In a new development from Los Angeles, Kylie Jenner finds herself at the center of legal controversy as a former housekeeper has taken action against her. The lawsuit, which was officially filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses the reality TV star of allowing cruel and unusual treatment to occur within her employment environment.

On Wednesday, Juana Delgado Soto initiated this legal action not only against Kylie Jenner but also her corporate entity, Kylie Jenner Inc., as well as staff supervisor Itzel Sibrian, Tri Star Services, and La Maison Family Services. This lawsuit follows closely on the heels of a similar case brought by another member of Jenner’s cleaning staff just last week.

Soto claims she reached out to Jenner directly through a letter, detailing the abuse she endured from other staff members on Jenner’s payroll, highlighting the toxic work environment she faced.

The allegations within the lawsuit include racial discrimination, harassment, and failure to pay due wages. It points particularly to Sibrian, Soto’s direct supervisor, accusing her of ridiculing Soto’s English proficiency, allegedly mocking her by laughing, calling her “stupid,” and questioning her ability to speak English properly.

Further, the lawsuit outlines that in early June 2024, Sibrian purportedly retaliated against Soto for her previous complaints. This retaliation allegedly manifested as harsher treatment, a reduction in pay from $41.66 per hour to $35.00 per hour without justification, a change in her work schedule eliminating overtime, and the imposition of unreasonable workloads.

Jenner’s team said the beauty mogul had not yet seen the the court filing and declined to comment.

The Met Gala is experiencing an unprecedented twist: Anna Wintour appears to take a backseat, her successor is barely mentioned, and the usual crowd of A-list celebrities is noticeably sparse.

And honestly, who could really fault them?

Hosted by the power couple behind Amazon Prime Whole Foods, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos, this year’s event is set to unfold as a spectacle—albeit for reasons that may not be entirely positive.

Reflect on a time when a royal visit from the King and Queen of England might have been designed around attending the Met Gala.

Indeed, it was at this prestigious event that Princess Diana made her notable appearance three decades ago, in 1996, after her divorce.

She shimmered and slightly scandalized in a custom, deep blue Dior slip dress by John Galliano, accessorized with a seven-strand sapphire and pearl choker, and a pair of sapphire and diamond earrings, the latter inherited by Kate Middleton.

Galliano later talked about what Diana wanted to convey with her look that night.

‘We went to Kensington Palace and discussed drawings,’ Galliano said in the 2024 documentary In Vogue: The 90s.

‘I was trying to push for pink, but she was not having it,’ Galliano said. ”No, not the pink!” That was real, real fun.’

Jeff Bezos has effectively purchased the Gala for his blushing bride, that great vulgarian Lauren Sanchez, and it is she who will be standing atop the Met steps

On December 9, 1996, Princess Diana attended the 50th anniversary celebration of Dior at the Met Gala

Instead, Diana wanted to show the world, on fashion’s biggest stage, the life she was carving out for herself: free from royal strictures, independent, feminine, youthful and a bit rebellious.

Galliano himself said he gasped when he saw Diana arrive at the event: ‘I couldn’t believe it. She’d ripped the corset out. She didn’t want to wear the corset. She felt so liberated… The dress was much more… sensuous.’

Diana attended with the brilliant British fashion editor Liz Tilberis, then in charge of Harper’s Bazaar and co-chair of the event with Vogue’s Anna Wintour.

Back then, it didn’t matter whether a fashion house or high-end advertiser could afford one of the $350,000 tables – you had to have Anna’s consent to attend.

And even then, Anna also had veto power over what every guest wore – each look crossed her desk for approval.

Flash forward thirty years, and the Met Gala is a shell of itself.

Anna is no longer editor-in-chief of Vogue, having anointed a far less stylish, glamorous, talented successor in Chloe Malle, the nepo-spawn of actress Candice Bergen and late French film director Louis Malle.

Such a frump is Chloe that she recently took to CNN to deny reports that Anna had staged an emergency ‘fashion intervention’ for her.

‘Yeah, I dress different than Anna does, and maybe that’s confusing for people,’ Chloe said. ‘The fact that that leans a bit towards ‘if Katharine Hepburn was a librarian’ is just something people are going to have to deal with.’

Heresy!

Not that it really matters, because neither Anna nor Chloe are in charge of the Met Gala – which is reportedly struggling to sell tables this year – anymore.

No: Jeff Bezos has effectively purchased it for his blushing bride, that great vulgarian Lauren Sanchez, and it is she who will be standing atop the Met steps in what will surely be a cleavage-baring, tacky, overwrought look – because Lauren, it’s reported, will not be following the rules.

