Rmeish who spoke by phone with Fox News Digital, said residents of the town have long-faced pressure because they refused to align with Hezbollah.

“After 2000, when Israel left, we were always labeled as collaborators of Israel,” Tarek said. “We suffered a lot from this stigma.”

He said Hezbollah supporters accused the town of cooperating with Israel simply because it escaped the destruction seen in neighboring villages.

The interviews come as the Trump administration brokers talks between Israel and Lebanon aimed at stabilizing the border and addressing Hezbollah’s military presence in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem recently rejected any discussion about disarming the group, while U.S. officials continue pushing to strengthen the Lebanese state over the armed terror group.

Hezbollah Flag

Hezbollah worked to build facilities below private residential buildings and houses in southern Lebanon. (Benoît Durand / Hans Lucas / AFP via Getty Images)

Tarek argued Hezbollah’s grip on Lebanon cannot be separated from Iran.

“The Lebanese government has been ruled by Hezbollah for almost 36 years,” he told Fox News Digital. “They are deeply entrenched in all arms of the government, security, army and institutions.”

“If the president or prime minister says they want peace, Hezbollah will resist that,” he added.

Tarek said weakening Iran is the key to weakening Hezbollah.

Rmeish in southern Lebanon

Residents of the Christian border town of Rmeish in southern Lebanon say the village remained largely untouched during the war after locals prevented Hezbollah fighters from operating inside the town. (Jusoor News)

“It’s about cutting the head of the octopus, which is the Iranian regime,” he said. “Once you cut the head, Hezbollah will no longer function.”

Another resident said many in the town increasingly believe “Hezbollah’s project is an Iranian project, not a Lebanese one.”

Another woman from the village described living surrounded by war while trying to keep the town outside the fighting.

Rmeish, Lebanon

A landscape view of Rmeish, a predominantly Christian town near the Israel-Lebanon border whose residents say they worked to keep Hezbollah fighters out of the village during the war. (Jusoor News)

“We are in the middle, and the war surrounds us from all sides,” she said. “This makes us live in a state of fear, anxiety, insecurity and instability.”

A man from the village said residents had endured decades of wars that they have nothing to do with.

“We decided to remain steadfast,” he said. “Where would we go?”

An older resident said his family has suffered from violence along the border since the 1970s.

“We are tired of wars,” he said. “We want nothing but peace.”

Despite accusations from Hezbollah supporters, residents insisted they do not regret standing up to the terrorist group.

“All accusations of treason are rejected,” one resident said. “The people of Rmeish want to live safely on their land.”

Another resident added: “Just because I don’t believe in your project doesn’t mean I’m a traitor.”

Southern Lebanese border town of Rmeish near Israel. (Jusoor News)

A view of the southern Lebanese border town of Rmeish near Israel. (Jusoor News)

Ahed Al Hendi, a senior fellow at the Center for Peace Communications, told Fox News Digital that, “The defiance shown by Christians in southern Lebanon reflects a major shift in the country’s internal dynamics. For more than two decades, many Christians living near the border suffered under Hezbollah’s dominance, yet were stigmatized and often afraid to speak openly against it.” 

“Today,” Al Hendi added, “with the changing balance of power, they are increasingly confronting Hezbollah publicly and speaking out against what they see as its tyranny.”

Stream ‘Good Omens’ Season 3 for Free: Release Date, Time & Viewing Tips Unveiled


After nearly three years since the heart-rending conclusion of its second season, Good Omens is reaching its final chapter.

The third season of Good Omens is set to debut tomorrow, May 13, on Prime Video.

This concluding season will feature a single, extended 90-minute episode to tie up the journey of Crowley and Aziraphale, diverging from the previous six-episode format of the earlier seasons. The decision to condense the season came in the wake of multiple sexual assault allegations against the show’s creator and showrunner, Neil Gaiman, leading to his departure from the series, with production proceeding without him.

Adapted from the novel by the same name, Good Omens initially centers around angel Aziraphale (Michael Sheen) and demon Crowley (David Tennant), who have formed a unique camaraderie while living on Earth. Together, they strive to thwart the advent of the Antichrist and avert the apocalypse that would disrupt their comfortable earthly life.

In the series’ conclusion, Aziraphale and Crowley face a reckoning in their relationship, addressing past grievances and rekindling their connection as the Second Coming, which Aziraphale had ascended to Heaven to oversee, takes an unexpected and perilous twist.

Good Omens Season 3 Release Date

Good Omens Season 3 will be released on Wednedsay, May 13, only on Prime Video.

