A swarm of teenagers on e-bikes unleashed mayhem across a bustling part of Orlando, Florida, prompting police to file several charges, declare authorities.

This downtown disruption took place earlier this month, with law enforcement stating that the unruly crowd significantly endangered public safety and caused traffic jams affecting local inhabitants.

Through a social media post, the Orlando Police Department shared footage revealing bicyclists converging on intersections, halting cars, and blocking an ambulance with its lights flashing.

The same clip shows officers detaining some members of the group, documented through body camera and surveillance footage.

In the post, the police department said in part, “Reckless riding, running red lights, blocking traffic, and blocking an ambulance and other emergency vehicles from responding puts everyone at risk, including the riders themselves.”

The post went on to say, “This type of dangerous behavior will not be tolerated. Orlando Police officers will continue enforcing the law to help keep Downtown safe for everyone.”

Orlando police said to FOX 35 Orlando in a statement: “Because of the size and mobility of the group, not every rider was immediately apprehended. However, officers took enforcement action when it could be done safely.

It was not immediately clear how many teens were charged during the incident.

It’s not just a question of what you eat—it’s also about the timing of your meals.

Groundbreaking research has unveiled a potential correlation between the timing of meals and brain health, highlighting that confining eating to certain hours each day may enhance cognitive function as we grow older.

Unveiled at the American Society for Nutrition’s Nutrition 2026 meeting, the study indicates that restricting meal intake to an 8- or 9-hour timeframe daily—and ceasing consumption at least four hours before bedtime—might bolster mental acuity in aging individuals.

During the investigation, 47 overweight and obese women aged between 50 and 79 embarked on a six-month weight loss regimen to analyze the effects of meal timing.

All participants in the study were directed to reduce their calorie consumption by 500 calories daily. However, 26 of these women were further instructed to consume all their meals within a nine-hour window, unlike the remaining participants who kept their eating habits over the more conventional 12-hour span.

The time-restricted group generally ate between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. for around eight hours a day, compared to an average of 12 hours in the standard eating group.

After six months, weight loss was similar in both groups, each losing around 15 pounds.

But those who stuck to the 8-hour window performed significantly better on tests measuring spatial planning and problem solving.

The time-restricted group also made fewer mistakes on tests involving memory and learning.

Obesity is a risk factor for cognitive decline, since excess fat tissue contributes to inflammation that can damage the brain — so dropping pounds can already help you on your way to better brain health.

“Losing weight alone will ward off some of the aging-related cognitive decline,” Sue Shapses, principal investigator of a new study, said in a press release.

But the two groups of women lost the same amount of weight yet had different cognitive test results, suggesting that the restricted eating window — a type of intermittent fasting — made the big difference.

“These outcomes suggest a better ability to remember information during everyday tasks and reducing mistakes related to memory, attention and problem-solving,” Shapses said.

While this study was small, future research can determine whether cognitive improvements apply to larger populations, as well as explain why meal timing might affect the brain.

The researchers believe several explanations could account for the modest brain boost, including interactions among circadian rhythm, inflammation, metabolic health and biological pathways that help the body sense and respond to nutrients.

Previous research that found the best times for eating to slim down your waistline were similar to the results of this study.

Eating between 6 a.m. and concluding activity by 10 p.m. aligned with the body’s natural circadian rhythms, which could enhance the body’s ability to burn fat.

Ten years back, starting your day with a healthy breakfast was straightforward—who would have thought that a seemingly mundane bowl of cereal could go wrong?

Whether it was muesli, Weetabix, or Cornflakes, you were assured of consuming something beneficial.

Fast forward to today, and these breakfast staples are now criticized as nutrition offenders. Health experts and dieticians are warning people to steer clear of these ‘sugar-laden’ options.

Professor Tim Spector, a noted author on diet, labels these breakfast cereals as ‘factory creations devoid of the original plant nutrients.’

He boldly asserts that ‘almost no breakfast cereal offers any real health benefits.’

As a nutritionist with more than a decade of experience, I can tell you he is wrong. Many cheap options on our supermarket shelves are in fact a perfectly sound choice, with practically no sugar and delivering a good boost of fibre to help prevent bowel disease, including cancer.

But some products claiming to be ‘healthy’ are better than others – and it can be difficult to spot red flags, for instance a short ingredient list isn’t necessarily a good thing.

Here, we compare some of Britain’s best‑known ‘healthy’ cereals. We’ve analysed a 100g portion – as opposed to the 30g listed on the back of the packet – because that’s far more representative of a typical bowl. How does your favourite fare?

M&S Only 3 Ingredients Bran Flakes, £2.50

Contains: 367 calories, 0.4g fat, 2.1g sugars, 10.9g fibre, 11.2g protein, 0.88g salt

Made from just wholegrain wheat, barley malt extract and salt, these minimal-ingredient bran flakes lean into the non-UPF trend but are somewhat lower in fibre than the popular Kellogg’s version – although they still deliver a third of your recommended daily intake.

Barley malt extract, produced from sprouted barley and used as a sweetener, is used very sparingly (the equivalent of just half a teaspoon), so it’s a low‑sugar option. The downsides are they are unfortified with essential vitamins like other products, and are slightly saltier. 

