Home Blog Page 315

Pay-to-Play Arizona Group Home Avoids Penalty in Boy’s Death

0

PHOENIX – Caregivers responsible for 9-year-old Jakob Blodgett had already raised concerns that he was slipping candy and refusing his insulin, records show. At the Arizona group home where he was placed, a staff member texted a supervisor after seeing that the boy’s blood sugar level was dangerously high.

The instruction that came back was simple: give him water.

By the time Jakob missed two doses of the long-acting insulin he depended on, he was rushed to a hospital. Doctors found swelling in his brain, placed him on a ventilator and later determined he died in 2022 from complications tied to Type 1 diabetes.

No penalties were issued in connection with Blodgett’s death. Now, Sunshine Residential Homes — Arizona’s largest provider of group home placements for children — is drawing renewed scrutiny amid a political fight surrounding Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs’ reelection bid. Records indicate the company made political contributions that benefited Hobbs, then received a state-approved rate increase months later for providing beds to children in care.

Arizona’s attorney general, also a Democrat, said investigators found no proof of bribery. Republican lawmakers, however, continue to press for answers, while the state auditor general’s office is carrying out a separate review.

The boy’s death and the pay-to-play allegations highlight questions about Arizona’s congregate-care capacity for children, training for workers who care for them and oversight of providers and other contractors who hold leverage over the state simply due to their size and influence.

Alleged political favors become campaign fodder

Hobbs maintains she wasn’t involved in the decision to increase rates for Sunshine Residential Homes. But Republican challenger, U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs, has made the scandal a centerpiece of his campaign to unseat her.

“That was all handled by the department,” Hobbs said, “and they made the decision based on what was in the best interest of the department and the kids in their care.”

The allegations were first reported by The Arizona Republic and prompted an investigation by Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes. However, Mayes’ office said it couldn’t find evidence to support bribery charges against Hobbs and concluded that Sunshine’s rate increases were the result of its “outsized leverage” as the state’s largest group home provider, not because of politics.

The company had threatened to reduce its bed capacity if it didn’t get an increase, saying it would instead use beds to house unaccompanied immigrant children for the federal government, officials said. Child welfare officials have said a reduction in Sunshine’s beds would significantly affect the state’s ability to place children in homes and would likely lead to siblings in foster care being split up and sent to different homes.

In all, Sunshine made $550,000 in contributions, including $100,000 to Hobbs’ inaugural fund in December 2022 and $150,000 to a legal defense fund for Hobbs between November 2023 and May 2024, according to records.

A separate investigation by the state auditor general’s office and Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell, a Republican, is continuing.

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office also has interviewed several Sunshine employees as part of an ongoing criminal investigation into Blodgett’s death. No one has been charged.

Blodgett isn’t the only diabetic child to die after a stay at an Arizona group home. In July 2024, a 15-year-old boy staying at a group home in Mesa operated by another company died of diabetic ketoacidosis after staff said the boy refused to take insulin, according to records.

Text messages outline concerns over a diabetic coma

Blodgett was staying at a foster home in metro Phoenix where only the house manager was trained in managing his diabetes.

Staff members said the boy was refusing to take his medicine. The manager advised an employee via text to tell the boy that the manager would be called if he refused to take his medicine.

“We don’t want him to go into a diabetic coma,” the manager texted.

The employee texted back about whether the child should get insulin. The manager didn’t respond.

The next day, the employee texted the boy’s blood glucose reading to the manager and asked what to do. The manager said to give Blodgett water but didn’t give any instructions about insulin, according to lawyers for the state and Blodgett’s family. The day after missing his second dose, Blodgett was taken to a hospital.

Violation nets no penalties

Two weeks before approving a 30% rate increase in May 2023, the Arizona Department of Child Safety issued a licensing violation against Sunshine over Blodgett’s case. The agency declined to specify to The Associated Press which policy was violated.

Robert Pastor, an attorney representing the family in a wrongful death lawsuit, said the violation was for not giving Blodgett the insulin as prescribed. The lawyer said Sunshine’s staff missed the signs of ketoacidosis, a serious complication caused by a lack of insulin, and waited too long to take Blodgett to the hospital. He also disputed claims that the boy had refused medication.

The state didn’t fine Sunshine or suspend or revoke its license as a result of the violation, according to court records. The agency said it detailed the steps Sunshine had to take to come into compliance, but declined to reveal to the AP what those steps were.

Pastor agreed with the attorney general’s conclusion that Sunshine has a lot of leverage over the state due to reliance on the company’s beds.