Good Omens Season 3 Release Time

Good Omens Season 3 debuts on Prime Video at 3 a.m. ET / 12 a.m. PT.

How to Watch Good Omens Season 3 for Free

As noted above, Good Omens is exclusive to the Prime Video streaming service.

If you aren’t a Prime Video subscriber yet, you can get started with a 30-day Amazon Prime free trial, including Prime perks like the Prime Video streaming service, free two-day shipping, exclusive deals, and more. After the free trial, Amazon Prime costs $14.99/month or $139/year.

All 18- to 24-year-olds, regardless of student status, are eligible for a discounted Prime for Young Adults membership as well, with age verification. After a six-month free trial, you’ll pay 50% off the standard Prime monthly price of $14.99/month — just $7.49/month — for up to six years and get all the perks.

Good Omens Season 3 Cast

A mix of returning cast members and new faces will be a part of Good Omens Season 3.

  • David Tennant as Crowley, a demon who has lived on Earth since the dawn of creation
  • Michael Sheen as Aziraphale, an angel who has lived on Earth since the dawn of creation
  • Derek Jacobi as The Metatron, the spokesperson for God
  • Doon Mackichan as the Archangel Michael
  • Gloria Obianya as the Archangel Uriel
  • Liz Carr as the Archangel Saraqael
  • Paul Chahidi as the Archangel Sandalphon
  • Quelling Sepulbeda as Muriel
  • Bilal Hasna as Jesus
  • Toby Jones as TBD

Good Omens Season 3 Trailer

How Did Good Omens Season 2 End?

Season 2 of Good Omens ends as the Metatron offers Aziraphale the position of Supreme Archangel, while giving Crowly a chance to restore his angelic status so they can lead Heaven together. While Aziraphale views this as an opportunity to finally make a difference, a disillusioned Crowley refuses to return to a system he finds toxic, instead proposing they run away together like Gabriel and Beelzebub.

This fundamental disagreement culminates in a desperate, grief-stricken kiss from Crowley, as he tells Aziraphale, “we could’ve been… us.” Ultimately, the pair parts ways: Aziraphale ascends to Heaven, while a shattered Crowley drives off into the night.


Why Trust Decider Shopping

This article was written by Angela Tricarico, Commerce Streaming Reporter for Decider, the New York Post, and Page Six. Angela keeps readers up to date with cord-cutter-friendly deals, how to watch your favorite sports teams and movies on each streaming service and the very best in tech, like soundbars, to enhance your viewing experience. Not only does Angela test and compare the services, devices and merch she writes about, but she’s also a superfan specializing in the intersection of shopping, tech and pop culture. Prior to joining Decider and the New York Post in 2023, she wrote about streaming and consumer tech at Insider Reviews. 


For more like this, check out the Decider Shopping section.

Tragic Turn of Events: Seattle Beer Garden Employee’s Death Sparks Self-Defense Controversy

0

In a tragic discovery at a Seattle beer garden, an employee was found shot dead as the establishment opened for business the following morning. Days later, a colleague implicated in the shooting surrendered to authorities, asserting that the act was in self-defense.

According to a police report shared by the Seattle Times, 25-year-old Quusaa “Q” Margarsa’s lifeless body was located by his coworkers at The Growler Guys in Northeast Seattle on Saturday morning. They stumbled upon the grim scene as they prepared to start their day.

Investigators revealed that 20-year-old Lucas Logan, a fellow employee, is suspected of fatally shooting Margarsa. The incident reportedly occurred following an after-hours gathering at the bar, which included an unidentified woman.

After closing The Growler Guys at approximately 1:30 a.m., Margarsa was said to have visited Lava Hookah Lounge. Friends informed investigators that he subsequently left the lounge accompanied by a man and a woman he encountered there.

The trio then made their way back to The Growler Guys, where the tragic events unfolded.

Surveillance footage showed Margarsa, Logan and the woman arriving at 5:25 a.m., with Margarsa using the key given to him by the owners to access the closed establishment.

Inside, the three spent about an hour hanging out and drinking before what appeared to be an argument broke out between Margarsa and Logan at the front door at around 6:40 a.m. Investigators also noted the group may have been doing narcotics together during that time.

According to the arrest report, the woman told investigators the argument started when Margarsa wanted Logan to leave the bar and for her to stay back with him.

Investigators noted in a probable cause statement obtained by the Seattle Times that while the footage contained no audio, during the argument, Margarsa is seen turning his back to unlock the door.

“The male suspect pulled out a handgun from his crossbody bag and shot Margarsa multiple times in the back,” the statement said.

Logan and the woman fled through the top half of a Dutch door and escaped in her car moments after the shooting, according to the probable cause statement.

