Share and Follow
The legal landscape shifted dramatically on Tuesday when the Department of Justice unveiled an indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a group long recognized for its advocacy work. In a striking development, the SPLC faces 11 charges, including wire fraud, money laundering, and making false statements to a federally insured bank. These allegations have sent shockwaves through both legal and political circles.
While the charges themselves are serious, the underlying activities alleged by the DOJ paint an even more troubling picture. Reports suggest the SPLC was allegedly involved in paying extremists, despite publicly denouncing such groups to bolster its fundraising efforts. Most notably, one of the individuals allegedly receiving payments was an organizer of the notorious “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, South Carolina—a rally that played a pivotal role in Joe Biden’s decision to run for president in 2020.
In the wake of these unsettling accusations, one might expect a cautious response. However, the Democratic Party, along with some media outlets, has quickly rallied to the SPLC’s defense, offering a contentious narrative. Instead of addressing the grand jury’s indictment directly, they have framed the SPLC’s actions as mere payments to “informants,” a claim that has been echoed by figures such as Rep. Daniel Goldman of New York, as well as major news organizations like ABC News, USA Today, and the Associated Press.
This explanation, however, raises more questions than it answers. The SPLC is not a law enforcement body and thus lacks the authority to use informants in any legal capacity. Unlike the DOJ, which legitimately employs informants to aid in investigations, the SPLC’s alleged activities do not align with any legal investigative purpose. The notion that payments to someone involved in organizing logistics for a neo-Nazi rally could be considered as merely compensating an “informant” is perplexing. What information could they have been providing, to whom, and for what purpose? The SPLC has no power to prosecute or investigate crimes, casting doubt on the legitimacy of these payments.
SPLC funneled over $3 million to persons in extremist groups – including the KKK and American Nazi Party.
The extremists the SPLC investigated were on the SPLC payroll. pic.twitter.com/A1arlWdRK5
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 21, 2026
You’d hope in the face of such disturbing allegations, including the possibility that the SPLC paid for criminal activity to take place, that Democrats would at least keep their mouths shut while this played out. But no, they’ve quickly, in conjunction with a compliant press, formulated a lie and are running with it. Instead of admitting what the indictment (which was returned by a grand jury) actually says, they are claiming the SPLC was just innocently paying “informants.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for paying sources to infiltrate hate groups, a tactic federal agencies have used for decades. https://t.co/flekWop4XX
— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) April 22, 2026
The DOJ uses paid informants all the time —why is it OK for them but not the SPLC? @splcenter plays a vital role in fighting hatred, yet has been unfairly targeted by Trump and House Republicans since day one.
This politicized intimidation needs to stop, now. https://t.co/8VjTgLsxU4
— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) April 21, 2026
I guess I’m going to have to explain this like I’m talking to a four-year-old, but the SPLC is not a law enforcement agency. The fact that the DOJ pays and uses informants to investigate crimes is not, in fact, relevant at all to what happened here. Yet, you’ve got Democrat Rep. Daniel Goldman (NY-10), ABC News, USA Today, the AP, and many others all running with this line that these were just payments to “informants.”
How exactly is allegedly paying someone who helped organize transportation to a neo-nazi rally just paying an “informant? What were they informing on? To who? About what? For what reason? That doesn’t even make any sense. The SPLC can’t indict anyone. They have no jurisdiction to investigate criminal activity, nor would they need “informants” to be able to say the Ku Klux Klan is bad.
No, this is much more likely exactly what it smells like. Namely, that the SPLC was propping up “right-wing” extremism for financial and political gain, essentially paying for the very thing they were decrying. All the while, things like the Charlottesville rally have been used for nearly a decade to slander Republicans, no doubt a perk of their arrangements.
Regardless, the biggest reason it’s false to say the SPLC is being indicted for “paying informants” is that you don’t get to allegedly commit wire fraud, lie to federal banks about shell companies, and launder money and then go, “Oh, but we were just paying informants.” That’s not how any of this works. Goldman, who is a lawyer, knows that, but he’s also a hack, so he’ll say whatever he feels like he needs to say to deflect from how damning all this is. Never mind that the indictment is literally not for “paying informants.” It’s for crimes supposedly committed in making payments to the extremists in question.
There is a pending community note on this, but it is infuriating that a huge newspaper will just flat-out lie about the news
SPLC was not “indicted for paying sources”. They were indicted for wire fraud and making false statements. Just tell us the truth! It’s not that hard! https://t.co/ElkPzSEKKB
— PoIiMath (@politicalmath) April 22, 2026
None of this was unexpected, though. The moment this news dropped, there was never any chance Democrats would be honest about it. Heck, by the end of the week, you can expect the narrative to have morphed into “the DOJ is protecting extremists by indicting the SPLC.”
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.