“That leverage gave Sunshine an increased rate increase,” Pastor said. “We also know that that leverage that Sunshine has over DCS means that when they kill a child, there will be no consequences. There will be no accountability.”

In a statement, Sunshine spokesperson Tommy McKone said the wrongful death lawsuit remains active, but declined to comment on the licensing violation and the company’s policy on responding to children who refuse medications.

“Sunshine Residential followed all policies and procedures for the required care, throughout his stay at our homes, under state law,” McKone said.

In court records, lawyers for Sunshine said the state indicated Blodgett’s medical needs were minimal and didn’t inform the group home provider that Blodgett’s diabetes management was complex.

Boy was hospitalized before heading to group home

Blodgett went into foster care in December 2022 after his father was jailed on a drug charge. His blood glucose levels were high when he was brought to a welcome center operated by the Department of Child Safety, which sought medical help for Blodgett from a children’s hospital where he was treated over several days.

Once discharged, Blodgett went to a Sunshine home.

While he went two days without getting the long-lasting insulin he needed before going to bed, the staff did give him another type of insulin — fast-acting insulin after eating meals — over both days. After the boy missed a long-lasting dose, the house manager contacted the same hospital to talk about how to improve his blood glucose levels.

In a deposition, the house manager testified there was nothing the staff could do if the child refused his medication. Pastor said the claim that the boy refused insulin is a false narrative aimed at blaming the child.

More workers should have been trained

Myriam Villarreal, an official in the Department of Child Safety’s operation that licenses group homes, testified in an April 2025 deposition that Blodgett’s condition wasn’t caught in time because group home workers weren’t trained in spotting the signs of ketoacidosis.

Pressed on why the company didn’t face any penalties, Villarreal testified that the state asked for policy modifications from the company. And she said training should have been provided to the staff members who directly cared for the boy, not just the house manager.

“We didn’t look that every single staff (member) had the appropriate training,” Villarreal testified.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Lionel Richie Health Scare: Family Fears Hidden Illness

0

Long Island Teacher in Student Rape Case Arrested for Stalking

0

A former Long Island art teacher who was fired after being accused of raping a student in his classroom has been arrested again — this time for allegedly stalking the same young woman.

The former Bay Shore High School student dialed 911 Thursday morning after she allegedly saw 53-year-old John Kennedy following her when she left her Bay Shore home and traveled to an undisclosed location in Selden, Suffolk County police said.

“Suffolk County Police today arrested a high school teacher for stalking a former student that he had sexual affairs with previously,” a department spokesperson said. Kennedy was taken into custody Thursday evening at his home in St. James, authorities said.

John Kennedy, 53, was arrested for stalking a former student that he is accused of grooming and raping. Suffolk County Police Department

The alleged stalking incident involving the now-18-year-old accuser came just over a week after she filed a blistering lawsuit against the Bay Shore school district. In court papers, she accused school administrators of failing to shield her from a “serial sexual predator” who allegedly raped her repeatedly inside his own classroom.

Kennedy, once described by many current and former students as their “favorite” teacher, was first identified by The Post in October after allegations surfaced that he had sex with the then-17-year-old senior in his art class. He had been placed on administrative leave amid the scandal before his firing.

The girl was of the legal age of consent in New York at the time of the alleged abuse, and a Suffolk County police probe was initially closed after finding no evidence of criminal conduct.

But her lawyer, Andrew Silvershein, claimed Kennedy occupied a position of power as a teacher that made the relationship inherently exploitative, regardless of the age of consent.

The lawsuit also alleged the school district had an obligation to protect the former student from being sexually groomed by the teacher — and ignored warning signs along the way. 

Bay Shore High School in Bay Shore, NY, with a sign announcing closures for Yom Kippur and Columbus Day, and a board meeting.

Bay Shore High School. Google Maps

Bay Shore Superintendent Steven Maloney has maintained that the district acted swiftly once it learned of the allegations and immediately placed Kennedy on administrative leave, barred the creep from campus and alerted Suffolk police.

The scandal marks the third high-profile incident involving possible sexual misconduct by Bay Shore teachers.

In November 2024, the district was ordered to pay $25 million in damages tied to a case involving Thomas Bernagozzi, a retired third-grade teacher who was accused of sexually abusing students for more than three decades.

A Suffolk County jury found the district ignored repeated warning signs about the child predator, whose abuse spanned the 1970s through the early 2000s — and over 50 former students have since come forward.

Marcus Johnson, a teacher’s assistant at the high school, was also charged with raping a 15-year-old student in 2017.

The Post was unable to find a working phone number for Kennedy.