Hours later, a co-worker arrived Saturday morning, found the door open and discovered Margarsa on the floor in a pool of blood with three spent casings nearby.

Two days after the shooting, Logan turned himself in to police with his defense attorney, Pete Mazzone, on Monday morning, KOMO News reported.

Logan’s attorney insists his client shot Margarsa in self-defense, according to KOMO News.

“This is a clear case of not only self-defense, but defense of others,” Mazzone said at a brief court hearing in the King County Jail on Tuesday.

“The fear was ‘we’re locked in here, and this guy doesn’t want to let the girl leave,’” Mazzone said.

“When they tried to leave peacefully, they found the door they had come in from was locked. It wasn’t that Mr. Q was escorting them out, it was Q was escorting, at least Logan, into a back room where he had words with him.”

However, prosecutor Chris Anderson told the court Margarsa had his back turned with his key in the door when Logan drew a gun, pointed it at his head and fired.

“Mr. Margarsa was found with the key to that door in his dead hand. Not a weapon — a key,” Anderson said.

King County District Court Judge Matthew York set Logan’s bail at $2 million Tuesday, agreeing with prosecutors that the 20-year-old is a danger to the community given the “brazen” nature of the alleged shooting, the Seattle Times reported.

Prosecutors said they will review the case and expect to decide on charges within the coming days.

As for the woman at the beer garden that night, prosecutors believe she had no involvement in the shooting and did not directly witness it, adding that she had contacted police through a private attorney and was cooperating with the investigation.

Unraveling the Conclusion of Good Omens Season 3: An In-Depth Analysis




Warning: Spoilers Ahead for “Good Omens” Season 3

The celebrated series “Good Omens,” initially based on the beloved novel by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, garnered significant acclaim for its first season. Its success prompted a second season, intended as a narrative bridge between the original book and the authors’ envisioned, though never realized, sequel. The conclusion of Season 2 left fans eager for more, but the show’s continuation was uncertain following allegations of misconduct involving Gaiman. Consequently, Gaiman stepped away from the third season’s production, which was reduced from six episodes to a singular 97-minute special. Despite his departure, Gaiman’s original script contributions remain, with Michael Marshall Smith and Peter Atkins completing the writing.

Now available on Prime Video, the special delivers a bittersweet experience for fans who have cherished the evolving tale of Aziraphale, the angel (played by Michael Sheen), and Crowley, the demon (portrayed by David Tennant). The complex circumstances surrounding this new chapter add layers to the narrative, prompting discussions about its alignment with Pratchett’s intended direction and the creative team’s focus on preserving the story’s core essence.

The second season’s finale saw Aziraphale and Crowley parting ways—Aziraphale returning to Heaven for the planning of the second coming, and Crowley staying behind on Earth. Season 3 opens amid unexpected turmoil in Heaven; the Book of Life has vanished, and the Metatron (Derek Jacobi) mysteriously disintegrates, echoing a moment reminiscent of the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s infamous Thanos snap. Amidst this chaos, a prematurely arrived Jesus (Bilal Hasna) descends to Earth, seeking guidance from a heavily inebriated Crowley, who has recklessly wagered away his cherished Bentley.

Aziraphale returns to Earth to locate the missing messiah, reuniting with Crowley to help him reclaim the Bentley through a crossword puzzle contest. Their quest for Jesus takes a turn when they learn of the murder of another angel, Sandalphon (Paul Chahidi), prompting visits to both Heaven and Hell. In their investigation, Aziraphale, Crowley, and the somewhat clueless “investigating angel” Muriel (Quelin Sepulveda) uncover that Michael (Doon Mackichan) has orchestrated the theft and murders. Michael’s nefarious actions escalate as she uses the Book to erase Uriel (Gloria Obianyo) and obliterate entire nations. In a climactic showdown, Aziraphale and Crowley take to the skies in the Bentley, heading toward the Eternal Flame to confront Michael as she threatens the universe’s existence. Remarkably, Aziraphale’s bookshop emerges unscathed.

What you need to remember about the plot of Good Omens Season 3

At the end of the second season “Good Omens,” Aziraphale and Crowley go their separate ways, with the former returning to Heaven to help plan the second coming and the latter staying on Earth. In Season 3, Heaven finds itself in unexpected chaos — the Book of Life is missing, and the Metatron (Derek Jacobi) gets disappeared out of existence (in a manner visually reminiscent of Thanos’ snap in the Marvel Cinematic Universe). Amidst this chaos, the new incarnation of Jesus (Bilal Hasna) makes his way down to Earth earlier than intended, where he seeks advice from an extremely drunk Crowley, who has gambled away his beloved Bentley.

