Share and Follow
When examining the core objectives of the far-left movement, it often boils down to three primary desires: acquiring more resources, reducing work hours, and exerting control over others. While some may attempt to disguise these goals, particularly the more strategic individuals, their true intentions can occasionally become apparent. Recently in Minneapolis, we observed a revealing instance of these ambitions in action.
The first desire, acquiring more resources, is evident in the push for rent caps, the appropriation of private property, and the redistribution of wealth. The proponents of these measures seem to overlook legal processes, suggesting a more forceful approach reminiscent of historical figures like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Castro.
Next is the aspiration to work less, exemplified by proposals for a 20-hour workweek, likely with the expectation of maintaining a full-time salary. This notion implies that any enforcement would be backed by coercion. Lastly, achieving these aims necessitates a significant degree of control.
The proposals, outlined in interviews with Fox News Digital at a recent Minneapolis demonstration, would mark a dramatic shift away from private ownership and free-market principles toward a worker-controlled model if they were ever to come to fruition and would fundamentally change the United States as we know it.
More stuff: Rent caps, seizure of private property, and confiscating wealth. They don’t bother to mention any legal means for doing that; therefore, we may very well presume that they intend to do this the old-fashioned, Lenin/Stalin/Mao/Castro way, at gunpoint. Less work. A 20-hour workweek, which we can presume comes with being paid for 40 hours. Again, the doubled wage will be required at the threat of gunpoint. And all of that requires they be in control.
This is who they are.