Longest-Serving Female Prisoner Back Behind Bars Weeks After Release

0

Britain’s longest-serving female prisoner has been sent back to jail only weeks after being released.

Maria Pearson, 70, who was branded an “evil psychopath,” walked free in July after spending nearly four decades in prison for the 1986 fatal stabbing of her love rival, Janet Newton.

Her release was approved by the Parole Board at the tenth time of asking, following nine failed attempts to secure freedom — even though there had been warnings she could still present a “high risk” of causing “serious harm”.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, relatives of Ms Newton said they “dreaded” what might happen next and insisted they believed Pearson was still “dangerous”.

It has now emerged that Pearson has been recalled to prison, apparently after breaching a condition of her licence.

In response, Ms Newton’s sister Lynn said it was the ‘most positive update that myself and my family could have hoped for’.

Calling for ‘lessons to be learnt,’ she added that she now hopes Pearson will spend the rest of her life behind bars.

‘I don’t believe she should have been released after the prison psychologist recommended an open prison first as she was highly likely to reoffend,’ the 59-year-old told Teesside Live. 

Maria Pearson (pictured), now 70, who stabbed her ex-boyfriend's new partner to death,has been recalled to prison just weeks after spending nearly 40 years behind bars

Maria Pearson (pictured), now 70, who stabbed her ex-boyfriend’s new partner to death,has been recalled to prison just weeks after spending nearly 40 years behind bars

Building society worker Janet Newton (pictured) was murdered by Pearson in 1986

Building society worker Janet Newton (pictured) was murdered by Pearson in 1986

‘The Parole Board need to take accountability that they dismissed recommendations and made the wrong decision. 

‘A lesson needs to be learned. 

‘I hope with all my heart that she stops in prison until the day she dies, there is no place in society for her, she has proven that by being recalled only two weeks after release.’ 

Pearson, from Hartlepool, married welder Malcolm Pearson bigamously in 1986 – days after the birth of their daughter. 

Their ‘doomed’ relationship was ‘intense and stormy’ and their baby was taken into care after a serious incident at their home.

After the couple split, the welder began a relationship with building society worker Ms Newton – leaving Pearson consumed with jealousy.

She stalked her rival and sent hate letters to her mother.

Finally on October 19, 1986, two days after her ex became engaged to Ms Newton, she plunged a knife 17 times into her chest after confronting her in the street.

The knife penetrated 23-year-old Ms Newton’s heart and she was left lying in a pool of blood, Teesside Crown Court later heard.

Pearson's 'doomed' relationship with Malcolm Pearson (pictured) was 'intense and stormy' and their baby was taken into care after a serious incident at their home

Pearson’s ‘doomed’ relationship with Malcolm Pearson (pictured) was ‘intense and stormy’ and their baby was taken into care after a serious incident at their home

Aged 31, Pearson was found guilty of murder in 1987 and ordered to serve a minimum 12 years of a life sentence before being considered for parole.

However her requests to be released were repeatedly turned down, leading to campaigners labelling her the UK’s ‘forgotten inmate’.

In 2006, then Home Secretary John Reid rejected a Parole Board recommendation for Pearson to be moved to an open prison and prepared for release.

She was later twice moved to an open prison before being returned to higher-security jails amid concerns over her behaviour. 

Finally in June 2026, the Parole Board approved her release on licence – despite offender managers assessing that she ‘posed a high risk of causing serious harm’.

It said the ‘finely balanced decision’ was made on the basis that once Pearson is freed, she would have to abide ‘strictly’ by conditions including being tracked by GPS for 12 months and follow a curfew.

The decision comes after she has served almost 39 years – longer than notorious Moors Murderer Myra Hindley, who had been locked up for 36 years when she died in November 2002.

In response, Ms Newton’s sister told the Daily Mail she ‘dreaded’ to think what would happen now Pearson was free.

‘I just hope another family doesn’t have to go through what we have gone through,’ she added.

‘I don’t think she will be able to cope in the outside world.’

Following Pearson’s recall to prison, a spokesman for the Prison and Probation Service told Teesside Live: ‘Prisoners released on licence are kept under tight supervision. 

‘As this case shows, we do not hesitate to put them straight back behind bars if they break the rules.’ 

The Ministry of Justice was approached for comment. 

It is understood that a recall review will now be referred back to the Parole Board to decide if Pearson must stay locked up.