Returning to Earth to find the missing messiah, Aziraphale reunites with Crowley and helps him win back the Bentley via a crossword competition. Their hunt for Jesus gets interrupted with the news of another angel, Sandalphon (Paul Chahidi), being killed, spurring trips to Heaven and Hell to investigate. Aziraphale, Crowley, and even dim-witted “investigating angel” Muriel (Quelin Sepulveda) figure out that Michael (Doon Mackichan) is responsible for the theft and the killings. Destroying pages from the Book, Michael disappears Uriel (Gloria Obianyo) and starts wiping whole countries off the map. Aziraphale and Crowley ride the Bentley into the sky towards the Eternal Flame to confront Michael as she destroys the whole universe … but Aziraphale’s bookshop survives.

What happened at the end of Good Omens Season 3?

In the bookshop at the end of everything, Crowley finally forgives Aziraphale for leaving him. The angel and demon find a special visitor in the bookshop: Satan (Toby Jones). Crowley confronts his former boss over having secretly known their rebellion was doomed to failure. Writing in an empty book that Crowley declares the new Book of Life, Aziraphale summons God (Tanya Moodie) into the room.

God offers to answer a single question from each of them. Crowley asks, “Why make people and then punish them for behaving like people?” Satan dismisses this question as “the problem of evil,” but Crowley clarifies that it’s really more a problem of free will not existing in a universe where God’s plan predetermines all.

Aziraphale has a more personal question for God: “Why give me Crowley, why make me complete, and then take it away?” God’s answer: “Because you were able to value what most people never even know they have. Your love for him was the messiest, sinniest, most predictable thing in the universe, and it always made me smile.”

Just as God tries to end the conversation, Crowley demands an answer to his question, rejecting the whole idea of apocalypse. God puts the fate of existence in Aziraphale and Crowley’s hands, and they ultimately request God a new universe where there are no angels, demons, or deterministic “Great Plans” — essentially, a “godless” universe. The bookshop and its four inhabitants vanish, the Big Bang occurs … and 13.8 billion years later, Aziraphale and Crowley are seemingly born again as humans, a bookstore owner and an astrophysicist who fall in love and move in with each other on the South Downs.

Is this the ending Terry Pratchett wanted?

This is a question we might never be able to really answer, especially since most of what we know about any “Good Omens” sequel plans Terry Pratchett considered before his passing in has been revealed second-hand via Neil Gaiman’s comments over the years. Pratchett ordered his unfinished manuscripts destroyed after his death in 2015, but his estate has been heavily involved in the “Good Omens” TV series, with Pratchett’s personal assistant Rob Wilkins an executive producer.

The proposed “Good Omens” sequel novel was said to be titled “664: The Neighbor of the Beast” (or “668”), a joke that doesn’t really seem relevant to the TV finale and is perhaps indicative of changes. At a Q&A event in 2005, Pratchett indicated that his original sequel ideas from 15 years prior would require adjusting given how the world had changed since. Like the TV ending, the original “Neighbor of the Beast” plan involved the second coming, but unlike the TV ending, it was going to be set in America. The TV ending does give context to at least one detail that fans have buzzed about for decades — Gaiman’s description of a 2005 dinner with Pratchett where they decided Aziraphale and Crowley were “on the South Downs.”

Whatever the actual answer is to how many ideas in “Good Omens” Season 3 came from the creator of “Discworld,” viewers can still feel the spirit of the characters’ co-creator in the finale. In particular, the concept of God creating a godless universe, and seeing the beauty in that, feels in line with Pratchett’s humanism. The author’s portrait hangs over Aziraphale and Crowley’s human incarnations in one of the closing scenes.

Is the ending rushed?

Of course “Good Omens” Season 3 is rushed. Given the compression of six planned hours into just 90 minutes, how could it not be rushed? It’s the human characters who suffer the most from this compression. Bilal Hasna’s Jesus is delightful to watch but feels woefully underutilized, and the ordinary people he reaches out to fail to make much of an impression. Where the original book and the first season built real stakes around the threatened apocalypse, the actual completed apocalypse in this iteration of “Good Omens” feels reduced to an abstraction.

Thankfully, the last 25 minutes of “Good Omens” actually get some room to breathe. Putting God, Satan, and the Ineffable Husbands in a room together and letting them hash out matters both existential and personal results in a conclusion that feels genuinely satisfying, even with all our questions of what might have been. For all the special’s flaws, its resolution is the best ending we could have gotten, given the unfortunate circumstances of this whole production.