She will not, one surmises, be submitting her look for Anna’s prior approval.

Imagine, given that this year’s theme is, nominally, ‘Costume Art’ – but really, the theme is The Body.

Such a frump is Chloe that she recently took to CNN to deny reports that Anna had staged an emergency ‘fashion intervention’ for her

‘The Naked Body,’ ‘The Pregnant Body,’ ‘The Classical Body’ – all excuses for rampant exhibitionism.

Those Ozempic’d Hollywood figures will surely use this theme as the excuse it is to dress nearly nude.

Among the official ‘host committee’: The morbidly obese Lena Dunham, whose latest memoir is a screed against us all for judging – what else? – her body; the aforementioned dud Chloe Malle; the overexposed Teyana Taylor, last seen putting director Paul Thomas Anderson in a headlock while taking the stage at the Oscars; and Elizabeth Debicki, most famous for playing Princess Diana in The Crown.

The official co-chairs: Nicole Kidman, Venus Williams, Beyoncé (who gave us one of the best Met Gala memes, standing in the corner of an elevator as her sister Solange beat Jay-Z leaving an afterparty) and Anna herself, gripping onto what’s left of her power with white knuckles.

How fitting that all of this, high fashion’s last gasp, is playing out as The Devil Wears Prada 2 opens this weekend.

Star Meryl Streep, who plays the Anna manqué Miranda Priestly, will not be in attendance.

Why bother? Meryl’s been flogging this sequel for months. She even appears alongside Anna on Vogue’s May cover – further proof of Anna’s diminished power.

Back when the orginal film was announced, plenty of actresses passed on it, so terrified were they of Anna’s wrath. They couldn’t risk exile from the pages of Vogue, or a vaunted Vogue cover or an exclsuive fashion show or an invite to, yes, the Met Gala.

How fitting that all of this, high fashion’s last gasp, is playing out as The Devil Wears Prada 2 opens this weekend. Pictured: Anne Hathaway, Anna Wintour and Emily Blunt at the premiere

Same with the big fashion deisgners and houses, most of whom declined to lend clothes, accessories or branding. The late Valentino was a notable exception, appearing in the original as himself.

So how karmically poetic that now Anna needs ‘TDWP2’ more than the movie needs her.

How poetic that star Anne Hathaway has walked back her statement that she insisted the movie cast non ‘traditional’ models – meaning not underfed, rail-thin, GLP-1 addicts – and then walked that right back.

‘Nobody lost their jobs,’ Hathaway said. ‘In fact, it created more jobs… Isn’t it better when you see so many types of bodies up there?’

No, it’s not, because the Era of Ozempic has proven that body positivity is a lie, just like everything the Met Gala once claimed to represent: Good taste, elitism and restraint.

Wait – we must amend that! Reports have it that Meghan Markle, seemingly uninvited yet again, is ‘convinced’ that her invitation will be arriving any minute.

Now that’s some fashion world snobbery we can get behind.

In a recent court filing, prosecutors revealed insights into Cole Allen’s mindset as he allegedly plotted to assassinate President Donald Trump. The 31-year-old stands accused of attempting the act during the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner in Washington, D.C., last weekend.

The documents indicate that Allen embarked on an Amtrak journey on April 21, purchasing a one-way ticket from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C., with a brief stopover in Chicago. Throughout his trip, prosecutors claim Allen maintained a digital journal on his phone, capturing his reflections and observations as he traveled cross-country.

However, these notes did not directly reference any assassination plot. Instead, they, along with a subsequent manifesto, revealed a mind brimming with disjointed thoughts. A former FBI behavioral analyst described Allen’s mindset as “scattered,” underscoring the discord between his musings and the seriousness of his alleged intentions.

Following an alleged shooting incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on April 25, 2026, law enforcement apprehended Cole Allen. The incident drew national attention, and a photo of the arrest was shared by President Trump on Truth Social.

During his initial train journey, while traveling through the southwestern United States, Allen noted, “the southwest desert in spring. Distant wind turbines looming like snowy mountains across the hazy NM desert,” providing a glimpse into his thought process at the time.

Of Chicago, where he would switch trains and board a second train to his final destination, Allen wrote that, “Chicago is cool; kinda like an Iowa small town was scaled up to LA size.” Of the sliver of southwestern Pennsylvania through which he would pass, he wrote that the “woods are awesome (look like vast fairy lands filled with tiny trickling creeks in spring apparently.”