How David Oiaknin Builds Companies for Sustainable Growth

0

In many industries, complexity is treated as an obstacle to be simplified or avoided. David Oiaknin sees it differently. For him, the most durable business opportunities often sit inside complicated systems that others overlook. A real estate developer and entrepreneur working across real estate, manufacturing, and technology, Oiaknin has built his career around connecting sectors that are often viewed in isolation. His perspective is straightforward: modern construction relies on manufacturing efficiency, and that efficiency increasingly depends on technology, coordination, and disciplined execution. The businesses that understand those connections can find a meaningful competitive edge.

The Problem With Short-Term Thinking

Real estate and construction are not typically industries short on capital or potential projects. What they often lack, however, is the kind of long-term infrastructure that supports sustainable growth. Companies may expand rapidly when demand is strong, only to face strain when conditions shift. Partnerships are frequently built around individual deals rather than shared operating systems. As businesses grow, the complexity of financial planning, regulatory compliance, procurement, and supply chain management can quickly exceed the systems in place to handle it.

That dynamic leaves many companies in a familiar position: busy, but not necessarily building lasting value. Momentum can look like growth from the outside, but activity without structure is difficult to sustain. In construction and real estate development, the difference between what gets completed and what endures often comes down to the systems behind the work.

Where Execution Becomes Strategy

Oiaknin’s answer to that challenge is not simply another product or short-term fix. It is a methodology centered on creating scalable organizations with repeatable processes, operational discipline, and growth models built to withstand changing market cycles. Rather than optimizing only for favorable conditions, his approach emphasizes performance through volatility as well as expansion.

Within real estate, Oiaknin’s focus includes ADU development and modular construction, two areas where construction technology can help shorten delivery timelines and reduce per-unit costs when it is effectively integrated into the building process. In advanced manufacturing, he applies operational optimization methods more commonly associated with high-output industrial settings to construction-related businesses that have historically been slower to embrace systematized growth.

Across both, technology is not being deployed for its own sake. It is used to potentially enable better decisions, reduce waste, improve transparency, and create organizations that may be capable of consistent performance, even at scale. 

The Disciplines That Set Him Apart

What makes Oiaknin’s profile unique is his mix of expertise in strategic business development, real estate and construction knowledge, manufacturing optimization, and technology integration. That convergence wasn’t accidental. His business growth strategy reflects the belief that the most valuable opportunities in real estate and construction lie outside conventional deal flows. 

They are found in the seams between industries, where manufacturing inefficiency can limit construction output, where technological adoption lags behind operational needs, or where fragmented supply chains prevent otherwise strong businesses from scaling. By structuring companies to address those “in-betweens,” he strives to position them to generate value not just for initial investors, but for partners and customers over the years.

An Optimistic Future

Oiaknin’s focus spans far into the future. His vision is to expand technology-driven real estate platforms, advance off-site and modular construction methods, and build strategic partnerships with investors and operators who share a long-term goal. 

His belief is that sustainable businesses are built through trust, operational excellence, and repeatable actions, not through the pursuit of scale alone. For those looking to learn more about companies designed to compound over time, David Oiaknin’s work is a model worth a look. 

China Threatens America’s AI Lead With an Overlooked Advantage

0

China is accelerating its push to build the data centers and power networks needed to fuel artificial intelligence, a rapid expansion that is drawing fresh attention in Washington. While the United States still holds a major advantage in the physical backbone of the AI boom, Beijing’s ability to deliver enormous infrastructure projects at speed has raised questions about how quickly that gap could narrow.

For now, America’s lead remains substantial. The Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence’s 2026 AI Index, citing Cloudscene data, reported 5,427 data centers in the U.S. in 2025, compared with 449 in China. Stanford noted, however, that the figures do not reflect key differences such as facility size, computing power or how intensively the sites are used.

Still, the pace of China’s buildout is difficult to ignore.

People visit the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai

Visitors attend the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, China, on July 18, 2026. (Go Nakamura/Reuters)

“We know that China is far behind, but we also know that they are moving at great speed,” China expert Gordon Chang told News Media.

Chang argued that Beijing understands the U.S. advantage will be difficult to erase if America continues building at the same pace and said growing opposition to data-center development could slow that expansion.

President Donald Trump made a similar argument this week, warning communities fighting new projects that China stands to benefit.

“China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Actually, they can’t believe it is happening!” Trump also argued that communities embracing data centers would gain jobs and tax revenues.

Vice President JD Vance sharpened that warning Thursday, telling Fox Business there was “a very good chance” the U.S. could lose the AI race to China if Democrats regain control of Congress.

Vance said the broader problem is America’s ability to build enough power to support data centers and other major infrastructure. “We cannot be a country that says we’re not going to build more power,” Vance said, arguing that the administration is trying to make it easier to construct power plants alongside data centers while protecting residential ratepayers from higher electricity costs.