In a way, “Good Omens” Season 3 felt similar to Part 2 of the “Chainsaw Man” manga. Both stories involve a whole lot of stuff being physically erased from existence and the universe being doomed as a result, so the heroes sacrifice their supernatural natures in order to create new universes. The difference is that the “Chainsaw Man” ending is an anti-climax, a deliberately dissatisfying shrug, whereas “Good Omens” goes all in on a happy ending.

It’s all about the love story

For all the ways you can criticize “Good Omens,” it nails that happy ending for Aziraphale and Crowley. Director Rachel Talalay (who also directed some of the best “Doctor Who” episodes) knew this was the assignment. In an interview with TV Fantatic, she explained that managing such a grand scale finale was always about answering the essential question of “What is the story about?” Her answer to this question was the relationship between the two main characters. She credits Michael Sheen and David Tennant as “the keepers of their characters and the storyline,” saying the actors’ understanding of their roles made her feel “safest” directing the love story.

This romance is not merely fun for shippers but the essential emotional core of the finale. All the story’s bigger questions, and where its apocalyptic stakes are felt most deeply, hang upon how the personal connection of this angel and demon pair fuels their greater understanding of justice in the world. This intertwining of the romantic and the existential is perhaps best expressed in the show’s final tears-of-happiness scene, where human-Aziraphale asks human-Crowley, “Do you ever wonder if there’s anything more than this?” Human-Crowley answers, “I don’t need anything more than this. I have the universe out there, and I have you. I have everything I ever wanted.”



Grandview Baseball Team Secures Spot in TMSAA State Tournament

TELFORD, Tenn. (WJHL) — The Grandview baseball team had a day full of excitement and anticipation as they embarked on a significant milestone.

On Tuesday morning, the Eagles set off on their inaugural journey to the TMSAA state baseball tournament in Chattanooga, marking a historic moment for the team.

Later that evening, they took to the field for their debut game against Highland Rim Middle School from Fayetteville, Tennessee.

This season has been nothing short of remarkable for the Eagles, who hail from Telford, Tennessee. They boast an impressive 19-1 record, underscoring their dominance on the diamond.

Fueled by a formidable offensive lineup, the team scored an astounding 302 runs throughout the season. Their path to the state tournament saw them secure hard-earned victories over Unicoi and Norris middle schools.

The team lost in the opening round of the state tournament 5-2. They will end the state tournament with a game in the consolation bracket.

New Housing Tax Reforms: Why First-Time Buyers May Face Delays in Seeing Benefits

0
About 75,000 Australians are set to see $19,000 slashed from house prices – but not for years. 

Last night’s federal budget announcement delivered a major policy shift by reducing the capital gains tax discount back to its pre-1999 levels and maintaining negative gearing.

These significant changes are slated to take effect starting July 2027.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Dr Jim Chalmers following the Budget at Parliament House in Canberra. (Alex Ellinghausen)

According to Treasury forecasts, this tax reform is expected to assist approximately 75,000 individuals in purchasing their first home over the next decade. It could also offer a potential savings of around $19,000 for someone buying a home at the national median price over a few years.

Budget documents suggest that this initiative aims to enhance housing affordability and decrease investor demand, potentially leading to a greater proportion of homes being owned by occupiers rather than investors.

Although these reforms are being hailed as the most impactful of the 21st century, experts caution that it may take some time for the benefits of reduced prices and improved market access to be fully realized by prospective first-time home buyers.

Grattan Institute’s economic expert Matthew Bowes said the changes will lead to three per cent higher home ownership rates over a decade as investors are disincentivised to buy a property due to less generous tax breaks and profit when they sell down the line.

“What these tax reforms do is help ensure that first home buyers aren’t being outbid by investors at auctions,” he said.

“Over time, they will mean somewhat fewer investors and somewhat more home owners, and help support home ownership.”

Bowes said the impact of the twin tax reforms on housing affordability will be “relatively small” in the next few years.

“At least to begin with, based on previous estimates of the impact of these kinds of policies,” he said.

Treasury’s numbers also suggest the changes will lead to 35,000 fewer homes built over a decade and a small impact of less than $2 a week for someone paying the median rent.

The government faced a slew of criticisms this morning for breaking an election promise to deliver the tax reforms, including some questions about whether it went far enough to support first-home buyers.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers was asked about whether the tax reforms went far enough if only 75,000 would be helped over 10 years during his post-budget speech today.

He said intergenerational inequity in the housing sector reached a level he was “not prepared to tolerate”.

“It’s worth it for 75,000 Australians who wouldn’t otherwise get a hook in the housing market,” he told journalists at the National Press Club.