The train route taken by Cole Allen from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C., with a stop in Chicago where he switched trains. Allen’s three-day journey began on April 21, 2026, and he took notes along the way. (Fox News Digital)

Allen arrived in Washington, D.C. early in the afternoon on Friday, April 24. He spent about 30 hours in the city before initiating his alleged attack.

Surveillance video from the Washington Hilton hotel, also released by the Department of Justice, showed Allen apparently pacing through hallways, once entering the hotel’s fitness center and taking a look around before hastily exiting.

Minutes before the attack, a pre-scheduled email from Allen was sent to his family and friends, explaining his actions, according to authorities.

He allegedly acknowledged that his mission would likely severely harm him at the least, but never stated that he was willing to die for his cause. His motivations were political, and he painted himself as a savior of the oppressed. He apologized profusely to family, friends and everyone he had come in contact with on his cross-country trek. He noted that there were certain people he hoped wouldn’t be caught in the crossfire, and described himself as “friendly.”

Surveillance video released by the Justice Department appears to show suspect Cole Allen rushing a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton with a weapon in hand during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting. (Department of Justice)

Jonny Grusing served as a special agent in the FBI’s Denver Field Office for 25 years. For 13 of those years, he was the Behavioral Analysis Unit coordinator for the division.

“His flippancy of what he was talking about in the train or writing about, coincides with what he writes in his manifesto as, ‘hello everybody, so I may have given a lot of people a surprise today,’” said Grusing. “I mean, that’s not someone who’s singularly focused on a grievance.”

“I would say he was conflicted. He’s apologizing to everyone, even people that he rode along the [train] with, which he’s not harming them in any way,” said Grusing. “But he’s apologizing to the people at work, he’s apologizing to his family and he’s apologizing to the people he might have to do violence to. Whether that’s him trying to convince whoever reads this, that he’s a not a bad person or that he’s conflicted … that’s not someone to me who seems single-minded that he’s going to be successful in his mission.”

A photo of Cole Allen in a graduation gown and cap from 2025. (Cole Allen/LinkedIn)

Grusing said Allen seemed “scattered,” and described him as a narcissist.

“The profiling unit taught us about dangerous human characteristics and the two I think that would apply to Mr. Allen are narcissism and psychopathy,” he said. “I think he’s become more narcissistic just from his writings, in saying that, ‘this is on me,’ ‘this is my problem,’ [and] ‘I have to act.’”

“And then even him trying to manage other people’s perception of him, like the people that rode on the train with him and helped him with his luggage, they weren’t affected by this at all,” said Grusing. “But yet he feels like he’s impacting all of society by doing what he’s doing, which again, that’s what makes me think, when he makes these little statements and apologies to everyone, he’s saying, ‘I’m going to become a national name by doing this. Look at me.’”

“So he’s putting himself as this martyr, as this patriot, as the only one who can really fix this thing that’s broken, and that’s very dangerous.”

Fox News Digital reached out to Allen’s attorney.

There is growing concern that some of the most notorious criminals, including Mark David Chapman, who assassinated John Lennon, and the infamous “Son of Sam” serial killer, David Berkowitz, could be released if new parole legislation is enacted in Albany. Critics have raised alarms about two bills that could significantly alter the current parole system.

The first proposal, known as the Elder Parole bill, would allow violent offenders to bypass their minimum sentences. This bill proposes that individuals who have reached the age of 55 and served at least 15 years of their sentences could be eligible for early parole hearings, irrespective of the gravity of their offenses.

The second legislative proposal, the Fair and Timely Parole bill, aims to mandate that the state parole board release prisoners unless they are deemed a “current” threat to public safety. This measure would apply regardless of the severity of the crimes committed by the inmates.

Critics argue that these bills, if passed, could pave the way for the release of dangerous criminals, even those who have been sentenced to life imprisonment. A law enforcement source expressed concerns, stating, “Consider some of the most heinous and noteworthy people in prison today; they will undoubtedly be released within the next two years if these bills are signed into law.”

“Consider some of the most heinous and noteworthy people in . . . prison today, they will undoubtedly be released within the next two years if these bills are signed into law,” a law enforcement source said.

The elder bill’s lead sponsors are Sen. Cordell Cleare (D-Manhattan) of Harlem and Assemblywoman Maritza Davilla (D-Brooklyn).

Under the measure, inmates who are sprung are entered into community supervision as if they served their full sentence. If they are rejected for parole, they must be informed in writing “as to the factors and reasons for the denial” — and automatically get a new chance at freedom after two years.

Every two years, victims’ families would be dragged back to the parole board to fight against the release of their loved one’s killer.