He also pointed to the widening US-China electricity gap, saying China now generates roughly three times as much power as the United States. “We’ve got to build more power plants. We’ve got to make the regulatory state easier to work with.”

Asked about China’s rapid infrastructure expansion, the Chinese Embassy in Washington rejected the premise that AI should primarily be viewed as a geopolitical contest.

“AI should not be owned by major countries, still less dominated by contests and rivalry,” Embassy spokesperson Liu Chang told News Media.

Liu pointed to China’s 2025 Global AI Governance Action Plan, which calls for accelerating construction of clean power, next-generation networks, computing capacity and data centers. He said China advocates cooperation with the U.S. and wants AI development to benefit both countries and the broader international community.

Behind that diplomatic message, Beijing is undertaking a massive geographic reorganization of its computing infrastructure.

Under China’s “East Data, West Computing” initiative, Beijing is directing more computing capacity toward western regions where land is available and wind and solar resources can help reduce energy costs.

Five of China’s eight national computing hubs are located in western China, according to a June 25 report from the government-backed Digital China initiative. More than 30 data centers were under construction within a three-kilometer area in Horinger, Inner Mongolia, while intensive construction was also underway in Zhongwei, Ningxia.

Huawei Technology Co.’s new data center is seen under construction in Guian New Zone, in southwestern China’s Guizhou province May 14, 2019. Picture taken May 14, 2019. (Reuters)

That buildout caught the attention of members of the bipartisan US-China Economic and Security Review Commission during a recent fact-finding trip to China.

“I left with an intense belief that the Chinese see this as the frontier in terms of competition,” Commission Vice Chairman Mike Kuiken told News Media, describing AI as increasingly intertwined with robotics, biotechnology, advanced materials and manufacturing.

Kuiken said China has one significant advantage when it comes to constructing the infrastructure needed to support that technology.

“The Chinese, because they write the rules as they go, and the rule of law largely does not exist, are able to just move faster in terms of building things,” he said.

But Kuiken also identified a major Chinese weakness: access to the most advanced chips.

“The constraints that are real though, the Chinese do not have the ability to procure advanced chips,” he said, while describing Beijing’s ability to rapidly construct coal plants and other infrastructure as “quite incredible.”

Service technicians work to install the foundation for a transmission tower at the CenterPoint Energy power plant on June 10, 2022 in Houston, Texas.

The AI boom is accelerating demand for data centers across Texas as companies seek more space, power and infrastructure to support increasingly intensive computing needs. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

The U.S. retains major advantages beyond its data-center lead. The Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence’s 2026 AI Index found that America produced 59 notable AI models in 2025 compared with 35 from China, and U.S. private AI investment reached $285.9 billion, compared with $12.4 billion in China. Stanford cautioned that private investment figures understate Beijing’s overall spending because of Chinese government-backed funds.

At the same time, Chinese models have rapidly narrowed the performance gap. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index found that as of March 2026, the top U.S. model led the top Chinese model by just 2.7%.

Chang also alleged that Beijing is seeking to exploit American opposition to data centers and claimed China-linked networks have helped support protests against projects in the US. “These protests are not entirely organic,” Chang told News Media.

Kuiken was cautious about portraying those local disputes as part of a broader anti-China fight, saying genuine U.S. opposition to data-center projects has also emerged over concerns including electricity costs, water use, noise and land development.

“We are building things in the U.S. faster than we have in a long time,” he said, adding that policymakers are working through infrastructure constraints. “Usually there are local issues that are driving those things.”

The emerging competition, therefore, is not simply over who develops the smartest AI model.

Robots fight during an MMA-style performance at Engine AI booth at the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China,

Robots fight during an MMA-style performance at Engine AI booth at the 2026 World Robot Conference, in Beijing, China, August 19, 2026. (Maxim Shemetov/Reuters)

It is increasingly a race over who can build the electricity, data centers, chips and networks needed to run those models at enormous scale — and how quickly they can build them.

Trump Trade Official: Britain Choosing Brussels Over America

0

A senior trade figure in Donald Trump’s administration has delivered a sharp message to Britain, claiming the UK is squandering the opportunities of Brexit and effectively picking “Brussels over America.”

Jamieson Greer, the United States trade representative, said the UK had not made the most of leaving the European Union, arguing that ministers were continuing to shadow EU regulations while keeping parts of the British market difficult for American exporters to access.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Greer said that was the conclusion Washington had drawn from its dealings with London. He recalled telling UK officials: “You’re free of the EU. Why don’t you liberalise a little bit, accept goods made to American standards, accept agricultural goods made to American standards?”