“It’s worth the political risk that we’ve taken in coming to a different view and changing our policy position in some contentious areas

“I’d rather do the right thing by those 75,000 people and explain why a change in policy was necessary and own that than to leave this problem for someone else to fix down the track and in the meantime to let this problem get worse.”

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.

21-Year-Old Chinese Student Admits to Photographing Military Planes

0

An international student from China has admitted to capturing images of military planes at a Nebraska base, asserting that the photos were intended for his personal interest.

Tianrui Liang, a 21-year-old attending the University of Glasgow in Scotland, was detained on April 7 at John F. Kennedy International Airport. He was preparing to fly to Frankfurt, Germany, en route to Glasgow.

Just days before, on March 31, he was apprehended while photographing aircraft at Offutt Air Base, located near Omaha, Nebraska. This detail emerged during Liang’s plea hearing, as reported by the prosecution.

The proceedings, which unfolded in the US District Court of Nebraska, were covered by the Lincoln Journal Star.

Using a telescopic lens from a public road adjacent to the base, Liang successfully captured images of military aircraft models RC-135 and E-4B, according to Assistant US Attorney Matt Lierman.

Both models are Boeing-manufactured planes. The RC-135 is a reconnaissance aircraft, and the E-4B is a modified Boeing 747-200 that serves as a mobile command center.

Personnel at the base spotted Liang taking the photos, and an FBI special agent went to question him on the side of the road. 

The student admitted to taking the pictures and knowing that it was illegal to do so. He said that they were for his personal collection and that he is into the airplane spotting hobby.

A 21-year-old Chinese student named Tianrui Liang has pleaded guilty to taking photos of military aircraft parked at Offutt Air Base in Nebraska (pictured)

A 21-year-old Chinese student named Tianrui Liang has pleaded guilty to taking photos of military aircraft parked at Offutt Air Base in Nebraska (pictured)

Liang took photos of an E-4B, which is a modified Boeing 747-200 that serves as a mobile command center. An E-4B is pictured in flight

Liang took photos of an E-4B, which is a modified Boeing 747-200 that serves as a mobile command center. An E-4B is pictured in flight

Liang also took photos of an RC-135, which is a reconnaissance aircraft. An RC-135 is pictured in flight

Liang also took photos of an RC-135, which is a reconnaissance aircraft. An RC-135 is pictured in flight

Liang surrendered his iPhone and Canon camera to the FBI, which discovered several photos of planes parked at Offutt Air Base. He also handed over other electronics, including a drone. 

The student was appointed a federal public defender named Jeffrey Thomas, who asked Magistrate Judge Michael Nelson to expedite Liang’s sentencing hearing, which is currently scheduled for June 18. 

Liang has already been in jail for 30 days, which has threatened his academic career, Thomas argued. 

The public defender added that his client has no criminal record and that the judge already has a breadth of evidence which should enable him to determine what Liang’s sentence should be. 

Federal guidelines recommend zero to six months in jail and a fine of up to $100,000 as punishment for violating the federal statute prohibiting photography of military aircraft. 

Lierman, the prosecutor, argued that Liang’s actions represented a national security risk and that expediting the sentencing hearing would be irresponsible. ‘We don’t have the full picture here,’ he told the judge, according to the Lincoln Journal Star.

The prosecutor added that the evidence in the case was mostly self-reported by Liang and that a pre-sentence investigation to verify it must be conducted. 

There is no way to be certain that Liang is the innocuous student who was on spring break and likes airplane spotting without conducting an investigation, Lierman said. 

The prosecution argued that Liang's actions presented a national security risk and that his claims that he is a student who was taking photos for his personal collection must be investigated. A squadron of RC-135s parked at Offut Air Base is pictured

The prosecution argued that Liang’s actions presented a national security risk and that his claims that he is a student who was taking photos for his personal collection must be investigated. A squadron of RC-135s parked at Offut Air Base is pictured

Liang's public defender argued that enemies of the US have satellites that can provide pictures of US military bases, and taking photos from the ground is outdated. A satellite image of Offut Air Base is pictured

Liang’s public defender argued that enemies of the US have satellites that can provide pictures of US military bases, and taking photos from the ground is outdated. A satellite image of Offut Air Base is pictured

Thomas, the public defender, countered that the federal statute his client was arrested for violating was enacted in the 1950s and is a relic of the space race with the Soviet Union. 

He argued that adversaries of the United States have sophisticated satellites that can provide images of military bases, and taking photos from the ground is an outdated espionage strategy that presents little risk in comparison. 

