Tyler Robinson’s Controversial Courtroom Move: A Bold Bid to Ban Cameras Amid High-Profile Trial

In a notable courtroom development in Salt Lake City, the individual accused of murdering Charlie Kirk has requested a judge to exclude cameras from the courtroom, arguing that live broadcasts are compromising his right to a fair trial.

Tyler Robinson is scheduled to appear in court on Friday, where his legal team will argue that media coverage is unfairly influencing the jury pool in his aggravated murder case.

Robinson’s attorneys point to a particular instance involving a New York Post article, which they claim misrepresented Robinson as having confessed to the murder during a December 11 courtroom appearance. Although his conversation with his lawyers was not audible, the article referenced a “lip reading analysis” suggesting Robinson remarked, “I think about the shooting daily.”

His legal team contends that live streaming of the proceedings is less about informing the public and more about generating advertising revenue, sensationalism, and promoting political agendas. They argue it primarily serves to demonize Robinson, as outlined in their motion to remove cameras from the courtroom.

The prosecution plans to pursue the death penalty if Robinson is found guilty of the September 10 shooting of the conservative activist, Charlie Kirk, who was speaking to a large audience at Utah Valley University in Orem at the time of the incident.

Robinson, who turned 23 on Thursday, has not yet entered a plea.

Media sensationalism around the case has cut both ways. In a March 30 headline, the U.K.-based Daily Mail reported the bullet that killed Kirk “did NOT match” a rifle allegedly used by Robinson. The story was based on an inconclusive, preliminary finding by ballistics experts and led to speculation about Robinson’s possible exoneration. The FBI is running additional tests, according to court documents.

Media organizations, prosecutors and Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, want the court to allow cameras. They argue the best way to guard against the misinformation and conspiracy theories that concern Robinson’s defense team is to make the process transparent.

Yet livestreaming by media outlets already has tested the patience of Judge Tony Graf.

During the December hearing, Graf briefly stopped the livestream and ordered the camera relocated after it showed the defendant’s shackles in violation of a courtroom decorum order.

Then, a January hearing was interrupted when Robinson’s attorneys said close-up shots of Robinson being livestreamed by a local television station could again lead to claims based on lip reading. That, too, was a violation of Graf’s decorum order. The judge ordered the camera operator not to film Robinson for the remainder of the hearing.

Mike Judd, a lawyer for a coalition of media organizations including The Associated Press that have been fighting to preserve access, said Graf so far has focused on whether his rules inside the courtroom are being followed, not what the media is saying outside of court.

“The court can do all of that in order to try to control what gets fed into that media ecosystem,” Judd said. “You reduce the likelihood of somebody publishing things that you think may be of potentially biasing concern later on.”

Policies on cameras and livestreaming vary among states, and many including Utah give judges discretion over whether to allow cameras. Cameras are generally prohibited in federal courts.

“There’s Supreme Court precedent that says courts generally need to be open to the public, but that’s not an absolute right,” said University of Utah law professor Teneille Brown. “Even if they allow public access, that does not equal a right to broadcast or record.”

Robinson’s attorneys are seeking to delay his May preliminary hearing, when prosecutors must show that they have enough evidence to proceed to a trial.

Prosecutors have said DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two unfired cartridges and a towel used to wrap the rifle. Defense attorneys note that forensic reports indicate multiple people’s DNA was found on some items, which they say requires a more complex analysis.

Robinson reportedly texted his romantic partner that he targeted Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred,” prosecutors have said.