But, according to Greer, the response from the British side has often been cautious. He said officials had indicated they needed to “wait and see what the EU says about it,” adding that such an approach was “a problem” for the United States and made trade talks more difficult.

When asked directly whether Britain was using Brexit to strengthen its trade position, Greer gave a terse answer: “No, they’re not.”

Six years after the UK formally left the European Union, both sides have been pushing for a deeper relationship with each other. 

All the while, Trump has been rattling longstanding allies by threatening to impose harsh tariffs on the EU, seize the Danish territory of Greenland and curb America’s support for Nato. 

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has signalled his intent to get closer to the EU, telling parliament on Wednesday that Brexit has hurt the UK. 

Donald Trump announcing his initial round of tariffs at the White House in April last year

Donald Trump announcing his initial round of tariffs at the White House in April last year

At a London meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday, he promised to work on the ‘UK’s drive to get closer to Europe’.

Mr Burnham has promised to sign a deal that would remove border checks on UK food and drink exports to the EU, as part of the UK’s ‘reset’ with the continent. 

These rules require Britain to comply with strict EU food standards that the US has long seen as protectionist and against their interests. 

Many US products, including chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-raised beef, cannot be sold in the UK, meaning that Mr Burnham’s deal would effectively block the UK from importing American food items. 

On top of this, the UK has also pushed back on US demands that the government recognise American industrial goods standards. 

Despite these problems, Mr Greer said he has a ‘good relationship’ with UK business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, and that an early trade deal between Washington and London was ‘beneficial to both sides’ and a ‘good early harvest’.

But he said that the main ‘sticking points’ in talks between the two Western nations were over agricultural and farm goods. 

He said: ‘The UK has had free access into the US agricultural market, where we’ve had very limited access on the US side into the UK agricultural market.’

Jamieson Greer, the United States trade representative, (pictured, centre) has accused the UK of failing to take advantage of Brexit by aligning with EU rules

Jamieson Greer, the United States trade representative, (pictured, centre) has accused the UK of failing to take advantage of Brexit by aligning with EU rules

Last week, sources told the Mail that Canada is looking to expand its trade links with Britain as its latest trade war with the US pushes it to other allies and wean itself off its southern neighbour.   

‘I think if you asked anyone in the government, they would all say they are very supportive of this CANZUK idea,’ one source said, adding the UK and Canada had a ‘historic opportunity’ to bolster trade ties, saying both had become ‘estranged’ from their largest trading partners, the US and EU respectively.

While the change of Prime Minister and cabinet reshuffle had made trade discussions ‘difficult’, Canadian diplomatic sources were upbeat, saying: ‘Burnham’s government is relatively new and finding its feet, but in preliminary discussions we’re sensing a real openness and desire to move on that.’

Britain is Canada’s third-largest trading partner but talks to ramp up that co-operation have taken on fresh urgency after Donald Trump announced a fresh wave of tariffs on the country after a previous spate of levies last year.

RHOC Recap: Tamra’s Divorce Bombshell, Vicki’s Ring Fury

RHOC Recap: Tamra Reveals Eddie Threatened Divorce Amid Fight, Vicki Lashes Out Over Engagement Ring Rumor as Shannon Declines One-on-One Meeting With Tamra

On this episode of The Real Housewives of Orange County, the women are juggling birthday celebrations, bruised feelings, and the ongoing work of repairing friendships. Of course, with this cast, nothing stays simple for long. The Tres Amigas are still not completely back on solid ground, and Heather finds herself needing to answer for behavior the group sees as judgmental.

Getting older is also becoming a hot topic among the ladies. Emily, Gina, and Tamra get candid about menopause, with Tamra revealing that she is planning a “night of seduction” with Eddie after admitting their sex life has been going through a bit of a dry spell.

Carmella, Jenn, and Heather connect over the emotional milestone of sending children off to college before the conversation shifts to Heather’s tension with Emily. Heather feels as though criticism is coming at her from every direction, though she insists she is not being overly sensitive. As Heather grows closer to Carmella, the rest of the group starts questioning what is really behind the sudden friendship.

The confusion stems from Heather previously making comments about Carmella to Tamra, only to now turn to Carmella for real estate advice. Gina, who is also a real estate agent and considers herself a stronger friend to Heather, cannot make sense of the shift. She is especially unwilling to let it slide after recalling that a drunk Heather called Carmella trashy in Vegas — and now appears eager to become her new best friend.