The public defender added that ‘in 1950, the statute certainly wasn’t crazy,’ but even at the time, violating it was considered a misdemeanor, and it is even ‘less of a misdemeanor’ today.

He also noted that his client has been into airplane spotting since 2020, when Liang would have been 15 years old.

The prosecution conceded that enemies of the US certainly use satellites for espionage, but that ‘if satellites answered all of the questions, with respect to our adversaries, we wouldn’t need human intelligence. We know that’s not true.’ 

Lierman said that Liang should remain in custody until his sentencing hearing while the pre-sentencing investigation unfolds.  

The judge agreed with the prosecution and said that the information Liang provided to law enforcement provided more questions than answers, that the sentencing hearing would not be expedited and that the student would remain in custody until then. 

Taiwan Anxiously Observes as Trump-Xi Summit Signals Potential US-China Power Dynamics Shift

0

KAOHSIUNG, Taiwan: As U.S. President Donald Trump engages in crucial discussions with China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping, in Beijing, all eyes are on Taiwan. From the island’s presidential office to its military command centers and high-tech semiconductor firms, there is a heightened sense of anticipation. The pressing issue at hand is whether Trump will negotiate from a position of strength or leave Taiwan vulnerable in the geopolitical landscape.

Taiwan, an effectively independent entity with a population of 23 million, has long been under the shadow of a potential threat from China. Despite never having governed Taiwan, the Chinese Communist Party claims the island as part of its territory.

Analysts in Taiwan caution that Xi may propose a bargain to Trump: concessions on trade tariffs, fentanyl controls, access for U.S. businesses, or collaboration on global issues such as Iran and Ukraine, in return for U.S. acquiescence to an increased Chinese influence over Taiwan’s future.

PLA Navy and PLA Army conducting live-fire drill in Zhangzhou City

In a striking display of military might, the PLA Navy and Army recently conducted an extensive live-fire exercise in Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province, China. This demonstration of force underscores the strategic tensions in the region.

Taiwan’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Francois Wu, expressed his concerns in an interview with Bloomberg News. “Our greatest fear,” he stated, “is that Taiwan becomes a bargaining chip in the talks between Xi Jinping and President Trump.”

Huang Kwei-bo, a professor in National Chengchi University’s Department of Diplomacy, told Fox News Digital that Taiwan shouldn’t assume nothing will change. “Taiwan shouldn’t rule out the possibility that the United States and mainland China could reach an understanding behind the scenes, agreeing to reduce arms sales to Taiwan, or become less active in helping us meaningfully participate in international space,” he said.

In comments on Monday, President Trump acknowledged China’s dislike of U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, and said the topic would be “one of the many things I’ll be talking about.” 

Chinese rockets launching near Taiwan during live-fire military drills

China launched rockets near Taiwan during live-fire drills as the People’s Liberation Army Eastern Theater Command surrounded the island with warships and aircraft amid rising tensions. (PLA Eastern Theater Command/Reuters)

Over the past week, more than 50 communist Chinese aircraft crossed the Taiwan Strait median line or entered Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. 

Those numbers are not a dramatic new escalation. In Taiwan, they are increasingly seen as part of a new normal: a sustained pressure campaign that falls short of war but keeps Taiwan’s military on alert. China also intentionally damages the undersea cables that connect Taiwan to the internet, hacks into Taiwan’s computer systems daily, and floods social media with content that praises the communist party.

Taiwanese air force.

FILE: In this undated file photo released by the Taiwan Ministry of Defense, a Chinese PLA J-16 fighter jet flies in an undisclosed location (Taiwan Ministry of Defense via AP)

Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is a major concern for Washington. The island is home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., or TSMC, the dominant producer of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. Those chips are used in smartphones, cars, artificial intelligence systems and U.S. defense technology. Any conflict or blockade that cuts Taiwan off from global markets would ripple through American factories, consumers, technology companies and military planning.

However, as the leaders of the two nations most closely intertwined with Taiwan’s future meet, there is no outward sense of panic here.

President Donald Trump standing next to President Xi Jinping

President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping prepare for a key summit in May. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty Images)

“Most people here are not obsessed with China every day,” Audrey Chiang, who runs a tourist souvenir shop in Kaohsiung, told Fox News Digital. Chiang has a son who is just a few years away from serving one year as a military conscript, a 2024 response to China’s invasion threats. “We go to work. We worry about the next big test at our kids’ school. We complain about traffic. But everyone knows things can change very quickly.”