Verdict: 7.5/10

Weetabix, £3.50

Contains: 362 calories, 0.6g fat, 4.2g sugars, 10g fibre, 12g protein, 0.28g salt

With 95 per cent wholegrain wheat and added vitamins and minerals, a couple of Weetabix with protein-heavy milk is hard to fault. It’s a good source of fibre and protein, and low in sugar – most of which comes from malted barley extract – and salt.

While studies show most people eat 60-100g at breakfast, this would equal roughly four biscuits, which is quite a bit. Therefore it’s likely the average person will consume fewer calories and sugar than is listed above. This makes it one of the most nutritious breakfast cereals and perhaps the best family all-rounder. 

Verdict: 10/10

Shredded Wheat, £2.75

Contains: 363 calories, 0.5g fat, 0.8g sugars, 14.3g fibre, 12.5g protein, 0.05g salt

If you value simplicity above all else, Shredded Wheat is hard to beat. Made entirely from wholegrain wheat, it’s naturally high in fibre and protein while containing virtually no sugar or salt.

It isn’t fortified, so you miss out on some useful added vitamins and minerals but with milk and some berries it’s a healthy start to the day. 

Verdict: 9.5/10

Sainsbury’s Puffed Wheat, 95p

Contains: 362 calories, 0.8g fat,

Containing nothing more than steam-puffed wheat, this cereal is the least sugary and salty of all the products. 

A big bowl provides a decent amount of protein – but not as much bowel-friendly fibre as Weetabix, Bran Flakes and Shredded Wheat. It also isn’t fortified, meaning it’s not quite the nutritional all-rounder that Weetabix is. But with milk and a fruit and seed topping it’s still a healthful choice.

Verdict: 8/10

Shreddies, £3.50

Contains: 365 calories, 0.3g fat, 12.5g sugars, 12g fibre, 10.8g protein, 0.73g salt

Made from more than 96 per cent wholegrain wheat, Shreddies offers more than a third of your daily fibre and enough protein to keep you full, with the added benefit of iron and B vitamins. 

The sugar content is higher than ideal – around three teaspoons in a large bowl – but they’re still a far better everyday choice than many people assume. 

Verdict: 8.5/10

All Bran, £2.50

Contains: 313 calories, 0.5g fat, 15g sugars, 26g fibre, 12g protein, 0.9g salt

If fibre is your priority, few cereals come close. Nearly 80 per cent wheat bran, it delivers almost the entirety of your daily fibre needs in one large bowl. Wheat bran is one of the best-studied fibres for moving food along the gut, making this a particularly good choice if you’re prone to constipation. It also provides useful iron and B vitamins though the trade‑off is that the recommended serving contains around 15 per cent of your daily salt. 

Verdict: 8.5/10

Dorset Nutty Muesli, £4

Contains: 403 calories, 1.6g fat, 8.3g sugars, 9.8g fibre, 11.6g protein, 0.05g salt

Packed with wholegrain oats, toasted wheat flakes and generous handfuls of almonds, cashews and hazelnuts, this is inevitably more calorie-dense because of the nuts, but with the minerals that nuts provide, this is of little concern. The sugar content comes naturally from raisins rather than added sugar, but is still more than is ideal at breakfast. 

Verdict: 7.5/10

Jordan’s No Added Sugar Granola, £3.75

Contains: 427 calories, 3.5g fat, 9.8g sugars, 18g fibre, 8.5g protein, 0.05g salt

One of the better granolas on the market, made largely from wholegrain oats, seeds and dried fruit, rather than added sugar. But don’t confuse ‘no added sugar’ with ‘low sugar’ – there’s still more than two teaspoons’ worth because of naturally occurring sugars in the fruit. Some of its impressive fibre comes from added chicory root fibre, a prebiotic that can boost the healthy bacteria in the gut.

Verdict: 8/10

Kellogg’s Special K, £4.35

Contains: 392 calories, 0.3g fat, 15g sugars, 6g fibre, 8g protein, 0.84g salt

Special K has moved on from its dieting‑era reputation, and has since repositioned itself as a healthy everyday cereal. It’s one of the more heavily fortified cereals, providing generous amounts of iron, vitamin D and B vitamins – the iron boost in particular is useful for women and girls who are more vulnerable to deficiency. The fibre content is on the lower end – containing half the amount of some other cereals – and the sugar level – more than three teaspoons – is higher than ideal. 

Verdict: 7/10

Kellogg’s Fruit and Fibre, £2.25

Contains: 408 calories, 3g fat, 23g sugars, 8.8g fibre, 9g protein, 1.1g salt

Despite the name, this cereal is considerably lower in fibre and protein than some other wholegrain cereals. Although some of its sugars come naturally from dried fruit, it also contains added sugar and has the highest total sugar content in our selection, while coconut pushes up the saturated fat. 

Verdict: 5/10

Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, £2.50

Contains: 378 calories, 0.2g fat, 8g sugars, 3g fibre, 7g protein, 1.1g salt

Made from refined maize rather than wholegrain, corn flakes contain very little fibre and only modest protein, so they’re unlikely to keep you full for long. They do offer some iron and B vitamins, and their sugar content is average, but they are nutritionally inferior to most other options. Adding a handful of almonds can help slow the rise in blood sugar and make the meal more filling. 

Verdict: 6/10