Vicki is not really being herself lately and the ladies wonder if Vicki is editing herself because of her boyfriend, Michael. Vicki is very clearly hiding him from the group, but why?

Gina goes on to say that Vicki told her Mike has the ring, but there is one stipulation:  he told her, “you’ve got 90 days to not piss me off” and then he will propose. If she makes him mad before 90 days, the countdown starts all over.  Talk about a threat! Her boyfriend is dictating the terms of this relationship and it’s weirding everyone out. Now they are questioning if he really is this good guy Vicki claims he is and Tamra wonders if perhaps he DID already propose, but took it back.

Vicki is focused on taking care of her life so she can whoop it up more with her boyfriend. According to Vicki, they talk about their future often, but because she is still working, it’s becoming hard. Michael calls her out for “talking a big game” about slowing down with work.  Vicki questions their life plan and Michael runs off from the camera at that exact moment. Interesting…

Because Shannon mentioned she was lonely, the ladies have decided to throw her a birthday surprise.  Heather and Jenn are the first to arrive at Shannon’s house with balloons in tow.  Gina, Emily, and Carmella enter posing as pizza delivery and Vicki and Tamra round out the surprise.  Shannon is feeling extra special (especially since she did just have a random make-out sesh with a guy) and she is hopeful for a great year.

It comes to everyone’s attention that Shannon is going to lunch with ONLY Tamra (dos amigas?- gasp!) and Shannon becomes a little uneasy.  In the past, one on one time with Tamra never ended well for Shannon and so she begins to question this plan that she agreed to.

Jenn visits with her sons and tries to uplift them as they try to navigate their feelings.  Her sons do a great job advising one another, which is refreshing to see.

Tamra’s seduction weekend is underway.  In an attempt to spice things up, she has reserved a hotel room for her and Eddie to rekindle their flame. Tamra is working hard to save her marriage, especially since Eddie did mention that it might be time to file for divorce.  She is promising not to let this marriage go and Eddie is open for time to focus on each other. 

Later, Shannon admits to Tamra that she is not comfortable having a one-on-one with her, and so she is trying to get Vicki to join the date.  Tamra is annoyed because Shannon is being wishy-washy, but agrees to a tres amigas lunch to celebrate Vicki’s birthday.

Shannon is not trying to push this rekindled friendship with Tamra too quickly, so she is looking forward to being with Vicki on her birthday with Tamra.   But, instead of going to lunch with them, Tamra joins Jenn, Heather, and Emily for lunch. Tamra is annoyed that she tried with Shannon, so she just sent flowers from “Tamra Grudge” to Vicki.  Tamra did not even tell Shannon and Vicki she was not coming.  Shannon now realizes that Tamra truly has not changed.

Over at the dos amigas lunch, Vicki learns that the rumor is swirling about her ring.  Vicki is aghast that anyone would think that Michael gave her an engagement ring, but then took it back…and she is more annoyed that Tamra is giving this rumor life. Vicki knows that Michael would never put up with this kind of drama.

It’s time for Heather to fess up for sh*t talking Carmella.  Sure, she likes Carmella now, but Emily demands Heather admit to calling her trashy.  Heather claims she pre-judged Carmella and feels badly for talking negatively.  Emily explains that Heather’s extreme behaviors toward Carmella are weird and Heather is adamant that she will talk to Carmella about using this word trashy,

Jenn is hosting a garden party and has invited an intuitive reader along for the ride. Vicki explains that her birthday was good, but quiet…and things are awkward once Shannon arrives, considering Tamra blew her off the day before. 

The reader begins her spiritual journey with the group and of course there are naysayers amongst them.  Jenn believes the universe gave her the word fearless and Shannon thinks that it told her to stop worrying.  Emily wrote down guilt and Heather wrote down confident, particularly about her friendships. And Gina is beyond irritated about Heather using Carmella as her realtor, but is trying to hold back.

Heather takes Carmella aside to admit that she f*cked up by being judgmental and calling her trashy. Heather apologizes for pre-judging and they decide to move past things. That was almost too easy! 

The ladies sit down for some snacks and toast Vicki, the birthday girl. Tamra addresses the elephant in the room: Shannon is still not comfortable with Tamra. Tamra still believes that Shannon is the one who started the demise of their relationship and in the midst of their fight, Shannon falls into a sneezing frenzy. Shannon acknowledges that Tamra has been kind to her, but she needs time to heal. 

Gina blurts out that she told Vicki about the engagement rumor. Vicki gets insanely defensive and is also mortified because Michael is going to freak once he learns the ring has become a topic of conversation. Vicki makes it clear that he is private and that she is sick of Heather constantly interrupting her while she is trying to make a point.