Taiwan’s legislature on May 8 passed a near US$25 billion supplemental defense spending bill, meant in part to signal to Washington that Taipei isn’t simply depending on America to protect itself. But the package was smaller than the almost US$40 billion requested by Taiwan President Lai Ching-te’s administration. 

Taipei-based American political analyst, Ross Darrell Feingold, told Fox News Digital that many in Taiwan assume that the U.S., and possibly Japan, will come to the island’s defense in the event of a war. “Going back to the Cold War when the U.S. had a treaty obligation to defend Taiwan, and even after the treaty was abrogated, the consistent assumption is that the U.S. president will send in the military to save Taiwan. More recently, there is a growing assumption Japan will do so as well. But Taiwan still must do what is necessary to prove to its partners that Taiwan’s own people will be on the front line,” he said.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company fabrication plant in Phoenix Arizona

The Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company fabrication plant in Phoenix, Arizona, on March 3, 2025. TSMC plans to invest an additional $100 billion in U.S. plants to increase chip production and support President Donald Trump’s goal of boosting domestic manufacturing. (Rebecca Noble/Bloomberg)

Taiwan’s main political parties have major differences in their approaches to China, but broadly support U.S. arms purchases and agree that Beijing is a threat to democratic Taiwan.

Chinese officials insist Taiwan’s status is an “internal affair.” Taiwan’s elected government rejects that, and so do most Taiwanese, who see Taiwan’s future as something only they should decide.

National Pingtung University Associate Professor Paul Lee is among those who think Xi Jinping is going to push the U.S. president hard on Taiwan. Speaking by phone, he told Fox News Digital that “Xi Jinping almost certainly wants one clear change from the U.S., he’ll want Trump to say the United States ‘opposes Taiwan independence’ rather than the language it uses now that is closer to ‘does not support Taiwan independence.’ To be frank, I don’t think President Trump sees Taiwan as that important – except as the producer of the world’s most advanced semiconductors, and as a source of some revenue from weapons sales.” Lee notes that the difference between “doesn’t support” and “opposes” may not seem like much for Trump, but for Xi, it would be viewed as a major victory.”

A procession of Taiwanese armed military vehicles patrolling outside Songshan Airport in Taipei

A procession of Taiwanese armed military vehicles patrols outside Songshan Airport in Taipei on Oct. 14, 2024, following China’s announcement of the Joint Sword-2024B military exercise encircling Taiwan. (Daniel Ceng/Anadolu)

For Taiwan’s ruling party, and anyone in Taiwan who supports moves by Lai and his predecessor to establish at home and abroad that Taiwan is not part of China, such a change in language would come as a blow as it implies that the U.S. does not agree with the people of Taiwan having the right to self-determination on their future, Lee explained, and he said Xi Jinping wouldn’t be satisfied with Trump simply saying a few sentences. 

“Trump has roughly three years left on his second term, and Xi will want to ensure the ‘oppose independence’ language translates into a new framework with new rules such as not letting Taiwan President Lai transit through the U.S., as one example. Xi knows U.S. presidents come and go, so the goal is to create a tacit agreement that Taiwan is in the Chinese sphere of influence, he said.

Chinese President Xi Jinping reviewing troops at PLA garrison in Macao

Chinese President Xi Jinping has instructed the Chinese Communist Party to assert influence for the country globally through a “United Front” strategy. He reviews troops during his inspection of the People’s Liberation Army garrison in the Macao Special Administrative Region on Dec. 20, 2024. (Li Gang/Xinhua via Getty Images)

Lee said China has been patiently waiting for an opportune moment, and the war in Iran, tariffs and other issues facing President Trump is presenting exactly that.

Lee said Taiwan’s government and academic community will closely scrutinize the official translations of what the two sides “agree” on. “Put simply,” Lee said, “if Xi Jinping agrees to help make things easier for Trump, Xi will not be satisfied with cryptically worded official press releases. He will want to see the beginning of a new U.S.-China framework for dealing with Taiwan.”

Augusta Duo Faces Federal Firearms Indictment: The Full Story


AUGUSTA, Ga. () – The U.S. Department of Justice’s Southern District of Georgia revealed on Tuesday that a federal Grand Jury has indicted two Augusta residents on charges related to firearms.

The individuals facing these indictments are as follows:

It is important to note that these indictments are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • Jason Booz, 46, of Augusta, indicted for Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon.
  • Twain Frails, 36, of Augusta, indicted for Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon.

“In the Southern District of Georgia, we are committed to prosecuting those who unlawfully possess firearms,” stated U.S. Attorney Margaret Heap. “We deeply appreciate our law enforcement partners and remain dedicated to the crucial task of removing illegal weapons from the hands of those who are not legally allowed to have them.”