The Fair and Timely Parole bill’s lead sponsors are radical socialist state Sen. Julia Salazar (D-Brooklyn) and Assemblyman David Weprin (D-Queens).

The legislation makes it much easier for jailbirds to be set free provided they’re model prisoners – no matter how bloodthirsty their crime.

The People’s Campaign for Parole Justice, which is advocating for both bills, says Salazar and Weprin’s legislation would “provide more meaningful parole reviews.”

Olivia Murphy, a violent crime survivor and policy and communications associate for Release Aging People in Prison, defended both bills, saying inmates “who have taken accountability for their crimes and done the hard work of transforming their thinking and behavior” should be freed.

“The evidence is clear that forcing completely rehabilitated elders to spend their final years in prison costs a fortune and delivers zero public safety benefit,” said Murphy, whose advocacy campaign is funded by billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and other far-left groups.

“They have the lowest rates of reoffending once released and the highest incarceration costs.”

Raphael Mangual, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, believes both measures are gaining steam in Albany and could pass as soon as this year.

“I think it’s a real risk, especially given the recent decline in crime in New York City,” he said. “I think that might have led to a space where people might be more tolerant than they were five years ago of engaging in this kind of experiment.”

He added: “It really shouldn’t matter how well somebody behaves in prison. You should have behaved before you got there. 

“You hear people who will say with very full confidence, including the advocates, that the likelihood of a person reoffending zeros out in older age,” he said. “No it doesn’t. A majority of state prisoners who are released will reoffend.”

The sibling of one murder victim found it unbelievable that his brother’s psychotic killer could be released after serving only 15 years of a 25 years-to-life sentence.

“My brother was brutally tortured to death throughout the night,” said Michael Pravia, the brother of 19-year-old Pace University student Kevin Pravia, who was murdered in 2008. “You know, I just feel like we’re living in a time where it feels like it’s another form of corruption, you know, letting these devils out of prison to harass the masses.

“They will have blood on their hands,” Pravia said of the legislators who pass the bills.

His brother’s killer, homeless drifter Jeromie Cancel, is in Auburn Correctional Facility.

“He was proud of his crimes,” said Pravia, whose brother was living near Union Square when he was choked with an electrical cord after inviting Cancel into his home.

Cancel smiled and laughed at his sentencing in 2010, sending the victim’s brother into a fury. “I’ll f—ing kill you, mother-f—er!” Pravia screamed at him in Manhattan Criminal Court. 

“There is not one ounce of me that thinks he is rehabilitated or has the ability to be rehabilitated,” Pravia, 34, said Thursday. “I think he is truly a sociopath. He’s bragged that he would do it again.”

If the Fair and Timely bill passes, Cancel is likely to get out if he has a clean prison record, the law enforcement source said. 

It’s not clear if Gov. Kathy Hochul, who’s running for reelection and needs liberal NYC to support her, would veto the two parole-reform bills.

A Hochul rep declined to elaborate on where Hochul stands on both pieces of legislation but said the  “governor is committed to ensuring the safety of New Yorkers and will review any bill that passes both houses of the Legislature.”

Presumptive Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman said he vehemently opposes bills and accused Hochul of pushing for the release of killers.

“Kathy Hochul has fast-tracked the release of violent criminals — even those who’ve killed police officers – and will certainly grant ‘get out of jail free’ cards to even more dangerous thugs,” the Nassau County executive said. “The Hochul pro-criminal era ends the day I take office.”

Another killer who could be released is cop-killer David McClary, who was sentenced to 25 years to life for assassinating rookie NYPD officer Edward Byrne as he sat in his car guarding the home of a witness in a Queens drug case in 1988.

Howard “Pappy” Mason, an infamous New York City drug kingpin, was convicted for ordering McClary to kill the young police officer. 

McClary, who was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for pulling the trigger, is 60 years old and serving his time at Wende Correctional Facility in Erie County. 

McClary has been denied parole eight times since becoming eligible in 2013, forcing the victim’s family to argue repeatedly to keep him behind bars. 

His release is opposed by the Police Benevolent Association, which has been fighting a wave of 43 cop killer releases since 2017 when parole guidelines were modified to place greater emphasis on an inmate’s “progress” in prison rather than the severity of their crime.

PBA President Patrick Hendry said, “Passing either of these bills would be a cruel and despicable blow to the families of our fallen heroes.

“There is no age and no formula that can absolve cop-killers of their heinous crimes or entitle them to rejoin society,” Hendry said. “We will fight tooth and nail alongside the families of our murdered police officers to ensure [these two bills] do not become law.”