However, at the end of the day, why is Vicki’s boyfriend hanging onto a ring and not proposing? Vicki tries her best to diffuse the situation as the party wraps up.  But before they leave, Carmella gifts Shannon and Vicki with some VERY generous treats…but this time, no vibrators…

TELL US – THOUGHTS ON THIS EPISODE OF RHOC?

Lindsay Clancy’s Secret Wheelchair Message Sparks Fury

0

Why Mamdani’s Equity Agenda Could Put NYC’s Kids at Risk

0

New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services deserves one thing: consistency.

For years, the agency has argued that “systemic racism” is the core problem undermining its work. Now, under Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s newly released citywide Racial Equity Plan, ACS is leaning even harder into that claim.

The trouble is that agency leaders have yet to produce solid evidence backing that diagnosis — while the solutions being promoted risk leaving more children, regardless of race, exposed to serious harm.

The plan, released Tuesday, states that “racism and biases” against black and Hispanic families “influence the reports made to the Statewide Central Register,” arguing that racial disparities appear “at the earliest stages of child welfare contact.”

Its proof? Last year, black and Hispanic families accounted for 36.1% and 46.2% of SCR intakes, respectively, while white children represented 6.3% and Asian children 3.6%.

But the fact that black kids are reported at higher rates is not prima facie evidence of racism: Black children are more than twice as likely nationwide to be the victims of maltreatment as their white peers and 12 times as likely as Asian children.

More From Naomi Schaefer Riley

Nationwide, black children die as a result of abuse and neglect at more than three times the rate of white children.

In other words, one would expect families to be reported for abuse and neglect at higher rates if they actually are abusing and neglecting (not to mention killing) their children at higher rates.

In response to these disparities, ACS proposes to make race and ethnicity a central focus of its function, by classifying cases finely and releasing more data disaggregated by race.

The one piece of information it doesn’t intend to disaggregate by race is data on child victims of abuse and neglect.

Moreover, the agency’s extensive list of “Racial Equity Goals” includes not a single mention of lowering child maltreatment rates.

Reducing racial inequity trumps reducing abuse and neglect every time.

The plan says: “There are many instances where a family is reported to the state unnecessarily . . . as a child is not in danger of maltreatment, and the family would be better served by supportive services or concrete resources rather than a child protection response.”

How many instances? It gives no answer — but the agency is nevertheless committed to reducing these reports.

ACS will promote “a citywide culture shift among mandated reporters” — teachers, nurses, cops and others — “from ‘when in doubt, call the SCR’ to ‘you can support a family without having to report a family,’ when a child is not in danger of maltreatment.”

But as the spate of tragic deaths in families known to ACS has shown, the agency seems to have no idea when a child is in danger of maltreatment.

By 2034, ACS pledges also to “ensure that more than 30% of cases are diverted to the CARES program,” its “non-investigatory” child-protection pathway.

It calls CARES “a core strategy for combating racial disparity and promoting social justice . . . by shifting low-to-moderate risk cases away from a traditional investigation to a collaborative and less intrusive response for families.”

But again, it’s not clear that ACS knows which cases are low-risk.

Meanwhile, by telling teachers and others not to report problems like chronic absenteeism, or kids coming to school hungry or without being bathed, ACS is blinding itself to kids in danger.

These are often signs of serious dysfunction in a family, commonly resulting from addiction or untreated mental illness

By suppressing reports, ACS cannot make proper decisions about when a family needs intervention.

Instead, ACS plans to give families more “concrete supports.”

They want to open more Family Enrichment Centers, for instance, stocked with resources like laundry facilities.

Yet parents engaged in chronic abuse or neglect of their children are unlikely to voluntarily walk into an FEC — and free washing machines won’t stop their behavior.

Finally, ACS’s goals for the city’s juvenile-justice population, of which it’s also in charge, are equally wrongheaded.

The agency promises to strengthen “restorative justice” practices in secure detention facilities — that is, have perpetrators sit down with the victims of their crimes to talk it out, instead of imposing real consequences.

Again, the purpose of this ACS plan is to reduce racial disparities in punishment; that’s why the agency nowhere acknowledges that restorative-justice techniques are ineffective in reducing recidivism.

Indeed, over the last half-decade when these tactics have been employed, juvenile recidivism in the city is either up or stable.

ACS has been plagued by woke and ineffective policies for years now.

Now it has a mayor who is equally committed to them.

Naomi Schaefer Riley is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.